jesuswordsonly/JWO/macarius-magnes-on-paul-from-circa-300-ad.html

621 lines
68 KiB
HTML
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en-gb" lang="en-gb" >
<head>
<base href="http://www.jesuswordsonly.com/JWO/macarius-magnes-on-paul-from-circa-300-ad.html" />
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<meta name="robots" content="index, follow" />
<meta name="keywords" content="Jesus Words, Jesus Words Only, Jesus Words on Salvation, Did Calvin Murder Servetus, Flaws of Young Earth Science, Ingenious Design, Apostle Paul" />
<meta name="author" content="coilone" />
<meta name="description" content="Jesus Words Only focuses on the words of Jesus as the sole inspired portion of the New Testament Scripture" />
<title>Macarius Magnes on Paul from circa 300 AD | JWO</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/plugins/system/jceutilities/css/jceutilities-217.css" type="text/css" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/plugins/system/jceutilities/themes/standard/css/style.css" type="text/css" />
<script type="text/javascript" src="/plugins/system/jceutilities/js/mediaobject.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/plugins/system/jceutilities/js/jquery-126.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/plugins/system/jceutilities/js/jceutilities-217.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/media/system/js/mootools.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/media/system/js/caption.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
MediaObject.init({'flash':"9,0,124,0",'windowmedia':"5,1,52,701",'quicktime':"6,0,2,0",'realmedia':"7,0,0,0",'shockwave':"8,5,1,0"});jQuery(document).ready(function(){jceutilities({'popup':{'legacy':0,'resize':1,'icons':1,'overlay':1,'overlayopacity':0.8,'overlaycolor':"#000000",'fadespeed':500,'scalespeed':500,'width':640,'height':480,'hideobjects':1,'scrollpopup':1,'theme':"standard",'themecustom':"",'themepath':"plugins/system/jceutilities/themes"},'tootlip':{'classname':"tooltip",'opacity':1,'speed':150,'position':"br",'offsets':"{'x': 16, 'y': 16}"},'imgpath':"plugins/system/jceutilities/img",'pngfix':0,'wmode':0});});
</script>
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="/images/favicon.ico" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/templates/system/css/system.css" type="text/css" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/templates/system/css/general.css" type="text/css" />
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/template_css.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/nav.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/style1.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<!--[if IE]>
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/ie.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<![endif]-->
<!--[if IE]>
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/ie.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<![endif]-->
<!--[if lte IE 6]>
<style type="text/css">
img { behavior: url(/templates/js_relevant/js/iepngfix.htc); }
</style>
<![endif]-->
<meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="en" /></head>
<body>
<div id="main-wrapper">
<div id="header_graphic">
<div class="inside">
<div id="newsflash"> <div class="moduletable">
<table class="contentpaneopen">
<tr>
<td valign="top" ><p>"But [Carlstadt's] most remarkable position [in 1520]...[was] the<em><strong> word of Paul</strong></em> is not to be put on a level with Christ." Beard <em>Luther </em>(1899)</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" >
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<h2><a href="http://www.jesuswordsonly.com/" title="Relevant">Relevant</a></h2>
<h2>A Joomla! Template for the Rest of Us</h2>
</div>
</div>
<div class="menubar">
<div id="navmenu">
<script type="text/javascript" src="/templates/js_relevant/js/barmenu.js"></script>
<ul class="menu"><li><a href="http://www.jesuswordsonly.com/"><span>Home</span></a></li><li class="haschild"><a href="/JWO/jesuswordsonly.html" class="haschild"><span>Books</span></a><ul><li class="haschild"><a href="/JWO/jesuswordsonly.html" class="child"><span>Jesus' Words Only</span></a><ul><li><a href="/JWO/jesus-words-only-amazon.html"><span>Purchase from Amazon.com</span></a></li></ul></li><li class="haschild"><a href="/JWOS/jesuswordssalvation.html" class="child"><span>Jesus' Words on Salvation</span></a><ul><li><a href="/JWOS/jesuswordsonsalvationamazon.html"><span>Purchase from Amazon.com</span></a></li></ul></li><li class="haschild"><a href="/Did-Calvin-Murder-Servetus/didcalvinmurderservetus.html" class="child"><span>Did Calvin Murder Servetus?</span></a><ul><li><a href="/Did-Calvin-Murder-Servetus/calvinfreebookonline.html"><span>Download e-Book</span></a></li><li><a href="/Did-Calvin-Murder-Servetus/didcalvinmurderservetusbackground.html"><span>Background Material</span></a></li><li><a href="/Did-Calvin-Murder-Servetus/didcalvinmurderservetusamazon.html"><span>Purchase from Amazon.com</span></a></li></ul></li><li class="haschild"><a href="/Bible/hownottostudythebible.html" class="child"><span>How Not to Study the Bible</span></a><ul><li><a href="/Bible/hownottostudythebible.html"><span>Download e-Book</span></a></li></ul></li><li class="haschild"><a href="/Young-Earth-Science/flawsofyoungearthscience.html" class="child"><span>Flaws of Young Earth Science</span></a><ul><li><a href="/Young-Earth-Science/flawsofyoungearthscience.html"><span>Download e-Book</span></a></li></ul></li><li><a href="/Young-Earth-Science/unintended-disservice-of-young-earth-science.html"><span>Unintended Disservice</span></a></li><li><a href="/Hebrew-Matthew/original-gospel-of-matthew-in-hebrew.html"><span>Original Gospel of Matthew</span></a></li></ul></li><li id="current" class="active"><a href="/Recommended-Reading/recommendedreading.html"><span>Further Reading</span></a></li><li><a href="/Audio/audio-messages.html"><span>Media</span></a></li><li><a href="/About-The-Author/about-the-author.html"><span>About The Author</span></a></li><li class="haschild"><a href="/Review.list/" class="haschild"><span>Reviews</span></a><ul><li><a href="/jwo-reviews.html"><span>Jesus Words Only</span></a></li><li><a href="/jwos-reviews.html"><span>Jesus Words on Salvation</span></a></li></ul></li><li><a href="/Contact-Us/contactus.html"><span>Contact Us</span></a></li><li><a href="http://astore.amazon.com/jwoogm-20"><span>Amazon Shop</span></a></li><li><a href="/Recommended-Reading/topical-index-of-this-website.html"><span>Topic Index</span></a></li></ul>
</div>
</div>
<div id="mainbody">
<div id="showcasetop">&nbsp;</div>
<table width="940" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="center">
<tr>
<td id="leftcol" valign="top" width="200">
<div class="inside">
<div class="moduleS1">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<h3>Search</h3>
<form action="http://www.jesuswordsonly.com/" method="post">
<div class="searchS1">
<input name="searchword" id="mod_search_searchword" maxlength="20" alt="Search" class="inputboxS1" type="text" size="20" value="search..." onblur="if(this.value=='') this.value='search...';" onfocus="if(this.value=='search...') this.value='';" /> </div>
<input type="hidden" name="task" value="search" />
<input type="hidden" name="option" value="com_search" />
<input type="hidden" name="Itemid" value="3" />
</form> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="moduleS1">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<h3>Questions?</h3>
Please enter your questions, and we will get back to you as soon as possible. As an anti-spam measure, we ask that you re-type the code you see in the box below, prior to clicking "Send Message"<br /><br />
<form name="s5_quick_contact" method="post" action="">
<input class="inputbox" id="namebox" onclick="s5_qc_clearname()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearname()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Name..." name="name"></input><br />
<input class="inputbox" id="emailbox" onclick="s5_qc_clearemail()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearemail()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Email..." name="email"></input><br />
<input class="inputbox" id="subjectbox" onclick="s5_qc_clearsubject()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearsubject()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Subject..." name="subject"></input><br />
<textarea id="messagebox" rows="" cols="" class="inputbox textarea" onclick="s5_qc_clearbody()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearbody()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; overflow:auto;width:80%; height:55px" name="message">Your Message...</textarea><br />
<input class="inputbox" id="spambox" onclick="s5_qc_clearspam()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearspam()" style="font-weight:bold; font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Enter The Code 9023" name="verif_box"></input><br />
<input id="email_address" type="hidden" value="" name="email_address"></input>
<input class="button" type="button" onclick="s5_qc_submit()" value="Send Message" ></input>
</form>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
// <![CDATA[
var s5_qc_spam_text = document.getElementById("spambox").value;
function s5_qc_clearbody() {
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value == "Your Message...") {
document.getElementById("messagebox").value="";
}
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
}
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
}
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
}
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
}
}
function s5_qc_clearname() {
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value == "Name...") {
document.getElementById("namebox").value="";
}
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
}
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
}
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
}
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
}
}
function s5_qc_clearemail() {
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value == "Email...") {
document.getElementById("emailbox").value="";
}
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
}
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
}
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
}
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
}
}
function s5_qc_clearsubject() {
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value == "Subject...") {
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value="";
}
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
}
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
}
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
}
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
}
}
function s5_qc_clearspam() {
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value == s5_qc_spam_text) {
document.getElementById("spambox").value="";
}
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
}
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
}
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
}
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
}
}
function s5_qc_isValidEmail(str_email) {
if (str_email.indexOf(".") > 2 && str_email.indexOf("@") > 0) {
alert('Your email is now being submitted - Thank you!');
document.s5_quick_contact.submit();
}
else {
alert('Your email address is not valid, please check again - Thank you!');
}
}
function s5_qc_submit() {
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value == s5_qc_spam_text || document.getElementById("subjectbox").value == "Subject..." || document.getElementById("namebox").value == "Name..." || document.getElementById("emailbox").value == "Email..." || document.getElementById("messagebox").value == "Your Message...") {
alert('All fields are required, please complete the form - Thank you!');
return false;
}
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value != "9023") {
alert('Your spam verification answer is incorrect.');
return false;
}
var s5_message_holder = document.getElementById("messagebox").value;
var s5_first_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(0);
var s5_second_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(1);
var s5_third_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(2);
var s5_fourth_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(3);
if (s5_first_message_char == "<") {
return false;
}
if (s5_first_message_char == "w" && s5_second_message_char == "w" && s5_third_message_char == "w") {
return false;
}
if (s5_first_message_char == "h" && s5_second_message_char == "t" && s5_third_message_char == "t") {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
else {
document.getElementById("email_address").value = "info@jesuswordsonly.com";
var email_str = document.getElementById("emailbox").value;
s5_qc_isValidEmail(email_str);
}
}
// ]]>
</script>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="moduleS1">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<h3>Recommendations</h3>
<p><a href="/Audio/music-store-manager.html">Only Jesus</a> (great song by Big Daddy)</p>
<p><a href="http://astore.amazon.com/justjesus0ece-20">Just Jesus: His Living Words (2011)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://astore.amazon.com/jesusonchurchstructure-20">Jesus' Words on Church Structure</a> by S. Rives</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jesusfocusedpublishers.com/"></a></p>
<p> </p> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="module">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<a href="/JWO/jesuswordsonly.html"><img alt="JesusWordsOnS-cropsmall" src="/images/stories/JesusWordsOnS-cropsmall.jpg" width="116" height="117" /></a> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="module">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<a href="/JWOS/jesuswordssalvation.html"><img alt="JesusWordsSalv-crop2" src="/images/stories/JesusWordsSalv-crop2.jpg" width="114" height="146" /></a> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="module">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<a href="/Did-Calvin-Murder-Servetus/calvinfreebookonline.html"><img src="/images/stories/DidCalvinMurderServetusM.jpg" alt="DidCalvinMurderServetusM" height="NaN" width="120" /></a> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td id="maincol" valign="top">
<div id="breadcrumbs">
<span class="breadcrumbs pathway">
<a href="http://www.jesuswordsonly.com/" class="pathway">Home</a> <img src="/templates/js_relevant/images/arrow.png" alt="" /> Further Reading</span>
</div>
<table class="contentpaneopen">
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<h2>Macarius Magnes - Oldest Systematic Critic of Paul?</h2>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">Macarius<span> Magnes in his </span><a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus.htm">Apocriticus</a><span> III.30-36 (ca. 300) defended orthodoxy throughout, but when it came to Paul, I dare say he left Paul hanging out to dry, so to speak. Magnes recreated a debate over Paul's remarks, both stating the criticism and Magnes' answer. But his answers all evade the point, and really are feeble next to the criticisms that are well put, and truly have no answer. I believe Magnes did this because by that means he had no other way to criticize Paul and not appear to be a heretic. But all his defenses of Jesus' words, etc., were well-defended and convincing. So here is an amazing excerpt from a set of dialogues Magnes created circa 300 AD about Paul visible at this<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus.htm#3_31"> link</a> -- with the footnotes excerpted at the end - yet Paul is devasted by his inconsistencies about the Law, circumcision and pleas for financial support. To prove my point, I will highlight in purple those aspects of the "Answer" which indeed indict Paul further for hypocrisy and inconsistency or lack of inspiration. Only one precommitted to accept any plausible defense for Paul would not see the good sense in the critic's points, and reject the so-called "Answer" of Magnes.</span></span></p>
<hr />
<blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">CHAPTER XXX. Objection based on the inconsistency of S. Paul, in his circumcising of Timothy (Acts xvi. 3).</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">He remained a little while in deep and solemn thought, and then said: "You seem to me very much like inexperienced captains, who, while still afloat on the voyage that lies before them, look on themselves as afloat on another sea. Even thus are you seeking for other passages to be laid down by us, although you have <a name="p100"></a> <span class="pb"></span>not completed the vital points in the questions which you still have on hand."<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#189"><sup>189</sup></a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">If you are really filled with boldness about the questions, and the points of difficulty have become clear to you, tell us how it was that Paul said, "Being free, I made myself the slave of all, in order that I might gain all" (1 Cor. ix. 19), and how, although he called circumcision "concision," <a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#190"><sup>190</sup></a> he himself circumcised a certain Timothy, as we are taught in the Acts of the Apostles (Acts xvi. 3). Oh, the downright stupidity of it all! It is such a stage as this that the scenes in the theatre portray, as a means of raising laughter. Such indeed is the exhibition which jugglers give.<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#191"><sup>191</sup></a> For how could the man be free who is a slave of all ? And how can the man gain all who apes all ?<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#192"><sup>192</sup></a> For if he is without law to those who are without law,<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#193"><sup>193</sup></a> as he himself says, and he went with the Jews as a Jew and with others in like manner, truly he was the slave of manifold baseness, and a stranger to freedom and an alien from it; truly he is a servant and minister of other people's wrong doings, and a notable zealot for unseemly things, if he spends his time on each occasion in the baseness of those without law, and appropriates their doings to himself.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">These things cannot be the teachings of a sound mind, nor the setting forth of reasoning that is free.<a name="p101"></a> <span class="pb"></span>But the words imply some one who is somewhat crippled in mind,<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#194"><sup>194</sup></a> and weak in his reasoning. For if he lives with those who are without law, and also in his writings accepts the Jews' religion gladly, having a share in each, he is confused with each, mingling with the falls of those who are base, and subscribing himself as their companion. For he who draws such a line through circumcision as to remove those who wish to fulfil it, and then performs circumcision himself, stands as the weightiest of all accusers of himself when he says: "If I build again those things which I loosed, I establish myself as a transgressor."</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="3_37"></a>CHAPTER XXXVII. Answer to the objection based on the inconsistency of S. Paul, in his circumcising of Timothy, etc.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">When his chosen band had stirred up such a swarm of subjects against Paul, and the multitude of points <a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#195"><sup>195</sup></a> had at length grown quiet again like bees which have rushed to the attack in dense array, we, being as it were pierced all round by the stings of the difficulties raised, stood and fought against each in dire necessity, saying thus:--- [It is not right that you should abuse a great man for behaving towards those young in faith just as a teacher, or a doctor or a general does. For a teacher educates by imitating the stammering voice of his pupil, a doctor cures by placing himself in the patient's circumstances, and<span style="color: #993366;"> </span><strong><em><span style="color: #993366;">a general wins over a barbarian chief to his king by adopting his customs</span> </em></strong>rather than by force of arms. Paul<strong><em> <span style="color: #993366;">did similar good by being all things to all men</span></em></strong>. Sometimes he is the teacher, imitating Gentiles in order to educate them to the Gospel, sometimes the doctor, saying: "Who is weak, and I am not weak ?" as if inflamed with the trouble<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#196"><sup>196</sup></a> (2 Cor. xi. 29); sometimes<a name="p102"></a> <span class="pb"></span>the general, softening men's prejudices by his strategy. So<span style="color: #993366;"> <em><strong>he went out to meet both those without law and the Jews, though he did not himself really feel as they</strong></em></span>.  [MY NOTE: Magnes admits therefore Paul's express hypocrisy.]</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">Therefore he only adopted circumcision in order to enrich the law with the Gospel by giving way on one point. A good doctor may<strong><em> <span style="color: #993366;">forbid a certain drug as being harmful, and yet in a bad case he may combine it with other drugs</span></em></strong> in order to overcome the disease. Just so, Paul rejected circumcision, and yet at a crisis he combined it with the doctrines of the Gospel.<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#197"><sup>197</sup></a>]</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><br /></span></p>
<hr />
<blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">CHAPTER XXXII. Objection based on S. Paul's use of the law for his own advantage (as in 1 Cor. ix. 7, etc.).</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">That he dissembles the Gospel for the sake of vainglory, and the law for the sake of covetousness, is plain from his words, "Who ever goeth to war at his own charges? Who shepherdeth the flock and doth not eat of the milk <a name="p104"></a> <span class="pb"></span>of the flock?" (1 Cor. ix. 7). And, in his desire to get hold of these things, he calls in the law as a supporter of his covetousness, saying, "Or doth not the law say these things ? For in the law of Moses it is written, Thou shall not muzzle an ox that is treading out the corn " (<em>v. </em>9). Then he adds a statement which is obscure and full of nonsense, by way of cutting off the divine forethought from the brute beasts, saying, "Doth God take care of the oxen, or doth he say it on our account? On our account it was written" (<em>v</em>. 10).<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#203"><sup>203</sup></a> It seems to me that in saying this he is mocking the wisdom of the Creator, as if it contained no forethought for the things that had long ago been brought into being. For if God does not take care of oxen, pray, why is it written, "He hath subjected all things, sheep and oxen and beasts and birds and the fishes" (Ps. viii. 8-9) ? If He takes account of fishes, much more of oxen which plough and labour. Wherefore I am amazed at_such an impostor, who pays such solemn respect to the law because he is insatiable, for the sake of getting a sufficient contribution from those who are subject to him.</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="3_39"></a>CHAPTER XXXIX. Answer to the objection based on S. Paul's use of the law for his own advantage (1 Cor. ix. 7, etc.).</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><span style="color: #993366;"><strong>[It is not in order to get something for himself that Paul introduces the comparison of the soldier and the shepherd</strong></span>, but in order to make the Corinthians thankful. For a soldier does his work faithfully only as long as the State pays him; and just so a herald of the Gospel will give his best work when his hearers respond to it. Similarly, the spiritual shepherd's encouragement is to see his sheep with fair fleeces and abundant milk. Again, the labourer sows the seed of the knowledge of <a name="p105"></a><span class="pb"></span>God in his hearers' hearts, and is grieved if it does not bear fruit.<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#204"><sup>204</sup></a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">Therefore<span style="color: #993366;"><strong> it was in order to benefit his hearers that Paul introduced these things</strong></span>, and supported them with the witness of the law, so that they might show their gratitude. For the <span style="color: #993366;"><strong>divine grace</strong></span>, though lacking nothing, <strong><em><span style="color: #993366;">demands a little answering tribute</span></em></strong> from those whom it enriches.<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#205"><sup>205</sup></a>] </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">MY NOTE: But Jesus said take no wages to preach the gospel.</span></p>
<hr />
<blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="3_33"></a>CHAPTER XXXIII. Objection based on his inconsistent attitude towards the law, condemning it in Gal. v. 3 and iii. 10, and approving it in Romans vii. 12 and 14.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">Then he suddenly turns like a man who jumps up from sleep scared by a dream, with the cry, "I Paul bear witness that if any man do one thing of the law,<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#206"><sup>206</sup></a> he is a debtor to do the whole law" (Gal. v. 3). This is instead of saying simply that it is not right to give heed to those things that are spoken by the law. This fine fellow, sound in mind and understanding, instructed in the accuracy of the law of his fathers, who had so often cleverly recalled Moses to mind, appears to be soaked with wine and drunkenness; for he makes an assertion which removes the ordinance of the law, saying to the Galatians, "Who bewitched you that ye should not obey the truth," that is, the Gospel? (Gal. iii. 1). Then, exaggerating, and making it horrible for a man to obey the law, he says, "As many as are under the law are under a curse" (Gal. iii. 10). The man who writes to the Romans "The law is spiritual" (vii. 14), and again, "The law is holy and the commandment holy and just," places under a curse those who obey that which is holy! <a name="p106"></a> <span class="pb"></span>Then, completely confusing the nature of the question, he confounds the whole matter and makes it obscure, so that he who listens to him almost grows dizzy, and dashes against the two things as though in the darkness of the night, stumbling over the law, and knocking against the Gospel in confusion, owing to the ignorance of the man who leads him by the hand.</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="3_40"></a>CHAPTER XL. Answer to the objection based on his inconsistent attitude towards the law.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">[When he says that to do one thing in the law obliges a man to do all, he is not abusing the law, but pointing to its minuteness, and to that difficulty in carrying it out which Christ has freed us from, by coming to fulfil it Himself.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">For<em> </em>a man who attempts to fulfil any part of it now may justly be accused of ignoring the complete fulfilment of it by the Only Begotten. He loses the effect of the Saviour's fulfilment, and yet cannot complete it himself, but is like one who has a hundred parasangs<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#207"><sup>207</sup></a><em> </em>to ride to reach a city, and only rides ninety-five; in which case he is no more in the city than when he started. If a man keeps countless commandments, and yet leaves one undone, it is as bad as leaving one gate of a city undefended out of thirty-five.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">As an example of the difficulty in fulfilling the whole law, take two enactments, concerning the sabbath and circumcision. What is to be done with the babe born on a sabbath, upon the eighth day after its birth ?<sup><a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#208"><sup>208</sup></a> </sup>Here one rule contradicts the other. If two points are so hard, what of the whole ? Indeed there are more rules than can be remembered concerning sacrifices, cleansings, etc.<span style="color: #993366;"><strong> Such a burden proved too much for the Jews.<a name="p107"></a> <span class="pb"></span>Only Christ could fulfil it, and so cancel it that none need be subject to it any more</strong></span>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">As a cubit-rule measures dimensions, but can itself only be measured by the man who made it, so the law, which is the measure of life, could only be measured by Christ, who made it, and finally sealed it up by placing the better measure of the Gospel beside it.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><span style="color: #993366;"><strong>To try and fulfil what Christ has thus fulfilled, is to act in opposition to Him.</strong></span> Thus does Paul warn the Galatians. As for his calling the law "holy," etc., it was holy because the Holy One fulfilled it.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">Again, when he brings in the witness of the law and quotes from it, "Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn,"<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#209"><sup>209</sup></a> he is thinking of the apostolic band as the unmuzzled ox, which threshes that harvest which Christ has sowed. Hence he says, " Not concerning oxen were these things written, but concerning us" (1 Cor. ix. 10).]</span></p>
<hr />
<blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="3_34"></a>CHAPTER XXXIV. Objection based on another inconsistency, in saying "The law entered that the offence might abound " (Rom. v. 20).</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">For see here, look at this clever fellow's record. After countless utterances which he took from the law in order to get support from it, he made void the judgment of his own words by saying, "For the law entered that the offence might abound"; and before these words,<sup><a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#210"><sup>210</sup></a> </sup>"The goad <a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#211"><sup>211</sup></a> of death is sin, and the strength of sin is the law" (1 Cor. xv. 56). He practically sharpens his own tongue like a sword, and cuts the law to pieces without mercy limb by limb. And this is the man who in many ways inclines to obey the law, and says it is <a name="p108"></a> <span class="pb"></span>praiseworthy to live according to it. And by taking hold of this ignorant opinion, which he does as though by habit, he has overthrown his own judgments on all other occasions.</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="3_41"></a>CHAPTER XLI. Answer to the objection based on S. Paul's saying that "The law entered that the offence may abound " (Rom. v. 20).</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">[There was naturally much wickedness in life, and this could not be corrected unless the law came to reveal it. Good and bad could not be distinguished till standards of right and wrong were set up. From such a life of ignorance and sin the law guided men to the life of light. But its enactments naturally revealed as sin what was not before understood as such, and in this sense it "made the offence to abound."</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">Sin was a "goad of death" to drive men from true life, and took its "strength" from the law, because the law punished sinners (see 1 Cor. xv. 56). A goad requires some one to wield it in order to make it deadly, and it was thus that the law wielded sin. Paul bids men flee from it, not to the law, but to Christ who is Master of the law. He does not destroy the law, but its work as "schoolmaster" ( paidagwgo&amp;j ) is done when it has brought men to Christ (Gal. iii. 23). The law is like the moon, and the prophets like the stars, which fade away at dawn before the Sun and His twelvefold crown of Apostles, and yet remain, though without power.<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#212"><sup>212</sup></a>]</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="3_35"></a>CHAPTER XXXV. Objection based on S. Paul's words about their not having "fellowship with demons" in 1 Cor. x. 20, and also what he says in 1 Cor. viii. 4 and 8 and x. 25-26.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">When he speaks again of the eating of things sacrificed <a name="p109"></a> <span class="pb"></span>to idols, he simply teaches that these matters are indifferent, telling them not to be inquisitive nor to ask questions, but to eat things even though they be sacrificed to idols, provided only that no one speaks to them in warning. Wherein he is represented as saying, " The things which they sacrifice, they sacrifice to demons, but I would not that you should have fellowship with demons" (1 Cor. x. 20).<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#213"><sup>213</sup></a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">Thus he speaks and writes : and again he writes with indifference about such eating, "We know that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one" (1 Cor. viii. 4), and a little after this, "Meat will not commend us to God, neither, if we eat, are we the better, neither, if we eat not, are we the worse" <em>(v. </em>8). Then, after all this prating of quackery, he ruminated, like a man lying in bed, and said, "Eat all that is sold in the shambles, asking no questions for conscience' sake, for the earth is the Lord's and the fulness thereof" (1 Cor. x. 25-26). Oh, what a stage farce, got from no one ! Oh, the monstrous inconsistency of his utterance ! A saying which destroys itself with its own sword! Oh, novel kind of archery, which turns against him who drew the bow, and strikes him!</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="3_42"></a>CHAPTER XLII.<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#214"><sup>214</sup></a> Answer to the objection based on S. Paul's words about having fellowship with demons (1 Cor. x. 20), etc.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">Now that we have laid bare the full meaning of this passage, we will deal with the rest, if agreeable to you--- namely, how it was that Paul forbade them to eat things offered to idols,<sup><a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#215">215</a> [MY NOTE: Paul did not do so. So it is unclear what Magnes is referring to.]</sup> but he does not forbid them to take what was sold in the shambles, although it was well <a name="p110"></a> <span class="pb"></span>known that it was Greeks who did most of the slaughtering at that time.<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#216"><sup>216</sup></a> So you may perceive in this the accuracy and wisdom of Paul, how he protects their daily life and forbids the godly to touch things sacrificed to demons, but he permitted his friends to eat what was sold in the shambles without asking questions. [MY NOTE: Clearly Magnes is skirting the issue that Paul permitted eating such meat. Later he will address it. See below.] For the sacrifice of animals was at that time manifold, and different in various parts of the world. There was one kind to the spirits of the air, another to those on the earth, while there were other sacrifices again to those under the earth. For error, taking the deceitful serpent as its minister, whistled many a strain, charming and subduing with its deadly spells <a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#217"><sup>217</sup></a> earth, sea, air, and the things beneath the earth. So invisible spirits which flew in the air, which Isaiah sang of as flying serpents (Isa. xxvii. 1), demanded white and transparent sacrifices of birds, seeing that the air chances to be bright, and filled with light for the manifestation of the things that are below. But there are certain of the demons of the earth, which demanded herds of beasts for sacrifices which were black-skinned and dusky, seeing that the earth is by nature black and gloomy; and they ordered their sacrifices to be slain on lofty altars. Other demons of the regions beneath them enjoined that black offerings should be sacrificed to them in trenches, and that they should be buried alongside the remains of the things that had been slaughtered.<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#218"><sup>218</sup></a> Other deceitful phantoms of things in the seas demanded sacrifices of black things that were winged and living, and ordered them to be sent down into the sea, since the sea is black and in constant motion. Seeing then that wickedness thus destroys the things without reason through those that possess it, by feeding in this pitiable way on a multitude of beasts and birds, the Apostle naturally forbade the faithful to touch such things.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">You can verify these things from the book "Concerning <a name="p111"></a> <span class="pb"></span>the philosophy of oracles,"<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#219"><sup>219</sup></a> and learn accurately the record of the things sacrificed, as you read the oracle of Apollo concerning sacrifices,<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#220"><sup>220</sup></a> which Porphyry, puffed up with conceit, handed down to his intimates in a mystery, charging them with a terrible oath, as he himself reckoned, that they should not freely tell these things to many. The tragedy of this novel calamity will be well known to you, how the plotting of destroying spirits ruthlessly mangled the human race in various ways, as a flock without a shepherd, coming like an attack of wild wolves from the desert. It was impossible for any one to breathe freely, or to be quiet, but everything was forced together, from one end of heaven to the other, as though by a staff or a thunderbolt. If a man was crossing the sea, he let slip a sacrifice ; if he was journeying by land, he sacrificed four-footed beasts. If he were hollowing a cave or digging a piece of land, he threw down a sacrifice to the powers below, and many, by way of buying off their own death, buried some of their own stock while still alive. At any rate, Amistra, the wife of King Xerxes, sent fourteen boys down to Hades alive every year on her own behalf, by covering them with a mound, by way of appeasing the demons of the earth. Stakes and goads and snares had filled the world everywhere; neither air nor land, island nor sea were inopportune for their plottings ; but a girdle of guile had encircled the inhabited world, a dark veil of ignorance had enveloped it, and it was not possible for a man to live without trouble and fear. Life was full of suspicion, conditions were unreal, the very fact of chance was affected.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">Since therefore the world was full of disorder, and the greater part of life was devoted to demons, he proclaims to those who wish for a brighter<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#221"><sup>221</sup></a> life, that they must loathe the table of demons, lest perchance they <a name="p112"></a> <span class="pb"></span>should at all corrupt the habit of the soul by their fellowship. And again, <span style="color: #993366;"><strong>perceiving how impossible it was for any one who was clothed with flesh to renounce the daily life of the body, he gives permission by way of dispensation, and solemnly counsels them to respect the common market of the shambles and to get their victuals from it.</strong></span> For the matter did not call for trouble, and involved no blame for meddling with such things, seeing that those who undertook the business of the shambles were the ministers of a general and public means of diet. But there were certain servants of temples, picked out and separated from the rest, who in some kind of mystery poured out libations to images and sacrificed with a kind of mystic witchcraft. From these he bids them keep away, and not to touch them at all.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">But he destroys the ignorant bounds of Greek belief, cuts their doctrine in pieces, and makes their judgment void, when he says, "An idol is nothing in the world." For the Greeks found out the naming of idols, as the serpent found out the naming of gods; but the judgment of truth does not lay down such an opinion at all. Therefore it is impossible that the theory or standard of idols should be preserved in the world. For the making of images is reasonably spoken of as images, not as idols. These figures, fashioned from gold, silver, bronze, and iron, are silver and gold, but not idols. And the dead bodies of living creatures exist as dead bodies, not as idols. Souls that are loosed from bodies are rightly souls, but not idols. But the representations in statuary of those who are called heroes are images, not idols. And the things that are skilfully painted in colours on tablets, are the delineation of bodies, but certainly not idols. And the things that are called appearances of visions are phantoms and shadows of dreams, but they are not idols. So the great Apostle speaks truth when he says, "An idol is nothing in the world." Unless perchance some one is mad enough to wish to call the elements idols, but he is refuted as he says it; for fire, water, air, and earth are not idols, but properly fire, water, air, and earth.<a name="p113"></a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">To what then do those men sacrifice who pay respect to idols ? To demons, not to idols; but he does not wish them to be partakers of demons and partakers of Christ. Those who sell food in the shambles do not act as butchers for demons, but for the common life of men, and the end they set before them is not witchcraft but profit, which neither ruins nor corrupts the man who eats. This is the answer to your problem, which you may readily be learning.</span></p>
<hr />
<blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="3_36"></a>CHAPTER XXXVI. Objection based on S. Paul's words about virginity (1 Tim. iv. 1, and 1 Cor. vii. 25).</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">In his epistles we find another saying like these, where he praises virginity, and then turns round and writes, "In the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, forbidding to marry and commanding to abstain from meats" (1 Tim. iv. 1 and 3). And in the Epistle to the Corinthians he says, "But concerning virgins I have no commandment of the Lord" (1 Cor. vii. 25). Therefore he that remains single does not do well, nor will he that refrains from marriage as from an evil thing lead the way in obedience, since they have not a command from Jesus concerning virginity.<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#222"><sup>222</sup></a> And how is it that certain people boast of their virginity as if it were some great thing, and say that they are filled with the Holy Ghost similarly to her who was the mother of Jesus ?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">But we will now cease our attack on Paul, knowing what a battle of the giants he arms against him by his language. But if you are possessed of any resources for replying to these questions, answer without delay.</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="3_43"></a>CHAPTER XLIII. Answer to the objection based on S. Paul's words about virginity (1 Tim. iv. 1, and 1 Cor. vii. 25).</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">[Here, as always, the context must be studied. Often in Paul's writings a phrase by itself may suggest what he <a name="p114"></a> <span class="pb"></span>did not mean, as when he says, "On whom he will he hath mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth," a statement which must be taken in conjunction with his words about Him "that willeth that all men should be saved." In this passage (from 1<em> </em>Corinthians) about virgins,<strong><em> <span style="color: #993366;">it is not clear at once why he should say, "I have no commandment of the Lord, yet I give my judgment as one that hath obtained mercy," seeing that he had Christ speaking within him</span></em></strong><span style="color: #993366;">.</span> The explanation is as follows:---</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">Virginity is a difficult and unnatural state, and so it is left to the individual to choose it. If Christ forced it on people by a command, they might say that the fault was His if it led to a fall. In simpler matters Christ does give a command through Paul, such as theft, adultery, slander, etc. The wisdom of all this is obvious, and to make virginity a free choice only exalts its position. There is praise for the man who does as he is commanded, but for this act of free-will beyond what is obligatory there is a higher glory.<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#223"><sup>223</sup></a> Note that Paul's words show a humble reverence for what he speaks of, for he gives his opinion "as one that hath obtained mercy," not as an Apostle, nor as "judging angels" (but here the virgins are angels in his judgment).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">When he says that "There shall arise certain having their Conscience seared with a hot iron," <a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#224"><sup>224</sup></a> it is because he knew that such heretics would attract men by guile in recommending so excellent a thing as virginity,<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#225"><sup>225</sup></a> and thus using a branding-iron of godliness for their own deceitful purposes. These "seared" heresiarchs are like makers of counterfeit coin, washing over their worthless creed with the fine gold of virginity.<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#226"><sup>226</sup></a> They are <a name="p115"></a> <span class="pb"></span>"seared" because they know neither the dew of the Spirit nor the water of baptism, but are scorched at the Chaldean furnace.<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#227"><sup>227</sup></a> They insult creation and abuse the creatures of God which He meant to be received with thanksgiving.<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#228"><sup>228</sup></a>]</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">Representatives of these have spread abroad in the children of the Manichaeans.<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#229"><sup>229</sup></a> Such heresies does the country of the Pisidians contain, and of the Isaurians; Cilicia also, and Lycaonia and all Galatia. Their names it is irksome to repeat; for they are called Encratites and Apotactites, and Eremites,<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#230"><sup>230</sup></a> not Christians. They are not seekers of protection from the grace of heaven, but rebels and wanderers from the faith of the Gospel, though, by their abstention from meats, they say that they raise the citadel of godliness. At the head of their chorus doubtless stands Dositheus,<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#231"><sup>231</sup></a> a Cilician by race, who confirms their teaching in the course of eight whole books, and magnifies his case by the splendour of his language, saying again and again that marriage is an illegal act, and quite contrary to law. Here are his words, "Through union the world had its beginning <em>; </em>through abstention from it,<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#232"><sup>232</sup></a> it would fain have its completion." He says that the tasting of wine and the partaking of flesh is disgusting and loathsome altogether, thus <a name="p116"></a> <span class="pb"></span>indeed ruthlessly lifting up a cruel branding-iron for those that delight <a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#233"><sup>233</sup></a><em> </em>in him. By such reasoning all creation is accursed according to him, all life is under suspicion ard hurtful to everybody. Wherefore such men have come into conflict with the Divine, by insulting the beauty of the things that have been created; and nowhere have they benefited the common weal in anything, even though they do teach men to observe virginity, and set self-control as the highest point in life.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">The Apostle therefore, knowing all this, protected the Church's doctrine before the time came, to prevent its admitting the attempts of heretical branding-irons. Here you will please conclude the discussion of all these questions. If there is anything which perplexes you again, we will meet and have another discussion, at the convenience of our leisure, with readiness on the part of him who comes off best.<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus_fn.htm#234"><sup>234</sup></a> <a name="p117"></a></span></p>
<hr />
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><br /></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;">189. <sup>1</sup> Before the next sentence the MS. has <span>3Ellhn</span> in the margin, as a new heading, in order to mark the place where the actual objection begins. For the support thus claimed for the theory that Macarius is merely borrowing from a book, and himself turning it into a discussion, see Introd., p. xvii.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#190"></a>190. <sup>2</sup> Phil. iii. 2, <em>i.e.</em> a mere meaningless cutting.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#191"></a>191. <sup>3</sup> Gk. <span>parapa&amp;llion</span>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#192"></a>192. <sup>4</sup> The MS. gives <span>kaqhkeu&amp;wn</span>,<em> </em>which must be corrupt. The word, oddly enough, has just occurred in the previous answer of Macarius (ch. xxix. p. 122, 1. 2,<span>kai/per kaqhkeu&amp;wn toi~j 'Ioudai/oij polla&amp;</span><em>. </em>Foucart suggested <span>piqhkeu&amp;wn</span><em> </em>in both places, as equivalent to <span>piqhki/zw</span> (to play the ape), <em>Arist. Vesp. </em>1290). But this requires the further emendation of <span>pa&amp;ntaj</span><em> </em>to<span> pa~si</span><em> </em>in the present instance. <span>pa&amp;ntaj</span><em> </em>has just occurred in the same line, which may have caused the mistake.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#193"></a>193. <sup>5</sup> The speaker takes this in the moral sense, as meaning " lawless," as is clear from what follows.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#194"></a>194. <sup>1</sup> The MS. <span>u9popu&amp;roj</span><em> </em>may be altered to <span>u9poph&amp;ron</span>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#195"></a>195. <sup>2</sup><em> </em>After all, he only deals with seven objections instead of eight at the previous bout, but only four of them were against S. Peter, and all the eight are here attacks on S. Paul.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#196"></a>196. <sup>3</sup> The words <span>tw~| po&amp;nw| purou&amp;menoj</span> are taken as part of the quotation in Blondel's edition, but there is no need to do this.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#197"></a>197. <sup>1</sup> It will be noticed that Macarius makes no attempt to argue from the special case of Timothy.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#198"></a>198. <sup>2</sup> He omits the words, "In this city."</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#199"></a>199. <sup>3</sup> Surely this is a slip for "a Jew."</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#200"></a>200. <sup>1</sup> Or, more literally, " a foster-brother of that which is false."</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#201"></a>201. <sup>2</sup> lit. " Festering beneath the surface."</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#202"></a>202. <sup>3</sup> Such is the strangely inadequate three-fold answer given to the objection. The play upon the word 9Pw&amp;mh is quite characteristic of patristic interpretation. Macarius does not seem to have grasped that a Jew could be a Roman citizen.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#203"></a>203. <sup>1</sup> The quotations are abbreviated, <span>pa&amp;ntwj</span><em> </em>is omitted after <span>di0<em> </em>h9ma~j</span>, and the middle clause of <em>v. </em>7 is wanting. Macarius, however, makes use of the latter in his answer.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#204"></a>204. <sup>1</sup> The clause, "Who planteth a vine and doth not eat of the fruit thereof?" was omitted by his opponent from I Cor. ix. 7, but here Macarius plainly refers to it.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#205"></a>205. <sup>2</sup> No answer is here given to the difficulty about God not taking care of oxen, but there is a brief word of explanation at the end of the next answer (ch. xl. p. 107, 11. 12-17).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#206"></a>206. <sup>3</sup> This is quite different from the text of Galatians, "to every man that is circumcised." Perhaps the "one thing" comes from James ii. 10. Macarius accepts the quotation as it stands, and repeats it.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#207"></a>207. <sup>1</sup> This spontaneous introduction of a Persian measure of distance is a proof that the writer was near that part of the world. His subsequent suggestion of a city with so many gates indicates that there were large cities in his district.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#208"></a>208. <sup>2</sup> He chooses the example given by Christ Himself in John vii. 22-23, but can scarcely have that passage in mind, for it decides the difficulty.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#209"></a>209. <sup>1</sup> Macarius had ignored this part of the previous objection, and here his reference to the quotation can scarcely be called an answer to the difficulty raised, which seems to have proved too much for him.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#210"></a>210. <sup>2</sup> This is evidently a slip, as it is unlikely that he placed the Corinthian before the Roman Epistle.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#211"></a>211. <sup>3</sup> This correct translation must be given, rather than "sting," as Macarius develops the idea of a goad in his answer.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#212"></a>212. <sup>1</sup> The above summary is in a very abbreviated form, but it will be seen that, unlike some of his defence of S. Paul, his line of argument is excellent, and is a sound interpretation of S. Paul's own attitude towards the law.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#213"></a>213. <sup>1</sup> The verse is quoted in an abbreviated form.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#214"></a>214. <sup>2</sup> The full translation of this answer is given, as its language is curious and interesting.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#215"></a>215. <sup>3</sup> The answer at once makes obvious what the objection failed to state explicitly—namely, that S. <strong><em>Paul's inconsistency lies in his contradiction of the decision in Acts xv. that the Gentile converts were not to eat things offered to idols.</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#216"></a>216. <sup>1</sup> This is an attempt to render <span>kai/per 9Ellh&amp;nwn w9j e0pi\ to_ plei~ston tw~n makelleuo&amp;ntwn to&amp;te gnwrizome/nwn</span><em>. </em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#217"></a>217. <sup>2</sup> <span>i1ulci</span> of the MS. must be for <span>i1ugci</span><em>.</em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#218"></a>218. <sup>3</sup> <span>sfazome/nwn</span><em> </em>is the addition of a later hand in the margin, and scarcely seems to supply the sense required.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#219"></a>219. <sup>1</sup> This was a book by Porphyry, called <span>peri/ th~j e0k logi/wn filosofi/aj</span>.<em> </em>It is lost, but is mentioned by Fabricius, v. p. 744. See Introd., p. xiv., for the argument which the reference to this book affords, as against Harnack's belief that the writer of these objections is Porphyry himself.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#220"></a>220. <sup>2</sup> For this see Euseb., <em>Praepar. Evang. </em>iv. 8, 9.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#221"></a>221. <sup>3</sup> <span>eu0age/steron</span><em></em>perhaps "purer."</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#222"></a>222. <sup>1</sup> The word applies to men as well as women, and it is the masculine plural which is here used, but the translation "virginity" best accords with the words which follow about the Blessed Virgin.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#223"></a>223. <sup>1</sup> Macarius reflects the attitude of his age in regarding virginity as a cause of "merit."</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#224"></a>224. <sup>2</sup> I Tim. iv. 2. This is the passage quoted in the objection, but <em>v.</em> 2 was then omitted, and only <em>vv</em>. 1 and 3 given. ( <span>a0nasth&amp;suntai</span><em> </em>is not S. Paul's word, but is incorrectly borrowed from the <span>a0posth&amp;sontai</span><em> </em>of the previous verse.) These are the men who should "forbid to marry" and therefore commend virginity.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#225"></a>225. <sup>3</sup> Our apologist is on the wrong track, but it leads to many things of interest to us.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#226"></a>226. <sup>4</sup> This sentence represents the previous paragraph, but best fits into the argument here.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#227"></a>227. <sup>1</sup> This seems to refer to the fiery furnace of Nebuchadnezzar.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#228"></a>228. <sup>2</sup> He is referring to the further words of I Tim. iv. 3, "abstaining from meats," as well as "forbidding to marry."</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#229"></a>229. <sup>3</sup> The followers of Manes are first found in Asia Minor, as here stated ; their system being founded on the theory of a god of good and a god of evil, which was to be found in the religion of Persia. For a further mention of Manes see Bk. IV. ch. xv.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#230"></a>230. <sup>4</sup> The Encratites (as the name implies) were the Gnostics whose contempt for matter showed itself in their strict asceticism, while the name Apotactites suggests the licentious tendencies of the Antinomian Gnostics, who showed their contempt in the opposite way. The Eremites were ascetics of the deserts.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#231"></a>231. <sup>5</sup> Dositheus cannot be the head of the Samaritan sect mentioned by Hegesippus (ap. Euseb., <em>H.E. </em>iv. <em>22) </em>and represented in the Clementine writings as the disciple of John the Baptist. Macarius is alone in mentioning him (see also iv. 15, p. 128, 1. 24), which shows that this list is not a copy of that of Epiphanius, as Salmon suggested, <em>D.C.B., </em>art. "Macarius."</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#232"></a>232. <sup>6</sup> <span>e0gkra&amp;teia</span>,<em> </em>the word from which Encratite is derived.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#233"></a>233. <sup>1</sup> <span>terpome/noij</span><em> </em>is the reading suggested by Blondel for MS. <span>prome/noij</span> or <span>poqome/noij</span>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt;"><a name="#234"></a>234. <sup>2</sup> If <span>su_n eu0marei/a| tou~ krei/ttonoj</span><em> </em>is to be so rendered.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br /></span></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<span class="article_separator">&nbsp;</span>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<div class="bottom_top"></div>
<div id="bottom">
</div>
</div>
<div id="footer"><strong>Content View Hits</strong> : 911675<br />
<script type="text/javascript">
var pv = new Array(1,0,0,0,1);
var trdlname = "/downloads";
//<![CDATA[
var regex = /\.(?:doc|eps|jpg|png|svg|xls|ppt|pdf|xls|zip|txt|vsd|vxd|js|css|rar|exe|wma|mov|avi|wmv|mp3)($|\&|\?)/;
//]]>
var trlkname = "/external/";
var trmlname = "/mailto/";
</script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.jesuswordsonly.com/modules/mod_analytics/gatr.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-3747914");
pageTracker._initData();
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}
</script>
</div>
<div class="copyright"></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>