embed/jesuswordsonly
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Wiki Activity
14edd76594
jesuswordsonly/books/original-gospel-of-matthew/235-hebrew-matthew-baptismal-account.html

564 lines
64 KiB
HTML
Raw Normal View History

initial backup of github.com/jesuswordsonly/jesuswordsonly.github.io
2023-08-31 11:16:13 +00:00
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en-gb" lang="en-gb" >
<head>
<base href="http://jesuswordsonly.com/books/original-gospel-of-matthew/235-hebrew-matthew-baptismal-account.html" />
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<meta name="robots" content="index, follow" />
<meta name="keywords" content="Jesus Words, Jesus Words Only, Jesus Words on Salvation, Did Calvin Murder Servetus, Flaws of Young Earth Science, Ingenious Design, Apostle Paul, False Apostle Paul, Faith Alone, Dispensationalism, Ebionites, Commands of Jesus, Original Gospel of Matthew, Hebrew Matthew" />
<meta name="title" content="Hebrew Matthew - Baptismal Account" />
<meta name="author" content="18ptTR" />
<meta name="description" content="Jesus' Words as Primary Focus for Christians" />
<meta name="generator" content="Joomla! 1.5 - Open Source Content Management" />
<title>Hebrew Matthew - Baptismal Account</title>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/media/system/js/mootools.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/media/system/js/caption.js"></script>
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="/images/favicon.ico" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/templates/system/css/system.css" type="text/css" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/templates/system/css/general.css" type="text/css" />
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/template_css.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/nav.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/style1.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<!--[if IE]>
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/ie.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<![endif]-->
<!--[if IE]>
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/ie.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<![endif]-->
<!--[if lte IE 6]>
<style type="text/css">
img { behavior: url(/templates/js_relevant/js/iepngfix.htc); }
</style>
<![endif]-->
</head>
<body>
<div id="main-wrapper">
<div id="header_graphic">
<div class="inside">
<div id="newsflash"> <div class="moduletable">
<table class="contentpaneopen">
<tr>
<td valign="top" ><p><span style="font-size: medium; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">“For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not, even that which he hath shall be taken away.” (Matt. 25:29 ASV.)</span></p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" >
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<h1><a href="http://jesuswordsonly.com/" title="Relevant">Relevant</a></h1>
<h2>A Joomla! Template for the Rest of Us</h2>
</div>
</div>
<div class="menubar">
<div id="navmenu">
<script type="text/javascript" src="/templates/js_relevant/js/barmenu.js"></script>
<ul class="menu"><li><a href="http://jesuswordsonly.com/"><span>Home</span></a></li><li class="haschild active"><a href="/books.html" class="haschild"><span>Books</span></a><ul><li><a href="/books/jesuswordsonly.html"><span>Jesus' Words Only</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/jesuswordssalvation.html"><span>Jesus' Words on Salvation</span></a></li><li class="haschild"><a href="/books/didcalvinmurderservetus.html" class="child"><span>Did Calvin Murder Servetus?</span></a><ul><li><a href="/books/didcalvinmurderservetus/background-material-did-calvin-murder-servetus.html"><span>Background Material</span></a></li></ul></li><li><a href="/books/hownottosudythebible.html"><span>How Not to Study the Bible</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/flawsofyoungearthscience.html"><span>Flaws of Young Earth Science</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/jesusorpaul.html"><span>Jesus or Paul</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/unintended-disservice.html"><span>Unintended Disservice</span></a></li><li id="current" class="active"><a href="/books/original-gospel-of-matthew.html"><span>Original Gospel of Matthew</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/commands-of-jesus.html"><span>Commands of Jesus</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/gospel-of-john.html"><span>Gospel of John</span></a></li></ul></li><li><a href="/recommendedreading.html"><span>Further Reading</span></a></li><li><a href="/media.html"><span>Media</span></a></li><li class="haschild"><a href="/reviews.html" class="haschild"><span>Reviews</span></a><ul><li><a href="/reviews/jwo-reviews.html"><span>Jesus Words Only</span></a></li><li><a href="/reviews/jwos-reviews.html"><span>Jesus Words on Salvation</span></a></li></ul></li><li><a href="/contactus.html"><span>Contact Us</span></a></li><li><a href="http://www.jesuswordsonly.com/topicindex/753-bookstore.html"><span>Bookstore</span></a></li><li><a href="/topicindex.html"><span>Topic Index</span></a></li><li><a href="/aboutauthor.html"><span>About Author</span></a></li><li><a href="/newsletters.html"><span>Newsletters</span></a></li></ul>
</div>
</div>
<div id="mainbody">
<div id="showcasetop">&nbsp;</div>
<table width="940" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="center">
<tr>
<td id="leftcol" valign="top" width="200">
<div class="inside">
<div class="moduleS1">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<h3>Search</h3>
<form action="index.php" method="post">
<div class="searchS1">
<input name="searchword" id="mod_search_searchword" maxlength="20" alt="Search" class="inputboxS1" type="text" size="20" value="search..." onblur="if(this.value=='') this.value='search...';" onfocus="if(this.value=='search...') this.value='';" /> </div>
<input type="hidden" name="task" value="search" />
<input type="hidden" name="option" value="com_search" />
<input type="hidden" name="Itemid" value="29" />
</form> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="moduleS1">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<h3>Questions?</h3>
Please enter your questions, and we will get back to you as soon as possible. As an anti-spam measure, we ask that you re-type the code you see in the box below, prior to clicking "Send Message"<br /><br />
<form name="s5_quick_contact" method="post" action="">
<input class="inputbox" id="namebox" onclick="s5_qc_clearname()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearname()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Name..." name="name"></input><br />
<input class="inputbox" id="emailbox" onclick="s5_qc_clearemail()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearemail()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Email..." name="email"></input><br />
<input class="inputbox" id="subjectbox" onclick="s5_qc_clearsubject()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearsubject()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Subject..." name="subject"></input><br />
<textarea id="messagebox" rows="" cols="" class="inputbox textarea" onclick="s5_qc_clearbody()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearbody()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; overflow:auto;width:80%; height:55px" name="message">Your Message...</textarea><br />
<input class="inputbox" id="spambox" onclick="s5_qc_clearspam()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearspam()" style="font-weight:bold; font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Enter The Code 1849" name="verif_box"></input><br />
<input id="email_address" type="hidden" value="" name="email_address"></input>
<input class="button" type="button" onclick="s5_qc_submit()" value="Send Message" ></input>
</form>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
// <![CDATA[
var s5_qc_spam_text = document.getElementById("spambox").value;
function s5_qc_clearbody() {
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value == "Your Message...") {
document.getElementById("messagebox").value="";
}
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
}
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
}
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
}
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
}
}
function s5_qc_clearname() {
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value == "Name...") {
document.getElementById("namebox").value="";
}
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
}
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
}
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
}
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
}
}
function s5_qc_clearemail() {
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value == "Email...") {
document.getElementById("emailbox").value="";
}
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
}
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
}
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
}
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
}
}
function s5_qc_clearsubject() {
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value == "Subject...") {
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value="";
}
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
}
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
}
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
}
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
}
}
function s5_qc_clearspam() {
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value == s5_qc_spam_text) {
document.getElementById("spambox").value="";
}
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
}
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
}
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
}
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
}
}
function s5_qc_isValidEmail(str_email) {
if (str_email.indexOf(".") > 2 && str_email.indexOf("@") > 0) {
alert('Your email is now being submitted - Thank you!');
document.s5_quick_contact.submit();
}
else {
alert('Your email address is not valid, please check again - Thank you!');
}
}
function s5_qc_submit() {
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value == s5_qc_spam_text || document.getElementById("subjectbox").value == "Subject..." || document.getElementById("namebox").value == "Name..." || document.getElementById("emailbox").value == "Email..." || document.getElementById("messagebox").value == "Your Message...") {
alert('All fields are required, please complete the form - Thank you!');
return false;
}
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value != "1849") {
alert('Your spam verification answer is incorrect.');
return false;
}
var s5_message_holder = document.getElementById("messagebox").value;
var s5_first_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(0);
var s5_second_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(1);
var s5_third_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(2);
var s5_fourth_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(3);
if (s5_first_message_char == "<") {
return false;
}
if (s5_first_message_char == "w" && s5_second_message_char == "w" && s5_third_message_char == "w") {
return false;
}
if (s5_first_message_char == "h" && s5_second_message_char == "t" && s5_third_message_char == "t") {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
else {
document.getElementById("email_address").value = "info@jesuswordsonly.com";
var email_str = document.getElementById("emailbox").value;
s5_qc_isValidEmail(email_str);
}
}
// ]]>
</script>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td id="maincol" valign="top">
<div id="breadcrumbs">
<span class="breadcrumbs pathway">
<a href="http://jesuswordsonly.com/" class="pathway">Home</a> <img src="/templates/js_relevant/images/arrow.png" alt="" /> <a href="/books.html" class="pathway">Books</a> <img src="/templates/js_relevant/images/arrow.png" alt="" /> Original Gospel of Matthew</span>
</div>
<table class="contentpaneopen">
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<h1><span style="font-size: 18pt;">Baptismal Account in Hebrew Matthew</span></h1>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">In the Hebrew Matthew of 38 AD, there is a variant to the baptismal account which is different from a much later Greek text tradition. This earliest variant has God say from Heav</span><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">en to Jesus at His baptism: "This Day I have begotten thee." &nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">As we shall see below, this earliest variant is validated by two quotes from the Epistle to the Hebrews in the NT, including Hebrews 5:5. This variant is also confirmed as originally present by numerous quotes by the early orthodox commentary of preachers. They relied upon the earliest Greek New Testament, but it was evidently changed later as these words were contrary to the "eternal son" doctrine that emerged in the 300s.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">So what did the Hebrew version of Matthew say -- the original version of our Gospel of Matthew? This Matthew, Jerome later explained, was translated into Greek. (Jerome in 393 AD explained the Ebionites-Nazarenes still maintained custody of that copy in a library at Caesarea.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">Epiphanius recorded near 400 AD that this original Hebrew Matthew had God speak from heaven at the baptism "today I have begotten thee."</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">After saying many things, this Gospel continues: &ldquo;After the people were baptized, Jesus also came and was baptized by John. And as Jesus came up from the water, Heaven was opened, and He saw the Holy Spirit descend in the form of a dove and enter into Him. And a voice from Heaven said, &lsquo;You are my beloved Son; with You I am well pleased.&rsquo; And again, &lsquo;<em><strong>Today I have begotten You</strong></em>.&rsquo; &ldquo;Immediately a great light shone around the place; and John, seeing it, said to Him, &lsquo;Who are you, Lord? And again a voice from Heaven said, &lsquo;This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased.&rsquo; Then John, falling down before Him, said, &lsquo;I beseech You, Lord, baptize me!&rsquo; But He forbade him saying, &lsquo;Let it be so; for thus it is fitting that all things be fulfilled.&rsquo;&rdquo; (Epiphanius, <em>Panarion</em> 30.13.7) [<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authentic_Gospel_of_Matthew">Wikipedia</a>]</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"></span></p>
<h1><span style="font-size: 18pt;">Historical Evidence That "This Day I have begotten thee" is Correct</span></h1>
<h3><span style="color: #333399; font-size: 18pt;">A. Old Mss. of Matthew</span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Also, &ldquo;this day I have begotten thee&rdquo; appears in the following Greek of Matthew: D (Greek) and the Old Latin. (E.B. Nicholson, <em>The Gospel according to the Hebrews</em> (1879) at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=QVAVAAAAYAAJ&amp;dq=some%20things%20out%20of%20the%20Gospel%20according%20to%20the%20Hebrews%20and%20the%20Syriac&amp;pg=PA40#v=onepage&amp;q=juda&amp;f=false">40</a>.) Also, in "Codex Bezae and most of the old Latin manuscripts...the voice instead cites Psalm 2:7: <em><strong>'This day I have begotten thee.</strong></em>" (Barbara Aland, Jo&euml;l Delobel,&nbsp;<em>New Testament textual criticism, exegesis, and early church history</em> (Peeters, 1994) at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=Z4xXSlE_ZvcC&amp;lpg=PA121&amp;ots=K380wpl4Fq&amp;dq=juvencus%20this%20day%20i%20have%20begotten%20thee&amp;pg=PA120#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false">120</a>.)<img src="/images/stories/JWO_Online/Jesus_as_young_man.jpg" alt="Jesus as young man" width="76" height="92" style="float: right;" /></span></p>
<h3><span style="color: #333399; font-size: 18pt;">B. Luke 3:22 In Old Manuscripts</span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The baptismal account of Jesus in Luke 3:22 in old manuscripts likewise had this account that the Father spoke from heaven to Jesus: "This day I have begotten you."</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">A modern study Bible comments on Luke 3:22: "Other ancient authorities read You are my Son,<strong><em> today I have begotten you</em></strong>." (Wayne A. Meeks, Jouette M. Bassler, <em>The HarperCollins Study Bible: New Revised Standard Version</em> (HarperCollins: 1997) at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=aMkEa-Z4shEC&amp;lpg=RA1-PA1962&amp;ots=SWWdDM1c0V&amp;dq=%22Other%20ancient%20authorities%20read%20You%20are%20my%20Son%22&amp;pg=RA1-PA1962#v=onepage&amp;q=%22Other%20ancient%20authorities%20read%20You%20are%20my%20Son%22&amp;f=false">1962</a>.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The New American commentary reads: &ldquo;You are my beloved Son; with you I am well pleased: this is the best attested reading in the Greek manuscripts. The <strong><em>Western</em></strong> reading, &lsquo;You are my Son, this day <strong><em>I have begotten you</em></strong>,&rsquo; is derived from Psalm 2:7.&rdquo; <a href="http://www.usccb.org/nab/bible/luke/luke3.htm">http://www.usccb.org/nab/bible/luke/luke3.htm</a> (last accessed 2005.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">This reference to a "Western" text that reads "begotten thee" is because it appears in the Greek Western type text known as Codex D. It also appears in many other texts of Luke 3:22.</span></p>
<h3 style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; padding: 0px; line-height: 29px; font-weight: normal; font-size: 20px; color: #76756a; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Geneva, Helvetica, sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;"><span style="color: #333399; font-size: 18pt;">B.1. Augustine Mentions Old Manuscripts Only Might Not Contain 'This day I have begotten thee'</span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Throckmorton in <em>Gospel Parallels</em> (1992) at 14 lists some of the sources for "This day I have begotten thee." He lists - "D it Justin, Clement, Origen, <strong>Augustine</strong>, Gospel of the Ebionites." </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Why does Throckmorton mention Augustine? First, because Augustine in the late 300s attests to "this day I have begotten thee" is present in "some codices." Second, because Augustine cannot prove it was missing in any Greek early text, he simply says instead "it is SAID not to be found in the more ancient Greek codices...." Augustine does not say he knows of any ancient Greek codice that is lacking "this day I have begotten thee." Instead of proof, he offers an unattributed claim that some 'say' it is not in SOME earlier Greek codices, but without his scholarly verification of which he was certainly capable of easily checking. The entire quote is worth reading.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt;">Augustine in <em>In De Cons. Evang</em>. 2,31 writes:</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt; padding-left: 30px;">But once more, with respect to that rendering which is contained in some codices of the Gospel according to Luke, and which bears that the words heard in the heavenly voice were those that are written in the Psalm, "Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten Thee" [Ps 2:7]; <strong>although it is said not to be found in the more ancient Greek codices</strong>, yet if it can be established by any copies worthy of credit, what results but that we suppose both voices to have been heard from heaven, in one or other verbal order?</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt;">The full Latin and English translation comes from&nbsp;Wieland Willker, A Textual Commentary on the Greek Gospels Vol. 3 Luke (Bremen: 2015) at Luke 3:22. Willker made the entire <a href="http://www.willker.de/wie/TCG/TC-Luke.pdf">PDF </a>available&nbsp;free online.</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt;">This actual quote from Augustine dashes claims such as Wasserman's that tries to criticize Ehrman, saying "Ehrman does not mention the important remark by Augustine that the most ancient Greek MSS do not attest to the second reading,"&nbsp;<em>i.e.</em>, "this day I have begotten thee." (Tommy Wasserman, Ph.D., &ldquo;Misquoting Manuscripts? &ndash; The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture Revisited,&rdquo; <span style="font-style: italic;">The Making of Christianity: Conflicts, Contacts, and Constructions</span>. (Ed. Magnus Zetterholm och Samuel Byrskog) (ConBNTS 47. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2012) pp. 325-50, at <a href="http://www.difa3iat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Eharman.pdf">335</a>.)</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt;">But Wasserman overstates what Augustine said. Rather, Augustine's actual words say that supposedly even "some" Greek codices are "said" to lack the language -- but certainly it had not been verified by Augustine despite his abundant access to those earlier codices. Augustine's actual language strengthens the case that "this Day I have begotten thee" is original. Augustine was strongly motivated to destroy the anti-Trinitarian position of Festus who exploited this verse being still present in Matthew and Luke in a respected edition in the late 300s. So Augustine obviously had researched the earlier codices, and he could not affirm any had omitted "This day I have begotten thee." The best he could do is make a non-descript claim that some say it is omitted in some earlier Greek codices. This confirms that a respected text &nbsp;through Augustine's day, upon which Festus relied, said in Luke as well as Matthew "This Day I have begotten thee."</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt;">At least Wasserman is wrong that Augustine says that "most ancient Greek MSS do not attest" to the "this day I have begotten thee." That is wrong. The truth is that Augustine was routed by Festus, and resorted to bottom-of-the barrell proof, ineffectually trying to conjure doubt without any proof when it was certainly available to him had there been any such earlier codex that lacked "this Day I have begotten thee."&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"></span></p>
<h3 style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; padding: 0px; line-height: 29px; font-weight: normal; font-size: 20px; color: #76756a; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Geneva, Helvetica, sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;"><span style="color: #333399; font-size: 18pt;">B.2 Comparable "This is My Son in whom pleased"</span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Throckmorton in <em>Gospel Parallels</em> (1992) explains that the different yet somewhat similar "son, in whom I am well pleased" is present in P4 from the "third century" (the Paris Papyrus, pg. x, xviii), S, meaning Sinaiticus, &ldquo;middle fourth century&rdquo; (<em>id</em>., xiv, 14); A B, Codex Alexandrinus, &ldquo;5th century&rdquo; and Codex Vaticanus, &ldquo;4th Century&rdquo; (id., x, 14), and W Manuscript (5th century). </span></p>
<h3 style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; padding: 0px; line-height: 29px; font-weight: normal; font-size: 20px; color: #76756a; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Geneva, Helvetica, sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;"><span style="color: #333399; font-size: 18pt;">B.3 Ehrman's Weighing of NT Manuscripts</span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times; background-color: #ffffff;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 24px;">Ehrman in <em>Orthodox Corruption of Scripture</em> (Oxford U. Press, 1996) at 62-63) says even though "this day I have begotten thee" is not in P4 from the third century, the evidence before and through the D manuscript supports strongly that this is the correct original of Luke, saying "This Day I have begotten thee." </span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times; background-color: #ffffff;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 24px;">In the same manner, in 2003 Ehrman commented again on this variant in <em>Lost Christianities</em> (2003) at 222, pointing out that this alteration proved &ldquo;remarkably successful,&rdquo; even though &ldquo;the text is found in virtually all our oldest witnesses....&rdquo;</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Others list for Luke 3:22's reading "This day have I begotten thee" the following: </span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Bezae Cantabrigiensis, some Italic, Justin Martyr&nbsp;</span><em style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 16px; line-height: normal;">Dialogue with Trypho</em><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">&nbsp;ch.88 p.244; Hilary, Methodius ("<a href="http://www.biblequery.org/lkmss.htm">Early Manuscripts of Luke,</a>" Biblequery.com.)&nbsp;</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt; background-color: transparent;">The Codex Bezae dates to the 400s, and it has "this day I have begotten thee." See George Huntston Williams, Radical Reformation (3d Edition.) (Truman State University, 1995) at 452 fn. 42 (&ldquo;Thou art my son, this day I have begotten thee,&rsquo; a wording that <em><strong>survives in the Codex Bezae</strong></em> for Lk. 3:22.&rdquo;)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt; background-color: transparent;">Ehrman says it is also in the Didaschalia, Tyconius, and Augustine -- all have "this day I have begotten thee." Ehrman says the only earlier exception is the P4 manuscript. This is insufficient, he says, to prevail over the overwhelming weight of sources prior to P4 and the many after P4. (Ehrman, <em>Orthodox Corruption</em>, supra, at 62-63.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt; background-color: transparent;">Interestingly, Matthew&rsquo;s version of the baptism at Matthew 3:17 in the same Codex D reads differently than it does today. It mentions the Holy Spirit descending as a dove upon Jesus. It is interesting that Epiphanius says the Hebrew version of Matthew of the Ebionites had that language too. This reading is also present in the DuTillet Hebrew Matthew. Hence, Codex D which contains Luke's 'begotten thee' language also contains other language in Matthew that matches the Hebrew Matthew,&nbsp;<em style="background-color: transparent; font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">i.e.</em><span style="background-color: transparent; font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">, the mention of the dove.</span></span></p>
<h3><span style="color: #333399; font-size: 18pt;">D. The Epistle to the Hebrews</span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The original baptism language of "this day I have begotten thee" is quoted in the NT in the Epistle to the Hebrews 1:5 and 5:5.</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son,<em><strong> this day have I begotten thee</strong></em>? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son? (Heb. <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=hebrews%201:5&amp;version=KJV">1:5</a>, KJV)</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">So also Christ glorified not himself to be made an high priest; but he that said unto him, Thou art my Son,<em><strong> today have I begotten thee</strong></em>. (Heb. 5:5, KJV)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">These passages in Hebrews are sometimes said to convey the "adoptionist" view of Jesus. They are dismissed as invalid in one stroke. Orthodoxy about an "eternal son" has won out even though it requires removal from Matthew and Luke the very same words.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">A more vague allusion is seen in Acts. &ldquo;God hath fulfilled the same unto us their children, in that he hath raised up Jesus again; as it is also written in the second psalm, Thou art my Son,<strong><em> this day have I begotten thee</em></strong>.&rdquo; (Acts 13:33 KJV.)</span></p>
<h3><span style="color: #333399; font-size: 18pt;">E. Patristic Sources 95-325 AD Repititiously Quote 'this day I have begotten thee'</span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">There is no doubt how the original baptism-of-Jesus once read to include the quote from Psalm 2:7. As quoted at length below, the original version is <em><strong>quoted numerous times</strong></em> in the following early &lsquo;patristic&rsquo; writings between 96 A.D. and 325 A.D.: <em>First Epistle of Clement to the Corinthians</em>;<em> Dialogue of Justin with Tryphon, A Jew</em>; <em>The Instructor</em>; <em>The Banquet of the Ten Virgins; or, Concerning Chastity</em>; and <em>Acts of the Holy Apostles Peter and Paul</em>. The Luke version is specifically quoted in the 300s by the heretic Faustus but without dispute on the validity of the Lucan quote when Augustine does a point-by-point rebuttal to Faustus. Faustus also insisted it was in Matthew's account, which indeed it was clearly in the Hebrew Matthew.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Let's review these proofs, and provide a link to the online versions of the original sources.</span></p>
<div><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"></span></div>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; color: #0000ff;">160 AD, Clement</span></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">First, the original baptism-of-Jesus account is quoted in Book One, Chapter VI of The Instructor, a work of 160 A.D. by Clement of Alexandria: &ldquo;For at the moment of the Lord&rsquo;s baptism there sounded a voice from heaven, as a testimony to the Beloved, &lsquo;Thou art My beloved Son,<strong><em> to-day have I begotten Thee.</em></strong>&rsquo;&rdquo; &ldquo;Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume II/CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA/The Instructor/Book I/Chapter VI,&rdquo; at <a href="http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Ante-Nicene_Fathers/Volume_II/CLEMENT_OF_ALEXANDRIA/The_Instructor/Book_I/Chapter_VI.">wikisource</a>&nbsp;Alternatively see also, Clement of A., <em>Christ, the Educator, Fathers of the Church</em> (CUA 2010) Vol. 23 at <a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=tI_GTDlgcZsC&amp;lpg=PA25&amp;ots=DifFH86ohy&amp;dq=washington%20codex%20this%20day%20i%20have%20begotten%20thee&amp;pg=PA25#v=onepage&amp;q=washington%20codex%20this%20day%20i%20have%20begotten%20thee&amp;f=false">page 25</a>&nbsp;("When the Lord was baptized, a voice loudly sounded from heaven, as a witness to him who was beloved, 'Thou art my beloved son, this Day I have begotten thee.")<br /></span></p>
<div><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"></span></div>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; color: #0000ff;">300 AD, Methodius</span></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Methodius (A.D. 260-312), in Part 9, chapter IX in his work, The Banquet of the Ten Virgins; or, Concerning Chastity, is similarly quoting the original baptism-of-Jesus account when we read: &ldquo;Now, in perfect agreement and correspondence with what has been said, seems to be this which was<strong><em> spoken by the Father from above to Christ</em></strong> when He came to be baptized in the water of the Jordan, &lsquo;Thou art my son: <strong><em>this day have I begotten thee</em></strong>.&rsquo;&rdquo; &ldquo;Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume VI/Methodius/Banquet of the Ten Virgins/Thekla/Part 9,&rdquo; <a href="http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Ante-Nicene_Fathers/Volume_VI/Methodius/Banquet_of_the_Ten_Virgins/Thekla/Part_9">wikisource</a> (Schaff)</span></p>
<div><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"></span></div>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; color: #0000ff;">300 AD, Lactantius</span></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Again, in the words of Lactantius (A.D. 260-330), in his The Divine Institutes, book IV, chapter XV, he quotes the original uncorrupted version of the baptism-of-Jesus account: &ldquo;Then a voice from heaven was heard: &lsquo;Thou art my Son,<strong><em> today have I begotten Thee</em></strong>.&rsquo; Which voice is found to have been foretold by David. And the Spirit of God descended upon Him, formed after the<strong><em> appearance of a white dove</em></strong>.&rdquo; .&ldquo;Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume VII/Lactantius/The Divine Institutes/Book IV/Chap. XV,&rdquo; <a href="http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Ante-Nicene_Fathers/Volume_VII/Lactantius/The_Divine_Institutes/Book_IV/Chap._XV">wikisource</a> (from Schaff).</span></p>
<div><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"></span></div>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; color: #0000ff;">234 AD, Acts of...Peter and Paul</span></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">In the Acts of the Holy Apostles Peter and Paul (234 A.D.), it says: &ldquo;Him therefore to whom the Father said, Thou art my Son, <strong><em>this day have I begotten</em></strong> Thee, the chief priests through envy crucified.&rdquo; .&ldquo;Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume VIII/Apocrypha of the New Testament/Acts of the Holy Apostles Peter and Paul/Acts of the Holy Apostles Peter and Paul,&rdquo; <a href="http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Ante-Nicene_Fathers/Volume_VIII/Apocrypha_of_the_New_Testament/Acts_of_the_Holy_Apostles_Peter_and_Paul/Acts_of_the_Holy_Apostles_Peter_and_Paul">wikisource</a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; color: #0000ff;">230 AD (est.), Origen</span></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The same verse also once apparently existed in John&rsquo;s gospel. In Origen&rsquo;s Commentary on the Gospel of John, section 32, Origen (died 254) writes evidently quoting John&rsquo;s gospel upon which he was commenting: &ldquo;None of these testimonies, however, sets forth distinctly the Savior&rsquo;s exalted birth; but when the words are addressed to Him, &lsquo;<strong><em>Thou art My Son, this day have I begotten Thee</em></strong>,&rsquo; this is <strong><em>spoken to Him by God</em></strong>.&rdquo; <a href="http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/origen-john1.html">(Early Christian Writings</a>)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; color: #0000ff;">96 AD, Clement</span></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">In the First Epistle of Clement to the Corinthians, XXXVI from 96 A.D., written by Clement&mdash;a man who was a direct disciple of the Apostle Peter&mdash;it says: &ldquo;But concerning His Son the Lord spoke thus: <strong><em>&lsquo;Thou art my Son, to-day have I begotten Thee</em></strong>.&rsquo;&rdquo; &nbsp;(Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. 1 at <a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=bPdMAQAAMAAJ&amp;lpg=PA15&amp;ots=jUg8QXHgWV&amp;dq=first%20epistle%20of%20clement%20But%20concerning%20His%20Son%20the%20Lord%20spoke%20thus%3A%20%E2%80%98Thou%20art%20my%20Son%2C%20to-day%20have%20I%20begotten%20Thee.&amp;pg=PA15#v=onepage&amp;q=first%20epistle%20of%20clement%20But%20concerning%20His%20Son%20the%20Lord%20spoke%20thus:%20%E2%80%98Thou%20art%20my%20Son,%20to-day%20have%20I%20begotten%20Thee.&amp;f=false">15</a>.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; color: #0000ff;">165 AD, Justin</span></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Lastly, in a writing by Justin (died 165 A.D.) known as the Dialogue of Justin with Tryphon, A Jew, in chapter LXXXVIII, Justin writes about Jesus, clearly referencing the Gospels&rsquo; baptism accounts:</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">He was in the habit of working as a carpenter when among men, making ploughs and yokes; by which He taught the symbols of righteousness and an active life; but then the Holy Ghost, and for man&rsquo;s sake, as I formerly stated, lighted on Him in the<em><strong> form of a dove</strong></em>, and there came at the same instant from the heavens a voice, which was uttered also by David when he spoke, personating Christ, what the Father would say to Him: &lsquo;Thou art My Son:<strong><em> this day have I begottenThee</em></strong>.&rsquo; (Justin, <a href="http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/justinmartyr-dialoguetrypho.html">Trypho</a>)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Justin then goes on to explain to Trypho the Jew&mdash;once more obviously quoting the original form of Matthew 3:17 and Luke 3:22:</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">For this devil, when [Jesus] went up from the river Jordan, at the time when the voice spake to Him, &ldquo;Thou art my Son: <strong><em>this day have I begotten Thee</em></strong>,&rdquo; is recorded in the memoirs of the apostles to have come to Him and tempted Him, even so far as to say to Him, &ldquo;Worship me;&rdquo; and Christ answered him, &ldquo;Get thee behind me, Satan: thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve.&rdquo; Id., ch. CII.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Other Christian writers predating 400AD who found the same passage in Matthew are Juvencus, Evangeliorum Libri Quattor, I 360-64 and Hilary, De Trinitate, VIII, 25, Tyconius, Reg. 1</span></p>
<h3><span style="color: #333399; font-size: 18pt;">F. Christians Quote Matthew and Luke Against Church Orthodox Views But Quote Accepted As Fact From Luke</span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Similarly, the phrase &lsquo;this day I have begotten thee&rsquo; was quoted by Faustus ca. 400 AD from both Matthew and Luke&rsquo;s Gospel as having been uttered at Jesus&rsquo; baptism. Faustus was made to appear unorthodox as this verse was being removed from Matthew's Gospel post Nicea 325 AD, and yet Faustus held on to the view that Jesus, the Son of David, was not born Son of God but became Son of God at his baptism.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">This also ran afoul of the late doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church that Jesus was the 'eternal' Son of God, which doctrine emerged at Nicea in 325 AD under Emperor Constantine's influence. (His goal was to alter Jesus to match Constantine's favored deity - Sol Invictus. See our article "<a href="/books/original-gospel-of-matthew/239-council-of-nicea-of-325-ad.html">Council of Nicea</a>.")</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Augustine in his point-by-point rebuttal in 400 A.D. does not dispute this is how Luke read. In 400 AD approximately, Augustine disputes only how Matthew then read. (Remember, however, the Hebrew Matthew originally had the 'This day I have begotten thee" at Jesus' baptism. See above.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">We find this Faustus-Augustine exchange in Schaff&rsquo;s Augustin: <a href="http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf104.iv.ix.xxv.html?highlight=this%20day%20i%20have%20begotten%20thee#highlight">The Writings Against the Manicheans and Against the Donatists</a>, in Book XXIII (1890) at 313. Schaff recounts Faustus&rsquo; points about the Matthew passage when read in light of Luke:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Faustus recurs to the genealogical difficulty and insists that even according to Matthew Jesus was not Son of God until His baptism. Augustin sets forth the Catholic view of the relation of the divine and the human in the person of Christ. So this quote begins with Faustus citing how Matthew and Luke read in 400 AD -- at least in the versions Faustus had access to:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">[Faustus wrote]</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">2. I will, for the present, suppose that this person was right in saying that the son of David was born of Mary. It still remains true, that in this whole passage of the generation<strong><em> no mention is made of the Son of God till we come to the baptism</em></strong>; so that it is an injurious misrepresentation on your part to speak of this writer as making the Son of God the inmate of a womb. The writer, indeed, seems to cry out against such an idea, and in the very title of his book to clear himself of such blasphemy, asserting that the person whose birth he describes is the son of David, not the Son of God. And if you attend to the writer&rsquo;s meaning [<em>i.e.</em>, Matthew's meaning]&nbsp;and purpose, you will see that what he wishes us to believe of Jesus the Son of God is not so much that He was born of Mary, as that <strong><em>He became the Son of God by baptism at the river Jordan</em></strong>. He [<em>i.e.</em>, Matthew] tells us that the person of whom he spoke at the outset as the son of David was baptized by John, and <strong><em>became the Son of God on this particular occasion</em></strong>, when about thirty years old, according to Luke, when also the voice was heard saying to Him, &ldquo;Thou art my Son; <em><strong>this day have I begotten Thee</strong></em>.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">Schaff provides Augustine&rsquo;s complete reply. <em>Id</em>., at 318 et seq. Augustine disputes only how Matthew read (as of that time in the church-approved Latin Vulgate). Augustine did not dispute how Luke read, as apparently that had not yet been altered. Augustine quotes only Matthew back at Faustus: &ldquo;when He was baptized by John, a voice from heaven, saying, &lsquo;This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.&rsquo;&rdquo; Augustine says these words do not &ldquo;imply that He was not the Son of God before.&rdquo; <em>Id</em>., at 315. Augustine ignores the quote from Luke which equally made Faustus&rsquo; case despite what we can now see was a deliberate change in Matthew to fit the late 'eternal son' doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church. (For further discussion of this portion of Faustus, see&nbsp;Barbara Aland, Jo&euml;l Delobel,&nbsp;<em>New Testament textual criticism, exegesis, and early church history</em> (Peeters, 1994) at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=Z4xXSlE_ZvcC&amp;lpg=PA121&amp;ots=K380wpl4Fq&amp;dq=juvencus%20this%20day%20i%20have%20begotten%20thee&amp;pg=PA121#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false">121</a>.)</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333399; font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">Based on Epiphanius and Jerome's account of the Hebrew Matthew, Matthew's Gospel must have been altered instead of Luke's Gospel by that time. Only after Augustine did not want to cope with Faustus's argument any longer, Catholic authorities also erased the Luke 3:22 version as well. That is the Latin Vulgate version that equally omits 'this day I have begotten thee' unlike the version evidently circulating in 400 AD.</span></p>
<h3><span style="color: #333399; font-size: 18pt;" data-mce-mark="1">When And Why Did This Change Happen?</span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">It takes no genius to figure out why this text was deleted about "this day I have begotten thee." It conflicted with a doctrine first adopted in 325 AD at Nicea that Jesus was the '<strong><em>eternal son</em></strong> of God.' While no verse expressly supports that idea, it became fixed dogma. Hence, it is no coincidence that all the texts prior to that era have 'this day I have begotten thee' in the baptism account -- proven by numerous quotations-- and all those surviving today after 325 AD are missing it.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">This is demonstrable simply by examining Charles Hodge's SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY (1871) Vol. 1. He addresses what would be the problem if this verse were in Scripture. He says if this language from Psalm 2:7 could be applied to Jesus, it is a "more plausible" objection to the 'eternal son' doctrine. He says:</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">More plausible objections are founded on certain passages of the Scriptures. In Psalm 2:7, it is said, &ldquo;Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.&rdquo; From this it is argued that Christ or the Messiah was constituted or <strong><em>made the Son of God in time, and therefore was not the Son of God from eternity.</em></strong> (Vol. 1<a href="http://www.ccel.org/ccel/hodge/theology1.iv.vi.vi.html"> section 6</a> at ccel.org.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Initially, notice that Hodges only has to address that it exists in a Psalm. He does not have to cope with the fact that the authentic version of Matthew's Gospel ascribed this to the voice of Yahweh from heaven at Jesus' baptism.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Hence, certainly this verse once was present in Matthew, and most certainly it was deliberately removed.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">But this is not an isolated incident.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Professor Bart D. Ehrman (Christian background; professor on Christianity) catalogs a whole series of similar alterations (some small, but some big) to the New Testament in his book<em> The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture</em> (Oxford University Press, 1993). There he warns us that: &ldquo;...theological disputes, <em><strong>specifically disputes over Christology</strong></em>, prompted Christian scribes to alter the words of scripture in order to make them more serviceable for the polemical task. Scribes modified their manuscripts to make them more patently &lsquo;orthodox&rsquo; and less susceptible to &lsquo;abuse&rsquo; by the opponents of orthodoxy.&rdquo; <em>Id</em>., at 4.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The Fourth Century church became embarassed that Jesus's sonship took place at his baptism. Proof of this embarassment comes from Jerome. Even though he is aware of the variant 'this day I have begotten thee,' Jerome appears to believe it is the valid version, but then in <em>Enchiridion </em>49 Jerome "explains that <strong><em>J</em></strong><strong><em>esus did not really become God's 'Son' on that day</em></strong>; the 'today' is instead<em><strong> an eternal day</strong></em>."&nbsp;(Barbara Aland, Jo&euml;l Delobel,&nbsp;<em>New Testament textual criticism, exegesis, and early church history</em> (Peeters, 1994) at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=Z4xXSlE_ZvcC&amp;lpg=PA121&amp;ots=K380wpl4Fq&amp;dq=juvencus%20this%20day%20i%20have%20begotten%20thee&amp;pg=PA121#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false">121</a> n. 14 (quoting Jerome.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Thus, from some misapprehension of what it meant to say Jesus was begotten by God as His Son at Jesus&rsquo; baptism, pious Fourth Century Christians rewrote Luke 3:22. They also removed the original &lsquo;begotten&rsquo; language from the baptism account in Matthew. (Our oldest complete versions of Luke and Matthew date to the Fourth Century.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The fact this verse was originally present is too well-attested from too many sources, including the Epistle to the Hebrews in our very own NT of today, to deny it once was what it originally said. Accordingly, it matters little that some of the oldest surviving manuscripts ... all after 325 AD...do not agree. All of the original texts pre-existing the Fourth Century have been lost (or were deliberately destroyed). <strong>Only fragments survive.</strong> We thus can recover the original and older text by resort to the much earlier sources such as the Epistle to the Hebrews and the &lsquo;patristic&rsquo; writings, as well as older fragments than 325 AD and the lines thereafter that continued that language into the mid 300s all the way to the Codex Bezae. (The King James Bible ordinarily followed that Codex, but here did not, perhaps for doctrinal reasons.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">What can we say of those church leaders in the early 300s who did not think it wrong to change the text? They were forgerers and hence sadly willing to use guile. They deserve our censure. As the orthodox church leader Tertullian said about Marcion in 200 AD and his followers who changed the earlier gospel accounts:</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">[W]e take up arms against heretics for the faith of the gospel, maintaining... that<em><strong> a late date is the mark of forgers</strong></em>, and...<strong><em>truth must needs precede the forgery</em></strong>, and proceed straight from those by whom it has been handed on. (Tertullian, Against Marcion, Bk. 4, ch. <a href="http://www.gnosis.org/library/ter_marc4.htm">5</a>.)</span></p>
<h1><span style="font-size: 18pt;">Arian Controversy and Council Of Nicea Explains Alterations</span></h1>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">It was only post 325 A.D. that the standard texts of Matthew and Luke were revised to omit "today I have begotten thee" from Jesus' baptism by John-the-Baptist. You will not find it any longer in the KJV, ASV, NIV, etc. This was because of the controversy with Arius in 306 A.D. who claimed the 'begotten' passages meant Jesus was not the "Eternal Son of God." However, the Roman Catholic church by 325 A.D. felt it was imperative to assert this about Jesus even though no verse in the NT ever calls Jesus the 'eternal Son of God.' For background, see Wayne A. Grudem, <em>Systematic theology: an introduction to biblical doctrine</em> (Zondervan, 1994) at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=DA8xl4eagDcC&amp;lpg=PA243&amp;dq=arius%20col.%201%3A15&amp;pg=PA243#v=onepage&amp;q=arius%20col.%201:15&amp;f=false">243</a>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Hence, words from the original account were let slip in many reproductions (except was kept in the Western text tradition which means it should haven used in the King James Bible but was not for some unspecified reason) to the point we do not any longer see them in our NT.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">But it never made any sense. To say Jesus was the "Eternal Son" begotten of God, as was developed in the 300s and beyond, was a contradiction in terms. As Adam Clarke, a Methodist, explained in his commentary:</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"&hellip;it is demonstrated that the doctrine of the <strong><em>eternal Sonship of Christ</em></strong> is<strong><em> absolutely irreconcilable to reason</em></strong>, and contradictory to itself. ETERNITY is that which has had no beginning, nor stands in any reference to time: <em><strong>SON supposes time, generation, and father</strong></em>; and time also antecedent to such generation: therefore the rational conjunction of these two terms, Son and eternity, is absolutely impossible, as they imply <strong><em>essentially different and opposite ideas</em></strong>" (<a href="http://bible.cc/acts/13-33.htm">Adam Clarke Commentary</a>).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Hence, at Jesus's water baptism, God-the-Father gave Jesus a new birth as Son of God (a unique status), declaring from heaven "This day I have begotten thee." This was an example of how baptism would have similar effects on ourselves although obviously we would not become Divine as Jesus uniquely was indwelled by the Father/Word. (John 1:1, 14:10.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Incidentally, the Talmud post-Christ -- a work of Jewish scribes -- preserved that Jewish scholars pre-Christ always said this would be how God Yahweh would address Messiah:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"></span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">"Our Rabbis taught, The Holy One, Blessed be He, <em><strong>will say to</strong></em></span><br /><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"><em><strong>the Messiah,</strong></em> the Son of David (may he reveal himself speedily in our</span><br /><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">day), 'Ask of me anything, and I will give it thee,' as it is said, 'I will</span><br /><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">tell of the decree,' erc., '<em><strong>this day have I begotten thee, ask of me and I</strong></em></span><br /><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"><em><strong>will give the nations for thy inheritance</strong></em>.''' (Talmud, Sukkah 52)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">(quoted in <em>Problems of Bible Translation</em> (1954) at <a href="https://www.adventistbiblicalresearch.org/sites/default/files/pdf/Problems%20in%20Bible%20Translations.pdf">page 145</a> (PDF link) </span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"><br /><em></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Bart Ehrman's Lost Christianities</span></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Bart Ehrman's book Lost Christianities (N.Y. 2003) explained <span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; line-height: 27.6px;">Luke was edited in three places. Luke 2:33 and Luke 2:48 both contain verses that state that Joseph was Jesus' father. At least, that is what is said in the oldest manuscripts. Verses such as Luke 2:33 <em><strong>supported Ebionite Christians' belief in so-called adoptionism, i.e., God spoke "this day I have begotten thee" over Jesus.&nbsp;</strong></em>Strangely, in some later manuscripts Luke 2:33 and Luke 2:48 both had the word 'father' edited out although over half of our bibles today have thankfully reverted to the original version. Luke 3:22 is where God clearly says that he is giving birth to Jesus as Son of God. It was edited so that it did not say so. Bart Ehrman at page 222 explains</span>:</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">&nbsp;"This is one proto-orthodox alteration that proved remarkably successful. Even though the potentially dangerous ("heretical") form of the text is found in virtually all our oldest witnesses [...] it is the altered form of the text that is found in the majority of surviving manuscripts and reproduced in most of our English translations."&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"></span></p>
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong>End.</strong></span></h2>
<hr />
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">Email On This Topic</span></h2>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Amy wrote me on November 3, 2010 as follows:</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The original gospel of Matthew clearly had Jesus being told by YHWH "this day I have begotten thee" and the holy spirit in the form of a dove descended, and entered Jesus. At that point, Jesus became the Son of God indwelled in a unique SHekinah sense by God Himself. Jesus was a man, and continued to be a man despite that experience. Every word or act he saw heard from the Father, he repeated / acted out, as Jesus says in John's Gospel. God knew our feebleness and used a man whom we can see in person, hear in person, who would uniquely be filled by God whom we would listen to....Daniel in Daniel 7 speaks of the Son of Man (a human) coming to earth in time of judgment on clouds of glory, holding God's power in his hands.....but his title and the passage makes it clear this is a MAN -- a man on "clouds of glory" (a synonymn for God's presence). </span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">NOTES </span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Jerome has a more lengthy quote, and his own translation of "only begotten" when it was a Hebraism meaning "beloved," not "only begotten." Regardless, here is Jerome's full quote from the Ebionite Gospel of Matthew:</span><strong><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"></span></strong></p>
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 14pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Second, God refers to Jesus as his "first-begotten Son," Jerome explains relying upon the Hebrew Matthew:</span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 14pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">In the&nbsp;<span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Gospel written in the Hebrew script</span>&nbsp;that the Nazarenes read, the whole fount of the Holy Spirit descends upon Him, for God is Spirit and where the Spirit resides, there is freedom. Further in the Gospel which we have just mentioned we find the following written: &ldquo;When the Lord came up out of the water the whole fount of the Holy Spirit descended upon Him and rested on Him saying, &lsquo;My Son, in all the prophets was I waiting for You that You should come and I might rest in You. For You are My rest. You are&nbsp;<span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">My first begotten Son</span>&nbsp;that prevails forever.&rsquo; &rdquo; (Jerome,&nbsp;<span style="font-style: italic;">Commentary on Isaiah</span>&nbsp;4) [<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authentic_Gospel_of_Matthew">Wikipedia</a>]</span></p> </td>
</tr>
</table>
<span class="article_separator">&nbsp;</span>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<div class="bottom_top"></div>
<div id="bottom">
</div>
</div>
<div id="footer"><strong>Content View Hits</strong> : 15148006<br />
<script type="text/javascript">
var pv = new Array(1,0,0,0,1);
var trdlname = "/downloads";
//<![CDATA[
var regex = /\.(?:doc|eps|jpg|png|svg|xls|ppt|pdf|xls|zip|txt|vsd|vxd|js|css|rar|exe|wma|mov|avi|wmv|mp3)($|\&|\?)/;
//]]>
var trlkname = "/external/";
var trmlname = "/mailto/";
</script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://jesuswordsonly.com/modules/mod_analytics/gatr.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-3747914");
pageTracker._initData();
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}
</script>
</div>
<div class="copyright"></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink