497 lines
35 KiB
HTML
497 lines
35 KiB
HTML
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
|
|
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en-gb" lang="en-gb" >
|
|
<head>
|
|
<base href="https://jesuswordsonly.com/component/content/article/1-jwo/177-2-corinthians-516.html" />
|
|
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
|
|
<meta name="robots" content="index, follow" />
|
|
<meta name="keywords" content="Jesus Words, Jesus Words Only, Jesus Words on Salvation, Did Calvin Murder Servetus, Flaws of Young Earth Science, Ingenious Design, Apostle Paul, False Apostle Paul, Faith Alone, Dispensationalism, Ebionites, Commands of Jesus, Original Gospel of Matthew, Hebrew Matthew" />
|
|
<meta name="title" content="2 Corinthians 5:16" />
|
|
<meta name="author" content="18ptTR" />
|
|
<meta name="description" content=" What does after the flesh mean in 2 Corinthians 5:16. Are either Bultmann or Schweitzer correct?" />
|
|
<meta name="generator" content="Joomla! 1.5 - Open Source Content Management" />
|
|
<title>2 Corinthians 5:16</title>
|
|
<script type="text/javascript" src="/media/system/js/mootools.js"></script>
|
|
<script type="text/javascript" src="/media/system/js/caption.js"></script>
|
|
|
|
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="/images/favicon.ico" />
|
|
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/templates/system/css/system.css" type="text/css" />
|
|
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/templates/system/css/general.css" type="text/css" />
|
|
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/template_css.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
|
|
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/nav.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
|
|
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/style1.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
|
|
|
|
<!--[if IE]>
|
|
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/ie.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
|
|
<![endif]-->
|
|
<!--[if IE]>
|
|
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/ie.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
|
|
<![endif]-->
|
|
<!--[if lte IE 6]>
|
|
<style type="text/css">
|
|
img { behavior: url(/templates/js_relevant/js/iepngfix.htc); }
|
|
</style>
|
|
<![endif]-->
|
|
|
|
</head>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<body>
|
|
|
|
<div id="main-wrapper">
|
|
|
|
<div id="header_graphic">
|
|
<div class="inside">
|
|
<div id="newsflash"> <div class="moduletable">
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<table class="contentpaneopen">
|
|
<tr>
|
|
<td valign="top" ><span><span style="font-size: medium;">"Christendom has done away with Christianity without being quite aware of it." Soren Kierkegaard</span></span></td>
|
|
</tr>
|
|
<tr>
|
|
<td valign="top" >
|
|
|
|
</td>
|
|
</tr>
|
|
</table>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
<h1><a href="https://jesuswordsonly.com/" title="Relevant">Relevant</a></h1>
|
|
<h2>A Joomla! Template for the Rest of Us</h2>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
<div class="menubar">
|
|
<div id="navmenu">
|
|
<script type="text/javascript" src="/templates/js_relevant/js/barmenu.js"></script>
|
|
<ul class="menu"><li><a href="https://jesuswordsonly.com/"><span>Home</span></a></li><li class="haschild"><a href="/books.html" class="haschild"><span>Books</span></a><ul><li><a href="/books/jesuswordsonly.html"><span>Jesus' Words Only</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/jesuswordssalvation.html"><span>Jesus' Words on Salvation</span></a></li><li class="haschild"><a href="/books/didcalvinmurderservetus.html" class="child"><span>Did Calvin Murder Servetus?</span></a><ul><li><a href="/books/didcalvinmurderservetus/background-material-did-calvin-murder-servetus.html"><span>Background Material</span></a></li></ul></li><li><a href="/books/hownottosudythebible.html"><span>How Not to Study the Bible</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/flawsofyoungearthscience.html"><span>Flaws of Young Earth Science</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/jesusorpaul.html"><span>Jesus or Paul</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/unintended-disservice.html"><span>Unintended Disservice</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/original-gospel-of-matthew.html"><span>Original Gospel of Matthew</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/commands-of-jesus.html"><span>Commands of Jesus</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/gospel-of-john.html"><span>Gospel of John</span></a></li></ul></li><li><a href="/recommendedreading.html"><span>Further Reading</span></a></li><li><a href="/media.html"><span>Media</span></a></li><li class="haschild"><a href="/reviews.html" class="haschild"><span>Reviews</span></a><ul><li><a href="/reviews/jwo-reviews.html"><span>Jesus Words Only</span></a></li><li><a href="/reviews/jwos-reviews.html"><span>Jesus Words on Salvation</span></a></li></ul></li><li><a href="/contactus.html"><span>Contact Us</span></a></li><li><a href="http://www.jesuswordsonly.com/topicindex/753-bookstore.html"><span>Bookstore</span></a></li><li><a href="/topicindex.html"><span>Topic Index</span></a></li><li><a href="/aboutauthor.html"><span>About Author</span></a></li><li><a href="/newsletters.html"><span>Newsletters</span></a></li></ul>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
<div id="mainbody">
|
|
<div id="showcasetop"> </div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<table width="940" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="center">
|
|
<tr>
|
|
<td id="leftcol" valign="top" width="200">
|
|
<div class="inside">
|
|
<div class="moduleS1">
|
|
<div>
|
|
<div>
|
|
<div>
|
|
<h3>Questions?</h3>
|
|
|
|
Please enter your questions, and we will get back to you as soon as possible. As an anti-spam measure, we ask that you re-type the code you see in the box below, prior to clicking "Send Message"<br /><br />
|
|
|
|
<form name="s5_quick_contact" method="post" action="">
|
|
|
|
|
|
<input class="inputbox" id="namebox" onclick="s5_qc_clearname()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearname()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Name..." name="name"></input><br />
|
|
<input class="inputbox" id="emailbox" onclick="s5_qc_clearemail()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearemail()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Email..." name="email"></input><br />
|
|
<input class="inputbox" id="subjectbox" onclick="s5_qc_clearsubject()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearsubject()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Subject..." name="subject"></input><br />
|
|
<textarea id="messagebox" rows="" cols="" class="inputbox textarea" onclick="s5_qc_clearbody()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearbody()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; overflow:auto;width:80%; height:55px" name="message">Your Message...</textarea><br />
|
|
<input class="inputbox" id="spambox" onclick="s5_qc_clearspam()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearspam()" style="font-weight:bold; font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Enter The Code 988" name="verif_box"></input><br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
<input id="email_address" type="hidden" value="" name="email_address"></input>
|
|
|
|
<input class="button" type="button" onclick="s5_qc_submit()" value="Send Message" ></input>
|
|
</form>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
|
|
// <![CDATA[
|
|
|
|
var s5_qc_spam_text = document.getElementById("spambox").value;
|
|
|
|
function s5_qc_clearbody() {
|
|
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value == "Your Message...") {
|
|
document.getElementById("messagebox").value="";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function s5_qc_clearname() {
|
|
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value == "Name...") {
|
|
document.getElementById("namebox").value="";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function s5_qc_clearemail() {
|
|
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value == "Email...") {
|
|
document.getElementById("emailbox").value="";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function s5_qc_clearsubject() {
|
|
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value == "Subject...") {
|
|
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value="";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function s5_qc_clearspam() {
|
|
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value == s5_qc_spam_text) {
|
|
document.getElementById("spambox").value="";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
function s5_qc_isValidEmail(str_email) {
|
|
if (str_email.indexOf(".") > 2 && str_email.indexOf("@") > 0) {
|
|
alert('Your email is now being submitted - Thank you!');
|
|
document.s5_quick_contact.submit();
|
|
}
|
|
else {
|
|
alert('Your email address is not valid, please check again - Thank you!');
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function s5_qc_submit() {
|
|
|
|
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value == s5_qc_spam_text || document.getElementById("subjectbox").value == "Subject..." || document.getElementById("namebox").value == "Name..." || document.getElementById("emailbox").value == "Email..." || document.getElementById("messagebox").value == "Your Message...") {
|
|
alert('All fields are required, please complete the form - Thank you!');
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value != "988") {
|
|
alert('Your spam verification answer is incorrect.');
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var s5_message_holder = document.getElementById("messagebox").value;
|
|
var s5_first_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(0);
|
|
var s5_second_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(1);
|
|
var s5_third_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(2);
|
|
var s5_fourth_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(3);
|
|
|
|
if (s5_first_message_char == "<") {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_first_message_char == "w" && s5_second_message_char == "w" && s5_third_message_char == "w") {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_first_message_char == "h" && s5_second_message_char == "t" && s5_third_message_char == "t") {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
else {
|
|
document.getElementById("email_address").value = "info@jesuswordsonly.com";
|
|
var email_str = document.getElementById("emailbox").value;
|
|
s5_qc_isValidEmail(email_str);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ]]>
|
|
</script>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
</div>
|
|
</td>
|
|
<td id="maincol" valign="top">
|
|
<div id="breadcrumbs">
|
|
<span class="breadcrumbs pathway">
|
|
Home</span>
|
|
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<table class="contentpaneopen">
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<tr>
|
|
<td valign="top">
|
|
<h1><span style="font-size: 18pt;">2 Corinthians 5:16: Any Alternative to Bultmann's View That Destroys Paul?</span></h1>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">What are the various historical interpretations of 2 Cor. 5:16? We are aware Bultmann saw it as Paul's direction that we no longer are to know Christ "according to the flesh," and now we know Jesus solely through His resurrected nature. Bultmann thus interpreted Paul as teaching we can safely ignore Jesus' pre-resurrection teachings, just as Paul had done. For a full discussion, see our webpage "<a href="/component/content/article/1-jwo/176-bultmann-on-paul.html">Bultmann's Exalting A Paul Who Treated Jesus as Irrelevant</a>."</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">In this page, we will explore the scholarly attempt to rebut Bultmann. Volgouris will contend that Paul meant we no longer know Jesus as a Jew, but as a resurrected being. <br /></span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Even so, it does not negate Bultmann's understanding. <br /></span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Thus, Volgouris' argument is frankly so weak and forced that it reminds us how likely accurate indeed is Bultmann's reading of Paul. (We of course at "Jesus Words Only" endorse Jesus' post-resurrection statement that the true apostles were instructed to "teach everything I have commanded you" - meaning teach what He commanded prior to His resurrection. Hence Paul's teaching as understood correctly, it appears, by Bultmann is falsified by Jesus himself.)</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">View That Christ's Teachings In The Flesh Are Unimportant Based Upon 2 Cor. 5:16</span></h2>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">In the scholarly article by Christos Sp. Voulgaris, "2 Cor, 5:16 and the problem of St. Paul’s opponents in Corinth," <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Theologia Review</span> 46 (Athens 1975), reprinted online at this link, he recognizes Bultmann's point. Voulgaris summarizes that Bultmann claimed that 2 Cor. 5:16 proves Paul's view was that it is irrelevant to know of the earthly teachings of Jesus. Voulgaris says 2 Cor. 5:16 highlights the</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">long debated problem of Paul’s<em><strong> acquaintance with the historical person of Jesus Christ</strong></em>, either previous or subsequent to his conversion, and its legitimacy for salvation in Jesus Christ by faith, which he preached. Id.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Voulgaris goes back to Clement of Alexandria from the patristic era. Clement intended us to understand "according to the flesh" in 2 Cor. 5:16 to mean prior to Christ's exultation. After this point is implied "the descent of the Holy Spirit upon the believers, following Christ’s exultation." (Christos Sp. Voulgaris, "2 Cor, 5:16 and the problem of st. Paul’s opponents in Corinth," <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Theologia Review</span> 46 (Athens 1975), reprinted online at this<a href="http://www.myriobiblos.gr/bible/studies/voulgaris_2cor5-16.asp"> link</a>.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Hence, Clement's view coincides with Bultmann's view that "according to the flesh" meant the period prior to Christ's exultation / resurrection / ascension.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Voulgaris does not mention Origen, but Origen had a similar view that Paul's reference to Christ "in the flesh" meant a period prior to Jesus's exultation/ascension. Origen spoke of:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">announcing Himself as flesh, He calls to Himself those who are flesh, that He may in the first place cause them to be transformed according to the Word that was made flesh, and afterwards may lead them upwards to behold Him as He was <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>before He became flesh</strong></span>; so that they, receiving the benefit, and ascending from their great introduction to Him, which was according to the flesh, say, "Even if we have known Christ after the flesh, yet henceforth know we Him no more." (Origen <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Against Celsus</span> Book VI at 353.)</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">But we, who can truthfully boast that "if we have once known Christ after the flesh, but now no longer do we know Him so," Origen <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Commentary on Matthew</span> Book XI at 177.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Later scholarship moved in the same direction. "Thus «???? ??????» is again referred to Christ’s human existence «according to external distinctions», «by what he is in the flesh»." (Voulgaris, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">id</span>., citing A. Plummer, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Second Epistle of St. Paul to the Corintians</span> (I.C.C., 5th ed., Edinburgh 1956) at 176.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Bultmann pointed at the question of what does "according to the flesh" modify, for it affects interpretation. "R. Bultmann put it, whether «???? ??????» «??????» and «???????» or the verbs «???????», «?????????» and «??????????»" (Voulgaris, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">id</span>., citing K. Grobel,<span style="text-decoration: underline;"> Theology of the New Testament</span>, E.T. (New York: T.I.P., 1951) at 238-239. Cf. Bultmann, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Exegetische Probleme des zweien Korintherbriefes</span> (Uppsala 1947) at 17.)</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Bultmann leans towards "after the flesh" modifying the verbs:</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Bultmann himself leans towards the second alternative...for he says that «…this decision means nothing for the sense of the total context, for a ‘Christ regarded <strong>in the manner of the flesh</strong>’ is just what a ‘<strong>Christ after the flesh</strong>’ is» (Voulgaris,<span style="text-decoration: underline;"> id</span>. citing<span style="text-decoration: underline;"> Theology of the New Testament</span>, at 239.</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Bultmann and Schweitzer took this then in the direction of what was supposedly the right gospel to preach -- just the Jesus that Paul knew - his kerygma, and not the one known by Apostles Matthew and John in their gospel accounts:</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">This, as we all know, has taken immense dimension ever since A. Schweitzer’s “Quest of the historical Jesus”, and was climaxed in R. Bultmann’s thought, where the emphasis lies not on the historical person of Christ “according to the flesh”, but rather on its existential meaningfulness proclaimed by the kerygma. (Voulgaris,<span style="text-decoration: underline;"> id</span>.)</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">Voulgaris's Attempt To Find A Different Interpretation</span></h2>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">However, Voulgaris tries to refute that interpretation of verse 16 as seen by Bultman and Schweitzer by first examining its context:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">the highly theological expressions in vss. 14-21 exclude the possibility that Paul is here defending himself against charges that he had or had not known Christ “according to the flesh,” as all interpreters suggest. (Voulgaris,<span style="text-decoration: underline;"> id.</span>)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Voulgaris begins his case by saying gar (for, because) in verse 13 proves vv 11-15 are one unit:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">This means that vss. 11-15 are bound together and form a literary unit. (Voulgaris, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">id</span>.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">This does not necessarily follow. But it proves unimportant to dispute this.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Second, Voulgaris points to the topics in vv 14-15 are the same:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">This is further supported by the fact that the content of vss. 14 and 15 deal with the same concept, <em>i.e</em>. Christ’s death and its effects upon men. (Voulgaris, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">id</span>.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Third, Voulgaris concedes the grammar presents a problem, but tries to unravel it:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">But this double “????” in the beginning of vss. 16 and 17 creates a confusion to the exegetes who regard it as introducing a double conclusion from vss. 11-15. And since, according to them, this cannot possibly be correct, they detach vs. 16 and connect vs. 17 with vs. 15 as its actual conclusion. (Voulgaris, id.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Fourth, Voulgaris reconstructs the conditions and results so v. 16 stands as part of the overall passage:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Grammatically, this is not so as overlooking certain facts, and first of all the fact that vs. 16 contains two complete clauses separated by a semicolon. This first clause (16a) is a result clause related directly to vss. 14-15. The second clause (16b) is a concessive clause introduced by “?? ???” which commonly admits that a condition exists (granting that), but does not regard it as a hindrance. Then vs. 17 begins naturally with a conditional sentence by “????” which gives it the form of a conclusion. This successive use of two consecutive clauses is not unusual, as W. Schmithals thinks, but it serves to emphasize the conclusion or expand it further into a new direction. (Voulgaris, id.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Finally, Voulgaris says this proves all the verses are conjoined on one topic:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Summing up, we believe that 2 Cor. 5:11-21 is a literary unit distinguished for its organic coherence.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">But what does this prove? How does this impact interpetation? He says verse 16 is added to undermine the assumption of the opponents of Paul. But this seems in line with how Bultmann reads the passage. Voulgaris explains:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">This is followed by his conclusion (vs. 16) which is contrary to the assumption of his opponents (not stated but implied) and is expanded into a new direction (vs.17 which is developed then into a wider theological statement (vss.18ff). (Voulgaris, id.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Voulgaris then says for us to understand "according to the flesh" in verse 16 we should realize Paul has taught the abolition of the Law to the Corinthians:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The abolition of the law, of circumcision and of the descent from Abraham Paul had made absolutely clear to the Corinthians during his visit to them to preach the Gospel (cf.1 Cor. 2:1f) and repeated it in his first letter (1 Cor.1:22f; 7:17-20). He also stated here that >????? ?? ???? ?????????? ?????? ???????????” (1 Cor.7:17).</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The foregoing discussion helps us to understand better the meaning of “???? ??????” in vs. 16. (Voulgaris, id.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">So what is this alternative interpretation?</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Voulgaris says Paul used "flesh" in different ways in other passages. In Gal. 1:16, Paul used it in an expression to say "man as such." Paul did not discuss his divine call with "man as such." In Gal. 2:20, Paul uses it in a phrase to mean a natural human relationship, i.e., the bonds of Israel. In Romans 4:1 Paul speaks of Abraham as a natural human progenitor by this term "flesh." This leads to this conclusion by Voulgaris:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">It is to be noted that in all these cases “???? ?????” modifies substantives and the reference is to <em><strong>natural human relationship, precisely to the Jews</strong></em>. (Voulgaris, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">id</span>.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">This conclusion has been the aim of all Voulgaris' belabored steps.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">However, it is a bit of a leap to say "flesh" in verse 16 points to "Jews" because in those other contexts that it happens to be Jews according to the flesh was in view. It is an extrapolation or abstraction even in those other verses, and not what the word "flesh" actually means in them. More importantly, verse 16 of 2 Cor. does not limit the context to just Jews. Regardless, Voulgaris concludes -- and we include most of this so one can see the progression of his thought:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">In view of this situation therefore, the dilemma posed by scholars with respect to the correct meaning of “???? ?????” in 2 Cor. 5:16 cannot be regarded as a dilemma at all. As in the other cases, so here, too, the reference is to natural human relationship. The background is the same. Paul refutes the ideas of his opponents referred to in vs. 12. ****</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Now on the basis of Paul’s explanation, we can infer the nature of the ideas of his opponents. Paul’s emphasis upon the universality of Christ’s death and resurrection leaves no doubt that his adversaries tried to minimize the independence of the Gospel from the law and turn it into an internal affair of the Jewish national and religious system on the basis of Christ’s descent “???? ?????” from Abraham. In other words, they tried to present Christ as one of the great teachers of Judaism. Undoubtedly this served the ultimate purpose of Judaism to maintain its national unity and eventually its very existence in view of the Church’s expansion among Jews and Gentiles. This, as was noted, constituted the most serious threat against the Church’s existence.</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">****</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Against the Jewish misconceptions regarding the Gospel, Paul opposes Christ’s love for all men stresses the universal character of his death. ‘Christ’s love, he says, forces us; “??????? ????” to assume that one died for all; therefore all died’ (vs. 14). In other words, Christ’s death did not affect certain persons, but humanity as a whole in its very nature. And he died for all, he continues, so that those who live by having appropriated his death, “?????? ??????? ????? ???? ?? ???? ????? ?????????? ??? ?????????” (vs. 15). Therefore, from now on we regard no one according to his descent (“???? ?????”); and even though we have known Christ as a Jew according to his descent, we know him thus no longer (vs. 16). Thus whoever is in Christ, he is a new creation (“????? ??????”); the old standards have passed away, behold everything has become new (vs. 17).</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">That this thesis is absolutely in line with Paul’s expressed elsewhere needs not be mentioned. (Voulgaris, id.)</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">My Comment on Voulgaris</span></h2>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Voulgaris wants us to understand that verse 16 means "we have known Christ as a Jew" rather than we have known him "according to the flesh." Voulgaris built this grand scheme up to make a point that is simply counter-textual. Paul <strong>did not say "Jew" when he used the word "flesh" in the verse examples cited by Voulgaris</strong>. The claim "flesh" means as a "Jew" was an abstraction not an interpretation by Voulgaris of 5:16 and those supposed proof texts. Moreover, the literal usage of the term "flesh" in those other passages simply concretely dealt with people or events which differ from verse 16.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Moreover, even if one conceded Voulgaris's point, so what? It is still compatible with what Bultman said. For if we no longer know Jesus as a Jew, it means we no longer know Jesus when He preached the Law's continuity in Matthew 5:17-19, and quoted the Law repeatedly in His earthly ministry. If Paul no longer wants us to know Jesus was a Jewish prophet, as Voulgaris's contends, it still carries the implication of what Bultmann said was Paul's express meaning. We can supposedly dispense with the message of Jesus when in the flesh (of a Jew) and who taught Jewish legal principles because Paul allegedly has the greater message that the Law is abolished.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Indeed, Voulgaris himself says Paul declared the Law abolished, and thus the refutation of Jesus's words in Matt. 5:17-19 by Paul is plain and clear even in Voulgaris's mind. So whether "in the flesh" meant as a pre-ascension human as Bultmann claimed or as a Jew, as Voulgaris claimed, Paul meant for us to no longer know Jesus through that period of His teachings. We are supposedly only to know Jesus through the post-Ascension period which prior to John's Revelation would mean we were 100% to know Christ through Paul's gospel.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">In sum, Voulgaris's highly strained argument which makes no great advance on reading the passage. Bultmann's reading thus appear that much stronger. This is especially true if this is the kind of case one must raise to fight against it.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"></span></p>
|
|
|
|
</td>
|
|
</tr>
|
|
|
|
</table>
|
|
<span class="article_separator"> </span>
|
|
|
|
</td>
|
|
</tr>
|
|
</table>
|
|
<div class="bottom_top"></div>
|
|
<div id="bottom">
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
<div id="footer"><strong>Content View Hits</strong> : 18823227<br />
|
|
<script type="text/javascript">
|
|
var pv = new Array(1,0,0,0,1);
|
|
var trdlname = "/downloads";
|
|
//<![CDATA[
|
|
var regex = /\.(?:doc|eps|jpg|png|svg|xls|ppt|pdf|xls|zip|txt|vsd|vxd|js|css|rar|exe|wma|mov|avi|wmv|mp3)($|\&|\?)/;
|
|
//]]>
|
|
var trlkname = "/external/";
|
|
var trmlname = "/mailto/";
|
|
</script>
|
|
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://jesuswordsonly.com/modules/mod_analytics/gatr.js"></script>
|
|
<script type="text/javascript">
|
|
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
|
|
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
|
|
</script>
|
|
<script type="text/javascript">
|
|
try {
|
|
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-3747914");
|
|
pageTracker._initData();
|
|
pageTracker._trackPageview();
|
|
} catch(err) {}
|
|
</script>
|
|
</div>
|
|
<div class="copyright"></div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</body>
|
|
</html> |