embed/jesuswordsonly
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Wiki Activity
main
jesuswordsonly/home/16-hebrew-matthew/250-dates-of-manuscripts-that-survive.html

627 lines
56 KiB
HTML
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en-gb" lang="en-gb" >
<head>
<base href="http://www.jesuswordsonly.com/home/16-hebrew-matthew/250-dates-of-manuscripts-that-survive.html" />
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<meta name="robots" content="index, follow" />
<meta name="keywords" content="a href=http://soundfrost.softonic.de/ youtube converter/a a href=http://soundfrost.softonic.com.br/ baixar videos do youtube/a" />
<meta name="title" content="Dates of the Oldest Mss of NT That Survive" />
<meta name="author" content="18ptTR" />
<meta name="description" content=" a href=http://soundfrost.softonic.de/ youtube converter/a
a href=http://soundfrost.softonic.com.br/ baixar videos do youtube/a" />
<meta name="generator" content="Joomla! 1.5 - Open Source Content Management" />
<title>Dates of the Oldest Mss of NT That Survive</title>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/media/system/js/mootools.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/media/system/js/caption.js"></script>
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="/images/favicon.ico" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/templates/system/css/system.css" type="text/css" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/templates/system/css/general.css" type="text/css" />
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/template_css.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/nav.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/style1.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<!--[if IE]>
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/ie.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<![endif]-->
<!--[if IE]>
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/ie.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<![endif]-->
<!--[if lte IE 6]>
<style type="text/css">
img { behavior: url(/templates/js_relevant/js/iepngfix.htc); }
</style>
<![endif]-->
</head>
<body>
<div id="main-wrapper">
<div id="header_graphic">
<div class="inside">
<div id="newsflash"> <div class="moduletable">
<table class="contentpaneopen">
<tr>
<td valign="top" ><p><span style="font-size: medium; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">“For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not, even that which he hath shall be taken away.” (Matt. 25:29 ASV.)</span></p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" >
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<h1><a href="http://www.jesuswordsonly.com/" title="Relevant">Relevant</a></h1>
<h2>A Joomla! Template for the Rest of Us</h2>
</div>
</div>
<div class="menubar">
<div id="navmenu">
<script type="text/javascript" src="/templates/js_relevant/js/barmenu.js"></script>
<ul class="menu"><li id="current" class="active"><a href="http://www.jesuswordsonly.com/"><span>Home</span></a></li><li class="haschild"><a href="/books.html" class="haschild"><span>Books</span></a><ul><li><a href="/books/jesuswordsonly.html"><span>Jesus' Words Only</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/jesuswordssalvation.html"><span>Jesus' Words on Salvation</span></a></li><li class="haschild"><a href="/books/didcalvinmurderservetus.html" class="child"><span>Did Calvin Murder Servetus?</span></a><ul><li><a href="/books/didcalvinmurderservetus/background-material-did-calvin-murder-servetus.html"><span>Background Material</span></a></li></ul></li><li><a href="/books/hownottosudythebible.html"><span>How Not to Study the Bible</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/flawsofyoungearthscience.html"><span>Flaws of Young Earth Science</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/jesusorpaul.html"><span>Jesus or Paul</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/unintended-disservice.html"><span>Unintended Disservice</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/original-gospel-of-matthew.html"><span>Original Gospel of Matthew</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/commands-of-jesus.html"><span>Commands of Jesus</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/gospel-of-john.html"><span>Gospel of John</span></a></li></ul></li><li><a href="/recommendedreading.html"><span>Further Reading</span></a></li><li><a href="/media.html"><span>Media</span></a></li><li class="haschild"><a href="/reviews.html" class="haschild"><span>Reviews</span></a><ul><li><a href="/reviews/jwo-reviews.html"><span>Jesus Words Only</span></a></li><li><a href="/reviews/jwos-reviews.html"><span>Jesus Words on Salvation</span></a></li></ul></li><li><a href="/contactus.html"><span>Contact Us</span></a></li><li><a href="http://www.jesuswordsonly.com/topicindex/753-bookstore.html"><span>Bookstore</span></a></li><li><a href="/topicindex.html"><span>Topic Index</span></a></li><li><a href="/aboutauthor.html"><span>About Author</span></a></li><li><a href="/newsletters.html"><span>Newsletters</span></a></li></ul>
</div>
</div>
<div id="mainbody">
<div id="showcasetop">&nbsp;</div>
<table width="940" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="center">
<tr>
<td id="leftcol" valign="top" width="200">
<div class="inside">
<div class="moduleS1">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<h3>Search</h3>
<form action="index.php" method="post">
<div class="searchS1">
<input name="searchword" id="mod_search_searchword" maxlength="20" alt="Search" class="inputboxS1" type="text" size="20" value="search..." onblur="if(this.value=='') this.value='search...';" onfocus="if(this.value=='search...') this.value='';" /> </div>
<input type="hidden" name="task" value="search" />
<input type="hidden" name="option" value="com_search" />
<input type="hidden" name="Itemid" value="1" />
</form> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="moduleS1">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<h3>Questions?</h3>
Please enter your questions, and we will get back to you as soon as possible. As an anti-spam measure, we ask that you re-type the code you see in the box below, prior to clicking "Send Message"<br /><br />
<form name="s5_quick_contact" method="post" action="">
<input class="inputbox" id="namebox" onclick="s5_qc_clearname()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearname()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Name..." name="name"></input><br />
<input class="inputbox" id="emailbox" onclick="s5_qc_clearemail()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearemail()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Email..." name="email"></input><br />
<input class="inputbox" id="subjectbox" onclick="s5_qc_clearsubject()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearsubject()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Subject..." name="subject"></input><br />
<textarea id="messagebox" rows="" cols="" class="inputbox textarea" onclick="s5_qc_clearbody()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearbody()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; overflow:auto;width:80%; height:55px" name="message">Your Message...</textarea><br />
<input class="inputbox" id="spambox" onclick="s5_qc_clearspam()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearspam()" style="font-weight:bold; font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Enter The Code 335" name="verif_box"></input><br />
<input id="email_address" type="hidden" value="" name="email_address"></input>
<input class="button" type="button" onclick="s5_qc_submit()" value="Send Message" ></input>
</form>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
// <![CDATA[
var s5_qc_spam_text = document.getElementById("spambox").value;
function s5_qc_clearbody() {
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value == "Your Message...") {
document.getElementById("messagebox").value="";
}
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
}
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
}
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
}
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
}
}
function s5_qc_clearname() {
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value == "Name...") {
document.getElementById("namebox").value="";
}
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
}
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
}
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
}
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
}
}
function s5_qc_clearemail() {
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value == "Email...") {
document.getElementById("emailbox").value="";
}
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
}
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
}
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
}
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
}
}
function s5_qc_clearsubject() {
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value == "Subject...") {
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value="";
}
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
}
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
}
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
}
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
}
}
function s5_qc_clearspam() {
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value == s5_qc_spam_text) {
document.getElementById("spambox").value="";
}
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
}
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
}
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
}
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
}
}
function s5_qc_isValidEmail(str_email) {
if (str_email.indexOf(".") > 2 && str_email.indexOf("@") > 0) {
alert('Your email is now being submitted - Thank you!');
document.s5_quick_contact.submit();
}
else {
alert('Your email address is not valid, please check again - Thank you!');
}
}
function s5_qc_submit() {
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value == s5_qc_spam_text || document.getElementById("subjectbox").value == "Subject..." || document.getElementById("namebox").value == "Name..." || document.getElementById("emailbox").value == "Email..." || document.getElementById("messagebox").value == "Your Message...") {
alert('All fields are required, please complete the form - Thank you!');
return false;
}
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value != "335") {
alert('Your spam verification answer is incorrect.');
return false;
}
var s5_message_holder = document.getElementById("messagebox").value;
var s5_first_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(0);
var s5_second_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(1);
var s5_third_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(2);
var s5_fourth_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(3);
if (s5_first_message_char == "<") {
return false;
}
if (s5_first_message_char == "w" && s5_second_message_char == "w" && s5_third_message_char == "w") {
return false;
}
if (s5_first_message_char == "h" && s5_second_message_char == "t" && s5_third_message_char == "t") {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
else {
document.getElementById("email_address").value = "info@jesuswordsonly.com";
var email_str = document.getElementById("emailbox").value;
s5_qc_isValidEmail(email_str);
}
}
// ]]>
</script>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="moduleS1">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<h3>Recommendations</h3>
<p><a href="/home/14-audio/401-music-store-manager.html">Only Jesus</a> (great song by Big Daddy)</p>
<p><a href="http://astore.amazon.com/jwoogm-20?node=1&amp;page=2">What Did Jesus Say?</a> (2012) - 7 topics&nbsp;</p>
<p>None above affiliated with me</p> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td id="maincol" valign="top">
<div id="breadcrumbs">
<span class="breadcrumbs pathway">
Home</span>
</div>
<table class="contentpaneopen">
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<h1>What Are The Dates Of The Oldest Mss of NT That Survive?</h1>
<h3><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>Overview of Manuscripts from the 1st Century [33 AD to 99 AD]</strong></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">According to German Biblical scholar, Carsten Thiede, P64 and P67 are fragments of parts of Matthew chapters 3, 5 and 26, and they are from the first century.&nbsp;See&nbsp;<a href="http://www.usefulcharts.com/religion/oldest-new-testament-manuscripts.html" style="color: #517291; text-decoration: underline;">chart</a>&nbsp;at&nbsp;<em>Oldest New Testament Manuscripts.&nbsp;</em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Portions of chapter 26 also appear on the so-called Magdalen College Papyrus which was found stored in 1996 at Oxford College.&nbsp;<span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">(Carsten Peter Thiede &amp; Matthew D'Ancona,&nbsp;</span><em style="color: #494a44; font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: large; line-height: 21px;">The Jesus Papyrus</em><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">&nbsp;(Doubleday: 1996) at 1.)</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Carsten Thiede is Director of the Institute for Basic Epistomological Research in Paderborn, Germany.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">In his book done in collaboration with Matthew D'Ancona --&nbsp;<em>The Jesus Papyrus</em> -- Thiede defends that this Magdalen College Papyrus -- dates "from the mid-first century A.D." (<em>Jesus Papyrus</em>,&nbsp;<em>supra</em>, at 1-2.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Also, beginning in 1972, Jesuit O'Callaghan contended there is a Dead Sea Scroll fragment that belongs to Mark. Since 1972, a few very reputable and diverse scholars have come to support this opinion, e.g., Kurt Schubert,Carsten Thiede and papyrologist Orsolina Montevecchi. (<em>Jesus Papyrus</em>, at 31-32).&nbsp;See also&nbsp;<a href="http://www.usefulcharts.com/religion/oldest-new-testament-manuscripts.html" style="color: #517291; text-decoration: underline;">chart</a>&nbsp;at&nbsp;</span><em><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Oldest New Testament Manuscripts.</span>&nbsp;</em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">What may support this is that Cave 7 of the Dead Sea Scroll uniquely contains Greek texts with the exception of six Greek texts in Cave 4. (Carsten Peter Thiede &amp; Matthew D'Ancona,&nbsp;<em>The Jesus Papyrus</em>&nbsp;(Doubleday: 1996) at 30). This area was overrun by a Roman legion in 68 AD, which creates an outer barrier on the age of the materials therein.&nbsp;<em>Id.&nbsp;</em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">A Jewish scholar on the Dead Sea Scrolls - S. Talmon - agreed that the texts in Cave 7 are Christian documents.&nbsp;<em>Id.</em>, at page 32.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>Overview of Manuscripts from 2d Century [100-199 AD]</strong></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The New Testament fragments which survive from this period totally exclude Mark.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">However, as noted above, one scholar, Jesus O'Callaghan contends there is a Dead Sea Scroll fragment that belongs to Mark. Since 1972, few have come to support this opinion, e.g., Kurt Schubert and Carsten Thiede. (<em>Jesus Papyrus</em>, at 31-32).&nbsp;See also&nbsp;<a href="http://www.usefulcharts.com/religion/oldest-new-testament-manuscripts.html">chart</a> at&nbsp;<em>Oldest New Testament Manuscripts.&nbsp;</em>What may support this is that Cave 7 of the Dead Sea Scroll uniquely contains Greek texts with the exception of six Greek texts in Cave 4. (Carsten Peter Thiede &amp; Matthew D'Ancona, <em>The Jesus Papyrus</em> (Doubleday: 1996) at 30). This area was overrun by a Roman legion in 68 AD, which creates an outer barrier on the age of the materials therein.&nbsp;<em>Id.&nbsp;</em>And a Jewish scholar on the Dead Sea Scrolls - S. Talmon - agreed that the texts in Cave 7 are Christian documents.&nbsp;<em>Id.</em>, at page 32.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The manuscripts in this period contain primarily three small framents -- one from Matthew (21:34-37, 43, 45) - P104 -- Oxyrynchus -- two from John's Gospel (18:31-33,38 &amp; 18:36-19:7) and one from Revelation (1:13-2:1) in P98 IFAO. See <a href="http://www.usefulcharts.com/religion/oldest-new-testament-manuscripts.html">chart</a> at&nbsp;<em>Oldest New Testament Manuscripts.</em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Other than this, the tiniest part of Acts and nothing from 1 or 2 Peter. The numbered papyrus fragments are:</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">P46, from the late second century, contains the Pauline epistles, including Hebrews (after Romans!), but not 1 or 2 Timothy or Titus. Interestingly, Romans 16:25-27 appears at the end of chapter 15!</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">P4 contains parts of Luke 1-6.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">P32 contains part of Titus 1-2.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">P90 is a fragment of John's Gospel containing parts of John 18:36-19:7.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">P64 contains parts of Matthew 26:7-8 and 26:31, and fragments of verses 14-15, verse 10, verse 32-33 and 22-23.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">P67 contains parts of Matthew 3:9, 3:15, 5:20-22, 5:25-28. (See also this <a href="http://www.bible.ca/ef/topical-the-earliest-new-testament-manuscripts.htm">link</a> to the same effect.)</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">P52 is from AD125. It is very, very tiny and contains parts of John 18:31-4 and John 18:37-8, but with a slightly different wording as compared to later manuscripts. It does not have two complete consecutive words written on it.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">P98 contains parts of Acts 1:13-20 &nbsp;(Source: <a href="http://essenes.net/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=149&amp;Itemid=563">New Testament Alterations</a>.)(This source inaccurately ignores the Revelation fragment mentioned in&nbsp;<em>Oldest New Testament Manuscript.</em>)</span></li>
</ul>
<h3><strong>Mark</strong></h3>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"Mark's gospel appears for the first time in the oldest extant manuscripts containing all four canonical gospels (p<sup>45</sup>) &nbsp;which was written in the middle of the 3d century. No other manuscript evidence for Mark exists before the 4th century, where Mark is included in the oldest uncial manuscript of the entire Greek Bible." (Helmut Koester, <em>The Ancient Christian Gospels</em> (1990) at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=DGK4sIPk4PYC&amp;lpg=PP1&amp;dq=Helmut%20Koester%20Ancient%20Christian%20Gospels&amp;pg=PA51#v=onepage&amp;q=proclamation&amp;f=false">273</a>.)</span></p>
<h3 style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; line-height: 28.18181800842285px; font-weight: normal; font-size: 20px; color: #76756a; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Geneva, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong>Matthew</strong></h3>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"In contrast to the gospel of Mark, the gospel of Matthew is quite well attested in the earliest tradition of the Christian communities. There are two early papyri written about 200 CE, containing at least the fragmentary text of the gospel of Matthew. Six more papyri were written in the third century. Rich attestation comes from the fourth century: six papyri, five uncial manuscripts, and of course, the two oldest manuscripts which present the entire text of the Bible." (Koester, <em>The Ancient Christian Gospels</em> (1990) at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=DGK4sIPk4PYC&amp;lpg=PP1&amp;dq=Helmut%20Koester%20Ancient%20Christian%20Gospels&amp;pg=PA314#v=onepage&amp;q=proclamation&amp;f=false">314</a>.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">These papyri were republished in Volumes 64-66 of the Oxyrynchus papyri project.&nbsp;They were recovered by Bernard P. Grenfell and Arthur S. Hunt in a series of expeditions from 1896/97 and 1903 through to 1907. (See this <a href="http://www.tyndale.cam.ac.uk/Tyndale/staff/Head/NTOxyPap.htm">link</a> from Tyndale House.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The oldest of Matthew are three: P.Oxy 4405, which represents a new portion of P77, containing Matthew 23:30-34, 35-39, dating as early as the 2d or 3d century); P.Oxy 4403, containing Matthew 13:55-56, 14:3-5, again from the 2d or 3d century; P.Oxy 4404, containing Matthew 21:34-37, 43 &amp; 45, from the late second century. (See L.W. Hurtado, University of Edinburgh, "The New Testament in the Second Century," at this <a href="http://larryhurtado.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/nt-in-second-century-essay2.pdf">link</a> in PDF, at page 3.)     For more on these papyri, see&nbsp;<a href="http://www.papyrology.ox.ac.uk/POxy/">http://www.papyrology.ox.ac.uk/POxy/</a> For a comprehensive list of the papyri from that site of portions of all NT books, see this <a href="http://www.bibletranslation.ws/manu.html">link</a>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">These Matthew papyri have variants found in later sources which differ from our Greek text tradition. Then there are also unique variants found in these fragments which are "only attested" in these versions." <em>Id.</em> If valid, then rather than confirming the Greek text, these recently discovered texts "may very well reflect very early readings that simply happen not to have survived in the extant Greek witnesses." (Hurtado, <em>id.</em>, at 4.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">After these papyri are two "Uncials" -- texts that comprise ONE entire New Testament -- the first is the Sinaiticus which was only found in the late 1800s, but is dated to about 340-380 AD. The next UNCIAL is the Alexandrian text from the 5th century, but it is missing the entirety of Matthew 1:1 to chapter 25:6, and thus leaves us no earlier complete Matthew than the Sinaiticus. See "Uncial Manuscripts" at this <a href="http://www.skypoint.com/members/waltzmn/ManuscriptsUncials.html">webpage</a>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">This then allows us to make a conclusion that other than these papyri fragments all Greek texts earlier than 340-380 AD have been lost. And one of the reasons is evident by looking at Matthew 28:19. All scholars and even some Catholic ones admit there was a forgery to add the trinity formula for baptism into the text. But because no post 340-380 AD Greek text omits it -- while it is omitted in the ancient Syriac and old African Latin and the Hebrew Shem-Tob Matthew which rely upon sources predating 340 AD, there must have been an effort to eradicate the earlier Greek texts of Matthew that conflicted with orthodoxy that was willing to alter Matthew 28:19 to sustain late doctrines. This is alluded to by Conybear:</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"In the case just examined (Matthew 28:19), it is to be noticed that not a single manuscript or ancient version [in Greek] has preserved to us the true reading. But that is not surprising for as Dr. C. R. Gregory, one of the greatest of our textual critics, reminds us, 'the Greek MSS of the text of the New Testament were often altered by scribes, who put into them the readings which were familiar to them,' and which they held to be the right readings." (Conybear, <em>Canon and Text of the New Testament</em> (1907) at 424.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">In other words, Conybear is saying that since scribes were freely altering texts to insert doctrines that were developing, the fact no conflicting text survived in Greek regarding Matthew 28:19 bespeaks that scribes did not want those texts to survive to challenge their work. The problem for those scribes is (a) we now have recovered fragments of earlier versions of passages other than Matthew 28:19 that show their corrupting efforts; and (b) the early church 'fathers' such as Origen, Justin, Tertullian etc., recorded in the 100s and 200s the early versions of Matthew and thus we can see that way the corrupting hand of scribes operated. Hence, this makes it necessary for Christians to exhort scholars to reconstruct faithfullly the original form of Matthew and the other gospels, to remove the hand of scribes who thought to 'help' in this improper manner.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">For a site dedicated just to the issue of Matthew 28:19, see this<a href="http://jesus-messiah.com/apologetics/catholic/matthew2819.html#What Happened To The Earliest MSS"> link</a>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">A very detailed mss by mss catalogue, and the dates relating to Matthew you will find at this link -&nbsp;<a href="http://www.biblequery.org/mtMss.htm">http://www.biblequery.org/mtMss.htm</a><a href="http://www.biblequery.org/mtMss.htm"></a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">As to the dating of the underlying writing of Matthew, it is clearly prior to 70 AD. For the epistle 1 Clement is certainly pre-70 AD, as it speaks of the sacrifices are still ongoing at the temple. Yet, 1 Clement quotes Matthew:</span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Remember the words of the Lord Jesus, for he said: "Woe to that man; it were better for him he had not been born that he should cause one of my elect to stumble...." See&nbsp;<em style="color: #494a44; font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: large; line-height: 20px;">The Apostolic Fathers</em>&nbsp;(ed. Jack N. Sparks) (Thomas Nelson, 1978) at section 46.)</span></p>
<h3 style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; line-height: 28.18181800842285px; font-weight: normal; font-size: 20px; color: #76756a; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Geneva, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong>Luke</strong></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">This is a gospel that the writer Ignatius of the 100s never once quoted. Nicholson:<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=QVAVAAAAYAAJ&amp;dq=some%20things%20out%20of%20the%20Gospel%20according%20to%20the%20Hebrews%20and%20the%20Syriac&amp;pg=PA72#v=onepage&amp;q=some%20things%20out%20of%20the%20Gospel%20according%20to%20the%20Hebrews%20and%20the%20Syriac&amp;f=false"> 72</a>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Some suggest it was a fairly late creation. I think not. What we do know is that Luke has several mutilations, sad to say.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Tertullian at 200 AD quotes from Luke a passage similarly found at Matthew 5:17, which reads: "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill." This verse <em>in Tertullian's scriptures preceded what remains in our Bibles at Luke 16:17</em>, which reads: "And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fail". Now the verse comparable to 5:17 in Matthew is gone from Luke 16 which Tertullian quoted in the 200s from Luke.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Tertullian also quotes the verse at Matthew 15:24, which reads: "But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel", as <strong><em>also contained in his copy of Luke</em></strong>. But now it is gone from Luke.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The Gospel of Luke also has evidence of moving around verses.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">When the Gospel of Luke was originally written, Luke 9:47-48 was connected with what is now Luke 17:1-2. The reason stems from something Origen wrote ca. 200 AD.</span></p>
<div>
<div><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">In Origen's <em>Commentary on Matthew</em>, he compares the narratives pertaining to the little ones in Matthew with their corresponding verses in Mark and Luke, Origen writes: "Next we must test accurately the meaning of the word 'necessity' in the passage, 'For there is a necessity that the occasions come,' and to the like effect in Luke, 'It is `inadmissible' but that occasions of stumbling should come,' instead of 'impossible&rsquo;"</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">In comparing the verses, Origen clearly speaks of the parallel between Matthew, Mark and Luke, and those in Luke 9:47-48 as being connected with those at Luke 17:1-2. Evidently either Luke 17:1-2 or Luke 9:47-48 was moved to different sections.</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"></span></div>
</div>
<h3><span style="color: #0000ff;">Causes</span></h3>
<p style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 10px;"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0); font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">To some significant degree, most of the early manuscripts were destroyed by Rome when it was an avowed enemy of Christianity.</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 10px 30px;"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0); font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"Diocletian in 303AD ordered all the sacred books to be burnt, ...but enough survived to transmit the text (Swete in Variorum "Aids")."</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 10px 30px;"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0); font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"<em><strong>One of the reasons why no early MSS. have been discovered &nbsp;is that they were, when found, burned by the persecutors of the Christians</strong></em>: &nbsp;Eusebius writes: "I saw with mine own eyes the houses of prayer thrown down and razzed to their foundations, and the inspired and sacred Scriptures consigned to the fire in the open market place (<em>Hist.Eccl</em>. viii 2.)."</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 10px 30px;"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0); font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"Among such senses he could not fail to learn what books men held to be more precious than their lives." (Dr. Westcott: &nbsp;<em>General Survey of the History of the Canon of the N.T</em>., at 383).</span></p>
<h3><span style="color: #0000ff;">To Conceal Prior Changes</span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Another possibility is that in the 300s, the Roman empire wanted to obliterate rival versions to the official Greek and Latin versions so as to give a single more current text exclusive authority. The efforts at pious alterations prior to the 300s are well-established by Christian scholars who were devout and not skeptics.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">For example, Dr. F. H. Scrivener writes that: </span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"In the second century we have seen<em><strong> too many instances of attempts to tamper with the text of Scripture</strong></em>, some merely injudicious, others positively dishonest." Scrivener states that "it is no less true to fact than paradoxical in sound, that the worst corruptions to which the New Testament has ever been subjected, originated within 100 years after it was composed: and that Irenaeus and the African Fathers, and the whole Western, with a portion of the Syrian Church" used inferior manuscripts (F.H.Scrivener, <em>Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament</em>).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Dean Burgon quotes Gaius (AD175-200) who speaks of the source of corruptions that survive in the early papyri: </span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"The Divine Scriptures these heretics have audaciously corrupted. Laying violent hands upon them, <em><strong>under pretense of correcting them</strong></em>." (Burgon, <em>The Revision Revised</em>, p. 323).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Eusebius (Eccleastical History), citing the second century Church commentator Clement of Alexandria: </span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"The worst corruptions to which the New Testament has ever been subjected originated within one hundred years after it was composed."</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">In the words of Colwell (<em>What is the Best New Testament Text?</em>, p.119) &nbsp;</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"The first two centuries witnessed the creations of the large number of variations known to scholars today. &nbsp;In the manuscripts of the New Testament most variations, I believe, <em><strong>were made deliberately</strong></em>."</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">G.D. Kilpatrick (<em>Atticism and the Text of the Greek New Testament</em>, at 125-131) states: &nbsp;</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"Deliberate changes in all text types appear to antedate A.D. 200...as distinct from errors... all categories of deliberate alteration... &nbsp;are present in both groups. Tatian is the last author to make deliberate changes. The vast majority of deliberate changes were older then A.D. 200. &nbsp;They came into being in the period A.D. 50-200."</span></p>
<h3><span style="color: #0000ff;">To Conceal The Jewish Orientation of Early Christianity</span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Another possibility is that Rome did everything it could to erase the historical truth that Christianity is Jewish at its core. Hence, erasing any and every memory of that period was necessary. So passages that emphasize this had to be removed, written without them, and leave us with a Jesus more palatable to Gentiles and pagans.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">There are systematic examples of this.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">First, Jerome translated into Greek and Latin in the late 300s the <em>Gospel According to the Hebrews</em>. It was a Hebrew / Hebrew letters text kept at the library of Caesarea and its custodians claimed Matthew wrote it. Jerome believed this, and had great faith that its variants were the valid original.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">But now both translations by Jerome are gone although 49 quotations from this gospel exists among the early patristic writers -- from Origen, Hegesippus, Epiphanius, Eusebius and Jerome. Why is it gone? No one dares say the obvious: it offended the post-Constantine church which sought to savage all Jewish influence in Christianity. Passover was changed to Easter, for example, -- the day of the goddess Eostre -- by Constantine's direct goal to divorce Christianity from Judaism. See our link to the discussion of the "<a href="/home/1-jwo/75-easter-error.html">Easter Error</a>." Nicholson similalry notes:</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Similarly, the extensive biography of James the Just done by Hegesippus is entirely gone, along with most of Hegesippus' writings which extensively quoted the <em>Gospel According to the Hebrews</em>. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Nicholson mentions some of this in passing while discussing other points:</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Now we know that&nbsp;<em>Hegesippus </em>wrote largely about James the Just, and his Memoirs were still in existence at least as late as the 6th cent. It is the more probable that his account of James&nbsp;<em>did </em>include this story because we have already seen that<strong><em> he used the&nbsp;Gospel according to the </em></strong><strong><em>Hebrews</em></strong>. (Edward Nicholson, <em>The Gospel According to the Hebrews</em> (1879) at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=QVAVAAAAYAAJ&amp;dq=some%20things%20out%20of%20the%20Gospel%20according%20to%20the%20Hebrews%20and%20the%20Syriac&amp;pg=PA65#v=onepage&amp;q=some%20things%20out%20of%20the%20Gospel%20according%20to%20the%20Hebrews%20and%20the%20Syriac&amp;f=false">65</a>.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Accordingly, it appears there were systematic efforts to conceal the original <em>Gospel According to the Hebrews</em>&nbsp;written by Apostle Matthew after most patristic fathers showed it great respect and deference through the 390s.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">And one of the ways to prevent its influence was to destroy every copy of earlier mss. of Matthew, Luke, etc., that had passages reminiscent of that earlier gospel. This is sad to say, but it makes it no less true.</span></p>
<h1>Study Notes</h1>
<h3>Earliest MSS of Latin Vulgate</h3>
<p><span style="font-size: large; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The oldest surviving manuscript of the Latin Vulgate translation of the New Testament is known as Codex Fuldensis. It was commissioned by Victor, the bishop of Capua in Italy in 546 A.D. Incidentally, it includes the apocryphal Epistle to the Laodiceans as a part of the New Testament.&nbsp;&ldquo;The Old Testament Apocrypha,&rdquo; World Internet Bible College at <a href="http://internetbiblecollege.net/Lessons/The%20Old%20Testament%20Apocrypha.htm">http://internetbiblecollege.net/Lessons/The%20Old%20Testament%20Apocrypha.htm</a> (accessed 5/28/2011).</span></p>
<h2><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Manuscripts from 200-299 AD</strong></span></h2>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>These manuscripts are more complete than the earlier ones, and some may date from the end of the previous century. Three are of particular note:</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>P66, from about AD 200, contains these portions of John's Gospel:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>John 1:1-6:11</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>John 6:35 - 14:6 and 14:26 and 14:29-30</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>John 15:2-26</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>John 16:2-4 and 16:6-7 and 16:10-20</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>John 20:22-23 and 20:25 - 21:9</strong></span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>One scholar, in 'The Unauthorized Version', says of these P66 fragments:</strong></span></p>
<blockquote style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>"We have two early papyri which overlap across seventy verses of John's Gospel, and even if the plain errors of their copyists are excluded, they differ at no less than seventy small places.".</strong></span></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>P72contains Jude and 1 and 2 Peter and sundry non canonical works, such as The Nativity of Mary, the eleventh Ode of Solomon, Melito's Homily on the Passover, the Apology of Phileas etc.</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>In 2 Peter 1:2, other manuscripts read "May grace and peace be multiplied to you in the knowledge of God and of our Lord Jesus." p72 deletes the "and' to read "God, our Lord Jesus". P72 also differs from the present Jude 5 to say that the savior of the people from Egypt was "the God Christ". p72 also differs from 1 Peter 5:1 to state that Peter was a witness to the "sufferings of God", and not the "sufferings of Christ", as all later manuscripts read.</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>P75,&nbsp;usually dated at 175 AD - 225 AD contains the following from John's and Luke's Gospels:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Luke 3:18-22</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Luke 3:33-4:2</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Luke 4:34 - 5:10</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Luke 5:37 - 6:4</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Luke 6:10 - 7:32 and 7:35-39 and 7:41-43</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Luke 7:46 - 9:2</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Luke 9:4 - 17:15</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Luke 17:19 - 18:18 and Luke 22:4 - 24:53</strong></span></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>John 1:1 - 11:45 and 11:48-57</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>John 12:3 - 13:1 and 13:8-9</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>John 14:8-30 and 15:7-8 &nbsp;(Source: <a href="http://essenes.net/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=149&amp;Itemid=563">New Testament Alterations</a>)</strong></span></li>
</ul>
<h2>Roman Rulers Erase Earlier Texts</h2>
<p>[from <a href="http://essenes.net/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=149&amp;Itemid=563">New Testament Alterations]</a></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>The early fourth century was a time when the Roman branch of Christianity gained almost total dominance over other rival branches, including the true remnants of original Nasarene "Christianity". They immediately began legislation and persecution against these rival philosophies and their manuscripts. In an attempt to bring these groups and manuscripts in line with the new orthodox position, Pope Damasus I, the year 382, had Jerome begin revision &amp; unification of Latin Bibles. In 384 Jerome presented Pope Damascus I with new Latin Gospels which become the Vulgate Latin Text recognized as the standard Western Christian Bible. Once in possession of this new "orthodox" bible, the orthodox church systematically eradicated all divergent texts and those who used them, creating the scarcity of first, second and third century source material which now plagues modern Essene scholarship.</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Prof. Eberhard Nestle, an expert in original evangelical texts, comments on this situation in his Einf~hrung in die Textkritik des griechischen Testaments:</strong></span></p>
<blockquote style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>"Learned men, so called Correctors were, following the church meeting at Nicea 325 AD, selected by the church authorities to scrutinize the sacred texts and rewrite them in order to correct their meaning in accordance with the views which the church had just sanctioned."</strong></span></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>The Danish professor of religious history, Detlef Nielsen, says further:</strong></span></p>
<blockquote style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>"We have to handle many, partly contradictory texts which were written in the time period of 50 - 150 AD. In the New Testament were no less than four evangelical texts included. One tried to bring about some kind of unity which was presented as an unadulterated, true narrative of the life and teachings of Jesus, complementing each other, and which together -- though apparently unsimilar -- formed the only true evangelical text. In order to bring the various passages in harmony of each other, they were subjected to a thorough revision. As a first measure one rewrote the evangelical handwritten manuscripts, disregarding parts which did not conform, and wrote comments to make them compatible with each other. One then took to the clerical art of interpretation in order to explain the contents in such a way that</strong> </span><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>a unified evangelical text could be created."</strong></span></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>One of the oldest evangelical texts is Mark.... Papias is communicating this in his epistle to the presbyter, Johannes, admitting it is not a perfect work because not everything was well-explained to Mark:</strong></span></p>
<blockquote style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>"Mark...recorded with great energy, if not with great accuracy, everything that he could remember had been told about Jesus. He himself had never seen the Master. He was just the interpreter of Peter, and could only retell what he had heard at various instances; not always had he got everything well explained to him and commented. One should therefore not reproach Mark ..."</strong></span></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Edgar Hennecke says:</strong></span></p>
<blockquote style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>"It is known that the wording of the Greek texts, which we use as a base, originate from the 5th century"</strong></span></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Alphred Resch says:</strong></span></p>
<blockquote style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>"Probably many of these manuscripts were kept in old monasteries in the 4th century, like Codex Cantabrigeniensis D. and Codex Syrus Sinaiticus which both marvelously survived. At the time, 382 AD during the pope Damasos, the canonical texts were adopted and in this connection all old documents were destroyed."</strong></span></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Many fragments and smaller manuscripts exist from these centuries. The five main western manuscripts of this period are:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Codex Vaticanus about AD 350. This has lost the New Testament from Hebrews 9 onwards. (Includes 1-4Maccabees - Psalms of Solomon - Ps151 + 27NT), and is missing Gn1-46:28, Ps105:27-137:6, 1Tm-Phm, Heb9:14-end)</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Codex Sinaiticus about AD 350. This manuscript, the most complete, lay hidden in a monastery until the end of the last century. It includes the Shepherd of Hermas and the Epistle of Barnabas. Nine correctors worked on it until the 12th century. It also includes works from the Old Testament which are rejected by Christians today, such as 4 Maccabees. (Has 2-3Maccabees - Psalms of Solomon - Ps151 + 27NT + Barnabas + Hermas), is missing Hermas 31.7-end)</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Codex Alexandrinus about AD 400. This also includes 1 Clement and contained 2 Clement and the Psalms of Solomon. It has lost Matthew 1-24 , John 7-8. (Includes 1-2Maccabees + 14_Church_Odes + 27NT + 1-2Clement), missing 1K12:17-14:9, Ps49:20-79:11, Psalms of Solomon, Mt1-25:6, Jn6:50-8:52, 2Cr4:13-12:6, 1Clement57.7-63.4, 2Clement12.5b-end)</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Codex Bezae about AD 420. This contains (in this order) Matthew, John, Luke, Mark, 3 John and Acts.</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Codex Washingtonensis (5th century). This contains (in this order) Matthew, John, Luke, Mark.</strong></span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Around 400 the Peshitta Bible become the standard Syrian Christian Bible. This is the Syriac (Aramaic) Vulgate, Syr(p), (OT + 22 NT, excludes: 2Pt, 2-3Jn, Jude, Rev.). This text may be of more interest to many modern Essenes due to its Aramaic language and preservation of idioms.</strong></span></p>
<center>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>About this time, around 400, some think the pericope of the Adulteress, John 7:53-8:11, was probably added to John. However, there is reason to believe it was in the Hebrew Matthew, and was merely copied into John late so as to preserve it. From this same time period we also have the Codex Bobiensi which has "shorter", and perhaps the original, ending of Mark which does not contain the Resurrection story of Mark 16:9-20. (Jerome, circa 400, cites the "expanded" ending of Mark found after Mk16:14).</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</center>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<span class="article_separator">&nbsp;</span>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<div class="bottom_top"></div>
<div id="bottom">
</div>
</div>
<div id="footer"><strong>Content View Hits</strong> : 13436366<br />
<script type="text/javascript">
var pv = new Array(1,0,0,0,1);
var trdlname = "/downloads";
//<![CDATA[
var regex = /\.(?:doc|eps|jpg|png|svg|xls|ppt|pdf|xls|zip|txt|vsd|vxd|js|css|rar|exe|wma|mov|avi|wmv|mp3)($|\&|\?)/;
//]]>
var trlkname = "/external/";
var trmlname = "/mailto/";
</script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.jesuswordsonly.com/modules/mod_analytics/gatr.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-3747914");
pageTracker._initData();
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}
</script>
</div>
<div class="copyright"></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink