730 lines
109 KiB
HTML
730 lines
109 KiB
HTML
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
|
|
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en-gb" lang="en-gb" >
|
|
<head>
|
|
<base href="https://www.jesuswordsonly.com/recommendedreading/166-chapter-26-6jwo-paul.html" />
|
|
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
|
|
<meta name="robots" content="index, follow" />
|
|
<meta name="keywords" content="Jesus Words, Jesus Words Only, Jesus Words on Salvation, Did Calvin Murder Servetus, Flaws of Young Earth Science, Ingenious Design, Apostle Paul, False Apostle Paul, Faith Alone, Dispensationalism, Ebionites, Commands of Jesus, Original Gospel of Matthew, Hebrew Matthew" />
|
|
<meta name="title" content="Chapter 26-6.JWO Paul" />
|
|
<meta name="author" content="18ptTR" />
|
|
<meta name="description" content="Jesus' Words as Primary Focus for Christians" />
|
|
<meta name="generator" content="Joomla! 1.5 - Open Source Content Management" />
|
|
<title>Chapter 26-6.JWO Paul</title>
|
|
<script type="text/javascript" src="/media/system/js/mootools.js"></script>
|
|
<script type="text/javascript" src="/media/system/js/caption.js"></script>
|
|
|
|
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="/images/favicon.ico" />
|
|
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/templates/system/css/system.css" type="text/css" />
|
|
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/templates/system/css/general.css" type="text/css" />
|
|
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/template_css.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
|
|
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/nav.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
|
|
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/style1.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
|
|
|
|
<!--[if IE]>
|
|
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/ie.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
|
|
<![endif]-->
|
|
<!--[if IE]>
|
|
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/ie.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
|
|
<![endif]-->
|
|
<!--[if lte IE 6]>
|
|
<style type="text/css">
|
|
img { behavior: url(/templates/js_relevant/js/iepngfix.htc); }
|
|
</style>
|
|
<![endif]-->
|
|
|
|
</head>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<body>
|
|
|
|
<div id="main-wrapper">
|
|
|
|
<div id="header_graphic">
|
|
<div class="inside">
|
|
<div id="newsflash"> <div class="moduletable">
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<table class="contentpaneopen">
|
|
<tr>
|
|
<td valign="top" ><p>It is misleading to build a thelogical system on certain texts in Paul's epistles without first taking into account the Hebrew Bible and the Synoptic accounts of the Gospel as it came from the lips of Jesus. (Minister, A. Buzzard, 1998)</p></td>
|
|
</tr>
|
|
<tr>
|
|
<td valign="top" >
|
|
|
|
</td>
|
|
</tr>
|
|
</table>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
<h1><a href="https://jesuswordsonly.com/" title="Relevant">Relevant</a></h1>
|
|
<h2>A Joomla! Template for the Rest of Us</h2>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
<div class="menubar">
|
|
<div id="navmenu">
|
|
<script type="text/javascript" src="/templates/js_relevant/js/barmenu.js"></script>
|
|
<ul class="menu"><li><a href="https://jesuswordsonly.com/"><span>Home</span></a></li><li class="haschild"><a href="/books.html" class="haschild"><span>Books</span></a><ul><li><a href="/books/jesuswordsonly.html"><span>Jesus' Words Only</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/jesuswordssalvation.html"><span>Jesus' Words on Salvation</span></a></li><li class="haschild"><a href="/books/didcalvinmurderservetus.html" class="child"><span>Did Calvin Murder Servetus?</span></a><ul><li><a href="/books/didcalvinmurderservetus/background-material-did-calvin-murder-servetus.html"><span>Background Material</span></a></li></ul></li><li><a href="/books/hownottosudythebible.html"><span>How Not to Study the Bible</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/flawsofyoungearthscience.html"><span>Flaws of Young Earth Science</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/jesusorpaul.html"><span>Jesus or Paul</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/unintended-disservice.html"><span>Unintended Disservice</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/original-gospel-of-matthew.html"><span>Original Gospel of Matthew</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/commands-of-jesus.html"><span>Commands of Jesus</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/gospel-of-john.html"><span>Gospel of John</span></a></li></ul></li><li id="current" class="active"><a href="/recommendedreading.html"><span>Further Reading</span></a></li><li><a href="/media.html"><span>Media</span></a></li><li class="haschild"><a href="/reviews.html" class="haschild"><span>Reviews</span></a><ul><li><a href="/reviews/jwo-reviews.html"><span>Jesus Words Only</span></a></li><li><a href="/reviews/jwos-reviews.html"><span>Jesus Words on Salvation</span></a></li></ul></li><li><a href="/contactus.html"><span>Contact Us</span></a></li><li><a href="http://www.jesuswordsonly.com/topicindex/753-bookstore.html"><span>Bookstore</span></a></li><li><a href="/topicindex.html"><span>Topic Index</span></a></li><li><a href="/aboutauthor.html"><span>About Author</span></a></li><li><a href="/newsletters.html"><span>Newsletters</span></a></li></ul>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
<div id="mainbody">
|
|
<div id="showcasetop"> </div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<table width="940" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="center">
|
|
<tr>
|
|
<td id="leftcol" valign="top" width="200">
|
|
<div class="inside">
|
|
<div class="moduleS1">
|
|
<div>
|
|
<div>
|
|
<div>
|
|
<h3>Search</h3>
|
|
<form action="index.php" method="post">
|
|
<div class="searchS1">
|
|
<input name="searchword" id="mod_search_searchword" maxlength="20" alt="Search" class="inputboxS1" type="text" size="20" value="search..." onblur="if(this.value=='') this.value='search...';" onfocus="if(this.value=='search...') this.value='';" /> </div>
|
|
<input type="hidden" name="task" value="search" />
|
|
<input type="hidden" name="option" value="com_search" />
|
|
<input type="hidden" name="Itemid" value="3" />
|
|
</form> </div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
<div class="moduleS1">
|
|
<div>
|
|
<div>
|
|
<div>
|
|
<h3>Questions?</h3>
|
|
|
|
Please enter your questions, and we will get back to you as soon as possible. As an anti-spam measure, we ask that you re-type the code you see in the box below, prior to clicking "Send Message"<br /><br />
|
|
|
|
<form name="s5_quick_contact" method="post" action="">
|
|
|
|
|
|
<input class="inputbox" id="namebox" onclick="s5_qc_clearname()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearname()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Name..." name="name"></input><br />
|
|
<input class="inputbox" id="emailbox" onclick="s5_qc_clearemail()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearemail()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Email..." name="email"></input><br />
|
|
<input class="inputbox" id="subjectbox" onclick="s5_qc_clearsubject()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearsubject()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Subject..." name="subject"></input><br />
|
|
<textarea id="messagebox" rows="" cols="" class="inputbox textarea" onclick="s5_qc_clearbody()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearbody()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; overflow:auto;width:80%; height:55px" name="message">Your Message...</textarea><br />
|
|
<input class="inputbox" id="spambox" onclick="s5_qc_clearspam()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearspam()" style="font-weight:bold; font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Enter The Code 291" name="verif_box"></input><br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
<input id="email_address" type="hidden" value="" name="email_address"></input>
|
|
|
|
<input class="button" type="button" onclick="s5_qc_submit()" value="Send Message" ></input>
|
|
</form>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
|
|
// <![CDATA[
|
|
|
|
var s5_qc_spam_text = document.getElementById("spambox").value;
|
|
|
|
function s5_qc_clearbody() {
|
|
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value == "Your Message...") {
|
|
document.getElementById("messagebox").value="";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function s5_qc_clearname() {
|
|
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value == "Name...") {
|
|
document.getElementById("namebox").value="";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function s5_qc_clearemail() {
|
|
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value == "Email...") {
|
|
document.getElementById("emailbox").value="";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function s5_qc_clearsubject() {
|
|
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value == "Subject...") {
|
|
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value="";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function s5_qc_clearspam() {
|
|
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value == s5_qc_spam_text) {
|
|
document.getElementById("spambox").value="";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
|
|
}
|
|
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
|
|
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
function s5_qc_isValidEmail(str_email) {
|
|
if (str_email.indexOf(".") > 2 && str_email.indexOf("@") > 0) {
|
|
alert('Your email is now being submitted - Thank you!');
|
|
document.s5_quick_contact.submit();
|
|
}
|
|
else {
|
|
alert('Your email address is not valid, please check again - Thank you!');
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function s5_qc_submit() {
|
|
|
|
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value == s5_qc_spam_text || document.getElementById("subjectbox").value == "Subject..." || document.getElementById("namebox").value == "Name..." || document.getElementById("emailbox").value == "Email..." || document.getElementById("messagebox").value == "Your Message...") {
|
|
alert('All fields are required, please complete the form - Thank you!');
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value != "291") {
|
|
alert('Your spam verification answer is incorrect.');
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var s5_message_holder = document.getElementById("messagebox").value;
|
|
var s5_first_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(0);
|
|
var s5_second_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(1);
|
|
var s5_third_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(2);
|
|
var s5_fourth_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(3);
|
|
|
|
if (s5_first_message_char == "<") {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_first_message_char == "w" && s5_second_message_char == "w" && s5_third_message_char == "w") {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_first_message_char == "h" && s5_second_message_char == "t" && s5_third_message_char == "t") {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
else {
|
|
document.getElementById("email_address").value = "info@jesuswordsonly.com";
|
|
var email_str = document.getElementById("emailbox").value;
|
|
s5_qc_isValidEmail(email_str);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ]]>
|
|
</script>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
<div class="moduleS1">
|
|
<div>
|
|
<div>
|
|
<div>
|
|
<h3>Recommendations</h3>
|
|
<p><a href="/recommendedreading/401-music-store-manager.html">Only Jesus</a> (great song by Big Daddy)</p>
|
|
<p><a href="http://astore.amazon.com/jwoogm-20?node=1&page=2">What Did Jesus Say?</a> (2012) - 7 topics </p>
|
|
<p>None above affiliated with me</p> </div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
<div class="module">
|
|
<div>
|
|
<div>
|
|
<div>
|
|
<a href="/books/jesuswordsonly.html"><img alt="JesusWordsOnS-cropsmall" src="/images/stories/JesusWordsOnS-cropsmall.jpg" width="116" height="117" /></a> </div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
<div class="module">
|
|
<div>
|
|
<div>
|
|
<div>
|
|
<a href="/books/jesuswordssalvation.html"><img alt="JesusWordsSalv-crop2" src="/images/stories/JesusWordsSalv-crop2.jpg" width="114" height="146" /></a> </div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
<div class="module">
|
|
<div>
|
|
<div>
|
|
<div>
|
|
<a href="/component/content/3-didcalvinmurderservetus/26-calvinfreebookonline.html"><img src="/images/stories/DidCalvinMurderServetusM.jpg" alt="DidCalvinMurderServetusM" height="NaN" width="120" /></a> </div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
</div>
|
|
</td>
|
|
<td id="maincol" valign="top">
|
|
<div id="breadcrumbs">
|
|
<span class="breadcrumbs pathway">
|
|
<a href="https://jesuswordsonly.com/" class="pathway">Home</a> <img src="/templates/js_relevant/images/arrow.png" alt="" /> Further Reading</span>
|
|
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<table class="contentpaneopen">
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<tr>
|
|
<td valign="top">
|
|
<h1><span style="font-size: 18pt;">Chapter Twenty-Six: John 3:16 </span></h1>
|
|
<h2 style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; line-height: 33.6363639831543px; font-size: 24px; color: #66869a; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Geneva, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;">What About Paul's Use of Pistis & Pisteuo?</span></h2>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong>Introduction</strong></span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">As mentioned above, to understand John 3:16, the Master and Sole Teacher has the privilege of interpreting His own words. We looked at the context of John 3:16. We looked at the context of other lessons of Jesus. We looked at inspired prophets like John the Baptist. We looked at the words of Apostle John — the writer of John 3:16 — who injected his own thoughts in John 12:42. There we saw Apostle John discusses the rulers who had <strong><em>pisteuo</em></strong> but contrary to that <em><strong>pistis</strong></em> later refuse to confess Jesus. The evidence repeatedly proves John 3:16 should have been translated as “<strong><em>obey</em></strong> unto Him” (Jesus). The verse gives no support that mere belief alone saves or mere belief is all there is to salvation.</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">The Problem Of Paul</span></h2>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">There is no secret here what is the problem weighing against us from changing our perceptions to Jesus’ intentions. Many impose their views of Paul’s doctrines upon Jesus’ words. They translate Jesus to most closely follow the doctrines they perceive Paul is teaching.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">However, we are not free to invert the relationship between Jesus and Paul so that Paul becomes the Master used to undermine the words and clear meanings of Jesus.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">As Kierkegaard pointed out in 1855 in his work My Task: “It is of great importance, especially in Protestantism, to straighten out...[the] inverting [of] the relationship, and in effect <strong><em>criticizing Christ by Paul, the Master by the disciple</em></strong>.”<sup><strong>26</strong></sup></span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Nevertheless, we will now demonstrate that Paul clearly often intends <strong><em>pistis</em></strong> to mean a faithfulness which is destroyed by disobedience, unto damnation of even Christians.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">We will also see that Paul sometimes means by <strong><em>pistis</em></strong> a faithfulness in the ‘Old Testament’ sense of faithful (obedient) living.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">We will also see that Paul often teaches that justification is by obedience or faithfulness, not belief alone — a truth hampered from your notice by minimizing translations of Paul’s words.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">This is not to deny there are just two or three problem passages where Paul affirms <em><strong>pisteuo</strong></em> or <em><strong>pistis</strong></em> in such a way that the meaning is belief alone. This is particularly the case in Romans 4:5.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">We will address these verses later, in particular the significance of Romans 4:5. We will see how the early church confronted this very problem of the words of Christ versus Paul. We will see clearly how the early apostolic church solved the dilemma. It will no doubt surprise many of you.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Regardless of how the early church resolved this problem, what remains unaltered is that there are abundant proofs that ordinarily — except for two or three passages — Paul means <strong><em>faithfulness</em></strong> (obedient living) for <strong><em>pistis</em></strong>, not faith or belief alone. This assists us once more in corroborating how Jesus was likely using the noun <em><strong>pistis</strong></em> and its verb cousin <strong><em>pisteuo</em></strong>.</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">Romans 10:11 Translates OT “Trust” With Pisteuo</span></h2>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Let’s start with Romans 10:11.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Paul uses <em><strong>pisteuo</strong></em> in Romans 10:11 to translate a verb in an ‘Old Testament’ passage which in Hebrew only meant <em><strong>trust</strong></em>. Because of the force of the original Isaiah passage, the NIV renders <em><strong>pisteuo</strong></em> in Romans 10:11 as<strong><em> trust</em></strong> rather than<strong><em> believe</em></strong> even though <em><strong>believe</strong></em> is how the NIV everywhere else translated <strong><em>pisteuo</em></strong> in the New Testament.</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">As Scripture says, ‘Anyone that<strong><em> trusts</em></strong> in him will never be put to shame.’ (NIV) (Rom. 10:11)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Paul is quoting from Isaiah 28:16.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Why did the NIV translate <strong><em>pisteuo</em></strong> in Romans 10:11 into <strong><em>trust</em></strong> rather than <strong><em>believe</em></strong>? Because the NIV realizes its own version of Isaiah 28:16 renders the word in the underlying OT as trust (rely upon and follow). The NIV translates Isaiah 28:16 as “the one who<strong><em> trusts</em> </strong>will never be dismayed...”</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Why didn’t the NIV render the Hebrew word as <strong><em>believes</em></strong> and then render Romans 10:11 as <em><strong>believes,</strong></em> so as to prevent an inconsistency in translating <strong><em>pisteuo</em></strong> when used by Paul elsewhere in the New Testament? Because the Hebrew word here was limited to <strong><em>trust</em></strong>. It was not faith or believing. The Hebrew word is not about intellectual assent in a fact about God or belief in a promise. But this then means that the NIV accepted that Paul here used the verb pisteuo to mean <strong><em>trust</em></strong>. The NIV left us to supposedly believe that Paul intended <strong><em>pisteuo</em></strong> everywhere else to mean merely believing in some fact about Jesus/the atonement, but here, and here alone, to mean trust.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Instead, it should have been a monumental fact that Paul uses in Romans 10:11<strong> <em>pisteuon</em></strong> to translate the ‘Old Testament’ word that meant <em><strong>trust.</strong></em> Because if this is true, then why should we not have used Romans 10:11 to enlighten us on translating <strong><em>pisteuo</em></strong> elsewhere in Paul’s writings? To make a comparison to how Jesus likely used <strong><em>pisteuo</em></strong>?</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Romans 10:11 is an important link back to the ‘Old Testament.’ It unlocks the normal meaning of the word <strong><em>pisteuo</em> </strong>in the New Testament. The Greek word has variable meanings. We cannot presuppose we know it means the most shallow meaning among all possible options: belief in or intellectual assent to a fact or truth. It can also mean trust, which implies obedience. Thus, how to translate <em><strong>pistis</strong></em> and <em><strong>pisteuo</strong></em> in Jesus and even in Paul’s writings is unlocked by witnessing first-hand Paul’s own rendering of the word for trust in the ‘Old Testament’ by the Greek verb <strong><em>pisteuo</em></strong>.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Thus, we know that because the OT equivalent word in Isaiah 28:16 only meant <em><strong>trust</strong></em>, and Paul rendered this ‘Old Testament’ word for trust by <strong><em>pisteuo</em></strong>, we can deduce the correct usage throughout the New Testament would primarily be at least <em><strong>trust</strong></em> (which connotes <em><strong>obedience</strong></em> anyway), not faith (which connotes mere belief or intellectual assent).</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">Romans 3:3: Another Proof That Pistis Does Not Mean Faith</span></h2>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">We read in the American Standard translation of Romans 3:3 the following:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">For what if some were without faith? shall their want of faith make of none effect the faithfulness [<strong><em>pistis</em></strong>] of God? (Rom 3:3 ASV.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Another meaning for <strong><em>pistis</em></strong> is proven here. This verse proves it sometimes certainly must mean faithfulness. It would be utter nonsense to render this the “faith of God” or even the “trust of God.” God has no faith in Himself or trust in Himself, which even hard-core Pauline scholars admit.<sup><strong>27</strong></sup></span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Here, <strong><em>pistis</em></strong> has only one meaning that fits in Romans 3:3: <strong><em>faithfulness</em></strong>, which here means ‘consistent righteous behavior.’ It is comparable to the human activity of faithfulness toward God. <strong><em>Pistis</em></strong> certainly has nothing to do with belief here.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">One comment on Romans 3:3 is insightful:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">It seems quite clear to me that Paul does not mean by PISTIS what Luther meant by “Glaube” (faith). PISTIS can certainly mean “faith” or “trust,” but it can also mean “faithfulness” as it must in Romans 3:3.<sup><strong>28</strong></sup></span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">There is more in Romans 3:3 to learn regarding<strong><em> pistis</em>.</strong> It also impacts translation of the <strong><em>apistia</em></strong> in the first part of the sentence. Ordinarily, and in the ASV quote above, it has <strong><em>apistia</em></strong> as “want of belief.” Yet, this is wrong. It mismatches the direct contrast to the <strong><em>pistis</em></strong> of God. Thus, the <strong><em>apistia</em></strong> — formed by the negative prefix a in Greek in front of pistis — should be seen as the contrast to the <em><strong>pistis</strong></em> of God. Thus, the <strong><em>pistis </em></strong>of God, which has to mean faithfulness of God, is being contrasted to<strong><em> apistia</em></strong> — obviously the <em><strong>unfaithfulness</strong></em> of men. This is translated correctly in the American Literal Translation:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">For what if some were unfaithful? Their unfaithfulness [<strong><em>apistia</em></strong>] will not make the faithfulness of God useless, will it? (Rom 3:3 ALT.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Yet, there is even one more key within this verse that makes certain <strong><em>apistia</em></strong> means <em><strong>unfaithful</strong></em> in the sense of disobedient.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Where the ALT has “if some were unfaithful” the Greek verb is <strong><em>apisteo</em></strong>. This combines the negative prefix <em><strong>a</strong></em> with <strong><em>pisteuo</em></strong> which latter verb we find in John 3:16. When the prefix and verb are so combined, the word means in ancient Greek either to <strong><em>disobey</em></strong> or <em><strong>disbelieve</strong></em>. In context, one can see here it means <strong><em>disobey</em></strong>. The ALT changed this into “were unfaithful;” while satisfactory, another more precise meaning that fits the context is <strong><em>disobey</em></strong>.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">With this background, now look at the entire passage with the underlying Greek verbs and nouns exposed. Here we see <strong><em>pistis</em>, <em>apistia</em></strong>, and <strong><em>apisteo</em></strong> are all dancing around giving us an entirely different concept about <strong><em>pistis</em></strong> and <strong><em>pisteuo </em></strong>in other contexts. Here <strong><em>pistis</em> </strong>certainly is not talking about belief as mental assent for God does not have that about Himself. This <strong><em>pistis</em></strong> of God is contrasted with the disobedient unfaithful behavior of men.</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">For what if some <strong><em>apisteo</em></strong>-ed [disobey-ed]? Their <strong><em>apistia</em></strong> [unfaithfulness] will not make the <strong><em>pistis</em></strong> [faithfulness] of God useless, will it? (Rom 3:3 ALT.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Thus, the <strong><em>pistis</em></strong> of God is the <em><strong>faithful righteous behavior</strong></em> of God. Paul teaches it is not useless merely because men are disobedient and unfaithful. Hence, pistis certainly in this context meant faithfulness, with an emphasis on righteous behavior. We know this because it is contrasted against disobedient behavior. We also saw that <strong><em>a-pisteuo</em></strong> meant “not obeying” here which re-emphasizes that <em><strong>pisteuo</strong></em> should ordinarily be translated to mean <em><strong>obey</strong></em> in the New Testament.</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">Romans 3:22: More Proof Pistis Means Faithfulness</span></h2>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">A reputable Christian scholar, N.T. Wright (Bishop of Durham, England), in 2005 pointed out that Luther erred in translating <strong><em>pistis</em></strong> as faith in Romans 3:22. Because it is speaking of the<em> pistis</em> “of Jesus,” it can only mean once again <strong><em>faithfulness</em></strong>. This is because the text has in Greek a subjective genetive (“faithfulness of Christ”) not an objective genetive (“faith in Christ”).<sup><strong>29</strong></sup></span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Wright is backed up by George Howard’s scholarly analysis of the Greek. He demonstrated that in the twenty-four times the genetive is used in Paul’s writings, it is used in the subjective genetive sense, which means <strong><em>of</em></strong>.<sup><strong>30</strong></sup></span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">In other words, because it says <strong><em>of</em></strong>, not <strong><em>in</em></strong>, within the genetive used in Greek, Wright explains Romans 3:22 must be speaking of Christ’s faithfulness, not Christ’s faith in Himself or God. The idea of <strong><em>pistis</em></strong> as <strong><em>faith</em></strong> when spoken of Jesus would be totally incongruous anyway within the verse. Only <strong><em>faithfulness</em></strong> makes sense when we speak of <strong><em>pistis</em></strong> as <strong><em>of Christ</em></strong>.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">This notion of Jesus’ “faithfulness” here likewise totally matches how Paul speaks elsewhere of “one man’s obedience” (Rom. 5:19) as a synonym for the <strong><em>faithfulness</em></strong> (obedience) of Christ. Hence, Paul uses pistis in Romans 3:22 to mean <strong><em>faithfulness</em></strong> (obedience) of Jesus, not the faith of Jesus.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Indeed, in the Gospel accounts we learn Jesus’ <strong><em>faithfulness</em></strong> was an obedience unto death to the Father’s will. (Matt. 26:39, “if it be possible, let this cup pass away from me: nevertheless, not as I will, but as thou wilt.”)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Weak efforts have been offered in reply to dispute Wright’s reading of Romans 3:22, but they are sophistic.<sup><strong>31</strong></sup></span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Wright was correct. In fact, Luther could never have been translating properly because he openly defended his translation of Romans 3:22 based upon the Latin text, not the Greek text.<sup><strong>32</strong></sup> Even so, Luther actually acknowledges in the quote in Footnote 32, page 461 that the Latin too has a genetive <strong><em>of</em></strong>, not<strong><em> in</em></strong>. Then how did Luther translate<strong><em> pistis</em></strong> as meaning <strong><em>faith</em></strong> when the <strong><em>pistis</em></strong> “of Jesus” in Romans 3:22 could not possibly be translated as <strong><em>faith</em></strong> “in” Himself? If the genetive is revealed, it had to be <strong><em>faithfulness</em></strong> (not <strong><em>faith</em></strong>) “of Jesus.” The explanation by Luther is astonishing. In one of the most stunning glosses of a Scripture text, Luther simply suggests he is free to replace the words <strong><em>of</em></strong> with <strong><em>in</em></strong>, because he prefers an entirely different structure to the sentence. It is unabashed! See Footnote 32, page 461.<sup><strong>33</strong></sup> This is how Luther changed the<strong><em> faithfulness of Christ</em></strong> into<strong><em> faith in Christ</em></strong>. This is how an example of <strong><em>pistis</em></strong> meaning <strong><em>faithfulness</em></strong> was erased by Luther, and made into <strong><em>faith</em></strong>. Thus, for generations, we lost one clear usage example from Paul that <strong><em>pistis</em> </strong>meant<strong><em> faithfulness</em>.</strong> Thanks to Bishop Wright in 2005, this original meaning has now been restored.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">We should note that the KJV is correct grammatically, revealing the genetive construction “of Jesus Christ” in Romans 3:22. However, it mistranslates <strong><em>pistis</em></strong> as <strong><em>faith</em></strong>. It reads “faith of Jesus Christ.” Yet, again, it is incongruous to speak about the “faith of Jesus” because Jesus cannot make Himself the object of His own belief. He knows who He is.</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">‘Faithfulness Of Jesus’ Appears Seven Times In Paul’s Writings</span></h2>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">By the way, Luther’s erroneous translation of Paul talking about a “faith in Christ” in Romans 3:22 is a translation error which reappears in six other passages in the English New Testament. Luther’s errors in these passages influenced English translations to follow Luther’s lead. This has misled millions on the nature of justification in certain passages. <em><strong>Pis-tis Christou</strong></em> appears not only in Romans 3:22, but also in Romans 3:26, Galatians 2:16,20, 3:22, Phil. 3:9, and Ephesians 3:12.</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">Justification Impacted</span></h2>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Thus, instead of Paul saying God “justifies him who believes in Jesus” (Rom. 3:26 KJV), it says God “justifies him who has the faithfulness of Jesus” (Romans 3:26) — a major reversal in meaning. If you have the obedience Jesus exhibited, God justifies you.<sup><strong>34</strong></sup></span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">If Paul had meant instead to say “faith in Jesus” in this verse on justification, he knew how to do it. Paul speaks elsewhere of those who have a “<em><strong>pistis en Cristos Iesous</strong></em>.” (Gal. 3:26; Eph. 1:15; Col. 1:4.) Similarly, others in the New Testament expressed such a thing as “<strong><em>pistis en Cristou</em></strong>.” <sup><strong>35</strong></sup> However, Paul never did that in these seven examples. He used a subjective genetive, and did so in particular in this justification verse. When rendered properly, it means you are only justified if you have the “faithfulness of Christ.”</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Hence, the only somewhat correct translation of Romans 3:26 — each rendering the genitive (possessive) properly — appears in Young’s Literal, New Revised Standard (1989), Darby’s, Douay Rheims (“faith of Jesus”) and the Spanish Reina Valera (RV “justifica al que es de la fe de Jesús”).The only error is that these Bibles<strong><em> each incongruously still translate pistis as faith</em></strong> (of Jesus) as <em><strong>if Jesus could be believing in Himself or the Father rather than having a faithfulness</strong></em> (of Jesus) toward the Father.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Another interesting point is that the KJV has it <strong><em>faith in Jesus</em></strong> in Romans 3:26 while in every other of the seven verses, the KJV has the possessive correct in saying faith <em><strong>of</strong> </em>Jesus. As Steven L. Chambers notes, “the King James version preserved ‘the faith <strong><em>of</em> </strong>Christ’ in every instance <em><strong>except Romans 3:26</strong></em>.”<sup>36</sup> Obviously, the KJV was concerned that any more accurate translation of 3:26 would <strong><em>upset justification doctrine</em></strong>. Because that is not at stake in the other six verses, the KJV correctly revealed the possessive “of” meaning.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"></span></p>
|
|
<hr />
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"></span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><strong>35.</strong>Chambers offers up the argument for consideration that twists this fact around to favor a reading of it as “faith in Christ.” This argument says Paul is entitled to have an idiosyncratic (isolated) meaning from all others who express the same thought differently. This argument says: “Paul never uses that construction; he never makes Christ (or God) the object of a preposition following pistis. Thus, pistis Cristou may well be an alternate, and uniquely Pauline, way of expressing ‘faith in Christ.’” (Steven L. Chambers, “‘Faith in Christ,’ or the ‘Faith of Christ? Pistis Cristou in Paul,” Lutheran Theological Review XII (1999-2000) at 23 (available online).) Chambers cites (and apparently realizes it is a valid point) Williams’ claim that this argument represents a fundamental logical error. Merely because “Paul does not use pistis en or eis when he seems to mean ‘faith in Christ’ does not lead to the inverse conclusion that he does mean ‘faith in Christ’ every time he speaks of pistis Cristou.” (Chambers, supra, at 25, citing Sam K. Williams, “Again Pistis Christou”, CBQ 49 (1987), 431-447, at 433-34.) Chambers appears to have a misunderstanding that Paul never says pis-tis en Cristou, which he does in Gal. 3:26; Eph. 1:15; Col. 1:4. What Williams is saying is that sometimes Paul appears to mean in Christ even when he only says pistis Cristou, but this does not support reading in into it every time. This is particularly true because Paul in those four cited passages does prove he knows how to say pistis en Cristou.</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<hr />
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">How Justification In the “Old Testament” Can Assist</span></h2>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Yet, the KJV’s effort to change justification into faith in Jesus is an unnecessarily strained translation in light of Hebrew scripture. The Scripture taught in Deuteronomy 6:25 that justification was by obedience to God’s law.<strong>37</strong></span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">This is also what Habakkuk 2:4 says in a proper translation: “the just shall live by his faithfulness.” Apparently Paul is being mistranslated whenever it is claimed he taught justification by faith in his quotes from the Habakkuk passage.<sup><strong>38</strong></sup> The underlying Hebrew word meant only<strong><em> faithfulness</em></strong>.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">This concept of justification is also what Ezekiel taught about justification. “But if a man be just, and do that which is lawful and right.... [and] hath walked in my statutes, and hath kept mine ordinances, to deal truly; he is just, he shall surely live, saith the Lord Jehovah.” (<a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ezekiel%2018:5-9&version=ASV">Eze 18:5,9 </a>ASV.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Then why translate Paul in Romans 3:26 in a highly dubious way as if Paul said one is ‘justified if one has faith in Jesus’ rather than what it truly says — God ‘<em><strong>justifies those who have the faithfulness of Jesus</strong></em>’? The ‘faith <strong><em>in</em></strong> Jesus’ construction is at<strong><em> total odds</em> </strong>with not just <em><strong>normal Greek grammar</strong></em>, but also it is <em><strong>contra-indicated by every prior clearly inspired Scripture on justification</strong></em>. This includes the parable from Jesus of the Prodigal Son (<a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=luke%2018:9-14&version=ASV">Luke 18:9-14</a>).<sup><strong>39</strong></sup></span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">This was the point of two scholars in the late 1950s on how to translate Romans 3:26: Herbert and Torrance.<sup><strong>40</strong></sup> They emphasized the Hebrew meaning of <strong><em>faithfulness</em></strong> in the original word that is ambiguously translated as <em><strong>pistis</strong></em> or <strong><em>pisteuo</em></strong> in the New Testament. When rendered into English, they said we should opt for faithfulness rather than faith. The ambiguity inherent in <strong><em>pistis</em></strong> and <strong><em>pisteuo</em></strong> was lacking in the original Hebrew which was sometimes being quoted (Hab. 2:4). In fact, the Hebrew texts which explained justification made it absolutely certain justification was by faithfulness, not faith.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">That such a choice was necessary was particularly true in Romans 3:26. As Chambers explains: “If <strong><em>pisteuo</em></strong>, they argued, actually had the preferred Greek translation of faithfulness, as distinct from faith, then Paul’s expression would mean that God was continuing” His prior lessons about justification by faithfulness.<sup><strong>41</strong></sup> It was a point well-taken, especially in light of Deuteronomy 6:25 and Habakkuk 2:4, properly translated. The King James translators claimed they were following such pass-through principles — old to new.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Yet, more important, the only suitable meaning of <strong><em>pistis</em></strong> when spoken “of Jesus” is faithfulness. That is the beginning and end of the issue. It is nonsense to say Jesus believes in Himself. It is also ridiculous to say He believes in God. Thus, instead Paul teaches in Romans 3:26 that justification is for anyone of us who has the "faithfulness (obedience) of Jesus." Paul here is expressing a doctrine of justification by obedience in imitation of Jesus.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">After this digression, let’s return to our proofs that Paul frequently uses <em><strong>pistis</strong></em> to mean <strong><em>faithfulness</em></strong>, not faith.</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">2 Thessalonians 1:3-5,8,11: Pistis Must Mean Faithfulness</span></h2>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Paul says God will punish two types with His everlasting vengeance. One type is “those who do not know him” and the second type is “those who do not obey (hupakouousin) the gospel of our Lord Jesus.” (1:8) Paul prays the Thessalonians, by contrast, will be “counted worthy of your calling, and fulfill every desire of goodness and every work of <em><strong>pistis</strong></em>, with power.” (1:11.) Paul glories in their <em><strong>pistis</strong></em> “in all your persecutions” that “you endure.” (1:4.) He then importantly says this persecution is “a demonstration (evidence) of the just judgment (krisis) of God, to the end (eis) that you may be counted worthy of the kingdom of God, for which you also suffer.” (1:5a ALT; 1:5b ASV.) Cf. 2 Tim.2:12 (“If we endure with Him, we shall also reign with Him.”)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Verse 1:5 tells you <em><strong>pistis</strong></em> means <em><strong>faithfulnes</strong></em>s in the three uses in this passage. For it ends saying God permits persecution to test them to make them “counted worthy of the kingdom of God, for which you also suffer.” Nicholl admits Paul says afflictions “function to purify them so that they will be counted worthy of the kingdom and so [they] can inherit it.” (Nicholl-2004: 149-50.) Paul wanted them to “be worthy of their calling.” (1:11.) Jesus said He rejects the many He invites whom He “called [yet] were not worthy.” (Matt. 22:8.) Hence, you are not simply worthy by the initial blood-cleansing by Christ or His call. Salvation is not guaranteed by faith alone had no persecution come your way. Rather, Paul says God allows persecution with the “end” or “objective” that by suffering “you may be counted worthy of the kingdom of God.”<sup><strong>42</strong></sup> If faith alone instead were true, no amount of the testing of your endurance in doctrinal belief is necessary to make you worthy of the kingdom. You would in theory be already worthy by faith alone before any persecution. Thus, something other than faith alone must be on Paul’s mind of what is being tested. Only faithfulness as the meaning of <strong><em>pistis</em></strong> makes sense in this passage each time it appears.</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">Twelve Proofs On Paul’s Usage Of Pistis As Faithfulness</span></h2>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">We clearly have seen twelve total times that the only meaning of <strong><em>pistis</em></strong> in a passage from Paul is <em><strong>faithfulness</strong></em>. See, Romans 3:3 (“faithfulness of God”), Romans 10:11 (the quote of Isaiah where it means “trust”), and seven other verses talking of the “faithfulness of Jesus.” (Romans 3:22, but also in Romans 3:26, Galatians 2:16,20, 3:22, Phil. 3:9, and Ephesians 3:12.) We saw that three times Paul extols the “faithfulness” of the Thessalonians under persecution, who are tested by God so they will be “counted worthy of the kingdom of God.” (2 Thessalonians 1:3-5,8,11.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">These twelve examples are just more proofs of how the word pisteuo (related to its noun form pistis) should be translated in John 3:16. <strong><em>Pisteuo</em></strong> means those who “<em><strong>obey</strong> </em>for/ unto Him” should have eternal life.</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">Paul’s Doctrine On Disobedience Means He Often Understood Pistis And Pisteuo As Faithfulness/Obey, Not Belief/Believe</span></h2>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Is there further confirmation that in Paul’s understanding <em>pistis</em> and <em>pisteuo</em> were negated by disobedience? If so, then we know Paul ordinarily meant these words respectively meant faithfulness (obedient living), not faith, unless the context dictates otherwise, as what saves. Otherwise, disobedience could never be relevant to salvation if faith alone is all there is to salvation.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">In other words, did Paul ever say a person who had pistis could fall by disobedience and lose their salvation/ inheritance in heaven? If so, then we would know the correct translation of pisteuo (verb) and pistis (noun) in Paul’s writings is ordinarily obey and faithfulness, not believe and faith, unless — to repeat — the context makes clear otherwise.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">If so, then the impact on our conception of salvation even as sometimes taught by Paul, and certainly as taught by Jesus in John 3:16, would be monumental. If salvation is by faith, then it is simple, easy and cost-free. If it is by obeying and faithfulness, it is precarious and costly.</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<h3><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="color: #000080;">Paul Teaches Disobedience Negates Pisteuo</span></strong></span></h3>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Paul several times expressly stated a Christian who was morally disobedient would lose his salvation. Paul, in fact, feared for himself that unless he cut off the body parts that ensnared himself in sin, he would go to hell whole.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Of course, Paul learned this lesson from Jesus. Our Lord told the apostles that each of them had a stark choice. You can go to heaven only if you maim yourself by the self-discipline of cutting off body parts ensnaring you in sin. Or, you can fail to take such measures to buffet your body, and you will certainly go to hell whole. (Mark 9:42-47.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Paul says the very same thing in 1 Corinthians 9:27. Paul states:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">I buffet my body, and bring it into bondage, lest by any means, after I have preached to others, I myself should be disapproved (adokimos). (1 Cor. 9:27.) (YLT)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><em>Disapproved</em> or <em>rejected</em> is the most literal Greek meaning of adokimos. Instead of “disapproved,” the KJV has it “castaway.” Regardless, it is a serious negative condition.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Sometimes it is translated as “reprobate.” Every other time the Greek word adokimos is used, it is always talking about the lost. (2 Cor. 13:5,6,7, 2 Tim. 3:8, Titus 1:16.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Thus, Paul held the fear that he might be rejected by God and thus be lost unless he buffeted his body. Consequently, in this verse, Paul shared Jesus’ view on salvation. Jesus taught you can go to heaven-maimed or hell-whole. (Mark 9:42-47.) You can cut off the body part ensnaring you in sin, and have eternal life (heaven maimed) or you can fail to “buffet” your body in such manner, and go to hell whole. Paul in this verse had Jesus’ view that sin, unaddressed by self-discipline over fleshly desire, will cause one to go to hell whole. Even Calvin read Paul’s words in the same way. He said it matched Jesus’ doctrine that one who begins as a believer must engage in “strenuous perserverance,” and it “would be of no avail to have set out boldly on the Christian race if they did not continue to the end.” (Calvin quoted in F. Lisco, <em>The Parables of Jesus</em> (Philadelphia:1850) at 119.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Unquestionably, in this passage, Paul applied this principle of heaven-maimed or hell-whole to someone like himself who already had initial pistis. Yet, Paul also clearly implied here that his own prior pistis is not the sole determinant of salvation. Hence, Paul’s concept of <em>pistis</em> is ordinarily not faith, but faithfulness, which can be negated by disobedience — the very thing Paul says in 1 Cor. 9:27 will make him <em>adokimos</em> — <em>disapproved, rejected</em>, a <em>castaway</em>, a <em>reprobate</em>. In other words, a lost soul.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">While few who sit in the pews of a cheap-grace church ever learn this truth about this passage, an Atlantic Baptist University article says its meaning is clear:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">To become disqualified (adokimos) is to be disallowed from obtaining eschatological salvation because of failing to meet its condition, obedience to God (see 2 Cor 13:5-7; 2 Tim 3:8; Titus 1:16; see also Heb 6:8). Implicit in Paul’s comments about himself is his warning to the Corinthians that they will likewise become disqualified if they continue their misuse of their freedom [by sinning].<sup><strong>43</strong></sup></span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><strong>Titus 1:16</strong>. In the same vein, Paul in Titus 1:16 says of those who disobey God’s commands yet confess — homologeo — God, their good works are adokimos. Paul uses this identical expression to say if you homologeo that Jesus is Lord, you shall be saved. (Rom. 10:9.) But here Paul says the very same homologeo for God is negated by disobedience.</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">They confess (<em>homologeo</em>) that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable, and disobedient [apeithos], and unto every good work reprobate [adokimos]. (Titus 1:16, KJV.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The Young’s Literal has this: “Unto every good work disapproved.” In the literal Greek, it means “to every good work rejected.” Thus, you can confess God, but if your works disobey Him, you deny God and all your good works are dis-approved/rejected by God. (They become like filfthy rags.) You must be lost despite having confessed God. Paul does not say this proves you never truly “believed.” He says instead you “deny” God by disobedience.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><strong>Galatians 6:7-9</strong>. Paul speaks likewise in Galatians 6:7-9. He says that salvation depends upon not sowing to the flesh — even for a Christian. If you have pistis in the next quote, it does not satisfy the obedience requirement that Paul simultaneously insists upon. This implies that Paul here understood obedience was implied in the meaning of the word pistis. Obviously, Paul ordinarily meant faithfulness (obedient living) not faith when he used pistis. Paul says:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. The one who sows to his sinful nature, from that nature he will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life. Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up. (Gal. 6:7-9 NIV).</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"></span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"></span></p>
|
|
<hr />
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"></span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino;"><strong>Table on What you sow</strong> <strong>You reap.</strong></span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino;">If you sow to the sinful nature You reap destruction.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino;">If you sow to the Spirit You reap eternal life.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino;">If you do not become weary in doing good, You will reap a harvest.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino; font-size: 18pt;"></span></p>
|
|
<hr />
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The meaning of this passage is clear if you simply notice the conditions and the outcomes. See Table above. Paul is addressing Christians. If they sow to the flesh, they will suffer “destruction.” In contrast, if they “sow to the Spirit,” which is paralleled by the phrase “not become weary in doing good,” they will reap “eternal life.”</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><strong>Romans 6:22</strong>. Another passage to consider is Romans 6:22. Here Paul says the benefit of becoming God’s servant is it should “lead to holiness, and the result is eternal life.”44 On this verse, the Atlantic Baptist University article says the meaning is unequivocal:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Paul continues by saying that the result (“fruit”) of being enslaved to God is holiness (<em>eis hagiasmon</em>), by which he means practical righteousness or habitual obedience to God. The result (“fruit”) of holiness, moreover, is <em>eternal life</em>. In other words, in Rom 6:20-22, Paul gives expression to the familiar Jewish idea that eternal life is conditional upon practical righteousness; it is significant that Paul does not say that the condition of receiving eternal life is imputed righteousness or the “righteousness of God”....</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Please note here the purpose or object use of<em> eis</em>. This is the preposition we emphasized in John 3:16 means <em>for</em>. John 3:16 says he who is pisteuo-ing <strong>eis</strong> Christ should be saved. Here in Romans 6:22, becoming God’s servant is the first step whose purpose is to lead to an object: holiness. It is for the purpose of making you holy. This is not a one-step of belief that transforms you into a holy person. Becoming God’s servant has the <strong>eis</strong> purpose of making you holy. Then the result is eternal life.</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><strong>Romans 2:13</strong>. In another passage, Paul ties justification to obedience. Paul writes:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">For not the hearers of the Law are just before God, but the doers of the Law shall be justified. (Rom 2:13.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Incidentally, compare this to our prior discussion of Romans 3:26. Paul there said God justifies whoever has the faithfulness of Jesus. This means those who imitate Jesus’ obedience are thus justified. (See page 462 supra.) This is identical to what Romans 2:13 quoted here literally says in all translations.</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><strong>Romans 2:6-7</strong>. In yet another passage — Romans 2:6-7 — Paul most remarkably of all says that God</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">will render to every man according to his works: to them that by patience in well-doing [i.e., lit. ‘endurance in good works’] seek for glory and honor and incorruption, eternal life.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The Greek words translated as ‘patience in well-doing’ more correctly say endurance in good works. Paul thus says ‘to those who endure patiently in doing good works, God will render eternal life.’</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Here, the Atlantic Baptist University article once more comments how clearly this spells out a doctrine contrary to what most suppose Paul taught. The Atlantic Baptist University article states:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Paul clearly affirms that believers will be judged based on what they have done, not on what they have believed. It should be noted that the eschatological judgment to which Paul refers does not presuppose that the criterion of receiving eschatological salvation is perfection, but rather habitual obedience.<sup><strong>45</strong></sup></span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Thus, this passage adds more support to re-interpreting the word pistis in Paul’s writings to ordinarily mean faithfulness, not faith. This supports the idea that Paul spoke this way in reliance on Jesus likewise teaching these principles.</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><strong>Colossians 1:22, 23</strong>. Similarly, Paul says that pistis leads to presenting you holy and blameless unless you fail to continue in pistis, and you lose your steadfastness in pistis. Paul’s aim is</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">to present you holy, and blameless, and above reproach in His sight IF INDEED YOU CONTINUE<sup><strong>46</strong></sup> IN PISTIS, grounded and steadfast, AND ARE NOT MOVED AWAY from the hope of the gospel... Colossians 1:22,23.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">One can see that again <em>pistis</em> here must mean <em>faithfulness</em>. The <em>pistis</em> can be ruined by losing steadfastness in the <em>pistis</em>. This is how one speaks of <em>faithfulness.</em> This is not how you speak about mere belief in facts about Jesus or the atonement. Moreover, this passage negates the idea that a belief one-time saved you. Instead, Paul says your salvation is tied up in an activity of<em> pistis</em> that must continue or otherwise it is in vain or for nothing. Faithfulness or trust, not faith, best fits those characteristics. Finally, the idea of a mental assent in the sense of faith in the doctrine of faith alone cannot be what Paul intended for pistis here because he just said pistis alone did not save you. Steadfastness or continuance are also necessary. To repeat, only faithfulness (obedient living) if read into<em> pistis</em> can contain a sufficiently broad meaning to make sense of this verse.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Thus, while everyone succumbs to translating pistis as faith here, the notion of mental assent does not fit. It should be translated here as faithfulness, not faith. Paul says it is destroyed by losing steadfastness and not continuing in the hope of salvation. When you lose hope in salvation, Paul is concerned you will no longer bother being faithful anymore. Paul is telling us to remain faithful and do not give up on the hope of salvation. Be steadfast. Be faithful.</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><strong>1 Timothy 5:8</strong>. Paul likewise shows how a true Christian’s misbehavior denies pistis and makes you worse than an unbeliever in this quote:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">But if anyone does not provide for his own and especially his household, he has denied the faith [pistis, trust, pledge] and is worse than an unbeliever. (1Ti 5:8 ALT.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Thus, once again, we see how the better translation choice for pistis is not faith, but pledge. When a Christian does not provide for his family, he denies the pledge of faithfulness you gave to Jesus as Lord. If pistis meant faith, how would you deny your acceptance of facts (belief) by simply misbehavior? But if pistis means here pledge, you surely deny such a trusting faithful relationship or pledge by misbehavior.</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><strong>1 Timothy 5:11-15</strong>. Paul speaks again similarly about<em> pistis</em> in 1 Timothy 5:11-15. In fact, here Paul certainly uses <em>pistis </em>not to mean <em>faith</em> in the sense of belief in facts about Jesus. In fact, most translations of this passage do not render<em> pistis</em> as <em>faith</em>, but instead translate <em>pistis</em> as <em>pledge</em>. This is a reasonable rendition. Yet, if you translate <em>pistis</em> here as pledge in this next quote, then why not thoroughly revise all of Paul’s passages on <em>pistis</em> to be about salvation by a <em>pledge</em>? A firm commitment, trust or faithfulness? The word<em> pledge</em> is a synonym for a most solemn trust. When you pledge your honor to a king, it is a promise of compliance with the will of that king.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Let’s now read 1 Timothy 5:11-15 where we find <em>pistis</em> is no longer translated by even the leading translations as<em> faith</em> but as <em>pledge</em>:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">But younger widows refuse: for when they have waxed wanton against Christ, they desire to marry; (12) having condemnation, because they have rejected their first <em><strong>pledge</strong></em> [<em>pistis</em>]. (13) And withal they learn also to be idle, going about from house to house; and not only idle, but tattlers also and busybodies, speaking things which they ought not. (14) I desire therefore that the younger widows marry, bear children, rule the household, give no occasion to the adversary for reviling: (15) for already some are turned aside after Satan. (1Ti 5:11-15 ASV.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Paul says that this wanton sensual desire in them makes them wax against Christ. By doing so, they have rejected their first<em> pistis</em>. Here Paul is talking identical to Jesus who says in Luke 8:13 that after the second seed hears the word, it at first accepts the word with Joy. Then the second seed keeps on <em>pisteuo</em>-sing for a while (translated typically as <em>believes</em>), but in time of temptation falls away, withers and hence dies. The noun form — <em>pistis</em> — in 1 Timothy 5:11-15 and the verb form — <em>pisteuo</em> —in Luke 8:13 must be talking of the first <em>pledge</em> to obey unto Christ which these persons initially made.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Thus, 1 Timothy 5:11-15 is just one more proof that dictates we can no longer construe Paul’s usage of <em>pistis</em> or <em>pisteuo</em> to always mean <em>faith</em>. Rather, Paul is obviously saying in these passages that salvation turns upon nothing so shallow as mere faith. Instead, Paul in these passage must be saying salvation turns on faithfulness, trust, a pledge or promise of compliance — which are legitimate alternative Greek meanings in standard lexicons.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">One can concede that Paul is not always consistent in his usage of <em>pistis</em> and<em> pisteuo</em>, as we shall discuss. That is not, however, a problem in how to interpret Jesus.<strong><em> It is a problem in how to understand Paul</em></strong>! Nevertheless, Paul clearly often states salvation is not by the shallow notion of faith alone. Hence this at minimum gives us further confirmation that our choice of how to translate <em>pisteuo</em> in John 3:16 conforms to even how Paul sometimes (or even often) spoke and taught. Jesus does not have to strictly agree with every mode of meaning of Paul. Rather, <strong><em>Paul must strictly always agree with Jesus</em></strong>. If Paul does not, this is proof that Paul is not speaking at that moment with inspiration. A conflict in Paul’s usage can <strong><em>never be used to gainsay Christ’s meaning</em></strong>. Yet, when Paul agrees with Jesus, it shows how Jesus’ meaning even penetrated into some or most of the writings of Paul.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The clearest examples are the following four inheritance warnings by Paul. They repeat the true gospel of Jesus Christ, as we previously have seen.</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">Paul’s Four Inheritance Warnings</span></h2>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">As the final proof that Paul’s concept of pistis often must mean faithfulness, not faith, is Paul’s inheritance warnings. In four passages Paul clearly said that if a Christian commits various sins (which are cognizable as moral rules from the Mosaic Law), such as covetousness, adultery, etc., this means you shall “not inherit the kingdom of God.” (1 Cor. 6:9, Ephesian 5:5-7, Galatians 5:19-21, and 1 Thessalonians 4:6-8.) Jesus said those who “inherit the kingdom” means they have “eternal life.” (Matt. 25:34,46. See page 219-20.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">We will discuss these four passages in a moment. The point is, if this is true, then this proves again that Paul often is not using pistis with its shallow meaning of faith. Rather, Paul often instead used it with a more strenuous meaning of faithfulness, which includes the notion of faithful obedience.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Let’s take, for example, 1 Thessalonians 4:6-8, from among these four passages. It clearly is addressing Christians, and says when you act disobediently you “reject God” who has given you His Holy Spirit:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">[For] each of you to know how to be acquiring his own vessel [fig., wife] in sanctification and honor, (5) not in lustful passion of desire, just as also the Gentiles, the ones not knowing God,(6) [so as] <em><strong>not to do wrong</strong></em> and take advantage of his brother in this matter, because the Lord [is the] avenger concerning all these [things], just as also we forewarned you and solemnly testified. (7) For God did not call us to impurity [or, immorality], but in sanctification.(8) Therefore,<strong><em> the one rejecting [this]</em></strong> [or, regarding [this] as nothing] does not reject a person but God, the One having also given His Holy Spirit to you. (1Th 4:4-8 ALT.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Or 1 Corinthians 6:8-10, we read similarly:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">But you act unjustly, and you defraud, and these [things to] brothers [and sisters]! (9) You know that <em><strong>unrighteous [ones] will not inherit [the] kingdom of God</strong></em>, do you not? Stop being led astray [fig., being deceived]; neither sexual sinners nor idolaters nor adulterers nor passive partners in male-male sex nor active partners in male-male sex (10) nor covetous [ones] nor thieves nor drunkards nor slanderers [or, abusive persons] nor swindlers will inherit [the] kingdom of God. (1Co 6:8-10 ALT.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">In this 1 Corinthians passage, Paul clearly says that these Christians are acting unjustly toward brothers and sisters. Paul understands these malefactors have truly accepted Christ. He then sternly warns them that anyone misbehaving will not inherit the kingdom of God. Actually, someone was leading them astray. Some taught that they safely could act unjustly toward brothers in the faith, or commit this list of sins, and still inherit the kingdom of God. Paul is sternly warning them that the opposite is true.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The passages of Ephesian 5:5-7 and Galatians 5:19-21 are to the same effect. In these two epistles addressed to the “brethren,” Paul warns, as he says he warned them before, that anyone who practices various moral sins “shall not inherit the kingdom of God.”</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Clearly all these passages prove that Paul had an idea that whatever he thought elsewhere about pisteuo or pistis often enough he taught obedience was implied in their word meanings. Yet, the only definition of pistis that works like this is the option to translate it as faithfulness, trust, or pledge. Those translations alone connote obedience. The meaning of faith for <em>pistis</em> in these passages, while conceivable, is certainly too shallow to convey what Paul must have intended in these passages.</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">Even in Passages Where Paul Means Intellectual Assent.</span></h2>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Finally, even when Paul does use pistis to mean faith, in the sense of doctrine, almost every time he uses the word that way, Paul also says in the very same context that the faith (doctrine) is denied or negated by <strong>disobedience</strong> to moral rules. 2 Tim.3:6-8; 2 Cor. 13:5. Thus, Paul was even then still harkening back to a fuller more strenuous meaning about what the faith (correct doctrine) entailed.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">This is not to deny Paul has verses which teach salvation is by pistis without works (obedience). (Eph. 2:8-9; Romans 4:4.) But to repeat, this does not raise a problem how to interpret Jesus’s usage of pistis or pisteuo. Nor would such evidence in just two passages refute that Paul clearly ordinarily used pistis and pisteuo to mean faithfulness.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Rather, the fact Paul has a different program of salvation in these two passages merely raises a problem on how to explain the contradiction within Paul’s view of salvation. In a moment, we shall discuss the solutions employed by the early Christian church to this dilemma. See “The Problem Of Paul’s Belief-Without-Obedience Verses” on page 481.</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">Conclusion On Ordinary Meaning Of Pistis And Pisteuo In Paul’s Writings</span></h2>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">As a result of the overwhelming evidence above, unbeknownst to most Christians in the pew, evangelical scholars now agree it is impossible to believe Paul consistently taught faith alone saves. Rather, Paul often taught faithfulness saves. As T. Schreiner wrote in <em>T</em><strong>he Law and Its Fulfillmen<em>t</em></strong> (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1993) at 203:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="margin-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Even though Paul asserts that no one can attain salvation by good works, he also insists that <strong>no one can be saved without them, and that they are necessary to obtain an eschatological inheritance</strong>.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">As the evangelist Charles Finney similarly said: </span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">“But he [Paul] has everywhere insisted on good works springing from faith, or the righteousness of faith, as indispensable to salvation.” (Finney, <strong>Justification by Faith</strong> (1837).)</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Consequently, the entire conception of salvation has been negatively impacted for centuries by translating<em> pisteuo</em> (the verb) and <em>pistis</em> (the noun) consistently as <em>believe</em> and <em>faith</em> respectively. The primary sense in Jesus’ teachings, let alone in other portions of the New Testament, of the word <em>pisteuo</em> was always <em>obey, trust, compliance</em>, etc. <em>Pistis</em> normally means <em>faithfulness</em>, not <em>faith</em>. This is why Paul could say <em>disobedience</em> (i) was a denial of <em>pistis</em> and (ii) was a denial of God who gave His Holy Spirit to you and (iii) causes the loss of the inheritance of the kingdom of God.</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">The Problem Of Paul’s Belief-Without-Obedience Verses</span></h2>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Paul two times teaches salvation by belief even if one is still disobedient and has commenced no obedience whatsoever. (Eph. 2:8-9; Rom. 4:4-5; cf. Romans 10:9.)<sup><strong>47</strong></sup></span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Specifically, as evangelical scholars appear all to concur, Paul teaches in Romans 4:5 that a mental assent to a belief without repentance from sin — while you are still ungodly — saves you. (Romans 4:5.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">These two instances of a usage of pistis to mean belief-only are clear as long as Paul meant by erga (works) a synonym for obedience. This appears to be Paul’s intent.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Yet, the only way to reconcile Paul fully to Jesus is to always read pistis as faithfulness. Unfortunately for Paul (if we wish to regard him as always inspired), this has serious difficulties within these two passages. Nevertheless, there is one plausible way to read Ephesians 2:8-9 this way so as to fit Jesus. The weight of Romans 4:5 in the opposite direction may make it a Quixotic venture to solve Ephesians 2:8-9 this way. Yet, if Romans 4:5 can ever be reconciled to Christ’s teachings, here is a solution to Ephesians 2:8-9.</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">Ephesians 2:8-9: Can It Fit Jesus’ Words?</span></h2>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">As to Ephesians 2:8-9, it can fit Jesus’ teaching if you read<em> erga</em> in Eph. 2:8-9 to mean <em>visible works</em>. As a result, then the clause “lest any man should boast” is no longer meant to require the most shallow meaning to <em>pistis</em> to keep the risk of boasting to the smallest minimum. Instead, the boasting clause would be directed at erga as explanation.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Thus, Paul would be saying you are saved by “faithfulness, not by works (to be seen by men) lest any man should boast.” This means you are saved by obedient living (to internal moral rules from Jesus) rather than by visible works. If salvation were by visible works, Paul means God would be tempting you to boast. Hence, God allegedly created a salvation formula that does not invite boasting because it depends on internal faithfulness that only God sees.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The problem is even if you read Ephesians 2:8-9 that way, there is the seemingly impossible hurdle posed by Romans 4:5 where Paul says he who “works not (<em>ergazomai</em>), but believes (<em>pisteuo epi</em>)<sup><strong>48</strong></sup> [on] the one justifying the irreverent — ungodly — is being accounted the <em>pistis</em> of Him unto [eis] righteousness.”</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">In other words, what this verse says is the one who lacks obedience (works) but is <em>pisteuo epi</em> on the One who justifies the ungodly is being reckoned with the faithfulness (<em>pistis</em>) of Jesus for righteousness’ sake.<sup><strong>49</strong></sup></span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">Pisteuo In Romans 4:5a</span></h2>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Here in Romans 4:5a, <em>pisteuo</em> by being contrasted with <em>ergazomai</em> is contrasting working against <em>pisteuo</em>-ing. This antithesis would support an intellectual assent-belief meaning to <em>pisteuo</em> in this verse.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Most troubling of all, Paul in Romans 4:5b says God “justifies the ungodly.”</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">In light of the fact works are irrelevant in this verse, and most concur repentance-from-sin is a work, every commentator agrees Paul directly affirms justification without repentance from sin.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">As Robertson’s <em>Word Pictures</em> says: “The man is taken as he is and pardoned.” Wesley concurs, saying God had to justify a man while he was “<strong><em>at that very time, ungodly</em></strong>.” Gill insists that Paul means Abraham (in context) was “in his<strong><em> state of unregeneracy</em></strong>...an ungodly person” when God justified him. The Geneva notes likewise say: “That makes him who is<em><strong> wicked in himself</strong></em> to be just in Christ.” Clarke concurs that Paul speaks of Abraham, and according to Paul: “Abraham...was called<strong><em> when he was ungodly</em></strong>, <em>i.e</em>. an idolater; and, on his believing, was freely justified.” Clarke says we are to understand this is the model: justification comes about <em><strong>without any interior repentance from sin</strong></em>. The only requirement Paul has in this verse is belief in the goodness and mercy of God. Clarke says:</span></p>
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Abraham’s state and mode in which he was justified, are the plan and rule according to which God purposes to save men; and as his state was ungodly, and the mode of his justification was by faith in the goodness and mercy of God.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Thus, it is Romans 4:5 which is the<em> sole basis to ridicule repentance-from-sin as a requirement for salvation</em> among most evangelicals.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">For example, the famous Ryrie Study Bible says <strong><em>repentance</em></strong> from sin is “a<em><strong> false addition to faith</strong></em>” when added as a condition of salvation.”<sup><strong>50</strong></sup></span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Likewise, Frederick Bruner, on the faculty with the Fuller Theological Seminary, and a prolific evangelical author, insists in his book Theology of the Holy Spirit that receipt of the Holy Spirit is “<strong><em>not conditional</em></strong>.” Confession of sin and <em><strong>repentance</strong></em> from sin are “works” which supposedly only hinder simple faith. Bruner insists that <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>repentance</strong></span> is “<em><strong>not something to be done</strong></em>.” Rather, it is God’s gift which enables a person to follow Christ and decide to be baptized.<sup><strong>51</strong></sup>Again and again Bruner berates Pentecostal Christians in particular who seek more than Christ’s forgiveness at conversion. Bruner declares it is wrong to insist that a convert has some responsibility for meeting conditions such as repentance, obedience, eagerness and the like. All such arguments from Bruner hang principally on Romans 4:5.</span></p>
|
|
<p> </p>
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="color: #000080;"><a href="/recommendedreading/169-chapter-26-7jwo-genesis-156.html"><span style="color: #000080;">Continue to Part 7.</span></a></span></strong></span></h2>
|
|
<div><hr /><span style="font-size: 18pt;"></span></div>
|
|
<p><span style="color: #3366ff; font-size: 18pt;"><strong>FOOTNOTES FOR PART 6</strong></span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">26. This inversion is usually done by not distinguishing Paul from Jesus, and simply labelling anything from Paul as “the Bible,” without any sense of priority for Jesus. For example: “As with any single verse or passage, we discern what it teaches by first filtering it through what we know the Bible [i.e., Paul] teaches on the subject at hand. The Bible [i.e., Paul] is clear that salvation is by grace through faith in Jesus Christ, not by works of any kind....(Ephesians 2:8-9). So, any interpretation which comes to the conclusion that any... act, is necessary for salvation, is a faulty interpretation.” http://www.gotquestions.org/baptism-Acts-2-38.html.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">27.The King James prefers a rendering that makes no sense, and renders this the “faith of God.” Fortunately, this is an isolated phenomenon. See GNB (“faithful”). In fact, those who believe Paul virtually always uses pistis to mean faith, concede in Romans 3:3 pistis must mean faithfulness. “The translation ‘faithfulness’ is dictated by the parallel terms as well as the reference to God’s pistis.” (Karl P. Donfried, “Paul and the Revisions: Did Luther Really Get It All Wrong?,” Dialogue: Journal of Theology Vol. 46, No. 1 (Spring 2007) at 31, 34 (available online).</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">28.Michael Palmer (April 1999) posted at http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/corpus-paul/19990403/000132.html (accessed 7-1-07).</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">29.N.T. Wright, <em>Paul in Fresh Perspective</em> (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2005) at 47.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">30.George Howard, “On the “Faith of Christ,” <em>Harvard Theological Review</em> Vol. 60 No. 4 (Oct. 1967) at 459, 459.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">31.One recent dissent is Karl P. Donfried, “Paul and the Revisions: Did Luther Really Get It All Wrong?,” Dialogue: Journal of Theology Vol. 46, No. 1 (Spring 2007) at 31 (available online). Donfried’s argument has numerous flaws, and no valid points. First and most important, Donfried does not deny there is a subjective genetive here — the key issue. Instead, he claims that he reads Luther as saying there is none in the quote in Footnote 32, page 461. But Luther does not say that. In fact, Luther is quoting Latin, not Greek which the scholar (Wright) is citing and whom Donfried opposes. Nor does Donfried note that Luther is confessing he is wishing the Latin read differently than it actually reads. The Latin reads exactly as Wright reads the Greek! It is a mystery how Luther came about with his translation even from the Latin! Next, Donfried quotes translations of early church ‘fathers’ who in allusions and paraphrases are translated as talking about ‘faith’ in this verse. However, these English translations of the early Greek and Latin ‘fathers’ prove nothing. The original Latin word fides in some of those texts has as much ambiguity as the Greek word pistis. One translation error does not support later error. Thus, because these ‘fathers’ were translated as talking about faith does not prove Romans 3:22 was translated as faith correctly. Finally, Donfried says Wright’s view of faithfulness as the correct translation has led to frightening theologies. He cites Bondros’ recent work as an example of where this translation must take you: “The extreme consequences of Wright’s misinterpretation of Paul can be seen in the recent volume by David Bondros, Paul on the Cross....” Id., at 35. He then explains Bondros teaches Paul did not believe Christ made atonement for sin, but Christ was merely obedient to being used as an instrument of redemption. This is the big smear by means of a fallacious non-sequitur. Yet, Donfried never actually addressed the key issue: the Greek meaning of the text.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">32.Luther unabashedly tried using the Latin version to understand the Greek, but it is incoherent because the Latin genetive is the same as the Greek. Luther wrote: “when it says the faith of Christ (fides Cristi) [the LATIN], we must understand faith in Christ (fides in Cristum).” (Luther, Works (American edition; ed. Jaroslav Pelikan and Helmut Lehmann; Philadelphia and St. Louis: Muhlenberg and Concordia, 1955ff) 25, 242 (Lectures on Romans). This makes no sense even on its face. Fides Cristi in Latin means the faith or faith-fulness of Christ. Luther apparently feels free that he can change this by a gloss of interpretation into fides in Cristum. How can you do that? Perhaps we should say that Luther is actually rewriting the verse to say what he would prefer it would have said. But neither does the Latin nor the Greek say what he wishes Romans 3:22 would say about<em> pistis</em>.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">33.Interestingly, Luther was not always consistent in wiping out the of in the translation of the same expression elsewhere. In Galatians 2:20, Luther translated it “dem Glauben des Sohnes Gottes.” That is, the “faith of the Son of God.”</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">34.Similarly, Galatians 2:20 should read that “I live in faithfulness, the faithfulness which is of the son of God.” Had Paul not used pistis...of the Son of God,” then we would not have been sure how to translate his first use of pistis which talks of his own pistis. We would not know whether he meant faithfulness or faith. Yet, by Paul equating it to the pistis of the Son of God, we know the latter usage is faithfulness. (It is absurd to speak of Jesus having a faith in Himself.) Thus, the first pis-tis is intended the same way as the second pistis, to demonstrate the similarity between the way Paul says he is living and the way Jesus lived: obediently. Incidentally, in a bizarre argument, Chambers claims Galatians 2:20 has to be read the other way around, so it is “I live in faith, the faith which is in the son of God” (i.e., an objective genetive). He claims this avoids clashing between how pistis reads for “believers” versus how it reads for Jesus. That’s totally false. It is the opposite. His reading claims that I have the same faith that was in Jesus Christ. However, that rendering clashes with common sense. Jesus does not have a faith in Himself that I then duplicate. He KNOWS who He is. He doesn’t have to have a faith (like myself) in what is not seen. (Rom. 8:24.) Also, it is a subjective genetive, meaning “of”; it does not mean “in.” Hence, it is Chamber’s argument that causes a ridiculous clash, while faithfulness makes perfect sense in both cases. For Chambers’ argument, see Steven L. Chambers, “‘Faith in Christ,’ or the ‘Faith of Christ? Pistis Cristou in Paul,” Lutheran Theological Review XII (1999-2000) at 23-24.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">35. Chambers offers up the argument for consideration that twists this fact around to favor a reading of it as "faith in Christ." This argument says Paul is entitled to have an idiosyncratic (isolated) meaning from all others who express the same thought differently. This argument says: "Paul never uses that construction; he never makes Christ (or God) the object of a preposition following pistis. Thus, pistis Cristou may well be an alternate, and uniquely Pauline, way of expressing `faith in Christ.'" (Steven L. Chambers, "`Faith in Christ,' or the `Faith of Christ? Pistis Cristou in Paul," Lutheran Theological Review XII (1999-2000) at 23 (available online).) Chambers cites (and apparently realizes it is a valid point) Williams' claim that this argument represents a fundamental logical error. Merely because "Paul does not use pistis en or eis when he seems to mean `faith in Christ' does not lead to the inverse conclusion that he does mean `faith in Christ' every time he speaks of pistis Cristou." (Chambers, supra, at 25, citing Sam K. Williams, "Again Pistis Christou", CBQ 49 (1987), 431-447, at 433-34.) Chambers appears to have a misunderstanding that Paul never says pistis en Cristou, which he does in Gal. 3:26; Eph. 1:15; Col. 1:4. What Williams is saying is that sometimes Paul appears to mean in Christ even when he only says pistis Cristou, but this does not support reading in into it every time. This is particularly true because Paul in those four cited passages does prove he knows how to say pistis en Cristou.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">36.Steven L. Chambers, “‘Faith in Christ,’ or the ‘Faith of Christ? Pistis Cristou in Paul,”<em> Lutheran Theological Review</em> XII (1999-2000) at 20, 22. (available online).</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">37.“And it shall be righteousness unto us, if we observe to do all this commandment before Jehovah our God, as he hath commanded us.” Deut. 6:25 ASV.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">38.This is extensively discussed in my prior book, Jesus’ Words Only (2007) at 274-76 and 507-08. This raises the question whether Paul really meant by pistis in translating Habakkuk 2:4 faith or faithfulness. Because the underlying Hebrew exclusively meant faithfulness (obedient living), it may be simply an English translation error which misperceives Paul as saying faith not faithfulness in Romans 1:17 and Galatians 3:11 when Paul quotes Habakkuk 2:4. Thus, it is conceivable Paul meant that justification is by faithfulness (obedience), not belief (faith) alone even in these two passages. If Paul meant faithfulness in both Romans1:17 and Galatians 3:11 is what justifies, we have all been misled by the erroneous translations of Romans 1:17 and Galatians 3:11. This would mean that it was not Paul who was mistranslating the sense of Habakkuk 2:4, but it was the English translators who were mistranslating Paul. Regardless of who is mistranslating whom, even had Paul meant we were justified by belief alone (mental assent), this does not permit us to overthrow prophetic statements from Habakkuk, Ezekiel and Moses in Deuteronomy on what causes justification. This is the point exhaustively demonstrated in Jesus’ Words Only (2007).</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">39.The twist on Romans 3:26 to ‘faith in Jesus’ also is contra-indicated by Jesus’ doctrine on justification by repentance in the Parable of the Publican and the Pharisee. See page 27 et seq. for anyone of us who has the “faithfulness (obedience) of</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">40.A. G. Herbert, “Faithfulness and ‘Faith,’” Theology 58 (1955) at 37379 and Thomas F. Torrance, “One Aspect of the Biblical Conception of Faith,” Expositary Times 68 (1957) at 111-14. Chambers claimed that their arguments were refuted by James Barr, saying Barr established that faith, not faithfulness ‘everywhere dominates in the New Testament.’ (See James Barr, The Semantics of Biblical Language (Oxford University Press, 1961; repr. London: SCM Press, 1983) 201, viz., at 161-205.) This exaggerates Barr’s claims and the validity of his proof. What Barr said instead was that Torrance was wrong to equate pistis necessarily with all the meanings that emet had in Hebrew. For the Hebrew concept of faithfulness in emet had wider implications than faithfulness in Greek. Barr means it is improper to read into a Greek definition a wider meaning that only exists in Hebrew. Thus, nothing in Barr says it is wrong to infer that Paul meant the meaning of faithfulness which is a permissible meaning in Greek when Paul quotes Habakkuk 2:4. The reason is clear: we should probably infer Paul used pistis as faithfulness because Paul should have known it meant faithfulness at minimum in the Hebrew of Habakkuk 2:4. Paul’s orientation most likely had to be to the Hebrew. (W.D. Davies, Paul and Rabbinic Judaism (1970).) Even if Paul thought only in Greek terms, nothing in the Septuagint Bible’s normal usage conveyed faith in the word pistis to Paul. As Bishop Robertson said: “the Septuagint... probably never uses pistis in our sense of ‘faith’... [s]o at least we can say that pistis by itself would not primarily suggest the idea of ‘faith’....” D. W. B. Robinson, “‘Faith of Jesus Christ’—a New Testament Debate,” The Reformed Theological Review Vol. 29, no.3 (Sept.-Dec. 1970) at 71, 81. For this reason, other scholars point out that Hebert and Torrance are still correct contextually on the meaning of pistis being faithfulness in Romans 3. See Richard B. Hays in The Conversion of the Imagination: Paul as Interpreter of Israel’s Scripture (Eerdmans: 2005). He explained: “Barr’s cogent criticisms of Torrance and A.G. Herbert do not however apply to the present exegetical observations about Romans 3. Barr’s basic objection is directed against the linguistically naive assumption that there is a distinctive (Hebraic) ‘fundamental meaning’ that governs the semantic range of... pistis in the NT without regard to context and usage.” Id., at 54. Hays, who agrees with my view of pistis as faithfulness in Romans 3, ends: “My observations here, rather than resting upon an alleged fundamental linguistic equivalence, proceed from the evidence of Paul’s usage of these words as functionally equivalent terms within this particular discourse.” Id. In scholarly circles, the reading of “faithfulness of Christ” has gained acceptance, following the seminal work in 1981 by Richard Hays entitled The Faith of Jesus Christ (2d Ed. 2001). Hays argues that Paul’s wording is not faith in Christ, but faithfulness of Christ.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">41.Steven L. Chambers, “‘Faith in Christ,’ or the ‘Faith of Christ? Pistis Cristou in Paul,” Lutheran Theological Review XII (1999-2000) at 22 (available online).</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">42.Most faith-alone advocates explicate this passage by illogical statements. Calvin for example simply makes an ad hoc statement that “No persecutions can make us worthy of the kingdom of God.” Yet, this is a direct contradiction of what Paul just said was God’s plain purpose!</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">43.This article is entitled: “The Spirit, The Necessity of Good Works and Final Judgment,” http://www.abu.nb.ca/courses/pauline/Works.htm (last accessed 11/25/2006), <span style="background-color: #ffff00;">now only available though the WayBackMachine as of 8/23/2006 at this</span><a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20060823040540/http://www.abu.nb.ca/Courses/Pauline/Works.htm"> link</a>. </span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">This Atlantic Baptist University course article cites in support G. D. Fee, The First Epistle to the Corinthians (NICNT; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1987) at 433-41; C. K. Barrett, The First Epistle to the Corinthians (2d ed.; London: Black, 1971) at 218. However, not all agree. The Atlantic Baptist article continues:</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">“According to J. Gundry Volf, Paul uses the term ‘disqualified’ (adokimos) in relation to apostleship or service, not in relation to his final salvation (Paul and Perseverance: Staying in and Falling Away (Louisville: Westminster/Knox, 1990) at 233-47). In 1 Cor 9:27a, what Paul renounces is [supposedly] his apostolic rights and Christian freedom, and this not for the sake of obtaining final salvation, but for the sake of obtaining a reward.”</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">In response, the Atlantic Baptist University piece says: “Her argument, however, is not convincing.”</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">More important to us, why would Gundry Volf try to make Paul not repeat what Jesus so clearly teaches in Mark 9:42-47? Why subtract a passage where Paul is in clear agreement with Jesus by spinning it to not be about salvation? The reason is obvious: Paul does not endorse cheap grace here, as he is often read to endorse in other passages.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">44.“But now that you have been set free from sin and have become slaves of God, the benefit you reap leads to holiness, and the result is eternal life.” (Romans 6:22 NIV.)</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">45.“The Spirit, The Necessity of Good Works and Final Judgment,” http:/ /www.abu.nb.ca/courses/pauline/Works.htm (last accessed 11/25/ 2006) <span style="background-color: #ffff00;">only accessible now through the WayBack Machine in its 8/23/2006 version at this</span> <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20060823040540/http://www.abu.nb.ca/Courses/Pauline/Works.htm">link</a>.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">46. The Greek word is <em>epimeno</em>. It also means “to stay at or with, to tarry still, still to abide, remain, to persevere.”</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">47.These verses support salvation by a mental belief without obedience, if “works” means obedience. If you are saved by pistis, not erga (Eph. 2:8-9, ‘faith’ not ‘works’) so no one can boast, it sounds like God is so concerned boasting may happen that He has debased salvation so mere belief in facts, as distinct from obedience/faithfulness, saves you. Similarly, if you pisteuo that God raised Jesus from the dead in Romans 10:9b, then this is condition b of what saves you. This 10:9b says if you believe this fact (i.e., the resurrection) is true, you are assured salvation. The salvation statement in Romans 10:9a, however, runs counter to belief alone. It adds the requirement that if you also homologeo en stoma — confess with the mouth — that Jesus is Lord, then you are saved. Confession is often admitted by Paulinists to be a work. An action. At least it is not faith alone. So there is a quandary hanging over Romans 10:9a versus10:9b. Finally, in Romans 4:4-5, if you pisteuo, but do not have erga, Paul shockingly say God justifies you while you are still “ungodly.” (This apparently says God justified a man who was unrepentant-about-sin — at least that is how most Paulinist commentators read it, as we shall see.) See also Phil. 3:8-11. There are various solutions that argue these verses teach salvation by faith and works and not by works alone. (Stulac.) Others claim erga means works of the ceremonial law cannot save. However, Paul’s negative view about the entire law makes that an unconvincing argument. See my prior book, Jesus’ Words Only (2007), chapter five. Others try to make the case Paul does not ever have a “cheap grace” gospel, relying heavily upon Romans 3:7-8. See, Lebedev, “Paul, the Law, Grace and … ‘Cheap Grace,’” Quodlibet Journal Vol. 6 No. 3, July - September 2004 (available at http://www.quodlibet.net/lebedev-grace.shtml.) Yet, if there is no means of resolution, I offered what I regard is the correct solution about the doctrinal conflict between Jesus and Paul (and Paul with Paul) in my work Jesus’ Words Only (2007). The title is succinctly the point.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">48.Vincent sees a small nuance in the fact this says pisteuo epi. It carries the idea of “mental direction with a view to resting upon.”</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">49.Please note Romans 4:5 is another instance where pistis means faith fulness. Paul speaks again about the pistis of Jesus. It again must mean faithfulness. It was Jesus’ obedience unto death to which Paul is referring by pistis here. However, it is the usage of<em> pisteuo epi</em> in the first part of Romans 4:5 that poses the difficulty.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">50.Charles Ryrie, <em>The Ryrie Study Bible</em> (Chicago: Moody Press, 1976) at 1950.</span></p>
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">51. Frederick D. Bruner,<em> A Theology of the Holy Spirit</em> (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1970) at 115, 116, 166.</span></p>
|
|
|
|
</td>
|
|
</tr>
|
|
|
|
</table>
|
|
<span class="article_separator"> </span>
|
|
|
|
</td>
|
|
</tr>
|
|
</table>
|
|
<div class="bottom_top"></div>
|
|
<div id="bottom">
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
<div id="footer"><strong>Content View Hits</strong> : 19268231<br />
|
|
<script type="text/javascript">
|
|
var pv = new Array(1,0,0,0,1);
|
|
var trdlname = "/downloads";
|
|
//<![CDATA[
|
|
var regex = /\.(?:doc|eps|jpg|png|svg|xls|ppt|pdf|xls|zip|txt|vsd|vxd|js|css|rar|exe|wma|mov|avi|wmv|mp3)($|\&|\?)/;
|
|
//]]>
|
|
var trlkname = "/external/";
|
|
var trmlname = "/mailto/";
|
|
</script>
|
|
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://jesuswordsonly.com/modules/mod_analytics/gatr.js"></script>
|
|
<script type="text/javascript">
|
|
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
|
|
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
|
|
</script>
|
|
<script type="text/javascript">
|
|
try {
|
|
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-3747914");
|
|
pageTracker._initData();
|
|
pageTracker._trackPageview();
|
|
} catch(err) {}
|
|
</script>
|
|
</div>
|
|
<div class="copyright"></div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</body>
|
|
</html> |