embed/jesuswordsonly
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Wiki Activity
main
jesuswordsonly/books/74-early-church-views.html

723 lines
135 KiB
HTML
Raw Permalink Normal View History

initial backup of github.com/jesuswordsonly/jesuswordsonly.github.io
2023-08-31 11:16:13 +00:00
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en-gb" lang="en-gb" >
<head>
<base href="https://jesuswordsonly.com/books/74-early-church-views.html" />
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<meta name="robots" content="index, follow" />
<meta name="keywords" content="false apostle paul, paul the heretic, heresy" />
<meta name="title" content="Early Church Views" />
<meta name="author" content="18ptTR" />
<meta name="description" content="early church had low opinion of apostle paul" />
<meta name="generator" content="Joomla! 1.5 - Open Source Content Management" />
<title>Early Church Views</title>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/media/system/js/mootools.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/media/system/js/caption.js"></script>
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="/images/favicon.ico" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/templates/system/css/system.css" type="text/css" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/templates/system/css/general.css" type="text/css" />
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/template_css.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/nav.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/style1.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<!--[if IE]>
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/ie.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<![endif]-->
<!--[if IE]>
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/ie.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<![endif]-->
<!--[if lte IE 6]>
<style type="text/css">
img { behavior: url(/templates/js_relevant/js/iepngfix.htc); }
</style>
<![endif]-->
</head>
<body>
<div id="main-wrapper">
<div id="header_graphic">
<div class="inside">
<div id="newsflash"> <div class="moduletable">
<table class="contentpaneopen">
<tr>
<td valign="top" ><span>Thus says YHWH, "Stand by the ways and see and ask for the ancient paths, Where the good way is, and walk in it: And you shall find rest for your souls...." </span>(Jer. 6:16)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" >
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<h1><a href="https://jesuswordsonly.com/" title="Relevant">Relevant</a></h1>
<h2>A Joomla! Template for the Rest of Us</h2>
</div>
</div>
<div class="menubar">
<div id="navmenu">
<script type="text/javascript" src="/templates/js_relevant/js/barmenu.js"></script>
<ul class="menu"><li><a href="https://jesuswordsonly.com/"><span>Home</span></a></li><li id="current" class="haschild active"><a href="/books.html" class="haschild"><span>Books</span></a><ul><li><a href="/books/jesuswordsonly.html"><span>Jesus' Words Only</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/jesuswordssalvation.html"><span>Jesus' Words on Salvation</span></a></li><li class="haschild"><a href="/books/didcalvinmurderservetus.html" class="child"><span>Did Calvin Murder Servetus?</span></a><ul><li><a href="/books/didcalvinmurderservetus/background-material-did-calvin-murder-servetus.html"><span>Background Material</span></a></li></ul></li><li><a href="/books/hownottosudythebible.html"><span>How Not to Study the Bible</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/flawsofyoungearthscience.html"><span>Flaws of Young Earth Science</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/jesusorpaul.html"><span>Jesus or Paul</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/unintended-disservice.html"><span>Unintended Disservice</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/original-gospel-of-matthew.html"><span>Original Gospel of Matthew</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/commands-of-jesus.html"><span>Commands of Jesus</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/gospel-of-john.html"><span>Gospel of John</span></a></li></ul></li><li><a href="/recommendedreading.html"><span>Further Reading</span></a></li><li><a href="/media.html"><span>Media</span></a></li><li class="haschild"><a href="/reviews.html" class="haschild"><span>Reviews</span></a><ul><li><a href="/reviews/jwo-reviews.html"><span>Jesus Words Only</span></a></li><li><a href="/reviews/jwos-reviews.html"><span>Jesus Words on Salvation</span></a></li></ul></li><li><a href="/contactus.html"><span>Contact Us</span></a></li><li><a href="http://www.jesuswordsonly.com/topicindex/753-bookstore.html"><span>Bookstore</span></a></li><li><a href="/topicindex.html"><span>Topic Index</span></a></li><li><a href="/aboutauthor.html"><span>About Author</span></a></li><li><a href="/newsletters.html"><span>Newsletters</span></a></li></ul>
</div>
</div>
<div id="mainbody">
<div id="showcasetop">&nbsp;</div>
<table width="940" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="center">
<tr>
<td id="leftcol" valign="top" width="200">
<div class="inside">
<div class="moduleS1">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<h3>Search</h3>
<form action="index.php" method="post">
<div class="searchS1">
<input name="searchword" id="mod_search_searchword" maxlength="20" alt="Search" class="inputboxS1" type="text" size="20" value="search..." onblur="if(this.value=='') this.value='search...';" onfocus="if(this.value=='search...') this.value='';" /> </div>
<input type="hidden" name="task" value="search" />
<input type="hidden" name="option" value="com_search" />
<input type="hidden" name="Itemid" value="2" />
</form> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="moduleS1">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<h3>Questions?</h3>
Please enter your questions, and we will get back to you as soon as possible. As an anti-spam measure, we ask that you re-type the code you see in the box below, prior to clicking "Send Message"<br /><br />
<form name="s5_quick_contact" method="post" action="">
<input class="inputbox" id="namebox" onclick="s5_qc_clearname()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearname()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Name..." name="name"></input><br />
<input class="inputbox" id="emailbox" onclick="s5_qc_clearemail()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearemail()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Email..." name="email"></input><br />
<input class="inputbox" id="subjectbox" onclick="s5_qc_clearsubject()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearsubject()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Subject..." name="subject"></input><br />
<textarea id="messagebox" rows="" cols="" class="inputbox textarea" onclick="s5_qc_clearbody()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearbody()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; overflow:auto;width:80%; height:55px" name="message">Your Message...</textarea><br />
<input class="inputbox" id="spambox" onclick="s5_qc_clearspam()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearspam()" style="font-weight:bold; font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Enter The Code 1956" name="verif_box"></input><br />
<input id="email_address" type="hidden" value="" name="email_address"></input>
<input class="button" type="button" onclick="s5_qc_submit()" value="Send Message" ></input>
</form>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
// <![CDATA[
var s5_qc_spam_text = document.getElementById("spambox").value;
function s5_qc_clearbody() {
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value == "Your Message...") {
document.getElementById("messagebox").value="";
}
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
}
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
}
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
}
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
}
}
function s5_qc_clearname() {
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value == "Name...") {
document.getElementById("namebox").value="";
}
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
}
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
}
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
}
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
}
}
function s5_qc_clearemail() {
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value == "Email...") {
document.getElementById("emailbox").value="";
}
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
}
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
}
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
}
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
}
}
function s5_qc_clearsubject() {
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value == "Subject...") {
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value="";
}
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
}
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
}
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
}
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
}
}
function s5_qc_clearspam() {
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value == s5_qc_spam_text) {
document.getElementById("spambox").value="";
}
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
}
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
}
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
}
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
}
}
function s5_qc_isValidEmail(str_email) {
if (str_email.indexOf(".") > 2 && str_email.indexOf("@") > 0) {
alert('Your email is now being submitted - Thank you!');
document.s5_quick_contact.submit();
}
else {
alert('Your email address is not valid, please check again - Thank you!');
}
}
function s5_qc_submit() {
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value == s5_qc_spam_text || document.getElementById("subjectbox").value == "Subject..." || document.getElementById("namebox").value == "Name..." || document.getElementById("emailbox").value == "Email..." || document.getElementById("messagebox").value == "Your Message...") {
alert('All fields are required, please complete the form - Thank you!');
return false;
}
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value != "1956") {
alert('Your spam verification answer is incorrect.');
return false;
}
var s5_message_holder = document.getElementById("messagebox").value;
var s5_first_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(0);
var s5_second_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(1);
var s5_third_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(2);
var s5_fourth_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(3);
if (s5_first_message_char == "<") {
return false;
}
if (s5_first_message_char == "w" && s5_second_message_char == "w" && s5_third_message_char == "w") {
return false;
}
if (s5_first_message_char == "h" && s5_second_message_char == "t" && s5_third_message_char == "t") {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
return false;
}
else {
document.getElementById("email_address").value = "info@jesuswordsonly.com";
var email_str = document.getElementById("emailbox").value;
s5_qc_isValidEmail(email_str);
}
}
// ]]>
</script>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="moduleS1">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<h3>Recommendations</h3>
<p><a href="/books/401-music-store-manager.html">Only Jesus</a> (great song by Big Daddy)</p>
<p><a href="http://astore.amazon.com/jwoogm-20?node=1&amp;page=2">What Did Jesus Say?</a> (2012) - 7 topics&nbsp;</p>
<p>None above affiliated with me</p> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="module">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<a href="/books/jesuswordsonly.html"><img alt="JesusWordsOnS-cropsmall" src="/images/stories/JesusWordsOnS-cropsmall.jpg" width="116" height="117" /></a> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="module">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<a href="/books/jesuswordssalvation.html"><img alt="JesusWordsSalv-crop2" src="/images/stories/JesusWordsSalv-crop2.jpg" width="114" height="146" /></a> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="module">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<a href="/component/content/3-didcalvinmurderservetus/26-calvinfreebookonline.html"><img src="/images/stories/DidCalvinMurderServetusM.jpg" alt="DidCalvinMurderServetusM" height="NaN" width="120" /></a> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td id="maincol" valign="top">
<div id="breadcrumbs">
<span class="breadcrumbs pathway">
<a href="https://jesuswordsonly.com/" class="pathway">Home</a> <img src="/templates/js_relevant/images/arrow.png" alt="" /> Books</span>
</div>
<table class="contentpaneopen">
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<h1><span style="font-size: 18pt;">Early Church Views on Paul</span></h1>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">1. Ebionites -- The First Christians</span></h2>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">The earliest Christians were commonly called Ebionites, meaning "the Poor."&nbsp;</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 10px; color: #494a44; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Geneva, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13.63636302947998px; line-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">In G. Uhlhorn, "Ebionites," <strong>A Religious Encyclopaedia or Dictionary of Biblical, Historical, Doctrinal, and Practical Theology </strong>(3rd ed.) (edited by Philip Schaff) Vol. II at pages 684&ndash;685 [see PDF at this&nbsp;<a href="http://archive.org/details/religiousencyclo02herz">link</a>], we read:</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 30px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 10px; color: #494a44; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Geneva, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13.63636302947998px; line-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">Ebionites. This designation was at first like 'Nazarenes,' <strong>a common name for all Christians</strong>, as Epiphanius (d. 403) testifies (<em>Adv. Har.</em> xxix.1) It is derived from the Hebrew Ebion, "poor," and was not given, as Origen supposes, for their low view of Christ.&nbsp;<span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1"><em>Id.&nbsp;</em>at 684.</span></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 10px; color: #494a44; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Geneva, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13.63636302947998px; line-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">Over one hundred years later, in about 180 AD, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irenaeus">Irenaeus</a> -- a Bishop from Gaul (now known as France) -- clearly describes those who persisted in the designation as Ebionites rejected Paul and followed the Law, relying upon Matthew's Gospel. In&nbsp;<em>Against the Heresies</em>, 1.26 Irenaeus says:</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 10px 30px; color: #494a44; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Geneva, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13.63636302947998px; line-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">"Those who are called Ebionites agree that the world was made by God; but their opinions with respect to the Lord are similar to those of Cerinthus and Carpocrates. They use<em>&nbsp;</em><strong>the Gospel according to Matthew only,</strong><em> </em>and<em> </em><strong>repudiate the Apostle Paul</strong><em>,</em>&nbsp;maintaining that he was <strong>an apostate from the law</strong>. As to the prophetical writings, they endeavor to expound them in a somewhat singular manner: they practice circumcision, persevere in the observance of those customs which are enjoined by the law, and are so Judaic in their style of life, that they even adore Jerusalem as if it were the house of God." (<a href="http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0103126.htm">Against Heresies 1.26</a>.)</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 10px; color: #494a44; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Geneva, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13.63636302947998px; line-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">This is comparable to Eusebius who in 325 AD wrote in <a href="http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/250103.htm">Ecclesiastical History 3.27</a>:</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 30px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 10px; color: #494a44; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Geneva, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13.63636302947998px; line-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"These men, moreover, thought that it was necessary to <strong>reject all the epistles of the apostle [Paul], whom they called an apostate from the law</strong>; and they used only the so-called <strong>Gospel according to the Hebrews</strong> and made small account of the rest."</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times; color: #000000;">Eusebius thus acknowledges the Ebionites used more than just Matthew's Gospel, yet similarly to Irenaeus, Eusebius said they emphasized Matthew's Gospel.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"><span style="line-height: 18.664772033691406px; text-indent: 48px; color: black;">Thus, Professor James Dunn notes the original Jewish core of the church regarded Paul as an apostate: &ldquo;The most direct heirs of the Jewish-Christian group&shy;ings within earliest Christianity [<em>i.e.</em>, the early Jerusalem church]<strong><em>&nbsp;</em>regarded Paul as the great apostate</strong>, an arch enemy,&rdquo; citing&nbsp;<em>Epistula Petri</em>&nbsp;2.3;&nbsp;<em>Clem. Hom</em>. 17:18-19.<span style="line-height: 18.664772033691406px; text-indent: 48px; color: black;"></span>&nbsp;(</span><span style="line-height: 18.664772033691406px; text-indent: 48px; color: black;">James D. G. Dunn,&nbsp;<strong>The Cambridge Compansion to St. Paul</strong>&nbsp;</span><em style="color: #494a44; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Geneva, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13.63636302947998px; line-height: 18.664772033691406px; text-indent: 48px;"></em><span style="line-height: 18.664772033691406px; text-indent: 48px; color: black;">(Cambridge University Press, 2003) at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=TNXPGiKx-mkC&amp;lpg=PA271&amp;vq=apostate&amp;pg=PA2#v=snippet&amp;q=apostate&amp;f=false">2</a>.)</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">This is comparable to Luke's account that in Acts 9:26 that the disciples at Jerusalem, which included the apostles, rejected that Paul was a true disciple of Jesus:</span></span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">26&nbsp;</span><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">And Saul, having come to Jerusalem, did try to join himself to the disciples, and they were all afraid of him, not believing that he is a disciple,... (<a href="https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=acts+9%3A26&amp;version=YLT">YLT</a>).</span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">2. Surprisingly Negative on Close Exam: Luke in Acts Circa 80 A.D.</span></h2>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Most Christians have been trained to assume Luke is only praising Paul in Acts. However, there is so much damaging information about Paul in Acts when read carefully, many scholars (<em>e.g.</em>, John Knox)&nbsp;now see an anti-Paul agenda to Luke's work. Knox believes that Luke intended Acts to bring Paul down a notch to undermine Marcion's Paul-only movement of 144 A.D. <em>See </em>John Knox,&nbsp;</span><strong><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Marcion&nbsp;and the New Testament: An Essay in the Early History of the Canon&nbsp;</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1942) at 114-39. On Marcionism, see our <a href="/books/56-marcionism.html">webpage</a> summarizing it.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">However, I prefer to think of it as objectivity. Clearly Luke gave much evidence in Paul's favor as well as much harmful information on Paul's legitimacy.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">A. Luke Negative On Paul's Apostleship Coming From Jesus Christ</span></strong></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">For example, while Paul claimed Jesus appointed himself (Paul) an apostle of Jesus Christ, in&nbsp;<strong>none of the three appearance accounts</strong> - evidently which Luke heard from Paul and recorded in Acts 9, 22 and 26 --&nbsp;<strong>does Luke identify Jesus making Paul His apostle</strong>. The Jesus of Damascus per Ananias appoints Paul solely as a "witness" -- a&nbsp;<em>martus</em> in Greek. The Jesus on the road to Damascus never says that Paul will be His apostle.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Also in Acts 1, Luke says Judas's replacement (chosen by the Holy Spirit) as an apostle is Matthias, not Paul.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">As a result, scholars note that in "Acts...Paul is&nbsp;<strong>denied the title of Apostle</strong>." (Martin Hengel, Anna M. Schwemer,&nbsp;<em>Paul between Damascus and Antioch: the unknown years</em> (Westminster John Knox Press, 1997) at&nbsp;<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=PRIKVslqctkC&amp;lpg=PA321&amp;dq=haereticorum%20apostolus&amp;pg=PA321">321</a> n. 3.) For more on this, see our article "<a href="/books/478-was-paul-a-true-apostle-of-jesus-christ.html">Was Paul A True Apostle of Jesus Christ?</a>"</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">B. Luke Exposes Paul's Disobedience to Holy Spirit Which Led To Temple's Desecration</span></strong></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Furthermore, we discuss elsewhere that Luke records in&nbsp;Acts <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=acts%2021:28-29&amp;version=NASB">21:28-29</a>;&nbsp;<a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts%2024:6,%2013,%2018&amp;version=NASB">24:6, 13, 18</a>; and <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts%2025:7-8&amp;version=NASB">25:7-8</a> that the post-conversion Paul defied the message of the Holy Spirit through Agabus &amp; other believers not to go to Jerusalem (Acts 21:4). As a result, on that trip Paul's Gentile companion, Trophimus, ends up defiling the Temple. Trophimus became an uncircumcised Gentile in the Holy Place. Luke records, although few seek to emphasize this fact, that Trophimus, an Ephesian passed the middle wall that kept uncircumcised Gentiles out of a specific area of the Temple. Trophimus, an Ephesian, obviously trusted Paul who wrote to the Ephesians that Christ tore down that same barrier at the Temple and now uncircumcised Gentiles were implicitly free to enter. <em>See </em>Eph.<a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Eph.%202:14-15&amp;version=NASB"> 2:14-15</a>.&nbsp;See our in depth discussion about Trophimus' actions at this&nbsp;<a href="/books/65-trophimus.html">link</a>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Jesus, to the contrary, taught in 33 A.D. that Ezekiel's warning that an uncircumcised Gentile in the Temple was an "abomination" (Ez. <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ez.%2044:9&amp;version=NASB">44:9</a>) was still a valid principle because Jesus said Daniel's prophecy of an abomination standing in the Temple was still in the future tense.&nbsp;(Matt. <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matt.%2024:15-16&amp;version=NASB">24:15-16</a>.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">This means <strong>Luke exposes</strong> to us that Paul was responsible in&nbsp;<strong>a spiritual sense</strong> for an abomination of the Temple of God in 58 A.D. Paul told Ephesians like Trophimus that the middle barrier no longer applied (<em>i.e.</em>, the rule that no uncircumcised Gentile could pass that barrier) after Christ's resurrection. But Jesus warned the abomination of desolation -- an uncircumcised Gentile standing in the Holy Place as Daniel identified it -- was coming. This means had Paul truly known of Jesus's message, and was obedient to the Holy Spirit, Paul never would have uttered the words we read in Eph. 2:14-15 or gone to the Temple at Jerusalem when&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><strong>God told Paul through the prophet Agabus and other believers by the Holy Spirit not to do so</strong>.&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">(Acts 21:4.) Paul disobeyed God, as Luke reveals, and the result of Paul's disobedience is that his travelling companion -- Trophimus -- defiled God's Temple.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Luke in fairness to Paul points out that Paul denied he escorted Trophimus into the sacred area, but that was little consolation to soften the bigger fact which Luke exposes -- <strong>Paul defied God's own instructions to Paul not to go to Jerusalem</strong> (Acts 21:4)&nbsp;on a trip that ended up in Paul's traveling companion defiling the Temple.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Hence, Luke was giving us a fair portrait of Paul -- giving the good along with the <em>very bad</em>.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">3. Early Church Leaders Who Do Not Even Know of Paul's Works</span></h2>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Justin Martyr is one of the most prolific writers in the early church whose writings have come down to us. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Yet, "Justin [103-165 A.D.] took <strong>no notice of Paul.</strong>..." (<em><a href="http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Encyclopaedia_Biblica/River_of_the_Wilderness-Rome_(Church)">Encyclopedia Biblica</a></em><a href="http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Encyclopaedia_Biblica/River_of_the_Wilderness-Rome_(Church)">.</a>) In Justin "Paul...is <strong>never quoted</strong> directly." (John Romanides, "<a href="http://www.romanity.org/htm/rom.22.en.justin_martyr_and_the_fourth_gospel.01.htm">Justin Martyr and the 4th Gospel</a>," <em>Greek Orthodox Theological Review</em> (1958) Vol. IV &nbsp;at 115 et seq.) &nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">In "Canon," <strong>Encyclopedia</strong> <strong>Brittanica</strong> (1903) Vol. 5 at <a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=xl4gAQAAMAAJ&amp;lpg=PA8&amp;dq=apocalypse%20of%20peter%20and-paul&amp;pg=PA8#v=onepage&amp;q=apocalypse%20of%20peter%20and-paul&amp;f=false">page 8</a>, it relates as to Justin Martyr: </span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"Paul's epistles are never mentioned, although he doubtless knew of them. Having <strong>little sympathy with Paulinism</strong> he attached his belief to the primitive apostles....[T]he epistle to the Hebrews and Acts <strong>he treated in the same way as the Pauline writings</strong>." </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Incidentally, the Encyclopedia Brittanica points out that as to the other items of canon, it is pretty clear he relied on the Matthew Gospel version in Hebrew that Jerome said was translated into Greek. Only the Greek version was canonized, not the original Hebrew version. The Encyclopedia relates: </span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"It is pretty certain that he relied upon an extra-canonical gospel, perhaps the so-called <strong>Gospel to the</strong> <strong>Hebrews</strong>....The Apocalypse [i.e., <strong>John's Revelation</strong>], 1 Peter and 1 John he esteemed highly...."</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Cosgrove similarly states:</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"Isidor Frank in his <em>Der Sinn Kanonbildung</em> (1971) argues that the 'Memoirs of the Apostles' are regarded by Justin and his community as 'auf einer Stufe' with the Old Testament. According to Frank, Justin definitely includes the three synoptic gospels within his designation of Memoirs<strong> but not</strong> John or<strong> Paul</strong>....Justin represents a reversal of the trend in the second century church of regarding apostolic writings [<em>i.e.</em>, letters] as canon." (Charles H. Cosgrove, "Justin Martyr and the Emerging Christian Canon," <em>Vigiliae Christianae </em>36 (1982) 209-232 Brill Leiden, excerpted at this Jstor<a href="http://www.jstor.org/pss/1583381"> link.</a>)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">When Justin speaks of the apostles operating post-resurrection, Justin is clear God sent "<strong>twelve</strong>," not "thirteen" which means he implicitly ignores Paul. (Justin, <strong>First</strong> <strong>Apology </strong>XLIX at <a href="http://www.archive.org/stream/firstapologyofju00just">47.</a>)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Proof this may be deliberate is that Justin later in the same <em>First Apology</em> denies Christians believe in "predestination," and "fatal destiny," (LIV) because the "prophetic Spirit instructed us in the doctrine of free-will by Moses, who introduces God speaking to man: 'Behold good and evil is before you; choose the good.'" (<em>First Apology</em> LVI, quoting&nbsp;Deut. 30:15,19. See <a href="http://www.archive.org/stream/firstapologyofju00just">Link</a> at page 51.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">And quite importantly, based upon Justin's many books, one may wonder if Paul's epistles were truly circulating among leaders of the church, as Justin clearly was. For Edwin Johnson in 1887 noted:</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"His [Justin Martyr, St. c. 100 - c. 165 C.E.] <strong>silence</strong> <strong>about Paul</strong>, when he had every reason to cite him in his anti-Judaistic reasonings, is a <strong>silence that speaks</strong>--<strong>a void</strong> that no iteration of unattested statements, no nebulous declamation, can ever fill." (Edwin Johnson [1842-1901] <em>Antiqua Mater:&nbsp;A Study of Christian Origins</em> (London: Trubner &amp; Co., Ludgate Hill, 1887) at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=R4gXAAAAYAAJ&amp;dq=Antiqua%20Mater%3A%20A%20Study%20of%20Christian%20Origins&amp;pg=PA35#v=onepage&amp;q=%20is%20a%20silence%20that%20speaks&amp;f=false">35</a>.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Papias (a disciple of Apostle John) from 130 A.D. too never once quotes Paul. See JWO:<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=3VFnsDuxBPcC&amp;lpg=PP1&amp;dq=jesus%20words%20only&amp;pg=PA326"> 326</a>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Ironically most of all, the one person who should know of Paul's letters, but appears to know nothing of them is Luke himself.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The fact Luke's Acts and Gospel show virtually no knowledge of Paul's epistles, and says nothing in either to help their acceptance was first exposed by theologian F.C. Bauer. Recently, Hengel and Schwemer,&nbsp;<strong>Paul: Between Antioch and Damascus,&nbsp;supra</strong>, at<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=PRIKVslqctkC&amp;lpg=PA321&amp;ots=GFnrpJIXZL&amp;dq=%22haereticorum%20apostolus%22&amp;pg=PA322#v=onepage&amp;q=%22haereticorum%20apostolus%22&amp;f=false"> 322</a><em>&nbsp;</em>says "since F.C. Bauer and his pupils, there has been no evidence that knowledge of Paul's letters by Luke can be demonstrated." <br /></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Further, no use was made by them by anyone else until after 100 AD, beginning with Clement. Hengel and Schwemer add: "When Luke was writing, Paul's letters may have been in the archives of one community or another. The use of them begins only with I Clement or shortly after 100 CE....They will have been collected and edited around this time" while Luke wrote "twenty years earlier."&nbsp;<em>Id.</em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">For example, Luke never conveys any of Paul's doctrines against the Law, of salvation by faith alone, eternal security, etc. Luke knows only a Paul who obeys the Law when requested by James in <a href="https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts+21&amp;version=NIV">Acts 21</a>, of one who affirms he believes in "all points according to the Law" in testimony before Felix at <a href="https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts%2024:14&amp;version=NIV">Acts 24:14</a>, and in testimony in <a href="http://biblehub.com/acts/26-20.htm">Acts 26:20</a>&nbsp;the Paul known to Luke says his gospel is one of "works worthy of repentance," etc. For a full discussion, see our article <a href="/books/465-luke-is-a-legitimate-gospel-history.html">Luke's Gospel is a Non-Pauline Gospel</a>.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; color: #3366ff;">3B. Apocalypse of Peter on Paul - ca 100 AD</span></strong></span></h2>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">This was listed as canonical in the very first list of works in canon ... the Muratorian fragment from the early 200s. Wikipedia records: "<span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">The Muratorian fragment states: 'the <strong><em>Apocalypses</em></strong> also <strong><em>of</em> </strong>John and <strong><em>Peter</em></strong> only do we receive, which some among us would not have read in church.'" ("<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apocalypse_of_Peter">Apocalypse of Peter</a>," Wikipedia.)&nbsp;</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">It has a reference that clearly is aimed at Paul, as it repeats the common criticisms about Paul. See "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apocalypse_of_Peter">Apocalypse of Peter</a>," Wikipedia. The Apocalypse quotes&nbsp;Jesus saying:</span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"And they will cleave to the name of a dead man, thinking that they will become pure. But they will become greatly defiled and they will fall into a name of error, and into the hand of<strong> an evil, cunning man and a manifold dogma, and they will be ruled without law</strong>."</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Then consider it is actually possible it was truly canon and removed, for the early canon history would support this. Besides being in the Muratorian canon from the 2d century, <em>Wikipedia</em> records:</span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clement_of_Alexandria" style="color: #0b0080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22.3999996185303px; background-image: none; background-attachment: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;" title="Clement of Alexandria"></a><span style="color: #252525; line-height: 22.3999996185303px;" data-mce-mark="1">Clement of Alexandria appears to have considered the <strong>Apocalypse of Peter</strong> to be holy scripture. Eusebius, <strong>Historia Ecclesiae</strong>&nbsp;</span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eusebius_of_Caesarea" class="mw-redirect" style="color: #0b0080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22.3999996185303px; background-image: none; background-attachment: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;" title="Eusebius of Caesarea"></a><span style="color: #252525; line-height: 22.3999996185303px;" data-mce-mark="1">(VI.14.1), describes a lost work of Clement's, the <strong>Hypothposes&nbsp;</strong></span><em style="color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22.3999996185303px;">&nbsp;</em><span style="color: #252525; line-height: 22.3999996185303px;" data-mce-mark="1">(Outlines), that gave "abridged accounts of all the canonical Scriptures, not even omitting those that are disputed, I mean the&nbsp;</span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistle_of_Jude" style="color: #0b0080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22.3999996185303px; background-image: none; background-attachment: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;" title="Epistle of Jude">book of Jude</a><span style="color: #252525; line-height: 22.3999996185303px;" data-mce-mark="1">&nbsp;and the other general epistles. Also the <strong>Epistle</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barnabas</strong>&nbsp;</span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistle_of_Barnabas" style="color: #0b0080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22.3999996185303px; background-image: none; background-attachment: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;" title="Epistle of Barnabas"></a><span style="color: #252525; line-height: 22.3999996185303px;" data-mce-mark="1">and that called the <strong>Revelation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Peter</strong>.</span><span style="color: #252525; line-height: 22.3999996185303px;" data-mce-mark="1">"</span><sup id="cite_ref-10" class="reference" style="line-height: 1; unicode-bidi: -webkit-isolate; font-size: 11px; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apocalypse_of_Peter#cite_note-10" style="color: #0b0080; white-space: nowrap; background: none;">[10]</a></sup><span style="color: #252525; line-height: 22.3999996185303px;" data-mce-mark="1">&nbsp;So the work must have existed in the first half of the 2nd century, which is also the commonly accepted date of the canonic&nbsp;</span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Epistle_of_Peter" style="color: #0b0080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22.3999996185303px; background-image: none; background-attachment: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;" title="Second Epistle of Peter">Second Epistle of Peter</a><span style="color: #252525; line-height: 22.3999996185303px;" data-mce-mark="1">.</span><sup id="cite_ref-11" class="reference" style="line-height: 1; unicode-bidi: -webkit-isolate; font-size: 11px; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apocalypse_of_Peter#cite_note-11" style="color: #0b0080; white-space: nowrap; background: none;">[11]</a></sup><span style="color: #252525; line-height: 22.3999996185303px;" data-mce-mark="1">&nbsp;Although the numerous references to it attest to its being once in wide circulation, <em><strong>the Apocalypse of Peter</strong></em> was ultimately not a
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">This means that in the next copy of the canon -- the Sinaiticus from about 340 AD -- we do not see Apocalypse of Peter included. But remember, no canon-conference was held until the 1540s at the Council of Trent -- and only by the Roman Catholic Church -- to decide what books are included in canon. So it begins as a complete mystery why a work that was part of Christian canon for over 200 years such as the Apocalypse of Peter is dropped from at least 340 AD forward. Yet, we do know that when Constantine in the first half of the 300s wanted the Christian Sabbath moved to Sun-Day because Constantine's god was Sol Invictus -- the Unconquered Sun (<a href="/topicindex/239-council-of-nicea-of-325-ad.html">link</a>), Paul's anti-sabbath passages made Paul a figure now politically important to protect in the Empire. The article <strong><em>Constantine's Damage to Christianity</em></strong> explains this transformation of why Paul received a revival in the 300s at this <a href="/books/245-contantines-damage-to-christianity.html">link</a>.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">4. Positive Early Church View of the Law At Odds With Paul's View</span></h2>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Ignatius around 150 AD said the only person whom Christians listened to was "Jesus Christ." He wrote: "<span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">all live according to the truth, and that no sect has any dwelling-place among you. Nor, indeed, do you hearken to any one rather than to Jesus Christ speaking in truth" (</span><em style="color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22.4px;">Epistle to the Ephesians</em><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">&nbsp;6).&nbsp;</span>&nbsp;(See "<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostasy_in_Christianity">Apostasy</a>," Wikipedia.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Naturally, the early church endorsed following the Law and Prophets, because Jesus taught this in Matthew 5:17-19 and many other places. For more details, see this <a href="/books/142-early-church-view-of-law-given-moses.html">link</a>. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The predominant position in the early church was to regard anyone who denied the Law's continued application was a heretic. This means that anyone familiar with Paul knew these statements placed Paul outside mainstream Christianity. One scholar, Oskar Skarsaune, in &ldquo;Heresy and the Pastoral Epistles,&rdquo; <em>Themelios</em> 20.1 (October 1994): 9-14 at <a href="http://www.biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/heresy_skarsaune.pdf">10</a> notes that</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">a passage&nbsp;in the Syrian <em>Didascalia Apostolorum</em> [from the 200s], defining heresy [states]:</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"[The heretics] all had one law, that they</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">* should <strong><em>not employ the Torah and the Prophets</em></strong>,</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">* and that they should blaspheme God Almighty,</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">* and should not believe in the resurrection." (Citing&nbsp;5&nbsp;Didasc. 23 (VI:10), quoted according to R. Hugh Connolly,<em> Didascalia Apostolorum</em> (Oxford, 1929 (=1969)) at&nbsp;202.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">While at first one might suppose only the first prong of what was heresy in the early church applied to Paul, that is not necessarily true.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">First, let us look at the last -- "not believe in the resurrection." Paul was interpreted by the Gnostics in the 200s as teaching we were already raised in Christ by baptism, but that "flesh shall not inherit the kingdom of God" (Paul writing the Corinthians in <a href="http://biblehub.com/1_corinthians/15-50.htm">1 Cor. 15:50</a> -- implying there was no physical resurrection.) This is where Paul ends up contradicting himself because he also teaches a bodily resurrection. See our "<a href="/books/175-pauls-contradictions-of-jesus.html">Contradictions with Jesus</a>" at end where we discuss Paul's self-contradictions.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Hence, the<em> Didascalia</em> was identifying as heresy what many thought Paul taught (justified by Paul's own words). Of course, the rebuttal was to find words in Paul which talk of us 'meeting' Jesus in the clouds at His next coming. It does not take away from the fact <em>Didascalia</em> said it is heresy to say (as Paul was construed to say), that there is <em><strong>no resurrection of the flesh to inherit the kingdom.</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">Finally, on the last prong of the three heresies identified by the <em>Didaschalia, </em>Paul did blaspheme God - numerous times in his epistles. For example, Paul said "<span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">God shall send them strong delusion...," speaking of God's intention to keep the lost lost, in&nbsp;<span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1"></span><a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Thessalonians+2%3A10-13&amp;version=KJ21" style="color: #517291; text-decoration: underline; font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt; line-height: normal;">2 Thess. 2:10-13</a><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">&nbsp;KJV-21st. Paul blasphemes God again whe</span></span>n Paul said "God does not live in Temples made with human hands" when the true God truly did so. <span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">(</span><a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=acts%2017:24&amp;version=NIV" style="color: #517291; text-decoration: underline; font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: large; line-height: 21px;">Acts 17:24</a><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">).&nbsp;</span>See our article "<a href="/books/188-blasphemy-a-paul.html">Paul and Blasphemy</a>." In the latter blasphemy, Paul meant to tell the Athenians that only their gods were false by this principle. However, Paul's words extended further, and implied Yahweh whom Jesus said lived in the Temple at Jerusalem was also a false god too by the same principle that Paul gave the pagans. If God does not live in Temples made of human hands, as Paul declared, then Yahweh was just as much a false god as any of the other gods Paul was condemning. This would hence be blasphemy.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">Hence, each of the 3 prongs of what identified a heretic in the 200s, recorded in the<em> Didascalia</em>, applied to Paul or how Paul was or could be construed. This was the period the church was fighting the Marcionites - Paul-only Christians. (See our article, "<a href="/books/56-marcionism.html">The Marcionites</a>.") Thus, it is not that surprising to see orthodoxy spelled out in the <em>Didaschalia</em> in a way to undercut Marcionite arguments based upon Paul's words.&nbsp;This therefore shows in the 200s how little regard the church had for Paul and Paul's doctrine within the MAINSTREAM Church.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">5. Ignatius, 58-90/117 AD</span></h2>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">A subtle criticism of Paul's grace teaching appears in Ignatius.</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Now note well those who hold heretical teachings about the grace of Jesus Christ which came to us. Note how contrary they are to the mind of God. They have no concern for love, none for the widow, none for the orphan, none for the oppressed, none for the prisoner or the one released, none for the hungry or thirsty. They abstain from communion and prayer. (Ignatius, <em>Letter to the Smyrneans</em> 6:2, quoted by Darrell L. Bock, <em>The Missing Gospels</em> (Nelson: Nashville Tennessee, 2006) at&nbsp;<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=UU7L33O0sIEC&amp;lpg=PP1&amp;dq=Darrell%20L.%20Bock%2C%20The%20Missing%20Gospels&amp;pg=PT152#v=snippet&amp;q=oppressed&amp;f=false">192</a>.)</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong>5B Encratites Exclude Paul Writings </strong></span></h2>
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Tatian in 180 AD led a group of apparently Gentile Christian who rejected Paul. They did accept Paul&rsquo;s view that marriage of unmarried was to be avoided &mdash; see link (although Paul has self-contradiction in 1 Tim 4:1-4), but otherwise rejected Paul&rsquo;s views on everything else. Here is excerpt from Wikipedia at this <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encratites">link</a>:</span></span></span></h2>
<p style="margin-top: 0.5em; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0px 0px 0px 30px; border: 0px; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, 'Nimbus Sans L', Arial, 'Liberation Sans', sans-serif; line-height: inherit; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; color: #222222;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;">The&nbsp;<strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none;">Encratites</strong>&nbsp;("self-controlled") were an&nbsp;<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ascetic" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; text-decoration: none; color: #5a3696;" title="Ascetic">ascetic</a>&nbsp;2nd century sect of Christians who forbade marriage and counselled abstinence from meat.&nbsp;<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eusebius" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; text-decoration: none; color: #5a3696;" title="Eusebius">Eusebius</a>&nbsp;says that&nbsp;<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tatian" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; text-decoration: none; color: #5a3696;" title="Tatian">Tatian</a>&nbsp;was the author of this heresy.<sup id="cite_ref-1" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1; font-size: 0.75em; background-image: none; unicode-bidi: isolate; white-space: nowrap;"><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encratites#cite_note-1" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; text-decoration: none; color: #5a3696;">[1]</a></sup>&nbsp;It has been supposed that it was these ... encratites who were chastised in the epistle of 1 Timothy (4:1-4).<sup id="cite_ref-2" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1; font-size: 0.75em; background-image: none; unicode-bidi: isolate; white-space: nowrap;"><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encratites#cite_note-2" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; text-decoration: none; color: #5a3696;">[2]</a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-3" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1; font-size: 0.75em; background-image: none; unicode-bidi: isolate; white-space: nowrap;"><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encratites#cite_note-3" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; text-decoration: none; color: #5a3696;">[3]</a></sup></span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 0.5em; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0px 0px 0px 30px; border: 0px; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, 'Nimbus Sans L', Arial, 'Liberation Sans', sans-serif; line-height: inherit; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; color: #222222;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;">The first mention of a Christian sect of this name occurs in&nbsp;<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iren%C3%A6us" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; text-decoration: none; color: #5a3696;" title="Iren&aelig;us">Iren&aelig;us</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-4" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1; font-size: 0.75em; background-image: none; unicode-bidi: isolate; white-space: nowrap;"><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encratites#cite_note-4" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; text-decoration: none; color: #5a3696;">[4]</a></sup>&nbsp;They are mentioned more than once by&nbsp;<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clement_of_Alexandria" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; text-decoration: none; color: #5a3696;" title="Clement of Alexandria">Clement of Alexandria</a>,<sup id="cite_ref-5" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1; font-size: 0.75em; background-image: none; unicode-bidi: isolate; white-space: nowrap;"><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encratites#cite_note-5" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; text-decoration: none; color: #5a3696;">[5]</a></sup>&nbsp;who says&nbsp;<sup id="cite_ref-6" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1; font-size: 0.75em; background-image: none; unicode-bidi: isolate; white-space: nowrap;"><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encratites#cite_note-6" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; text-decoration: none; color: #5a3696;">[6]</a></sup>&nbsp;that they are named from &ldquo;Temperance&rdquo;.&nbsp;<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippolytus_of_Rome" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; text-decoration: none; color: #5a3696;" title="Hippolytus of Rome">Hippolytus of Rome</a>&nbsp;refers to them as "<strong>acknowledging what concerns God and Christ in like manner with the Church; in respect,</strong> however, of their mode of life, passing their days inflated with pride"; "abstaining from animal food, being water-drinkers and forbidding to marry"; "estimated&nbsp;<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynicism_(philosophy)" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; text-decoration: none; color: #5a3696;" title="Cynicism (philosophy)">Cynics</a>&nbsp;rather than Christians". On the strength of this passage it is supposed that some <strong>Encratites were perfectly orthodox in doctrine</strong>, and erred only in practice.<sup style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1; font-size: 0.75em; background-image: none; white-space: nowrap;">[<span style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: italic; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none;"><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.or
<p style="margin-top: 0.5em; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0px 0px 0px 30px; border: 0px; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, 'Nimbus Sans L', Arial, 'Liberation Sans', sans-serif; line-height: inherit; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; color: #222222;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;">Somewhat later this sect received new life and strength by the accession of a certain&nbsp;<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Severus_(Encratite)&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; text-decoration: none; color: #dd3333;" title="Severus (Encratite) (page does not exist)">Severus</a>,<sup id="cite_ref-8" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1; font-size: 0.75em; background-image: none; unicode-bidi: isolate; white-space: nowrap;"><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encratites#cite_note-8" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; text-decoration: none; color: #5a3696;">[8]</a></sup>&nbsp;after whom Encratites were often called&nbsp;<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Severian_Encratites" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; text-decoration: none; color: #5a3696;" title="Severian Encratites">Severians</a>. These Severian <strong>Encratites accepted the Law, the Prophets, and the Gospels, but rejected the Book of the Acts and cursed St. Paul and his Epistles</strong>. But the account given by&nbsp;<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epiphanius_of_Salamis" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; text-decoration: none; color: #5a3696;" title="Epiphanius of Salamis">Epiphanius</a>&nbsp;of the Severians rather betrays Syrian Gnosticism [note: wrong...truly partial Paulinism] ...than Judaistic tendencies. In their hatred of marriage they declared woman the work of Satan or the devil,<sup id="cite_ref-CBTEL_9-0" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1; font-size: 0.75em; background-image: none; unicode-bidi: isolate; white-space: nowrap;"><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encratites#cite_note-CBTEL-9" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; text-decoration: none; color: #5a3696;">[9]</a></sup>&nbsp;as was sexual intercourse and marriage&nbsp;<sup id="cite_ref-CBTEL_9-1" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1; font-size: 0.75em; background-image: none; unicode-bidi: isolate; white-space: nowrap;"><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encratites#cite_note-CBTEL-9" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; text-decoration: none; color: #5a3696;">[9]</a></sup>and in their hatred of intoxicants they called wine drops of venom from the great Serpent, etc.<sup id="cite_ref-10" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1; font-size: 0.75em; background-image: none; unicode-bidi: isolate; white-space: nowrap;"><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encratites#cite_note-10" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; text-decoration: none; color: #5a3696;">[10]</a></sup>&nbsp;Epiphanius states that in his day Encratites were very <strong>numerous throughout
<p style="margin-top: 0.5em; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0px 0px 0px 30px; border: 0px; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, 'Nimbus Sans L', Arial, 'Liberation Sans', sans-serif; line-height: inherit; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; color: #222222;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong>In the Edict of 382,&nbsp;<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodosius_I" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; text-decoration: none; color: #5a3696;" title="Theodosius I">Theodosius</a>&nbsp;pronounced the sentence of death on all those who took the name of Encratites</strong>,&nbsp;<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Saccophori&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; text-decoration: none; color: #dd3333;" title="Saccophori (page does not exist)">Saccophori</a>, or Hydroparastat&aelig;,&nbsp;and commanded Florus, the Magister Officiarum, to make strict search for these heretics, who were&nbsp;<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manich%C3%A6ans" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; text-decoration: none; color: #5a3696;" title="Manich&aelig;ans">Manich&aelig;ans</a>&nbsp;in disguise.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 0.5em; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, 'Nimbus Sans L', Arial, 'Liberation Sans', sans-serif; line-height: inherit; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; color: #222222;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;">Hence those refusing all of Paul&rsquo;s doctrines were as of 382 AD sentenced to death. No doubt that this explains why none of their anti-Paul writings survive. See also Gray, Paul as Problem in History (2016) at Kindle loc. 688.</span>&nbsp;</p>
<h2 style="background-image: url('');">&nbsp;</h2>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: 18pt;">5C Elchesai at Rome &amp; Syria Reject Paul.</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"></span><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">A Jewish-Christian group known as Elchesaites or Elchasai operated from at least the beginning of the second century in Rome and Syria, and possibly elsewhere.&nbsp;</span></span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt; color: black;">They are mentioned by Hippolytus (Ref. IX 13-17; X.29 and Origen (according to Eusebius, His. Eccl. VI.38) and Epiphanius (Pan. 19; 53)</p>
<h2><span style="font-weight: normal; font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt; background-color: transparent;">Their Bishop in Syria was a well-known figure named Alcibiades.&nbsp;</span></h2>
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt; color: black;">Alcibiades held to "Christological elements&hellip;reminiscent of those in the []<strong>Clementine</strong> writings, and which are held by Epiphanius to be of Ebionite origin." (<strong>The Cambridge History of Judaism: The early Roman period&nbsp;</strong>(Cambridge University Press, 1984)(ed. William David Davies, et al.) at <a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=AW2BuWcalXIC&amp;ppis=_e&amp;lpg=PA496&amp;ots=rGLPFo8lew&amp;dq=Bagatti%2C%20The%20Church%20from%20the%20Circumcision&amp;pg=PA486#v=onepage&amp;q=Bagatti,%20The%20Church%20from%20the%20Circumcision&amp;f=false">486</a>.)</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt; color: black;">Hence, the Clementines were obviously part of the writings of this group in light of Professor Detering's conclusion that the Clementine works were apparently a first century work of the Ebionites. As mentioned previously, the original version of the Clementine writings -- before Rufinus in the late 300s changed Paul's appearances to be that of Simon Magus -- were opposed to Paul's teachings as contradictory of Christ's.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt; color: black;">Origen then writes about this group at Rome as of 247 AD. The <strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Judaism</strong> says of this Christian Jewish group: "An impression of this form of Elkasaism" Origen "knew of its existence at Rome ... around 247 AD in manifestations similar to those of Alcibiades." Id. Then footnote 41 is dropped in for this statement where without any introduction or explanation, the same fn. 41 says:&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt; color: black;"><strong>"The rejection of Paul is remarkable."&nbsp;&nbsp;</strong></p>
<p><span style="background-color: transparent; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px;"></span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt; color: black;">It cites as the source for this fact multipe sources, and that's all we can share until we read them. They are:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt; color: black;">Klijn and Reinink, <strong>Patristic</strong> <strong>Evidence</strong>, pp. <a href="https://www.google.com/books/edition/Patristic_evidence_for_Jewish_Christian/5-Z5DwAAQBAJ?hl=en&amp;gbpv=1&amp;dq=Klijn%20Reinink%2C%20Patristic%20Evidence%20for%20Jewish-Christian%20Sects%20Leiden&amp;pg=PA54&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;bsq=Klijn%20Reinink%2C%20Patristic%20Evidence%20for%20Jewish-Christian%20Sects%20Leiden">60f</a>&nbsp;[fully viewable]; Brandt, Elchasai, p. 77; Cirillo, Elchasai, pp. 21ff 80f. The rejection of Paul is remarkable."</p>
<h2 style="background-image: url('');">&nbsp;</h2>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong>6. Tertullian, 207 A.D. - A Highly Critical Analysis</strong></span></h2>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">In 207 A.D., Tertullian in <em>Against Marcion</em> -- quoted at length in <em>Jesus' Words Only</em> at 395 (see this <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=3VFnsDuxBPcC&amp;lpg=PP1&amp;dq=jesus%20words%20only&amp;pg=PA395#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false">link</a> to read it in full) --&nbsp;made the following sobering points about Paul:</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Jesus never made Paul an apostle from the records that we can read.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Paul's claim to apostleship solely relies upon Paul's veracity.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">If Paul were a true apostle, he is still an inferior apostle because Paul in Acts 15 submitted his doctrine to the twelve.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">If Paul later varied from the twelve, we must regard the twelve as more authoritative than Paul because Paul came later.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Paul's claim of being selected as an apostle later by Jesus seems implausible. That story asks us to believe Jesus had not planned things adequately with the twelve.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Lastly, Tertullian said Jesus warned us of false prophets who would come doing miracles in His name and signs and wonders, and Paul perfectly matches that prophesied type of prophet.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">The key quote with most of these points is the following passage from Tertullian -- written in 207 A.D. in <em>Against Marcion</em>:</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">I desire to hear from Marcion the<em><strong> origin of Paul the apostle</strong></em>. I am a sort of new disciple, having had instruction from no other teacher. For the moment my only belief is that nothing ought to be believed without good reason, and that is believed without good reason which is believed without knowledge of its origin: and I must with the best of reasons<em><strong> approach this inquiry with uneasiness when I find one affirmed to be an apostle, of whom in the list of the apostles in the gospel I find no trace</strong></em>. So when I am told that he [i.e.<strong><em>, Paul] was subsequently promoted by our Lord</em></strong>, by now at rest in heaven, I find some lack of foresight in the fact that&nbsp;<em><strong>Christ did not know beforehand that he would have need of him</strong></em>, but after setting in order the office of apostleship and sending them out upon their duties, considered it necessary, on an impulse and not by deliberation, to add another, by compulsion so to speak and not by design [i.e., on the Road to Damascus]. So then, shipmaster out of Pontus [i.e., Marcion],&nbsp;<strong><em>supposing you have never accepted into your craft any smuggled or illicit merchandise</em></strong>, have never appropriated or adulterated any cargo, and in the things of God are even more careful and trustworthy, will you<strong><em> please tell us under what bill of lading you accepted Paul as apostle</em></strong>, who had stamped him with that mark of distinction, who commended him to you, and who put him in your charge? Only so may you with confidence disembark him [i.e., Paul]: only so can he avoid being proved to belong to him who has put in evidence all the documents that attest his apostleship.&nbsp;<strong><em>He [i.e., Paul] himself, says Marcion, claims to be an apostle, and that not from men nor through any man, but through Jesus Christ</em></strong>. Clearly any man can make claims for himself: but his claim is confirmed by another person&rsquo;s attestation. One person writes the document, another signs it, a third attests the signature, and a fourth enters it in the records.<strong><em> No man is for himself both claimant and witness</em></strong>. Besides this, you have found it written that many will come and say, I am Christ. If there is one that makes&nbsp;<strong><em>a false claim to be Christ, much more can there be one who professes that he is an apostle of Christ</em></strong>....&nbsp;<strong><em>[L]et the apostle, belong to your other&nbsp;god</em></strong>:....&nbsp;(Tertullian, <em>Against Marcion</em> (Oxford University Press, 1972) at 509, 511, reprinted online at&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tertullian.org/articles/evans_marc/evans_marc_12book5_eng.htm">http://www.tertullian.org/articles/evans_marc/ evans_marc_12book5_eng.htm</a>.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">In fact, Tertullian in <em>Adversus Marcion</em> at <a href="http://www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/1003/1001/0160-0220,_Tertullianus,_Adversus_Marcionem,_MLT.html#[0327A]">3:5</a> (Caput V) (others erroneously cite <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=rUQAQNCMQ6EC&amp;lpg=PA473&amp;ots=64F18nOFg0&amp;dq=haereticorum%20apostolus&amp;pg=PA473#v=onepage&amp;q=haereticorum%20apostolus&amp;f=false">3:6:4</a>) said Paul is the "<strong><em>apostle of the heretics</em></strong>." In Latin, he called Paul "<em><strong>haereticorum</strong></em> apostolus."&nbsp;One commentator says this meant "the <strong><em>writings of Paul</em></strong> --- the haereticorum apostolos of Tertullian --- &nbsp;were <strong><em>regarded suspiciously</em></strong> at Rome." (Hans Lietzmann, <em>The Lord's Supper</em> (Brill: 1979) at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=1bsUAAAAIAAJ&amp;lpg=PA282&amp;ots=oCfZPSLxMs&amp;dq=haereticorum%20apostolus&amp;pg=PA282">282</a>.) Tertullian was categorized as having "a <em><strong>scornful</strong></em> 'haereticorum apostolus' on his lips..." toward Paul (W.C. Van Manen in "Epistle to the Romans"&nbsp;<em>Encyclopedia Brittanica</em> (N.Y.: 1903) Vol. IV at <a href="http://www.depts.drew.edu/jhc/vanrom.html">4127</a>)&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Tertullian spoke with justification. Among the early gnostic heretics, their writings refer to Paul as "the great (or greatest) apostle" and "Paul who has become like Christ." (A. H. B. Logan, A. J. M. Wedderburn, <em>New Testament and Gnosis</em> (2004) at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=qSdnK6qLhNgC&amp;lpg=PA13&amp;ots=ubigbdORV_&amp;dq=haereticorum%20apostolus&amp;pg=PA13">13</a>.) Tertullian was correct: Paul was the "apostle of the heretics."</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Incidentally, to downplay this "apostle of the heretics" designation, some have suggested Tertullian meant to write "<strong><em>ethnicorum</em></strong> apostolus" meaning "apostle of the gentiles." Editors, however, reject this solution as "unnecessary." See&nbsp;<em>Ante-Nicene Library</em> at&nbsp;<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=-iXeFqwwF1UC&amp;lpg=PA126&amp;dq=haereticorum%20apostolus&amp;pg=PA126">126</a> fn 5. But I reject it because the context and views of Tertullian prove Tertullian meant precisely what he said. Paul was the "apostle of the heretics."</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Also to hide "apostle of the heretics" in the Latin original, the English translations mollify the words. In the <em>Ante-Nicene Fathers</em> by Schaff, it offers an English translation which replaces this clear expression with these words instead: "When the <strong><em>very apostle whom our heretics adopt</em></strong> . . ." (<em>Id.</em>, at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=bu-pvKBmXhAC&amp;lpg=PA324&amp;dq=the%20very%20apostle%20whom%20our%20heretics%20adopt&amp;pg=PA324#v=onepage&amp;q=the%20very%20apostle%20whom%20our%20heretics%20adopt&amp;f=false">324</a> col. 2.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Not only is this incorrect, but also it is clear from context what Tertullian is saying. Tertullian in context is saying that sometimes Scripture speaks figuratively and by analogies. First, Tertullian cites some non-Paul passages to prove this. Finally, Tertullian says in effect that even Paul (whom Marcion says is the sole apostle in the NT) spoke often figuratively and in allegories. It is in that context, the key words appear. And the correct translation perfectly fits. So Tertulian says:</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"But why enlarge on the subject when<strong><em> the apostle of the heretics </em></strong>[<em>i.e.</em>, Paul] ...&nbsp;<strong><em>alleges</em></strong> that the rock which followed (the Israelites) and supplied them with drink was Christ; [and] teaching the Galatians...that the two narratives of the sons of Abraham had an allegorical meaning in their course...." [<em>i.e.</em>, Paul in&nbsp;Galatians ch. 4.]&nbsp;&nbsp;(Schaff, <em>Ante-Nicene</em>, etc. <em>id.</em>, at&nbsp;<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=bu-pvKBmXhAC&amp;lpg=PA324&amp;dq=the%20very%20apostle%20whom%20our%20heretics%20adopt&amp;pg=PA324#v=onepage&amp;q=the%20very%20apostle%20whom%20our%20heretics%20adopt&amp;f=false">324</a> col. 2.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Why the alterations in the English translation? To obscure from us the truth that Paul was often perceived negatively and inferior to follow.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">And this quote's fuller context proves that Tertullian's "scornful" appellation of "apostle of the heretics" is aimed at Paul. For Tertullian is paraphrasing Paul from Galatians, identifying the author of Galatians (<em>i.e.</em>, Paul) as the "apostle of the heretics." Of this there is no doubt, as Leitzman, Manen and Schaff in the quotes above agreed. Hengel likewise concurs that it is a "fact that he [<em>i.e.</em>, Paul] is called haereticorum apostolus...." in Tertullian's <em>Against Marcion&nbsp;</em>at 3:6:4.&nbsp;(Martin Hengel, <em>Paul: Between Antioch and Damascus: The Unknown Years</em> at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=PRIKVslqctkC&amp;lpg=PA321&amp;ots=GFnrpJIXZL&amp;dq=%22haereticorum%20apostolus%22&amp;pg=PA321#v=onepage&amp;q=%22haereticorum%20apostolus%22&amp;f=false">321</a>.) (For more on Tertullian's quote, see <a href="/books/456-critic-at-early-church-history.html">my reply to a critic's article "Was Paul The Apostle of the Heretics?"</a>)<br /></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Now such a scornful appellation for Paul does not mean Tertullian did not often treat Paul kindly when he found many edifying things in Paul's words or life. I also endorse this approach toward Paul as proper and fair. Indeed, Paul's words are often edifying, such as in his speech about love. But in the main, Paul's 'difficult to understand words' (if we are polite like Second Peter) make Paul the "apostle of the heretics," <em>i.e.</em>, his words are a support to those who diverge&nbsp;from the true faith which Jesus taught.</span></p>
<h1><span style="font-size: 18pt;">7. Elcesaites - Reject Paul</span></h1>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Ferdinand Bauer in <em>Church History of the First Three Centuries</em> (1879) Vol. 2 at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=D3RAAAAAIAAJ&amp;dq=theodotus%20byzantium&amp;pg=PA270#v=onepage&amp;q=apostle%20paul&amp;f=false">270</a> states:</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Another characteristic trait preserved in Eusebius, E.H. 6:38, where he quotes from a homily of Origen, on Psalm lxxxii, the doctrine of an Elcesaite, that <strong><em>he rejects the apostle Paul</em></strong>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The Elcesaites began at the time of Trajan at Rome. (Trajan was emperor 98 A.D-117 A.D.).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Their "period of influence extended from about 100 to 400" A.D. ("<a href="http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=124&amp;letter=E">Eclesaites</a>," <em>Jewish Encyclopedia</em>.)</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">They must be regarded as Jewish because they expressly insisted on "<strong><em>the rule of the Law</em></strong>," and held that "the faithful must be <strong><em>circumcised and live according to the Law</em></strong>" (Hippolytus, "H&aelig;reses," ix. 14). Special emphasis was laid on the observance of the Sabbath (<em>l.c.</em>ix. 16), and the turning of the face toward Jerusalem during prayer (Epiphanius,<em>l.c.</em>xix. 3). At the same time they asserted that sacrificing had not been enjoined upon the Patriarchs, and condemned it altogether (compare Uhlhorn, "Homilien und Recognitionen," p. 396).&nbsp;("<a href="http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=124&amp;letter=E">Eclesaites</a>,"&nbsp;<em>Jewish Encyclopedia</em>.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Samuel Coleridge's <em>Encyclopedia Metropolitania</em> (Fellowes: 1845) at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=MD5OAAAAYAAJ&amp;dq=elcesaite&amp;pg=PA135#v=onepage&amp;q=elcesaite&amp;f=false">139</a> provides this synopsis of this sect which is based upon the characterization of an opponent -- Epiphanius:</span></p>
<div class="gtxt_column">
<p class="gtxt_column" style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The&nbsp;Elcesaite were followers of Elxai, (sometimes Sect arising called Elxxus and sometimes Elcesai,) who lived in the time of Trajan. &nbsp;[Elxai was] educated in the Jewish faith,&nbsp;acquainted with the Christian Religion, ....</span></p>
</div>
<div class="gtxt_column">
<p class="gtxt_column" style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Attached to Jewish notions, the Elcesaitas turned towards Jerusalem in their prayers, kept the Sabbath, practised circumcision, and observed other ceremonies ; but, retaining little, if any, entire part of the Old Testament, they expressed detestation of Sacrifices, which they maintained had never been offered by the ancient Patriarchs. Though they <strong><em>believed in the existence of one unbegotten and Supreme Being</em></strong>, (whom they thought to honour by frequent purifications,) they contended, that external compliance with idolatrous rites was irreprehensible, as long as the inward mind remained uninfluenced. They regarded it, therefore, as the part of an intelligent man, on trying occasions, to renounce his faith in words, provided he preserved it in his heart.</span></p>
<p class="gtxt_column" style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">It has been doubted whether the Elcesaitae ought to be reckoned among the Christian or the Pagan Sects; and Epiphanius acknowledges his uncertainty on that point. They spoke, indeed, of <strong><em>Christ as of a great King</em></strong>, representing him as <strong><em>clothed in a human but invisible form</em></strong>, of stupendous dimensions ; but it is not clear whether they applied the title to our Lord or to some expected Messiah. Since, however, as we learn from Origen they retained various passages of the New Testament, (though <strong><em>they rejected the whole of St. Paul's, Epistles</em></strong>,) it must, we think, be concluded, that they had partially admitted the Christian Religion.</span></p>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The <em>Jewish Encyclopedia</em> depicts their baptism in a way that indirectly snipes at Christian practices as reflecting paganism but in most ways is normative Christian practice:</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;">The Christo-Messianology of the book is very ambiguous. The Messiah is conceived, on the one hand, as an angel of giant dimensions, a concept that recalls&nbsp;<a href="http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=646&amp;letter=S" class="cross">Shi'ur ?omah</a>in the Cabala, and Adam in the Haggadah; and, on the other hand, the doctrine of the <strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><em> continuous incarnation of the Messiah from Adam to Jesus</em></span></strong> (<a href="http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=761&amp;letter=A" class="cross">seeAdam ?admon</a>) is taught. [NOTE: The "eternal Son of God" notion of Roman Catholicism later relied upon a similar notion.] A strongly marked naturalistic-pagan element is found in the prescribed ablutions which among the Elcesaites <strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><em>answered to the Christian baptism</em></span></strong> . Water was held sacred by them&mdash;an ancient pagan conception widely spread, especially in Babylonia (Anz, "Ursprung des Gnostizismus," pp. 99<em><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">et seq.</span></em>); hence the Elcesaites preached not only <strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><em>forgiveness of all sins with the new baptism</em></span></strong> , but also enjoined ablutions against madness, consumption, and possession. During baptism they invoked, <strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><em>besides God and His son</em></span></strong> , the <strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><em>great king</em></span></strong> , also heaven, earth, water, oil, and salt, representing the five elements, according to the ancient Semitic conception. It <strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><em>may</em></span></strong> also be gathered from Hippolytus' quotations from the book of the Elcesaites that astrology and magic were prominent in their religion. The doctrine of Elcesai is as follows: "There exist wicked stars of impiety. This declaration is now made by us: O ye pious ones and disciples, beware of the power of the days of the sovereignty of these stars, and engage not in the commencement of any undertaking during the ruling days of these." The Sabbath is important as "one of those days during which prevails the power of these stars." For a similar astrological reason no work must be begun on the third day from the Sabbath&mdash;Monday (Hippolytus,<em><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">l.c.</span></em>). The asceticism of this sect, which <strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><em> forbade the eating of meat</em></span></strong> , but maintained the <strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><em> sanctity of marriage</em></span></strong> , must be noted. <span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">("<a href="http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=124&amp;letter=E">Eclesaites</a>,"&nbsp;<em>Jewish Encyclopedia</em>.)</span></span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">They were allies of the Essenes and Nazarenes:</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">According to Epiphanius, Elcesai and his brother Jexai had joined the Oss&aelig;ans, probably identical with the Essenes, who, as well as the related sect of the Nazarites, recognized Elcesai's authority. They lived in the region beyond the Jordan, offering no sacrifices, and condemning the use of meat. </span> <span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">("<a href="http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=124&amp;letter=E">Eclesaites</a>,"&nbsp;<em>Jewish Encyclopedia</em>.)</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Hence, in sum, the Eclesaites:</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">accepted God and His Son Jesus, the great King;</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">God was one, and unbegotten;</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Jesus had a pre-existence as Messiah, generated since Adam;</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Baptism was in the name of God and His Son;</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Jesus as Messiah was clothed in human flesh but also in an invisible form;</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The Law remained valid</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Sabbath must still be followed</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Circumcision of the faithful was still valid.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Forbade sacrifice;</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Forbade eating meat;</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Marriage was sacred; and</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Paul's writings were to be rejected.</span></li>
</ul>
<h1><span style="font-size: 18pt;">8. Macarius Magnes ca. 300</span></h1>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Macarius Magnes, <a href="http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/macarius_apocriticus.htm">Apocriticus</a>, III.30-36 (ca. 300) presents a hypothetical debate between a Paul advocate and a Paul critic. The defenses of Paul are far weaker than the critic's argument, and thus Magnes appears to be overall criticizing Paul. Here is how Magnes writes derisively of Paul's inconsistencies when talking of the Law:</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">[Paul] says, &lsquo;As many as are under the Law are under a curse&rsquo; (Gal 3:10). The man who writes to the Romans, &lsquo;The Law is spiritual&rsquo; (7:14), and again, &lsquo;The Law is holy and the commandment holy and just&rsquo; (7:12), <strong><em>places under a curse those who obey that which is holy!</em></strong>... In his Epistles &hellip; he praises virginity (I-Tim 4:1, I-Cor 7:25), and then<strong><em> turns round and writes,</em></strong> &lsquo;In the latter times some shall depart from the faith,... forbidding to marry&rsquo; (I-Tim 4:1-3).... And in the Epistle to the Corinthians he says, &lsquo;But concerning virgins I have no commandment of the Lord&rsquo; (I-Cor 7:25).</span></p>
<h1><span style="font-size: 18pt;">9. Methodius Circa 311 A.D.</span></h1>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Methodius, bishop of a see somewhere in Lycia, perhaps at Olympus wrote of Paul: &lsquo;You should not be upset by the sudden shifts in Paul&rsquo;s arguments, which<strong> give the impression that he is confusing the issue or dragging in irrelevant material or merely wool-gathering</strong>.... In all his transitions he never introduces anything that would be irrelevant to his teaching; but gathering up all his ideas into a wonderfully harmonious pattern, he makes all bear on the single point which he has in view.&rsquo; (Symposium III, 3.) (Quoted in Henry Chadwick,&nbsp;<em>The Enigma of St. Paul. The Ethel M. Wood Lecture delivered before the University of London on 27 February 1968</em> (London: The Athlone press, 1969) at&nbsp;<a href="http://www.biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/paul_chadwick.pdf">5</a>.)</span></p>
<h1><span style="font-size: 18pt;">10. Chrysostum - Says Paul Not Well Known</span></h1>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Chrysostum [ca. 398 AD] "writes in his Preface he wishes he [<em>i.e.</em>, Paul] was better known for <em><strong>s</strong><strong>ome are so ignorant of him that they do not know exactly the number of his epistles</strong></em>." (Nathaniel Lardner, Andrew Kippis, The Works of Nathaniel Lardner (1815) Vol. 2 at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=sKQTAAAAYAAJ&amp;lpg=PA605&amp;ots=8q7jN9x9Om&amp;dq=chrysostom%20unknown%20to%20many%20despised%20acts&amp;pg=PA605#v=onepage&amp;q=chrysostom%20unknown%20to%20many%20despised%20acts&amp;f=false">605</a>.)</span></p>
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">11. Jerome Believed Paul Lied About Peter (Reflected in Augustine's 394 &amp; 397 A.D. Letters)</span></h2>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><strong>Augustine of Hippo, </strong><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ccel.org%2Fccel%2Fschaff%2Fnpnf101.vii.1.XXVIII.html&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFrqEzdKk7meNrGzTOpbNkccRS4DcGLCvw"><em>Letter 28</em>, to Jerome</a> (394 AD) in response to Jerome apparently saying Paul contradicts and attributes to one of the 12 falsehood or error (<span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><em>i.e.</em>, to Peter)</span>, then Augustine warns all of the NT collapses: </span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"I have been reading also some writings ascribed to you, on the<strong><em> Epistles of the Apostle Paul</em></strong>. In reading your exposition of the Epistle to the Galatians,... most disastrous consequences must follow upon our<strong><em> believing that anything false </em></strong>is found in the sacred books: that is to say, that the men by whom the Scripture has been given to us and committed to writing, did put down in these books anything false.... For <strong>if you once admit</strong> into such a high sanctuary of authority<strong> one false statement</strong> as made in the way of duty, there will <strong>not be left a single sentence of those books</strong> which, if appearing to any one difficult in practice or hard to believe, may not by the same fatal rule be explained away, as a statement in which intentionally and under a sense of duty, the author declared what was not true.... If indeed Peter seemed to (Paul) to be doing what was right, and if notwithstanding,<strong><em> he, in order to soothe troublesome opponents, both said and wrote that Peter did what was wrong&mdash; if we say thus,... nowhere in the sacred books shall the authority of pure truth stand sur</em></strong><strong><em>e</em></strong>."</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"> |<a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ccel.org%2Fccel%2Fschaff%2Fnpnf101.vii.1.XL.html&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFrqEzeOTywUBZCPxzD7-0_FMA-YIpP0QA"><em>Letter 40</em>, to Jerome</a> (397 AD) - in response to Jerome &nbsp;saying Paul is directly lying and falsely accusing Peter of error, Augustine says if true, how could anyone know when Paul was telling the truth:</span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"If it be possible for men to say and believe that, after introducing his narrative with these words, &lsquo;The things which I write unto you, behold, before God, I lie not&rsquo;, <strong><em>the apostle (Paul) lied </em></strong>when he said of Peter and Barnabas, &lsquo;I saw that&nbsp;<strong><em>they walked not uprightly, according to the truth of the gospel</em></strong>&rsquo;,... [then] if they did walk uprightly, Paul wrote what was false; and if he wrote what was false here, when did he say what was true?"|</span></p>
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">12. Jerome's View That Paul Was A Hypocrite (Letter to Augustine, 404 A.D.)</span></h2>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><strong>Jerome, </strong><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ccel.orgwww.newadvent.org%2Ffathers%2F1102075.htm&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFrqEzfbYwNEIDxU1vmLRmM47ObTFY4Q_g"><em>Letter 112, to Augustine</em></a> (404): </span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"Porphyry ... accuses Paul of presumption because he dared to reprove Peter and rebuke him to his face, and by reasoning convict him of having done wrong; that is to say, of being in the very fault which he himself, who blamed another for transgressing, had committed.... Oh blessed Apostle Paul&mdash; who had rebuked Peter for hypocrisy, because he withdrew himself from the Gentiles through fear of the Jews who came from James&mdash;<strong><em>why are you, notwithstanding your own doctrine, compelled to circumcise Timothy</em></strong> (Acts 16:3), the son of a Gentile, nay more, a Gentile himself?" </span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 30px;">&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 24px;">Incidentally, these words were related to a distinct question of what explained Paul's account in Gal. 2:11-14 that he dressed down Peter at Antioch. Jerome adopted what Origen had previously endorsed because if all apostles are equally inspired, and assuming Paul is, then such a conflict is impossible without disproving the assumption that all apostles are equally inspired. &nbsp;So Jerome initially accepted Origen's solution that joint deception explains how Peter and Paul were actually in 100% agreement. As Trumball explains what Origen taught about Gal. 2:11-14: "Origen specifically claimed that the apostles Peter and Paul <strong>agreed together to deceive their hearers</strong> at Antioch by simulating a dissension between themselves, when in reality they were agreed." (H.J. Trumball, <a href="http://www.fullbooks.com/A-Lie-Never-Justifiable1.html">A Lie Never Justifiable </a>(1856) Trumball's footnote to this was:&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 24px;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;"><strong>Footnote 3</strong>: Gal. 2: 11-14. A concise statement of the influence</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">of this teaching of Origen on the patristic interpretations of the</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">passage in Galatians, is given by Lightfoot in his commentary on</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">Galatians, sixth edition, pp. 128-132.]</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 24px;">Hence, Origen claimed that both apostles lied and deceived others rather than Paul was led by God to embarass and publicly decry Peter as a hypocrite and thus a sinner. Augustine replied to Jerome that this "implied approval of deceit and falsehood," as Trumbull summarizes it. See <a href="http://www.fullbooks.com/A-Lie-Never-Justifiable2.html">link</a>. Eventually, Jerome came around to an explanation consistent with Augustine that Peter was not being deceptive. But this left unresolved how Paul, if he were a true apostle, and so was Peter, could find fault and censure another apostle if they were both simultaneously inspired at all times by the Holy Spirit. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 24px;">After rejecting Origen&rsquo;s solution, now Jerome openly called Paul to task as a hypocrite himself, and thus how dare Paul criticize Peter for the very same sin as Paul committed:&nbsp;</span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 10px; color: #494a44; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Geneva, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; background-color: #ffffff;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1"></span><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Jerome wrote:</span></span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 10px 30px; color: #494a44; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Geneva, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; background-color: #ffffff;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"Oh...Paul...why then did you cause Timothy to be circumcised [Acts 16:3] contrary to your own convictions?...I ask you again Paul, why did you shave your head? [Acts 21, nazarite vow; cf. Numbers 6:15, must shave head] ....We have thus seen that for fear of the Jews...<em><strong>Paul pretended that [he] observed the precepts of the Law.</strong></em>" (Quoted in Agenor Etienne Gasparin,&nbsp;<em>The Concessions of the Apostle Paul, and the Claims of Truth</em>&nbsp;(1854) at&nbsp;<a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=P6UCAAAAQAAJ&amp;lpg=PA57&amp;ots=RJbDb4OPWM&amp;dq=jerome%20pretending%20to%20be%20apostles&amp;pg=PA57#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false" style="color: #517291;">57</a>.)</span></span></p>
<h3><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">A. Jerome's Reply To Augustine Preserved by Abelard: Insists Paul Was Hypocrite In Peter Incident</span></strong></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><strong>Peter Abelard,</strong> <a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Findividual.utoronto.ca%2Fpking%2Fresources%2Fabelard%2FSic_et_non.txt&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFrqEzdrHbl5fHT7U2Lleub0KCPuLIzgzQ"><em>Sic et Non</em></a> (1120 AD): </span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"Writing in reply to St. Augustine, after he had been brought to task by Augustine concerning the exposition of a certain spot in Paul's Epistle to the Galatians, Jerome said (Epist.112.4), &lsquo;You ask why I have said in my commentary on Paul's letter to the Galatians that Paul could not have rebuked Peter for <strong><em>what he himself had also done</em></strong>. And you asserted that the reproof of the Apostle was<em><strong> not merely feigned</strong></em>, but true guidance, and that I ought not to teach a falsehood. I respond that ... I followed the commentary of Origen.'" </span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 30px;">&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 24px;">Both Jerome and Origen acknowledged that Paul lied, but apparently did not regard it as sin, as Augustine intepreted their answer. Later, Jerome acknowledge that if Paul lied it would be a sin. See H. Clay Trumbull, <a href="http://www.fullbooks.com/A-Lie-Never-Justifiable2.html">A Lie Never Justifiable.</a>&nbsp;And in the quote of Jerome by Gasparin, Jerome finally calls Paul a hypocrite himself...guilty of the same sin Paul accused Peter.</span></p>
<h3><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">B. Aquinas Summarizes The Jerome Criticism of Paul</span></strong></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><strong>Thomas Aquinas, </strong><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gutenberg.org%2Fetext%2F17897&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFrqEzcNvBnTDs4Dhcnjp0vI1aqQ5fs43A"><em>Summa Theologica</em></a>, I-II, Q.103, Art.4, Reply Obj.2 (1272 &nbsp;AD): </span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"According to Jerome, Peter [in Gal 2:6-14] withdrew himself from the Gentiles by pretense, in order to avoid giving scandal to the Jews, of whom he was the Apostle; hence he did not sin at all in acting thus. On the other hand, Paul in like manner <strong><em>made a pretense of blaming him,</em></strong> in order to avoid scandalizing the Gentiles, whose Apostle he was. But Augustine disapproves of this solution [offered by Jerome]."</span></p>
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">13. Jerome's Low View of Paul in 411 A.D.</span></h2>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Jerome severely criticizes Paul for lack of clarity, and giving feints difficult to understand. Jerome translated the Greek NT in 411 A.D. into the Latin Vulgate. Jerome in his Commentary on Galatians and Ephesians wrote: </span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"Paul does <em><strong>not know how to develop a hyperbaton</strong></em> [i.e., a change of normal word order for emphasis], <strong><em>nor to conclude a sentence</em></strong>; and having to do with rude people, he has <strong><em>employed the conceptions</em></strong>, which, if, at the outset, he had not taken care to announce as spoken after the manner of men, <strong><em>would have shocked men of good sense</em></strong>." (Gaussen, Theopneusty (1844): <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=jS42AAAAMAAJ&amp;dq=would%20have%20shocked%20men%20of%20good%20sense&amp;pg=PA119">119</a> quoting Comm. Galatians Bk 11, titl. Bk 1, i.1; and Comm. Ephesians Bk. 11: 3.1; also quoted in <em>Methodist Review</em> at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=KrxWAAAAIAAJ&amp;dq=would%20have%20shocked%20men%20of%20good%20sense&amp;pg=PA602">602</a>.) </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">In other words, Paul is difficult to understand, as Second Peter says. Paul's writing and grammar is atrocious to decipher. And his arguments use terrible and shocking analysis that requires one to pick apart what he says to prevent him from meaning the opposite of what he is saying. Thus, one may be able to untangle Paul's word meanings, Jerome seems to imply, but it is very rough going. Obviously, basing doctrine on Paul was regarded as precarious in the early church.</span></p>
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">14. Abelard, 1142 AD, Say Paul At Odds With What Christ Approved</span></h2>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><em>Peter Abelard,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Findividual.utoronto.ca%2Fpking%2Fmiscellaneous%2FAbelard.DLB.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFrqEzfVP91khYs9pELDqmTuMCCwZN09zA">Letters of Direction</a> </em>(before 1142 AD): </span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"We know of course that when writing to the Thessalonians the Apostle [Paul] sharply rebuked certain idle busybodies by saying that &lsquo;A man who will not work shall not eat.&rsquo;... But was <strong><em>not Mary sitting idle in order to listen to the words of Christ</em></strong>, while Martha was ... grumbling rather enviously about her sister's repose?"</span></p>
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">15. Indirect Proof From Early Orthodox Doctrines</span></h2>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Another way to prove the low opinion of Paul in the early orthodox church is to examine the prevalant doctrines within that early church. We have demonstrated elsewhere that Marcion (ca. 144 A.D.) advanced all of Paul's views -- predestination, eternal security, faith alone, the abrogation of the Law of Moses, and finally that Jesus "appeared to have human flesh" (Phil. 2:7), but did not actually have such flesh, etc. However, Paul's views in the mouth of Marcion were uniformally rejected in the early church. See "Tertullian Criticizes Every Pauline Doctrine of Marcion" at JWO:<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=3VFnsDuxBPcC&amp;lpg=PP1&amp;dq=jesus%20words%20only&amp;pg=PA402">402 </a>et seq.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Then, without ever naming Paul, all his peculiar doctrines which had no foundation in Christ's teachings were rejecting <em>uniformally</em> in the pre-325 A.D. Church. <em>See </em>"Patristic Era Rejects Paul's Salvation Doctrine," at JWO:<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=3VFnsDuxBPcC&amp;lpg=PP1&amp;dq=jesus%20words%20only&amp;pg=PA406">406</a> et seq.; "The Patristic Era Church Also Rejected Paul's Predestination Doctrine," at JWO:<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=3VFnsDuxBPcC&amp;lpg=PP1&amp;dq=jesus%20words%20only&amp;pg=PA412">412</a> et seq.; "The Patristic Era Church Also Blasted Paul's Doctrine on Idol Meats," at JWO:<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=3VFnsDuxBPcC&amp;lpg=PP1&amp;dq=jesus%20words%20only&amp;pg=PA415">415</a> et seq.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Also, see a webpage here entitled "<a href="/books/142-early-church-view-of-law-given-moses.html">Early Church View on Law given Moses</a>" which shows the prevalent view in the early church prior to 325 A.D. endorsed the validity of the Law given Moses. This is completely opposite to Paul's view.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">On the issue of salvation, scholars concur on the divergence between Paul and the Early Church as reflected in the gospels. For example, Guthrie (1871-1940), a Scottish-born Episcopalian, analyzed each of the gospels separately and found the early church writers emphasized morality as a key to salvation. See&nbsp;Kenneth Sylvan Guthrie, <em>The soteriology of Jesus </em>(Dunlap Printing Co., 1896) at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=nAYOAAAAYAAJ&amp;dq=jesus%20words%20on%20salvation&amp;pg=PA60#v">60</a>. Matthew's and Luke's gospel set forth this same principle -- that repentance, morality, works etc., are criticial to salvation. <em>Id.</em>,<em> </em>at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=nAYOAAAAYAAJ&amp;dq=jesus%20words%20on%20salvation&amp;pg=PA83">83</a> (Luke) and <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=nAYOAAAAYAAJ&amp;dq=jesus%20words%20on%20salvation&amp;pg=PA88">90</a>-92 (Matthew). While John's Gospel emphasized one must believe in Jesus for salvation (<em>id.</em>, at<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=nAYOAAAAYAAJ&amp;dq=jesus%20words%20on%20salvation&amp;pg=PA77"> 77</a>), it did not say belief was the only requirement.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">By contrast, Paul appears to emphasize that if one had faith, it was enough for salvation; and thus good works are merely a "desirable addition" to salvation. <em>Id.</em>, at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=nAYOAAAAYAAJ&amp;dq=jesus%20words%20on%20salvation&amp;pg=PA61">61.</a> Hence, Paul appears to teach that belief is the ONLY requirement, going far beyond the Gospel of John's stress on the importance of belief.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Thus what Paul taught was far in divergence from what the gospels were understood to teach in the early church.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The only explanation for this ignoring of Paul and rejection of his unique doctrines in the early church is that he had no weight in the early pre-325 A.D. church. Paul would be cited generally for agreeable sentiments, but not on anything that would teach repentance/works were merely a desirable addition to salvation. And the earliest writers -- Justin and Papias -- write as if they never heard of Paul!</span></p>
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong>16. A Mirror of Negative Comments in </strong>Chrysostum, 391 AD</span></h2>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Below are quotes from Chrysostom, an apologist for Paul, who is identifying criticisms that can be leveled at Paul from various statements in his epistles. Then Chrysostom tries to reply. These criticisms must have been circulating in the early church although rarely preserved. Tertullian was the exception because of the obviously greater need to fight Marcionism than be too concerned about his negative comments about Paul in&nbsp;<em>Against Marcion</em>. In the quotes below, Chrysostom offers palliatians to mollify negative opinions about Paul. However, as I will explain, they are typically weak and unconvincing ones. Thus, you must read commentators in the early church who promote Paul as sometimes representing a mirror reflecting back something you cannot see: the writings/views critical of Paul which were not being preserved with rare exception,&nbsp;<em>e.g.,</em> Tertullian.</span></p>
<h3><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong>John Chrysostom,</strong><strong><em><strong> Homilies on Galatians</strong></em></strong><strong> (391 AD):</strong></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><strong>Gal. 2:2</strong> [Critic of Paul paraphrased by Chrysostum] "What is this, Oh Paul! Thou who neither at the beginning nor after three years wouldest confer with the Apostles, do you now confer with them after fourteen years are past, lest you should be running in vain?<em><strong> Better would it have been to have done so at first, than after so many years</strong></em>; and why did you run at all, if not satisfied that thou were not running in vain?<em><strong> Who would be so senseless as to preach for so many years, without being sure that his preaching was true?</strong></em>...<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=X8QUAAAAQAAJ&amp;dq=homolies%20on%20galatians%20What%20is%20this%2C%20Oh%20Paul!&amp;pg=PA29#v=onepage&amp;q=neither%20at%20the%20beginning&amp;f=false"><sup>1</sup></a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><em>[<strong>My Comment</strong></em>: In context, Chrysostum will then argue that the reason Paul went to the see the apostles was due to revelation, and therefore it would supposedly have been folly for Paul to see the Apostles sooner than revelation directed him. However, such a statement makes no sense. Had Paul stayed away by revelation telling him NOT to go, it would make sense. But Paul says he went to see the apostles by revelation to do something which evidently was so long overdue God had to tell Paul to go! The excuse Chyrsostom makes is thus an obvious white-wash of what Chrysostom intelligently expressed in the quote above from an unnamed critic who saw as a flaw that Paul had not gone to visit the true apostles of Jesus Christ for so long.]</span></p>
<p class="gtxt_body"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><em><strong><strong>Gal. 2:6</strong> </strong></em><em>But of those who seemed to be somewhat, whatsoever they were, it maketh no matter to me, God accepteth no man's person.</em></span></p>
<p class="gtxt_body"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">[Critic of Paul paraphrased by Chrysostum]: "Here he not only does not defend the Apostles, but even&nbsp;<em><strong>presses hard upon those holy men</strong></em>, for the benefit of the weak. His meaning is this:&nbsp;<strong><em>although they permit circumcision, they shall render an account to God, for God will not accept their persons, because they are great and in station</em></strong>. But he does not speak so plainly, but with caution.<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=X8QUAAAAQAAJ&amp;dq=homolies%20on%20galatians%20What%20is%20this%2C%20Oh%20Paul!&amp;pg=PA33#v=onepage&amp;q=&amp;f=false"><sup>2</sup></a></span></p>
<p class="gtxt_body"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><em>[<strong>My Comment</strong></em>: Chrysostom in reply to the critic says that Paul implies that the true apostles had given up the practice of circumcision. He bases this on the tense of "<em>those who seemed to be somewhat, whatsoever they </em><strong>were</strong><em>." </em>Supposedly the 'were' did not mean the status of apostle at a prior time (which is the obvious meaning) but the practice of circumcision now supposedly being universally abandoned even among the true apostles. In this way, Chrysostum tries to portray the 12 also accepted Paul's practice of giving up circumcision of even Jews. However, in Acts 21 we see James confronting Paul years after the Jerusalem Council, and telling him the prior policy of non-circumcision was only true for Gentiles, not Jews. James then seeks reconfirmation from Paul that it is not his policy to teach abrogation of the Law. Therefore, Chrysostom's excuse using "were" was grammatically and factually baseless.]</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><strong>Gal. 5:11</strong>. And I, brethren, if I yet preach circumcision, why do I yet suffer persecution ?</span><br /><br /><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">[Chrysostum's point-of-view:]" "Observe how clearly he exonerates himself from the charge, that in many places he judaized and&nbsp;<em><strong>played the hypocrite </strong></em>in his preaching. He calls them as witnesses; for ye know, he says, that&nbsp;<em><strong>my command to abandon the Law</strong></em> is made the pretext for persecuting me. If I yet preach circumcision, why do I yet suffer persecution? for this is the only charge which they of Jewish descent have to bring against me. Had I permitted them to receive the Faith, still retaining the customs of their fathers, neither believers nor unbelievers would have laid snares for me, seeing that none of their own usages were disturbed. What then! did he not preach circumcision ? did he not circumcise Timothy ? Truly he did. How then can he say, "I preach it not?" Here observe his accuracy; he says not, " I do not perform circumcision," but, "&nbsp;<em><strong>I preach it not</strong></em>," that is, I do not bid men so to believe. Do not therefore consider it any confirmation of your doctrine, for though I circumcised I did not preach circumcision."</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><em>[<strong>My Comment</strong></em>: &nbsp;Chyrsostom's handling of this shows Paul is a quibbler of words as a means of not blatantly lying, and Chrysostom tries using this to prove Paul is honest. Obviously critics pointed to Paul as a hypocrite in the case of Timothy. Chrysostom's analysis is useful to prove in fact how hypocritical Paul truly was in the sense condemned by our Lord. For Chrysostom admits that Paul chose his words carefully. So Chrysostom says Paul does not preach circumcision even though, as in Timothy's case, he practiced it. Chrystostum conveniently overlooks 5:11 where Paul says the opposite, that he indeed is "still preaching circumcision, so why am I still being persecuted?" Paul engaged in double-speak and self-contradictions to confuse opponents and baffle defenders like Chrysostum on what basis they could defend Paul.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">What is hard to fathom is how Chrysostom could conclude his own argument was a valid means to rebut a charge of hypocrisy. It required Chrysostum to simply contradict Paul in 5:11, and say Paul never preached circumcision; he merely practiced it. Such fine-line expressions of Paul prove hypocrisy: the listener had a right to expect that if Paul says&nbsp;<strong><em>he does not preach circumcision (which Paul contradicts in 5:11),</em></strong> then surely he would&nbsp;<strong><em>not teach circumcision</em></strong> needs to be sometimes performed. Such behavior is clearly hypocrisy as Jesus defined it! The outside of the cup is clean, but not the inside. They perform deeds conforming to the Law&nbsp;<strong><em>solely to be seen</em></strong> by MEN. That's Paul to a T! Yet, Chrysostum chose to defend Paul on that basis--on a sophistry distinction. Yet, the truth was that Chrysostum had to ignore / contradict Paul says in 5:11 he still "preaches circumcision."]</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt; color: #0000ff;">Roman Catholicism Switched To Favor Paul</span></h2>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Paul's ascendancy began in the 300s when the Roman Catholic Church had an emperor -- Constantine -- who wanted to abolish Sabbath. He wanted all worship on the Day of the Sun -- the day to worship Sol -- short for Sol Invictus, the god of the Sun, as expressly stated in Constantine's statute of 321 AD. (Constantine in 324 AD for the first time told Christian bishops he was a convert since 310 AD. Then what explains this statute?)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"> From the point Constantine delivered 50 Bibles in 331 AD with the canon as he wished it to be, canon was re-arranged to make Paul of first rank among the epistles. This reflected itself in manuscripts printed from 331 AD forward, in particular the Latin Vulgate, where Paul's position was changed:</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The ancient manuscript order of the books of the "New Testament" has first the "Gospels" then "Acts" followed by the Jewish Epistles (Ya,akov (James); 1 &amp; 2 Kefa (Peter); 1, 2 &amp; 3 Yochanan (John) and Y'hudah (Jude)) followed by the Pauline epistles which are followed by Revelation. This order was <strong><em>rearranged by Rome in the Latin Vulgate in which the Pauline epistles were given first place and the Jewish epistles given second place.</em></strong> ("<a href="http://www.trimmfamily.com/hrvnt.html">The Hebraic Roots Version of the New Testament</a>.")</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The consequence of this shift placed the emphasis on Paul, and off the true aspostles:</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The original manuscript order had an important significance. It agreed with the precept that the message was to the Jews first and then to the Goyim (Gentiles). It also agrees with the concept that Ya'akov, Kefa and Yochanan were emissaries that come BEFORE Paul (Gal. 117) and with the concept that Kefa, Ya'akov and Yochanan served as three pillars which lend authority upon which Paul's message was built (Gal. 2:9) and not vice-versa. The reader of the NT was intended to read the "Jewish" epistles FIRST and<strong><em> then to read the Pauline epistles already having understood the Jewish epistles</em></strong>. The NT reader was intended to read Ya'akov's (James') admonition concerning faith and works (Ya'akov 2) as well as Kefa's<em><strong> warnings about Paul being difficult to understand and often twisted</strong></em> (1Kefa 315-16) etc.<strong><em> before ever attempting to understand the writings of Paul</em></strong>. The HRV follows the ancient manuscript order (which agrees also with the order of the ancient Aramai</span>c <span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">manuscripts)</span><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;"> in placing the "Jewish epistles" immediately after Acts and placing<strong><em> the Pauline Epistles AFTER them</em></strong>. <em>Id.</em></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">In the mid-300s, Constantine's rabid diatribes against Jewish law led to Victorinus' Commentary on Galatians, vindicating Paul over Peter on God doing away with any further obedience to the law. Victorinus shamelessly claimed Paul was correct that the Galatians were "sinning" by obeying God's law any longer. How ironic! Victorinus is the one known as the initiator of the "rediscovery of the Apostle Paul." (See <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289896679_Marius_Victorinus'_Commentary_on_Galatians">link</a>.) </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">What was now orthodox in Roman Catholicism was only what Paul taught. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">As Stephen Cooper in&nbsp;</span><strong><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Marius' Victorinus' Commentary on Galatians&nbsp;</span></strong><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">(2006) explains: "Victorinus chose the Pauline corpus as an object of commentary because this <strong>portion</strong> of the New Testament offered the <strong>best</strong> vehicle for promoting orthodoxy and orthopraxy in the church." (<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289896679_Marius_Victorinus'_Commentary_on_Galatians">Link</a>.)&nbsp; </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Thus, we all are witnessing for the first time in Christianity, Roman Catholicism <strong>chose</strong> <strong>someone</strong> <strong>other</strong> <strong>than</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong> to convey <strong>Jesus</strong>' <strong>teachings</strong> -- Paul. A person disregarded and dismissed for the early centuries. One whose doctrines which Marcion advanced in 140 AD were condemned universally -- predestination, faith alone, etc. In the process, Roman Catholicism in effect made Marcionism orthodox, only rejecting Marcion's view that Yahweh of the Original Covenant is distinct from the Father of the NT.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Then by 396 AD, Augustine in his summary entitled "Christian Doctrine" quotes Paul 116 times to 69 times for Jesus. (And Jesus was quoted most often to try to confirm the Trinity doctrine.) Almost all of Christianity now was about Paul's rule that the Law is gone. See Augustine,&nbsp;<span><em>On Christian Doctrine</em> (N.Y.: Liberal Arts Press, 1955). </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><span>What a far cry from Justin Martyr from 120 AD who wrote numerous full-length books quoting only Jesus to support a multitude of doctrines. Yet not one single quote from Paul. Not one quote!</span></span></p>
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt; color: #0000ff;"><strong>&nbsp;</strong></span></h2>
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt; color: #0000ff;"><strong>Conclusion</strong></span></h2>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The notion that the early church was ecstatic about Paul is a myth.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"></span></p>
<hr />
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong>Email Comment</strong></span></p>
<div style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">I enjoyed this page thoroughly. Thank you so much. I would like to suggest the addition of a VERY damning passage: Acts 9:26 in which the disciples (who we know were inspired by the Holy Spirit. Who we KNOW could recognize possessed humans and so know that they FELT the nature of a person's spirit) deny that Paul is one of them. <a href="https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=acts+9%3A26&amp;version=YLT">Acts 9:</a><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1"><a href="https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=acts+9%3A26&amp;version=YLT">26</a> reads: "</span><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">And Saul, having come to Jerusalem, did try to join himself to the disciples, and they were all afraid of him, not believing that he is a disciple...."&nbsp;</span></span></span><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">Thanks again and God Bless.&nbsp;</span><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">Acts 9:26 would fit under point 1 (Acts Circa A.D. 80) very nicely.</span></span></div>
<div style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"></span></div>
<div style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">John 20:22 Indicates that the original disciples were filled with the Holy Spirit. The Spirit is one though resident in many and so should recognize itself. When Saul came by, post "conversion" (Acts 9:26) it didn't see itself in him at all. (Def 3/16/2013)</span></div>
<div style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: normal;"><hr /><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">One Early Proponent Knew Paul's Letters</span></strong></span></div>
<div style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"></span></div>
<div style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">In the early church, the only writing that appears to know of Paul's epistles is the bishop Clement of Rome. For our synopsis of this letter's key points, see <a href="/books/207-clement-letters-to-corinthians.html">Clement - Letter to the Corinthians</a>.</span></div>
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><strong>&nbsp;</strong></span></h2> </td>
</tr>
</table>
<span class="article_separator">&nbsp;</span>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<div class="bottom_top"></div>
<div id="bottom">
</div>
</div>
<div id="footer"><strong>Content View Hits</strong> : 18815387<br />
<script type="text/javascript">
var pv = new Array(1,0,0,0,1);
var trdlname = "/downloads";
//<![CDATA[
var regex = /\.(?:doc|eps|jpg|png|svg|xls|ppt|pdf|xls|zip|txt|vsd|vxd|js|css|rar|exe|wma|mov|avi|wmv|mp3)($|\&|\?)/;
//]]>
var trlkname = "/external/";
var trmlname = "/mailto/";
</script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://jesuswordsonly.com/modules/mod_analytics/gatr.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-3747914");
pageTracker._initData();
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}
</script>
</div>
<div class="copyright"></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink