752 lines
112 KiB
HTML
752 lines
112 KiB
HTML
|
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
|
||
|
|
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en-gb" lang="en-gb" >
|
||
|
|
<head>
|
||
|
|
<base href="https://www.jesuswordsonly.com/books/283-guile-in-paul.html" />
|
||
|
|
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
|
||
|
|
<meta name="robots" content="index, follow" />
|
||
|
|
<meta name="keywords" content="Paul, guile, Romans 13:1-3, 2 Cor. 12:16" />
|
||
|
|
<meta name="title" content="Guile in Paul" />
|
||
|
|
<meta name="author" content="18ptTR" />
|
||
|
|
<meta name="description" content="false apostle Paul uses guile to gain converts" />
|
||
|
|
<meta name="generator" content="Joomla! 1.5 - Open Source Content Management" />
|
||
|
|
<title>Guile in Paul</title>
|
||
|
|
<script type="text/javascript" src="/media/system/js/mootools.js"></script>
|
||
|
|
<script type="text/javascript" src="/media/system/js/caption.js"></script>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="/images/favicon.ico" />
|
||
|
|
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/templates/system/css/system.css" type="text/css" />
|
||
|
|
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/templates/system/css/general.css" type="text/css" />
|
||
|
|
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/template_css.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
|
||
|
|
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/nav.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
|
||
|
|
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/style1.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<!--[if IE]>
|
||
|
|
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/ie.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
|
||
|
|
<![endif]-->
|
||
|
|
<!--[if IE]>
|
||
|
|
<link href="/templates/js_relevant/css/ie.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" />
|
||
|
|
<![endif]-->
|
||
|
|
<!--[if lte IE 6]>
|
||
|
|
<style type="text/css">
|
||
|
|
img { behavior: url(/templates/js_relevant/js/iepngfix.htc); }
|
||
|
|
</style>
|
||
|
|
<![endif]-->
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
</head>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<body>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<div id="main-wrapper">
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<div id="header_graphic">
|
||
|
|
<div class="inside">
|
||
|
|
<div id="newsflash"> <div class="moduletable">
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<table class="contentpaneopen">
|
||
|
|
<tr>
|
||
|
|
<td valign="top" >"Paul's reign [is] drawing to a close. Jesus, on the contrary, lives more than ever." (Renan,<em> Saint Paul</em> (1875))</td>
|
||
|
|
</tr>
|
||
|
|
<tr>
|
||
|
|
<td valign="top" >
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
</td>
|
||
|
|
</tr>
|
||
|
|
</table>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
<h1><a href="https://jesuswordsonly.com/" title="Relevant">Relevant</a></h1>
|
||
|
|
<h2>A Joomla! Template for the Rest of Us</h2>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
<div class="menubar">
|
||
|
|
<div id="navmenu">
|
||
|
|
<script type="text/javascript" src="/templates/js_relevant/js/barmenu.js"></script>
|
||
|
|
<ul class="menu"><li><a href="https://jesuswordsonly.com/"><span>Home</span></a></li><li id="current" class="haschild active"><a href="/books.html" class="haschild"><span>Books</span></a><ul><li><a href="/books/jesuswordsonly.html"><span>Jesus' Words Only</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/jesuswordssalvation.html"><span>Jesus' Words on Salvation</span></a></li><li class="haschild"><a href="/books/didcalvinmurderservetus.html" class="child"><span>Did Calvin Murder Servetus?</span></a><ul><li><a href="/books/didcalvinmurderservetus/background-material-did-calvin-murder-servetus.html"><span>Background Material</span></a></li></ul></li><li><a href="/books/hownottosudythebible.html"><span>How Not to Study the Bible</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/flawsofyoungearthscience.html"><span>Flaws of Young Earth Science</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/jesusorpaul.html"><span>Jesus or Paul</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/unintended-disservice.html"><span>Unintended Disservice</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/original-gospel-of-matthew.html"><span>Original Gospel of Matthew</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/commands-of-jesus.html"><span>Commands of Jesus</span></a></li><li><a href="/books/gospel-of-john.html"><span>Gospel of John</span></a></li></ul></li><li><a href="/recommendedreading.html"><span>Further Reading</span></a></li><li><a href="/media.html"><span>Media</span></a></li><li class="haschild"><a href="/reviews.html" class="haschild"><span>Reviews</span></a><ul><li><a href="/reviews/jwo-reviews.html"><span>Jesus Words Only</span></a></li><li><a href="/reviews/jwos-reviews.html"><span>Jesus Words on Salvation</span></a></li></ul></li><li><a href="/contactus.html"><span>Contact Us</span></a></li><li><a href="http://www.jesuswordsonly.com/topicindex/753-bookstore.html"><span>Bookstore</span></a></li><li><a href="/topicindex.html"><span>Topic Index</span></a></li><li><a href="/aboutauthor.html"><span>About Author</span></a></li><li><a href="/newsletters.html"><span>Newsletters</span></a></li></ul>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<div id="mainbody">
|
||
|
|
<div id="showcasetop"> </div>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<table width="940" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="center">
|
||
|
|
<tr>
|
||
|
|
<td id="leftcol" valign="top" width="200">
|
||
|
|
<div class="inside">
|
||
|
|
<div class="moduleS1">
|
||
|
|
<div>
|
||
|
|
<div>
|
||
|
|
<div>
|
||
|
|
<h3>Search</h3>
|
||
|
|
<form action="index.php" method="post">
|
||
|
|
<div class="searchS1">
|
||
|
|
<input name="searchword" id="mod_search_searchword" maxlength="20" alt="Search" class="inputboxS1" type="text" size="20" value="search..." onblur="if(this.value=='') this.value='search...';" onfocus="if(this.value=='search...') this.value='';" /> </div>
|
||
|
|
<input type="hidden" name="task" value="search" />
|
||
|
|
<input type="hidden" name="option" value="com_search" />
|
||
|
|
<input type="hidden" name="Itemid" value="2" />
|
||
|
|
</form> </div>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
<div class="moduleS1">
|
||
|
|
<div>
|
||
|
|
<div>
|
||
|
|
<div>
|
||
|
|
<h3>Questions?</h3>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Please enter your questions, and we will get back to you as soon as possible. As an anti-spam measure, we ask that you re-type the code you see in the box below, prior to clicking "Send Message"<br /><br />
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<form name="s5_quick_contact" method="post" action="">
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<input class="inputbox" id="namebox" onclick="s5_qc_clearname()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearname()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Name..." name="name"></input><br />
|
||
|
|
<input class="inputbox" id="emailbox" onclick="s5_qc_clearemail()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearemail()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Email..." name="email"></input><br />
|
||
|
|
<input class="inputbox" id="subjectbox" onclick="s5_qc_clearsubject()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearsubject()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Subject..." name="subject"></input><br />
|
||
|
|
<textarea id="messagebox" rows="" cols="" class="inputbox textarea" onclick="s5_qc_clearbody()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearbody()" style="font-size:11px; font-family:arial; overflow:auto;width:80%; height:55px" name="message">Your Message...</textarea><br />
|
||
|
|
<input class="inputbox" id="spambox" onclick="s5_qc_clearspam()" onfocus="s5_qc_clearspam()" style="font-weight:bold; font-size:11px; font-family:arial; width:80%" type="text" value="Enter The Code 7702" name="verif_box"></input><br />
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<input id="email_address" type="hidden" value="" name="email_address"></input>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<input class="button" type="button" onclick="s5_qc_submit()" value="Send Message" ></input>
|
||
|
|
</form>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
|
||
|
|
// <![CDATA[
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
var s5_qc_spam_text = document.getElementById("spambox").value;
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
function s5_qc_clearbody() {
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value == "Your Message...") {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("messagebox").value="";
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
function s5_qc_clearname() {
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value == "Name...") {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("namebox").value="";
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
function s5_qc_clearemail() {
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value == "Email...") {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("emailbox").value="";
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
function s5_qc_clearsubject() {
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value == "Subject...") {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value="";
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value.length < 1) {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("spambox").value = s5_qc_spam_text;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
function s5_qc_clearspam() {
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value == s5_qc_spam_text) {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("spambox").value="";
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("namebox").value.length < 1) {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("namebox").value = "Name...";
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("emailbox").value.length < 1) {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("emailbox").value = "Email...";
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("messagebox").value.length < 1) {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("messagebox").value = "Your Message...";
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("subjectbox").value.length < 1) {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("subjectbox").value = "Subject...";
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
function s5_qc_isValidEmail(str_email) {
|
||
|
|
if (str_email.indexOf(".") > 2 && str_email.indexOf("@") > 0) {
|
||
|
|
alert('Your email is now being submitted - Thank you!');
|
||
|
|
document.s5_quick_contact.submit();
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
else {
|
||
|
|
alert('Your email address is not valid, please check again - Thank you!');
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
function s5_qc_submit() {
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value == s5_qc_spam_text || document.getElementById("subjectbox").value == "Subject..." || document.getElementById("namebox").value == "Name..." || document.getElementById("emailbox").value == "Email..." || document.getElementById("messagebox").value == "Your Message...") {
|
||
|
|
alert('All fields are required, please complete the form - Thank you!');
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (document.getElementById("spambox").value != "7702") {
|
||
|
|
alert('Your spam verification answer is incorrect.');
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
var s5_message_holder = document.getElementById("messagebox").value;
|
||
|
|
var s5_first_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(0);
|
||
|
|
var s5_second_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(1);
|
||
|
|
var s5_third_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(2);
|
||
|
|
var s5_fourth_message_char = s5_message_holder.charAt(3);
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_first_message_char == "<") {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_first_message_char == "w" && s5_second_message_char == "w" && s5_third_message_char == "w") {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_first_message_char == "h" && s5_second_message_char == "t" && s5_third_message_char == "t") {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if (s5_message_holder.indexOf("s5_qc_null") >= 0) {
|
||
|
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
else {
|
||
|
|
document.getElementById("email_address").value = "info@jesuswordsonly.com";
|
||
|
|
var email_str = document.getElementById("emailbox").value;
|
||
|
|
s5_qc_isValidEmail(email_str);
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
// ]]>
|
||
|
|
</script>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
<div class="moduleS1">
|
||
|
|
<div>
|
||
|
|
<div>
|
||
|
|
<div>
|
||
|
|
<h3>Recommendations</h3>
|
||
|
|
<p><a href="/books/401-music-store-manager.html">Only Jesus</a> (great song by Big Daddy)</p>
|
||
|
|
<p><a href="http://astore.amazon.com/jwoogm-20?node=1&page=2">What Did Jesus Say?</a> (2012) - 7 topics </p>
|
||
|
|
<p>None above affiliated with me</p> </div>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
<div class="module">
|
||
|
|
<div>
|
||
|
|
<div>
|
||
|
|
<div>
|
||
|
|
<a href="/books/jesuswordsonly.html"><img alt="JesusWordsOnS-cropsmall" src="/images/stories/JesusWordsOnS-cropsmall.jpg" width="116" height="117" /></a> </div>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
<div class="module">
|
||
|
|
<div>
|
||
|
|
<div>
|
||
|
|
<div>
|
||
|
|
<a href="/books/jesuswordssalvation.html"><img alt="JesusWordsSalv-crop2" src="/images/stories/JesusWordsSalv-crop2.jpg" width="114" height="146" /></a> </div>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
<div class="module">
|
||
|
|
<div>
|
||
|
|
<div>
|
||
|
|
<div>
|
||
|
|
<a href="/component/content/3-didcalvinmurderservetus/26-calvinfreebookonline.html"><img src="/images/stories/DidCalvinMurderServetusM.jpg" alt="DidCalvinMurderServetusM" height="NaN" width="120" /></a> </div>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
</td>
|
||
|
|
<td id="maincol" valign="top">
|
||
|
|
<div id="breadcrumbs">
|
||
|
|
<span class="breadcrumbs pathway">
|
||
|
|
<a href="https://jesuswordsonly.com/" class="pathway">Home</a> <img src="/templates/js_relevant/images/arrow.png" alt="" /> Books</span>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<table class="contentpaneopen">
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<tr>
|
||
|
|
<td valign="top">
|
||
|
|
<h1><span style="font-size: 24pt;"><br />Guile in Paul</span></h1>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">A good introductory point to this topic is Proverbs <a href="http://ebible.com/bible/Proverbs%2012:10">12:10</a> (NIV) which says "the <span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">LORD</span> condemns <strong>a crafty man</strong>." We read similarly in Psalm 5:6: " <strong>deceitful</strong> men the LORD abhors." And finally, “<span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><strong>Cursed is he who doeth the work of the LORD deceitfully.” </strong>Jeremiah 48:10<span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">. Cf. Rev. 14:5: "</span></span><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">And in their mouth was found no guile: for they are without fault before the throne of God."</span></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">What kind of teacher was Paul, by his own admission? Did Paul ever say he used deceit (guile) and used craftiness to capture disciples? We shall see.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<h3><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="color: #3366ff;">Jesus' Example vs. Paul's Example</span> </strong></span></h3>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">In Jesus was "no guile."</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Jesus “left us an example, that we should follow His steps: who did no sin, neither was<strong><em> </em>guile</strong> found in His mouth.” (1 Peter<a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Peter%202:21-22&version=ASV"> 2:21-22</a>)(ASV.)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">What if Jesus ever spoke the words "I was crafty, and captured you with guile (deception)"? Wouldn't we think then Jesus was a sinner, and could not be of God? Wouldn't we conclude that if Jesus had truly said such a thing that Jesus would be cursed by God pursuant to Jeremiah 48:10? We would be compelled to abandon Jesus if he ever made such an outrageous statement that "I was crafty and captured you with guile / deception."</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">But then Paul says the same thing in 2 Cor. 12:16 which we would be revulsed if Jesus had said it, but we just accept it from Paul:</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">But be it so, I did not myself burden you; but, being <strong>crafty</strong>, I <strong>caught you with guile</strong>. (2 Cor. <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20corinthians%2012:16&version=ASV">12:16</a>, ASV.)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">A similar end-justifies the means attitude by Paul toward lying for the gospel is found here: "</span></span><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt; line-height: 1.3em;">For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; </span><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">why yet am I also judged as a sinner?” <a href="https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=romans+3%3A7&version=KJV">Romans 3:7 KJV</a>. </span></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Paul means that if "my lie" has advanced God's truth, then "my lie" is no sin. What kind of Gospel can ever be based upon a lie?</span></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p><strong><span style="font-size: 18pt; color: #0000ff;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">NIV Tampering to Conceal Romans 3:7</span></span></strong></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">This verse of Romans 3:7 has had a negative impact on even the translators who claim to be Christian on translating this very same verse. Out of sheer embarassment, the NIV alone among every other translation adds "Some may argue" in front of the verse -- thereby removing "my lie" from Paul's mouth, and putting it in some unknown's mouth. </span></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt;"><span style="color: #222222;">As evangelical Christian Ray Stedman says in </span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: #222222;">Reason to Rejoice: Love, Grace, and Forgiveness in Paul's Letter to the Romans</span><span style="color: #222222;"> (Discovery House, 2016) at this </span><a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=a2aeCwAAQBAJ&lpg=PT73&ots=CpjDdliqCz&dq=romans%203%3A7%20NIV%20addition%20%22someone%20might%20argue%22&pg=PT73#v=onepage&q=romans%203:7%20NIV%20addition%20%22someone%20might%20argue%22&f=false">link</a><span style="color: #222222;">:</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt; color: #222222; padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-weight: bold; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial;">"Translators of the New International Version erred by adding the phrase that is not in the original Greek text "Someone might argue...." The New King James renders it more accurately: </span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt; color: #222222; padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-weight: bold; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial;">For if the truth of God has increased through my lie unto his glory, why am I judged a sinner?" </span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt; color: #222222;"><span style="background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;">No Greek manuscript supports the NIV's alteration, as Stedman says. Nor does the NIV claim a variant as support in a footnote, as it often does, when it is relying upon a variant. The NIV has used its full authority to make us all think Paul did not actually express these words himself; it was someone else's hypothetical argument. What could be the justification? </span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt; color: #222222;"><span style="background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;">The NIV itself necessarily must believe it commits no sin on us when it misleadingly translated this verse. Why? Because if guile is no sin for Paul to advance the Gospel, it is no sin for the NIV to change the verse to protect Paul from even justified criticism. We simply cannot have that, and thus are authorized by Paul to change verses to maintain Paul's credibility even though the change itself is utterly unwarranted. For more examples from the NIV doing so, see </span><span><span style="background: #fdfeff;"></span><span style="background: #fdfeff;"><a href="/books/429-mistranslations-to-help-paul.html">Mistranslations to Protect Paul</a>. </span></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="color: #3366ff;">FYI: Romans 3:7 Is Paul's Proof That God Authors Evil.</span></strong></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt;">It should be noted that Romans 3:7 in the KJV's correct translation, Paul's meaning is clear. For Paul's point in context is to defend God authors evil, and does sometimes use evil to advance His truth. Thus, verse 7 is 100% pure Paul. Here is the proof.</p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt;">If you read <a href="https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=romans+3%3A5-8&version=KJV">Romans 3:5-8,</a> Paul begins by claiming "<span style="font-weight: bold; color: #001320;">our unrighteousness God doth establish</span>" -- so God authors our "unrighteous" behavior. (Verse 5.) This, for us as Spirit-filled Christians, should be seen as a repulsively evil blasphemy of God by Paul, but Paul will defend it.</p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt;">Paul goes on and tells you how some criticize his view. Paul says the "manner of men" criticizes this by arguing that God would be "unrighteous" to inflict "wrath" on us for doing the very same "unrighteousness" that God made us perform. Then Paul rebuts this very valid point that God cannot judge us still guilty of sin if He made us do the sin by 2 arguments:</p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt;"> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt;">First, Paul says if it were so, "how shall God judge the world?" (no one would be punished for evil, implying God must remain innocent even though he makes us do evil).</p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt;">Second, Paul utters the words at issue in verse 7 -- that the same unrighteousness (that God compels) can be justified when done to make God's truth "abound" -- "for if the truth of God in my falsehood did more abound to His glory, why yet am I as a sinner judged." This proves, Paul believes, it is not necessarily wrong for God to compel unrighteous behavior like lying when it is justified, such as a supposedly just lie.</p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt;">Then the proof that verse 7 is Paul's own words rather than a hypothetical opponent's words is that in verse 8 Paul says that verse 7 is how he would word it, contrasted against "and not, as we are evil spoken of, and certain affirm we say - 'We may do the evil things, that the good may come."</p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt;">Incidentally, I would say Paul says something far worse in verse 7 than his accusers claimed he said in verse 8. They merely said Paul says he sows evil in the hope good comes. But Paul defends that he does unrighteous lies that are no sins, and so why is he judged a sinner? He diffuses -- he thinks -- the claim -- that he says -let's do evil to see good come- by affirming what he truly defends is in verse 7 -- God's righteousness is advanced by lies sometimes, and that cannot be sin. Hence, verse 7 is a clear corrective to what Paul says is a false accusation in verse 8. Verse 7 is in Paul's mind the true way he wants it known that he defends lying - when it advances God's kingdom.</p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt;"><span style="background-color: transparent; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px;"></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Philippians As A Verse Similar to Romans 3:7</span></span></span></strong></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> <span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt; background-color: transparent;">Romans 3:7 is not isolated. Paul elsewhere speaks of lies being a means of spreading the gospel: “What then? Only that in every way, </span><strong style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">whether in pretense or in truth, Christ is preached; and in this I rejoice, yes, and will rejoice.” </strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt; background-color: transparent;">Philippians 1:18.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The <em>Infinite Truth</em> project ably comments on this verse:</span></span></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Forgiving all his sins prior to his self-proclaimed conversion, let us ponder on the philosophy on which Paul preached. In Philippians Chapter 1, Verse 18: “But what does it matter? The important thing is that in every way, whether from false motives or true, Christ is preached. And because of this I rejoice.” Paul clearly <strong><em>does not care if you go by evil means to spread the message of Christ</em></strong>, so long as people hear of Christ. ("<a href="http://infinitetruth.wikidot.com/christianity:criticism-paul">Paul: Apostle or Heretic?</a>" <em>Infinite Truth Project</em> (3/3/2016).)</span></span></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;" data-mce-mark="1">An example of such pretense was Paul having Timothy circumcised in Acts 16:3, even though Paul said that if a believer became circumcised that Christ would profit him nothing. Evidently, Paul had Timothy circumcised as a pretense to curry favor with Christians who felt it necessary, and not from an honest belief it was ever necessary. As the <em>Infinite Truth Project</em> also astutely commented on that development:</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;" data-mce-mark="1">And as a teacher, Paul showed some of his own hypocrisy. While keeping in mind Paul’s attitude towards circumcision found in Rom 2:25-27, 1 Cor 7:17-20, Gal 5:2-4, and Gal 6:12-15, we can see that <em><strong>Paul himself circumcised Timothy</strong> </em>[Acts 16:3], even though<em><strong> Christ would profit him nothing</strong></em>. [Gal 5:2] <em><a href="http://infinitetruth.wikidot.com/christianity:criticism-paul">Id.</a></em></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Even Jerome in the 400s raised Paul's actions with Timothy as proof of the very same "deceitful dissimulation" that Paul accused Peter of in Galatians. Jerome also cited as another such example Paul's behavior of taking vows to shave his head in Acts 21 to appear Law-obedient when asked by James to prove he does not teach against the Law. Jerome wrote: </span></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"Oh...Paul...why then did you cause Timothy to be circumcised contrary to your own convictions?...I ask you again Paul, why did you shave your head? ....We have thus seen that for fear of the Jews...<em><strong>Paul pretended that [he] observed the precepts of the Law.</strong></em>" (Quoted in Agenor Etienne Gasparin, <em>The Concessions of the Apostle Paul, and the Claims of Truth</em> (1854) at <a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=P6UCAAAAQAAJ&lpg=PA57&ots=RJbDb4OPWM&dq=jerome%20pretending%20to%20be%20apostles&pg=PA57#v=onepage&q&f=false">57</a>.)</span></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p><strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt; color: #0000ff;" data-mce-mark="1">Our Duties as Christians When We Test Paul's Principles</span></strong></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> <span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt; background-color: transparent;">How instead should a follower of Jesus interpret Paul's statement in 2 Cor. 12:16 -- "being crafty, I caught you with guile"? We will prove this means we need to eject Paul from our minds and Bibles as an authority as his presence destroys the integrity of Scripture.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;" data-mce-mark="1">Also, we are fundamentally required to do so by our Lord's words. Jesus tells us the father of Paul's lies to a spiritual community was Satan. Jesus even explains this in John 8:44 in a way that brings Paul to mind because Paul too was a "murderer from the beginning..." as Luke depicts Paul in Acts 9:7:</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1"></span><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">You belong to your father, the devil,</span><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1"></span><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1"> and you want to carry out your father’s desires.</span><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1"></span><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1"> He <em><strong>was a murderer from the beginning</strong></em>, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and <em><strong>the father of lies</strong></em>. (<a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+8:44">John 8:44 NIV</a>)</span></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;" data-mce-mark="1">Paul was listening to Satan, our Lord says, and Paul in common with Satan was a "murderer from the beginning." One may even ask whether Jesus again was giving a subtle warning to us about Paul when we put two and two together.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">To prove Paul's presence in the "Bible" destroys the Bible's trustworthiness, we will demonstrate how </span><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.3em;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;">Paulinists defend Paul's use of guile</span><strong style="font-style: italic;">.</strong></span><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1"> We will show you their explanation of how they justify Paul using intentional double-speak. Paul's agenda was, according to Luther and others, to get faith alone sold to the masses, and displace the gospel given by the 12--a defunct gospel these Paulinists assert. To do this, Paul had to use guile, but this goal supposedly justifies the means. This rationale has a familiar ring? </span><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">The end supposedly justifies the means.</span></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;" data-mce-mark="1">However, the Christ-centered response is that it is destructive of our Savior's message to keep such a voice alongside our Savior as any trustworthy authority. If we rationalize Paul can legitimately deceive us, and this is accepted<strong><em> to justify accepting a different Gospel than Jesus truly preached</em></strong>, then we will be permitting Paul's guileful tactic to <strong><em>rationalize destruction of the path to righteousness</em></strong>---the WAY Jesus taught. No man comes to the Father but by Jesus and His Principles. Thus we cannot let Paul draw us from the Way by guile to listen to a different voice than our Savior's.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p><strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt; color: #0000ff;" data-mce-mark="1">Gasparin Forsaw the Destruction of the Integrity of All The Bible If We Concede Paul's Principles Are Inspired</span></strong></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;" data-mce-mark="1">As Gasparin wrote in 1854 in <em><strong>The Concessions of the Apostle Paul</strong></em> about such accomodating principles that such principles are self-destructive. They represent a "system of dogmatics in which <strong>truth has no absolute value</strong>, in which there are as many truths as apostles" which renders the Bible's truths "entirely broken;" it represents "<strong>quicksand [where] we have no longer any assurance of anything</strong>." Id. at <a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=P6UCAAAAQAAJ&lpg=PA57&ots=RJbDb4OPWM&dq=jerome%20pretending%20to%20be%20apostles&pg=PA63#v=onepage&q&f=false">63.</a> </span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;" data-mce-mark="1">Thus, when Paul's principles of duplicity to feign a view are accepted as a Biblical morality, as most seminary trained pastors do (and it is a literally valid reading), such principles destroy the entire Bible. For now nothing about what it stands for can be trusted as true because we accept as Bibically valid that nothing Paul teaches can be trusted as really true. We simply will each choose to trust what we surmise was the purpose of Paul's self-contradictory talk. It all becomes subjective, and <strong>what you prefer it means</strong>. Paul is the leaven that ruins the whole loaf.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt; color: #0000ff;">Paul Defends The Use of Guile To Gain Followers</span></h2>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt; background-color: transparent;">Paul admits he was often being deceptive. Paul distinctly says, “being</span><strong style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"><em> crafty, I caught you with guile</em></strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt; background-color: transparent;">” (2 Cor. 12:16.) In Greek, "guile" is DOLOS and means Paul used "bait" like one craftily or cunningly uses to deceptively trick a fish to nibble, and then you have caught it on your hook. </span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt; color: #222222;">For DOLOS means literally the word BAIT. <span style="color: #222222;">This is the </span><a href="http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/morph?l=do%2Flw%7C&la=greek&can=do%2Flw%7C0&prior=panou=rgos&d=Perseus:text:1999.01.0155:book=II%20Corinthians:chapter=12:verse=16&i=1">link</a><span style="color: #222222;"> to the Perseus Tuft definition of DOLOS.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt; color: #222222;">Then you click Middle Liddell to find the correct Greek meaning. The Liddell is the best Greek dictionary, and it is free at that link. H<span style="background-color: transparent; font-size: 18pt;">ere is what it says DOLOS means:</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt; color: #222222; padding-left: 30px;">1. properly a bait for fish. Other -- any cunning contrivance for deceiving or catching, as the Trojan horse, the robe of Penelope. More other: generally any trick or strategem. In plural, wiles. </p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt; color: #222222; padding-left: 30px;">2. guile, craft, cunning treachery.</p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Jesus spoke in condemnation of such tactics by men He called "Hypocrites!" These men were the Pharisees. Then consider Paul counted himself still a member of the Pharisees after becoming a Christian: "My brothers, <em><strong>I am a Pharisee</strong></em>, the son of a Pharisee...." Acts <a href="http://bible.cc/acts/23-6.htm">23:6</a>.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Paul’s self-professed guile compounds itself when he tells the Thessalonians to the contrary: “For our exhortation was not of deceit, nor of uncleanness, <em><strong>nor in guile</strong></em>.” (1 Thess. <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20thess.%202:3&version=ASV">2:3</a>.) Which way is it Paul? Honesty or guile? You cannot even decide! Are you truthful here, or merely more guile?</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">As a result, Paulinists delight and exalt in Paul being duplicitous, fully admitting he quotes Bible passages out of context, speaks contradictorily, and misleads the reader to think he endorses the Law, repentance and obedience for salvation so as to deflect the criticism from the 12. But all the while these Paulinists admit Paul is merely opening the door for a different gospel, and that is his real agenda. Paul’s record of all such crafty arguments is admiringly reviewed and defended in a book by the evangelical Mark D. Given entitled <em>Paul’s True Rhetoric: Ambiguity, Cunning, and Deception in Greece and Rome</em> (Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 2002)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt; color: #0000ff;">Praise Of Paul's Use of Guile to Win Followers</span></h2>
|
||
|
|
<p> <span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt; background-color: transparent;">Given’s book is even highly praised in mainstream Biblical journals. For example, see the favorable review in Samuel Byrskog, “Paul’s True Rhetoric: Ambiguity, Cunning, and Deception in Greece and Rome,” </span><em style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Journal of Biblical Literature</em><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt; background-color: transparent;"> (December 31, 2002).</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">This characteristic in Paul has a long history of recognition and praise by both Erasmus (1466-1536) of Holland and by Luther.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Erasmus was the first European reformer in the early 1500s. He recognized Paul’s use of cunning and deception. Erasmus said in glowing terms that Paul in Romans uses “<strong><em>pious cunning</em></strong> and holy flattery.” Erasmus elsewhere similarly says: “This apostle of ours is<strong><em> always skillful and slippery...such a squid, such a chameleon</em></strong> — he plays the part of Proteus or Vertumnus.” This quote is found in <em>Holy Scripture Speaks: The Production and Reception of Erasmus’ Paraphrases of the New Testament</em> (ed. Hilmar M. Pabel & Mark Vessey) (University of Toronto Press, 2002) at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=6nVE1e1O7-kC&lpg=PA105&dq=skillful%20slippery%20squid%20cameleon&pg=PA105#v=onepage&q&f=false">105</a>.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">FYI: “Erasmus, the greatest scholar of that age, had at first sympathized with Luther...[b]ut when Erasmus perceived that Luther’s teachings, instead of reforming, produced confusion, disorder and threatened to undermine society itself” he backed off. (Stang, <em>The Life of Martin Luther</em> (Pustet, 1883) at 53.)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">One would imagine that if Paul used deception it would prove embarrassing to those who admired Paul. Yet, Mr. Given finds Paul’s guile as something <strong><em>praiseworthy</em></strong>. Paul was presenting a “mysterious...and finally <strong><em>sophistic</em></strong> God who<strong><em> cares enough to be cunning and is devoted enough to be deceptive</em></strong>.” (Given, <em>Paul's True Rhetoric</em> (2002), <em>supra</em> at 181.)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Double-Yuck!</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt; color: #0000ff;">Paul's Self-Avowed Hypocritical Tactics To Gain Followers</span></h2>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Paul taught us the example to accommodate Gentiles when around Gentiles and to act like a Jew around Jews.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">"For though I am free from all men, I have made myself a servant to all, that I might win the more; and <strong><em>to the Jews I became as a Jew</em></strong>, that I might win Jews; to those who are under the law, as under the law, that I might win those who are under the law;<em><strong> to those who are without the law as without law... that I might win those who are without law</strong></em>; to the weak I became weak, that I might win the weak. I have become all things to all men, that I might by all means save some." 1Corinthians 9:19-22</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">"Therefore, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God. Give no offense, either to the Jews or to the Greeks or to the church of God, just as<strong><em> I also please all men in all things</em></strong>, not seeking my own profit, but the profit of many, that they may be saved. Imitate me, just as I also imitate Christ." 1Corinthians 10:31-33</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Again, can anyone imagine Jesus / Yahshua playing chameleon and saying anything like "I have become all things to all men" or "I please all men in all things" as does Paul? But clearly this was Paul's tactical use of guile to gain followers -- deceiving Jews by keeping the outside of the cup clean by obeying Jewish laws and deceiving Gentiles by appearing to countenance their behaviors when around them as well. </span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Paul's avowed principles and behavior could not be a godly person who was following Christ. As Gasparin wrote in 1854 in <em><strong>The Concessions of Apostle Paul</strong></em>: </span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">"If the apostles habitually gave themselves the license of appearing different from what they really were, and if they taught the distinction between those truths which it was necessary to maintain and those which may be sacrificed or disguised,<em> </em><strong>it follows that God<em> </em>Himself sanctions two principles</strong>, against which His whole revelation protests, namely, that <strong>the claims of truth are not absolute</strong>, and that <strong>we may do evil that good may come!</strong>" Id. at <a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=P6UCAAAAQAAJ&lpg=PA57&ots=RJbDb4OPWM&dq=jerome%20pretending%20to%20be%20apostles&pg=PA60#v=snippet&q=license&f=false">60</a>.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Based upon this, Gasparin sought a solution -- we must reconcile Paul as pro-Law, as Jesus was, and that Paul only meant to reject the Pharisees' changes and additions to the Law. Id. at <a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=P6UCAAAAQAAJ&lpg=PA57&ots=RJbDb4OPWM&dq=jerome%20pretending%20to%20be%20apostles&pg=PA41#v=onepage&q=paul&f=false">41</a>. Otherwise, our faith falls to ruins as self-contradictory and built on deception by even our Savior who said the Law would continue until heaven and earth pass away.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Yet, Paul is certainly clear in support of an anti-Law position as an opposing conclusion to what Gasparin proposed. See Romans 7:1-11 for the clearest exposition. See also <a href="/books/106-chapter-five-jwo.html">chapter 5 of JWO</a>.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Yet, Gasparin's premise was correct - if Paul's words are taken literally on the issue of the Law, as they are by most evangelical Christians and all Catholics, it destroys the credibility of the Bible, including of Jesus. No one of any weight ever has accepted Gasparin's solution to the problem texts -- to substitute for "Law" the oral law and oral traditions. </span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Gasparin's solution fails because Paul expressly endorsed using guile and deception to conform to Law principles when around those who were "weak" about thinking the Mosaic law continued. This was most notoriously clear in Paul's words on eating idol meat (which he allowed unless you were around someone who was "weak" and thought the Law ... a Mosaic law against eating such meat..still applied). As a result, Paul gave us a gospel of <strong>lawless accomodation to any level of morality</strong>, low or high. Gasparin's solution could not win out because it is a false solution itself: Paul endorsed deception and guile to appear law-compliant around those who thought the Law -- the written Law-- still was in effect. </span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Gasparin would make us all deluded deceivers, contending Paul consistently teaches whatever position we want Paul to endorse. Paul is a chameleon, and thus anyone who insists Paul is a true inspired authority becomes an unwitting accessory to deception by insisting they only see one viewpoint in Paul -- one camp claiming faith alone and the other faith and works, or one camp saying a life without God's original law is ok but another camp saying it still applies, such as sabbath.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"></span><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">More importantly, the view Paul is an inspired voice is a destructive seed of the most important part of canon of all -- the words of Christ -- destroying anyone seriously taking Jesus' words about the necessity of repentance from sin, of sending to hell those who called him Lord but did not do charity to his servants, and so on. Why? Because this view about Paul allows them to justify by subtle manipulation of words to make Jesus sound like Paul that a one-time faith Jesus died for your sins (1 Cor. 15:1-4) guarantees salvation, which is thereby never imperilled again by salvation (thereby "accommodating Jesus to Paul's principles"). </span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt; color: #0000ff;">Luther Defends Paul's Use of Deception To Win Faith Alone Argument</span></h2>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"><br />Sadly, Paul was used by Luther in the early stages of the German Reformation to justify hypocritical tactics to promote the 'gospel' of Paul. Luther recognized that Paul advanced his faith-alone gospel by means of what were kindly dubbed pious frauds. Paul would often affirm the opposite of salvation by faith alone, matching Jesus’ salvation formula. Yet, Paul’s ulterior goal (and hence allegedly his supposedly laudable goal) was cunningly to slip in the teaching of salvation by faith alone as the superior message. </span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"></span><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Also in combination with such sophist plays, Paul would frequently mangle quotes from the Bible, distorting their meaning to the opposite of what they said in their original context, plus adding and changing words -- but it was supposedly justified because it proved his gospel of faith alone. See </span><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"><a href="/books/360-paul-misquotes-of-scripture.html">Paul Misquotes of Holy Scripture.</a></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">In line with those proofs, Erasmus said in </span><strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">The Praise of Folly</span></strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"> (1509) that Paul engages in such conduct, and is our support for such similar "foolishness " (which Erasmus I hope was pretending to praise.) Erasmus -- one of the leading reformers of the Reformation -- explains:</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 18pt; color: black; padding-left: 60px;">But why do I insist upon any one particular example, when in general it is the public charter of all divines, to <strong>mould</strong> and bend the <strong>sacred</strong> oracles till they <strong>comply</strong> with their own fancy, spreading them (as Heaven by its Creator) like a curtain, closing together, or drawing them back, as they please? Thus indeed St. <strong>Paul</strong> himself <strong>minces</strong> and <strong>mangles</strong> some <strong>citations</strong> he makes use of, and seems to <strong>wrest</strong> <strong>them</strong> to a <strong>different</strong> <strong>sense</strong> from what they were first <strong>intended</strong> for, as is confessed by the great linguist, St. Hierom. [See <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/30201/30201-h/30201-h.htm">link</a>, and word-search for this quote.]</p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 60px;"> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">In other words, you find the early reformers admitted Paul used guile in how he distorted the Bible. It is legitimate folly. They also praise Paul when he seemingly appeared for a moment to repeat Jesus’ message of faith and works. They said Paul advanced Jesus’ message of salvation by works and obedience only as a tactic to <strong>disarm the twelve apostles and James</strong> (the Lord’s brother) who suspected Paul was, in fact, retreating from Christ’s doctrine.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Luther recognized several passages showed Paul was working against the apostolic twelve and their view that works-worthy-of-repentance matters for salvation. Paul often intimates the twelve apostles and James — the bishop whom the twelve appointed over Jerusalem — were the opponents of Paul's gospel. See Gal. 2:6 (apostles “<strong>imparted</strong> <strong>nothing</strong> to me”); Gal. 2:9 (referring to Peter, John and James, Paul sneers at them, saying they only “seemed to be pillars”); Gal. 2:11-14 (“condemns” Apostle Peter before “them all”); 2 Cor. 11:12-23, viz. verse 13 (“fashioning themselves into apostles of Christ” understood as allusion to the twelve being ‘false apostles’). See discussion in my prior work,<em> J</em><em>esus’ Words Only</em> (2007) at 336.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">After reviewing these passages in Galatians, Luther justifies Paul’s disarming behavior in Luther’s commentary on Galatians chapter two. Luther embraces the idea that Paul was seeing the twelve apostles as false apostles from whom Paul (Luther implies) correctly desired to learn nothing. The twelve were advancing Jesus’<strong><em> </em>conditional gospel</strong>, and hence Paul saw them (correctly, according to the young Luther) as the enemies of the (supposedly true) unconditional gospel that Paul brought later. Luther writes:</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Paul here explains his motive for going up to Jerusalem. He did not go to Jerusalem to be instructed or confirmed in his Gospel by the other apostles. [Gal. 2:6, the twelve apostles “imparted nothing to me.”] He went to Jerusalem<strong><em> </em>in order to preserve the<em> </em>true Gospel for the Galatian churches and for all the churches of the Gentiles</strong>. When Paul speaks of the truth of the Gospel he implies by <strong>contrast a false gospel<em>.</em></strong> The<strong><em> </em>false apostles also had a gospel, but it was an untrue gospel</strong>. ‘In holding out against them,’ says Paul, ‘I conserved the truth of the pure Gospel....The false gospel has it that we are justified by faith, but not without the deeds of the Law. The<strong><em> </em>false apostles preached a conditional gospel</strong>.’ (Martin Luther, <em>Commentary on the Epistle to the Galatians</em> (1535) (trans. Theodore Graebner)(Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1949) at 48-60.)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Luther must be correct that Paul viewed the twelve as false apostles for advancing Jesus’ conditional gospel as still valid. This perfectly explains why we find in Romans that Paul AT FIRST endorsed the Law and salvation by works (Romans 2:6-7; 3:31;7:12) and in <a href="http://biblehub.com/acts/26-20.htm">Acts 26:20</a> Paul's says his message to Gentiles -- hence his gospel -- was "repentance, turning to God and <strong>works worthy of repentance</strong>" — matching clearly Jesus’ doctrine of salvation in the Gospel of Matthew.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<h2><span style="font-size: 18pt;">Examples of Paul's Guile in Romans About Salvation</span></h2>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Specifically, in Romans <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans+2%3A6-7&version=KJV">2:6-7</a> (KJV) Paul affirms unquestionably the key component that good works plays in salvation as Jesus taught the rich young ruler in Matthew's Gospel and in Jesus' statement "every tree without <strong><em>good fruit</em></strong> is cut down and thrown in the fire" (Matt. 7:19). Paul says:</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Who will render to every man according to his<em><strong> deeds</strong></em>: <sup>7</sup>To them who by patient continuance in <strong>well doing</strong> [<em>i.e., ERGA AGATHA -- "</em><strong>Good works</strong><em>"</em>]<em> </em>seek for glory and honour and immortality,<strong><em> eternal life</em></strong>:</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">[See <em>Eerdman's Dictionary</em> at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=P9sYIRXZZ2MC&lpg=PA1387&ots=sBb0BFfCps&dq=romans%202%3A6-7%20erga&pg=PA1387#v=onepage&q=romans%202:6-7%20erga&f=false">1387</a> on "Works" in 2:6-7 -<em> erga</em>, meaning "human activity" / "works"; see <a href="http://bible.org/seriespage/study-and-exposition-romans-21-16">Bible.org</a>, confesses 2:7 means "good works"; see also <a href="http://biblos.com/romans/2-7.htm">Biblos Greek</a> - although it admits 'erga' is noun, it renders as gerund-verb form of 'doing.' See also Greek NT in transliterated form <a href="http://kesov.org/bible/gk_bible/45_002.htm">here</a>.]</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Indeed, in Romans 2:6-7 we find the conditional gospel of the 12, in particular the Gospel they quoted from Jesus in Matthew's Gospel. Paul says God will repay you for your deeds, and <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>if</strong></span> you patiently do <strong><em>good deeds</em></strong>, God will render you "eternal life."</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">But in a short span, Paul will take that all back. The most emphatic is Romans <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans%204:3-5&version=KJV">4:3-5</a> (KJV) -- which was the key passage upon which Luther built the faith-alone-without-works doctrine. Paul says there:</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"><sup>3</sup>For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness. <sup>4</sup>Now to <strong>him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace</strong>, but of debt. <sup>5</sup>But to<strong><em> </em>him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness</strong>.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">As commonly interpreted by faith-alone advocates, this teaches that Abraham was "ungodly" when he had his first faith, and this faith alone justified him (saved him by grace), but he "worketh not." This is construed to mean good works including repentance were not involved in Abraham's justification (salvation). This is our supposed model, regardless of what Jesus taught, and thus Paul is understood (and I believe this is the correct reading of Paul) to be teaching in Romans 4:3-5:</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<ul>
|
||
|
|
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">God justifies the ungodly without repentance</span></li>
|
||
|
|
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">God justifies the ungodly without any good work</span></li>
|
||
|
|
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">God justifies the ungodly solely for belief</span></li>
|
||
|
|
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Therefore, God justifies based upon faith alone.</span></li>
|
||
|
|
</ul>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">How do Paulinists reconcile this obvious use of guile between Romans 2:7 and Romans 4:5? We read one example:</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Good works please God (Romans 2:7), and yet they are not faith (Romans 4:5). ("<a href="http://contendforthefaith2.com/romans45.html">Is Obeying God the same as Trusting God</a>" (2011).)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Yet, Romans 2:7 does not say that "good works <em><strong>please</strong></em> God...." No! It says "good works" are what you do patiently, and then God rewards you with "eternal life." So some Paulinists blind themselves so they do not have to confront the fact Paul used guile to affirm a truth he later disproves. Paul clearly used 2:7 to disarm the counter-attack of the 12 apostles or their allies, and once disarmed, he bombed them with Romans 4:5 to destroy their conditional Gospel -- the Gospel handed to them by Jesus Himself.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<h3><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">Mistranslation of Gen. 15:6 Affects Paul's Conclusion</span></strong></span></h3>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"><br />Incidentally, Paul in Romans 4:3-5 relies upon a Septuagint Greek mistranslation from 247 BC of the Hebrew of Gen. 15:6. The original passage, as it even reads in the KJV of Gen. 15:6 is: "And he believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness." Well, the second 'he' is interpolated to open up the possibility the second 'he' is not Abraham. However, in Hebrew there is no second 'he,' and instead the subject of the first clause -- Abraham -- is the intended subject of the second verb 'to count.' So it actually reads "he believed in the Lord and counted it to Him [i.e., God] as righteousness." (See our webpages where this is discussed: JWOS ch. 26 <a href="/books/169-chapter-26-7jwo-genesis-156.html">part 7</a>.)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Hence, Abraham believed God about the promise of a child in old age (promised in the preceding verse - 15:5) and counted God's promise as righteousness toward Abraham. There is thus nothing here about salvation/justification when one reads the original Hebrew of Gen. 15:6.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Regardless, the point is that Paul in Romans 2:6-7 affirms salvation includes a component of good works, but in Romans 4:2-5 Paul denies that and says justification comes to the ungodly without any good works, and solely hinges on belief.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Hence, the double-speak of Romans 2:6-7 would throw off the original twelve. That passage makes it harder to isolate Paul's contrary doctrine as his true position and hence made arguing against Paul virtually impossible or very difficult. Paul's defenders always could, and still do, <strong>cite the verses that conform to Jesus</strong>, while they privately know<strong> Paul does not stick with that view</strong>, and later unravels that view. They realize and defend this tactic among themselves as a purposeful and God-serving <strong>tactic of guile</strong>. They can beat back your criticism with some verses where Paul endorses Jesus' doctrine on salvation, the law, etc., but then squirm away in their own minds that it is necessary to use such guile then and even today to defeat those who follow Jesus' teachings on salvation. In the die-hard Paulinist mind, Jesus' teachings in the flesh are defunct, and part of a prior dispensation; only Paul supposedly carries the resurrected Jesus' message for the current dispensation. See our article, "<a href="/JWO/paulinism-examples.html">Examples of Paulinism</a>."</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<h3><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">Paul on The Law: Another Example of Paul's Use of Guile</span></strong></span></h3>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"><br />Another example of Paul's guile is Paul’s contradictory positions on the Law given Moses. First, Paul affirms belief in the Law given Moses. (Romans 3:31;7:12; Acts 24:14.) In particular, in Romans <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans%203:31&version=KJV">3:31</a> (KJV), we read:</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, <strong>we <em><strong>establish the law</strong></em></strong>.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Why did Paul initially affirm these truths only to undercut them later in Romans (as we shall see)? The gospel text by Matthew was circulating contemporaneously with Paul’s writings. Paul in Romans 3;31 had <em><strong>disarmed the twelve’s anticipated opposition that Paul was changing Jesus's view of the Law, </strong></em>so Paul NEXT slips in gradually and later strongly in the same epistle that the death of Christ put to death the bond of Israel to the Law which makes the Law now dead to us. We are now free to marry another without the bond to the old Law. (Romans 7:1-7. See our <a href="/JWO/romans-7-a-major-incongruity.html">extensive commentary on Romans 7:1-7</a>.)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Because of the pro-law passages in Romans 3:31, 7:12; Acts 24:14, faith-alone advocates can say Paul was “<em>slanderously reported to be an Antinomian</em>” [<em>i.e</em>., one who teaches the Law given Moses is abrogated]. (Edward Fisher, <em><em>The Marrow of Modern Divinity</em></em> (Boston: John Bryce: 1766) at ii.)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">But nothing is more clear in Paul’s writing than that he taught the Law given Moses, including the Sabbath command (one of the Ten Commandments), was abrogated. See, Ephesians 2:15, Colossians 2:14, 2 Cor. 3:11-17, Romans 7:1-7; 7:13 <em>et seq</em>, and Galatians 3:19 et seq. For full discussion, see my prior book, <em>Jesus’ Words Only</em> (2007) at 83 et seq.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Hence, again, Paulinists can say Paul is not Anti-Law / Antinomian by citing some pro-Law verses. But when they think they have the 'laugh' on you, they reaffirm to themselves and their followers that of course Paul believed the Law is dead and gone. I assure you though, the last laugh will be on them -- and tragically so.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<h3><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">Spiritual Damage Due To Paul's Boasting Of A Good Use of Guile / Deception</span></strong></span></h3>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"><br />Unfortunately, Paul’s example and words have had a tragic impact on Christian morals. Use of guile in argumentation became a revered principle of Roman Catholicism. Paul’s verse that he used “<strong>guile</strong>” was proof enough for Aquinas that “guile” (deceit) “<strong>is no sin</strong>.” (<em>Summa Theologica</em> Art. 4:1.)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Yet, God’s position in all of this is ignored: “<strong>Guile<em> </em></strong>is in the heart of them that <strong>think evil things</strong>.” (Prov.12:20.) The one who slays with “guile” shall die. (Exodus 21:14.) Most <strong>ironic of all</strong> — because Paul in Romans 4:7 only quotes the first half of this verse to prove imputed righteousness by faith alone — Psalm 32:2 says: “Blessed is the man unto whom Yahweh imputeth not iniquity, And in <strong>whose spirit there is no guile</strong>.” There it is again! The righteous — the ones without guile — are the ones to whom God will impute no prior sin based on atonement! You would deliberately have to twist that verse around so that a person <strong>with guile</strong> has no sin imputed to him!</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Luther was tragically defending that when Paul admits he used guile to capture the Gentiles that this justifies Christian pastors to use double-speak. Many of Paul’s writings never allowed you to pin him down to a decisive criticism of abandoning Christ’s doctrines unless you were willing to call him an out and out liar. Paul did this by using double-speak. Many faith-alone adherents still follow this model, and it takes careful dissection of their words to find their inconsistencies.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<h3><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">Scripture Loses Integrity When One Of Its Speakers Can Speak With Guile</span></strong></span></h3>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"><br />One problem with thinking an inspired person can talk with guile is that it leads to a <strong>dissolution of the integrity<em> </em>of Scripture</strong>. If you can explain away Paul whenever his teaching becomes demonstrably false / inconsistent with Jesus by admitting he was <strong>simply lying under inspiration</strong>, why would this not apply to everything Paul said? For example, even if Paul intended a doctrine to be followed, a Bible-based argument can always be that Paul was simply lying again.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">For example, Luther and Calvin each insisted Paul says in Romans 13:1-3 that a Christian must accept tyrants as God’s agents and thus a Christian must never seek revolution (even though Peter in Acts 5:29 speaks to the contrary). However, during the year 1776, colonial ministers who favored revolution said Paul did not mean what he said. In 1776, in a famous sermon Pastor West said as to Romans 13:1-3 that he “had to conclude that the <strong>apostle Paul meant the opposite of what he said</strong>.” (Quoted in Frazer, <span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Political Theology of America's Founding</span> (2006)(referenced at this <a href="http://jonrowe.blogspot.com/2006/08/was-american-revolution-consistent.html">link</a>.) West’s argument that Paul in effect LIED won the day among the religious colonial revolutionaries. (West's words on the right of Revolution later appear verbatim in the Declaration of Independence.) </span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Thus, an entire country’s origin, spiritually speaking, relies on saying Paul lied, which justified rejecting Paul’s express guidance and then going ahead into revolt! (We could revolt based upon Acts 5:29 and passages in OT on resisting oppression. We did not have to affirm Paul was a pious fraudster to do so as the colonialists chose to do to resolve the spiritual dilemma Paul presented.)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">This historical episode illustrates clearly the <strong>ongoing<em> </em>danger of Paul’s presence in inspired scripture</strong>. His presence destroys the integrity of ever taking anything God says as true. It may be all a lie like when Paul says one thing but means the opposite about faith-and-works.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<h3><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">Paul As A Master Of Guile Is The Only Way To Hold Onto Faith Alone</span></strong></span></h3>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"><br />Yet, recognizing Paul sometimes lies has been the only intelligible means for some who follow Paul's faith alone view to reject Paul’s just as clearly expressed view of the following:</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<ul>
|
||
|
|
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">his support that faith-and-works are necessary for salvation (Romans <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=romans%202:6-7&version=NIV">2:6-7</a> "endurance in good works" (erga agatha) is unto "eternal life"); <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=romans%203:31&version=NIV">3:31</a> ("we uphold the Law"); <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=romans%207:12&version=NIV">7:12</a> ("the law is holy"); <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=romans%208:13&version=NIV">8:13</a> ("if by the Spirit you put to death the misdeeds of the body, you will live"); 11:<a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=romans%2011:20-22&version=NIV">20-22</a>)</span></li>
|
||
|
|
</ul>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<ul>
|
||
|
|
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">justification comes by being "doers of the Law." (Romans <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=romans%202:13&version=NIV">2:13</a>)(" those who obey the law who will be declared righteous.")</span></li>
|
||
|
|
</ul>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<ul>
|
||
|
|
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">his support for salvation by repentance. First, he buffets his body so not to be "disapproved" / "rejected." 1 Cor. <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20cor.%209:27&version=YLT">9:27</a> (buffet body to prevent sin and become "disapproved"); second, sorrowful repentance is unto salvation: (2 Cor. <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Corinthians+7:9-10&version=NIV">7:9-10</a> ("godly sorrow to repentance worketh salvation");</span></li>
|
||
|
|
</ul>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<ul>
|
||
|
|
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">that one can lose their salvation due to disobedience or certain enumerated sins identified in the Law (1 Cor. <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20cor.%206:9&version=NIV">6:9</a>; Eph. 5:5-7; Gal. 5:19-20; 6:7-9; 1 Thess. 4:6-8);</span></li>
|
||
|
|
</ul>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<ul>
|
||
|
|
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">we must work out our salvation with fear-and-trembling (Phil.<a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=phil.%202:12-13&version=KJV"> 2:12-13</a>)</span></li>
|
||
|
|
</ul>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<ul>
|
||
|
|
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">we cannot assure ourselves of personal justification before the day of Judgment for it would be prideful to do so even if we know of no present sin in ourselves. (1 Cor. <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20cor.%204:1-5&version=KJV">4:1-5</a>; Phil. <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=phil.%203:12-13&version=KJV">3:12-13</a>.)</span></li>
|
||
|
|
</ul>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<ul>
|
||
|
|
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Paul tells Agrippa that his gospel teaches the Gentiles to "repent, turn to God and do works worthy of repentance." (Acts 26:20.)</span></li>
|
||
|
|
</ul>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">But against these verses are raised the crystal clear explanations by Paul that works do not profit at all, obedience to the Law can never save (even severs us from Christ to attempt to perform), and salvation is like Abraham's -- faith alone on a man supposedly who was an ungodly sinner / unrepentant at the moment he had faith. (Eph. <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=eph.%202:8-9&version=KJV">2:8-9</a>; Romans <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=romans%204:4-5&version=KJV">4:4-5</a>). The foundation of Luther's Reformation turned on one unequivocal sentence:</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"> "He who <strong>works not<em> </em></strong>but <strong>believes</strong> on the one who <strong>justifies the ungodly</strong> (note: not the repentant) is being <strong>accounted</strong> with the faithfulness of Him unto <strong>righteousness</strong>." (Romans <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=romans%204:4-5&version=KJV">4:4-5</a>.)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Paul emphasized later in Romans that to gain this covering, one need only express belief once and one is saved forever. (Romans <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=romans%2010:9&version=KJV">10:9</a>.) And compare and contrast </span><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"><a href="https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Corinthians+15%3A1-5&version=KJV">1 Cor. 15:1-5</a> where Paul says you must "keep steadfastly in mind" the belief Jesus died for sins and rose from the dead, and you "shall be saved." Either way, no ethical obedienc to God is ever insisted upon for salvation - at total odds with Jesus' teachings. (Mark 9:42-47 - believer ensnared in sin has two choices: heaven maimed by stern repentance or go to hell whole / unmaimed.)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Then of course, any conditionality in ongoing good works / obedience/ repentance is erased by piling on top of these principles all the eternal security verses in Paul. Thus all the contrary bullet points above disappear into oblivion.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">As a result, Paulinists teach if you make even one command, one act, or any effort at repentance, a requirement in addition to faith for salvation, Paul teaches you are lost! "<strong>But if you add something you<em> </em>have cancelled it out</strong>.” (R.B. Thieme Jr., <em>Doctrine of Grace: Eternal Security</em> (May 19, 1988) lesson 814.)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Consequently, no explanation of these conflicting messages is necessary for us dumb-folk by those who preach faith alone based upon Paul. Why? </span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Because Paulinists believe their man justifiably uses guile to gain adherents to his point of view of faith alone. The Paulinist who is aware of the deceit too can play the same game, and<strong> boldly deny they 'see' the contradiction</strong>. They will straight-face insist these statements in the bullet-point list above are all compatible 'if you understand the full-context.' </span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">What they refuse to admit is<strong><em> </em>these are self-contradictory doctrines by Paul</strong> because they do not want to admit what they privately believe: Paul<strong><em> </em>spoke<em> </em>the bullet points as guile to draw you into an opposite gospel</strong>. The unconditional gospel as Luther identified it. A gospel Luther identified as opposite of the conditional gospel of the supposedly 'false apostles' <em>i.e.</em>, the 12 still laboring under the belief that Jesus's words in the flesh were still part of the current dispensation of the church.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<h3><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">Leads To A Subjective 'What I Like' Hermeneutic To Rely Upon Self-Contradictory Paul</span></strong></span></h3>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;" data-mce-mark="1">It begs all credulity that Paulinists can treat Paul as inspired when he talks like this. We supposedly know he is inspired when he talks one way, but somehow we just know he is uninspired and lying when he says things that support an opposing view. This is simply a <em>subjective hermeneutic</em>. If applied to true Biblical passages, such thinking that God can speak in contradictions undermines taking any passage specifically in one direction if there is a less costly and more attractive cost-free alternative. We just follow the easy way, not the Way that Jesus said involved "agonizing" effort to enter. (Luke <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=luke%2013:24&version=KJV">13:24</a>, Greek <em>agonozai</em>, tepidly translated as 'strive' in the KJV.)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;" data-mce-mark="1">Then what instead should have been the response from a follower of Christ? </span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;" data-mce-mark="1">When we see someone using <strong><em>double-speak to maneuver around Jesus’ message given the 12</em></strong>, then this should have <span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">raised an alarm</span>. When Paulinists admit Paul quotes the Master with “extreme rarity” and came with a “fifth gospel” wholly devoid of what is in the other four, a <span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;" data-mce-mark="1">red flag</span> also should have gone up. Finally, we should have immediately questioned the supposition of apostleship and inspiration of one engaging in what everyone (Paulinists included) admits is duplicity — a clear pattern of bait-and-switch.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<h3><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">Rawlinson's Advice</span></strong></span></h3>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">A theologian once addressed the identical issue of how we must assess someone like this. When there are indications that someone is fraudulently trying to pawn off his words as inspired and as part of the Bible, we must pause. Speaking of a passage at the end of the Torah that speaks of Moses' death written by an author other than Moses, Rawlinson says this cannot be inspired scripture. In this context, Rawlinson expresses a valid principle. Rawlinson says if one engages in “<em><strong>impudent fraud</strong></em>” to “palm [off] on the world <em><strong>a gross and elaborate deception</strong></em>... [that is,] to obtain for <em><strong>his statements a weight and authority which they otherwise would not be entitled</strong></em>,” such duplicity should destroy “our confidence in<strong><em> the integrity of the author</em></strong>.” (George Rawlinson, “On the Genuineness and Authenticity of the Pentateuch,” <em>Aids to Faith: A Series of Theological Essays</em> (Ed. William Thomson, D.D.) (N.Y.: Appleton & Co., 1863) at 273, 279.)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Similarly, while deception by Paul may be excused by Givens and others devoted to Paul, we should have instead lost all sense of confidence in Paul’s integrity if the case for guile be proven. And that case is impossible to deny. As Thomas Cosette recently wrote: “Paul’s teachings use the<strong><em> most double-minded expressions of thought and practice there is</em></strong>.” (Thomas L. Cosette, <em>Hebrew Prophecies of the Coming of Paul</em> (2007) at 37.)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">When that is the inescapable conclusion, then how can we selectively pick verses to follow at odds with Jesus unless we are totally being subjective in our analysis? Aren’t we just picking verses from Paul solely because they conform to our predilection of an easy path even when at odds with Jesus? Aren't we favoring the easiest possible gospel to sell? Isn’t it human sensual thinking therefore that impels this desire for the easy way over the way that Jesus taught which He said requires “agonizing” effort to enter?</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<h3><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">Do Not Let Paul Charm You Simply Because Sometimes He Taught Words Like Those of Christ</span></strong></span></h3>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">God is not amused by these developments. Paulinists may assume they can never be judged by the principles of repentance, good works, obedience, ongoing fear from sinning, or that charity is the most important virtue. They think they can insist Paul cunningly put those standards forth to throw off the “false [twelve] apostles.” Paul was supposedly acting with proper guile by pretending to endorse salvation principles based on faith-and-works, repentance and obedience in Romans 2:6-7; 3:31; 7:12; 8:13;11:20-22; Philippians 2:12-13; 1 Corinthians 4:2-5; 13:2,13; 2 Corinthians 7:9-10; Ephesians 5:6-7; Acts 26:20, and Galatians 5:19-20; 6:7-9, etc.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">While Paulinists may think they will get away arguing this way with God, they are deluding themselves. God will never tolerate the idea that Paul could defend the allegedly true faith-alone gospel by deception and guile. God never could be the source of such bait-and-switch tactics.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<h3><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">A Judgment Day Excuse For Following Paul?</span></strong></span></h3>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Or will God instead excuse the Paulinists because Paul had signs and wonders? Was it truly reasonable to assume Paul spoke from God because Paul was confirmed by ‘signs and wonders’? Indeed, Paul repeatedly defended himself from charges he brought a false gospel by insisting “<em><strong>signs and wonders</strong></em>” were the “<strong><em>signs of the apostles</em></strong>” that he enjoyed. (2 Cor. 12:12. See also Romans 15:19 “signs and wonders” validated himself.)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">In other words, if signs and wonders are what Paul relied upon himself to prove his own validity, then will God have to accept that from you why you relied upon Paul? Will such an excuse protect you as a Paulinist if it turns out your confidence in Paul was misplaced?</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Absolutely not! Jesus will respond to the die-hard Paulinists that He already said the “false prophet” would come “in my name” with “<strong><em>signs and wonders to deceive</em></strong>, if possible, the elect.” (Mark 13:22-23; Luke 21:8.)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">In fact, signs and wonders are precisely what God allows false prophets to have in order to test the faithfulness of His people — to determine whether he or she loves God with his or her whole heart, mind and soul. (Deut. 13:1-5.) The key question, God insists, is <span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">not</span> whether the would-be prophet has “signs and wonders” <span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">but whether such a pretender seeks</span> to “<strong><em>seduce you from the way you were commanded to follow in the Law (given Moses)</em></strong>.” (Deut. 13:3.)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">As Tyndale says, this issue is whether such a pretender “<em><strong>juggles with [true] Scripture</strong></em>, and<strong><em> beguiles the people with false interpretations</em></strong>.” (<em>Obedience of a Christian Man</em>.) If so, God commands you to ignore such a would-be prophet despite verifiable “signs and wonders.”</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">What borders on the bizarre is that many Paulinists are<em><strong> admitting Paul is a deceptive lying teacher to advance a gospel at odds with the pre-Ascension-Jesus’ gospel but yet Paul has the superior gospel</strong></em>. Jesus must be scratching His head in wonderment. How did these Paulinists ever rationalize their final position of faith alone with this sorry record?</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">For you have their admission of following</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<ul>
|
||
|
|
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">a deliberately “<strong><em>false (guile-ful) prophet</em></strong>,” </span></li>
|
||
|
|
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">who came in Jesus’ name based on “<em><strong>signs and wonders</strong></em>” </span></li>
|
||
|
|
<li><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">who has a ‘<strong><em>contrary gospel’ to Jesus’ Gospel</em></strong>. </span></li>
|
||
|
|
</ul>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;"><br />This is what Luther said in essence in his commentary on Galatians 2 which we quoted above.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">How can anyone take these components, and rationalize a defense of holding onto a gospel from Paul at odds with Jesus? It makes no sense.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Consequently, on Judgment Day, Jesus will certainly not allow Paulinists to cite any faith-alone verse in defense. This is because Paulinists claim Paul was inspired. Since even Paul said “<strong><em>God cannot lie</em></strong>” (Titus 1:2), Jesus on judgment day is free to cite from Paul all the verses that prove Paul simultaneously endorsed salvation by obedience, repentance, and works -- the verses the Paulinists now place under the list of verses-by-guile to introduce 'faith alone' as the true doctrine.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Hence, all such Paulinists who defend deception to ignore works and obedience verses in Paul will be fairly judged by all these verses anyway. God will not treat these verses as legitimate pious frauds.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">If the Paulinist relied on faith-alone doctrine to their detriment (lived sinfully) or they misled just one person (let alone millions) into a lawless and non-salvific life, they only have themselves to blame for treating Paul as their teacher. For Jesus clearly said He Himself was the “<em><strong>Sole Teacher.</strong></em>” (Matt. 23:8-11.) He was the Way, not Paul. If these contingencies occur (<em>i.e.</em>, one soul is lost due to their false doctrine), these Paulinists will end up in the deepest darkness — the worst possible place in hell there is.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<h3><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">What Does ‘Sole Teacher’ Mean?</span></strong></span></h3>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">The author of the famous song <em>Amazing Grace </em>— Reverend John Newton (1725-1807) — explained this verse where Jesus cautions us against calling anyone else Teacher. Newton says it means that<strong><em> not even “the best” </em></strong>of the ministers, pastors, etc., are “so thoroughly furnished, nor so free from mistake, as to <strong><em>deserve our implicit confidence [which Jesus alone deserves].</em></strong>” (Rev. John Newton, <em>The Works of the Reverend John Newton </em>(Hamilton & Smith, 1821) Vol.7-8, Sermon 15, at 167.)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">There was thus never any excuse for a true follower of Christ making Paul a teacher in Christ’s church, let alone one superior to Christ in effect. Jesus is and always will be our Sole Teacher.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Carlstadt had the priority of Jesus’ words right when he founded the German Reformation in 1517 with Luther. In his 1520 treatise, <em>De Canoncis Scripturis Libellus</em>, Carlstadt said:</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">It is necessary in fact to preserve obedience to the Lord, and as the Spirit of the Apostles is not a guide equal or greater than the Lord, thus also the heart of<em><strong> Paul within his letters does not have as much authority as has Christ</strong></em>. (Charles Beard's <em>Martin Luther and the Reformation in Germany</em> (1889) at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=emIdSf6gTR0C&lpg=PA278&ots=k26bn6FeJ5&dq=carlstadt%20canon%20paul&pg=PA278#v=onepage&q=carlstadt%20canon%20paul&f=false"> 278</a> (reprint 2009) or 1896 edition at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=YlzNSeh7YgMC&dq=Paulinum%20sub%20literis&pg=PA401#v=onepage&q=Paulinum%20sub%20literis&f=false">401</a>.)(translation from Latin).</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: 18pt;">Unfortunately, rather than accept this correction, Luther was infuriated with his partner. Luther drove out Carlstadt from the reform movement, declaring Carlstadt <em>The New Juda</em>s. But Carlstadt was right: Jesus comes first. Everyone else is second tier. For there is only One Master. One Teacher.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><em><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Blessings, Doug</span></em></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<hr />
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<h3><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; color: #0000ff;">Study Notes</span></strong></span></h3>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; color: #800080;">Given's Book</span></strong></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Scholar Mark Given admits early on the truth about Paul's use of guile in his book <em>Paul's True Rhetoric</em> (Emory University, 2001), and lays out his biases:</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Paul's rhetorical strategies...display such a degree of <strong><em>intentional ambiguity, cunning and deception</em></strong> as to make him justifiably vulnerable to the polemical charge of perpetuating sophistries." (Page 3)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">"I am quite sympathetic with Paul, but I am also sympathetic to Paul's critics." (Page 3.)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<hr />
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><strong><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times; color: #800080;">Romans 3:7 - An Honorable Lie For God Exonerates Sin?</span></strong></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Doesn't Paul clearly excuse lying from sin if it supposedly advances God's glory?</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner? (Romans 3:7, King James Version)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">But if through my lie God's truth abounds to his glory, why am I still being condemned as a sinner? (English Standard Version)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">But if the truth of God through my lie abounded unto his glory, why am I also still judged as a sinner? (American Standard Version)</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Thus, clearly Paul admits he knew he was lying, but Paul felt the end justified the means. Yet, how indeed does truth abound by a lie?</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<hr />
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Femi Aribala of Nigeria has a quite pointed harsh article <a href="http://www.femiaribisala.com/food-for-thought/12-articles-of-faith/paul/178-distorting-the-word-of-god">Distorting the Word of God</a> on this issue about Paul yet to exhort us to righteousness and away from Paul's truly abhorrent principles. It can be excerpted in its entirety: </span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin: 15px 0px 15px 30px; color: #313335; font-family: UbuntuRegular; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><em style="color: #ea5353;"><strong>Whenever Paul swears, he tells a lie.</strong></em></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin: 15px 0px 15px 30px; color: #313335; font-family: UbuntuRegular; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Jesus calls the devil “the father” of lies. He says: “He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth.” <em>(John 8:44).</em> This profile corresponds to that of Paul in the bible. Paul was a murderer of Christians from the beginning and he is an inveterate liar. </span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin: 15px 0px 15px 30px; color: #313335; font-family: UbuntuRegular; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Paul disregards the truth. He says: “The important thing is that in every way, whether from false motives or true, Christ is preached.” <em>(Philippians 1:18).</em> Like a chameleon, he declares: “I have become all things to all men, that I might by all means save some.” <em>(1 Corinthians 9:22).</em> Accordingly, Paul says: "I try to please everybody in every way"<em>(1 Corinthians 10:33).</em> Then he contradicts himself: "If I were still trying to please men, I would not be a servant of Christ" <em>(Galatians 1:10).</em> </span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px 30px; color: #313335; font-family: UbuntuRegular; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">He even openly boasts of his deceitfulness: “Crafty fellow that I am, I caught you by trickery!” <em>(2 Corinthians 12:16).</em> This is not the way of Christ.</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Chyrsostum's Justification of Lying for God</span></strong></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;">Chrysostum was a famous church leader in the late 300s and early 400s. He is discussed as follows in Jay Trumbull's <a href="http://www.fullbooks.com/A-Lie-Never-Justifiable2.html">A Lie Never Justifiable</a>: </span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">Chrysostom, as a young man, evaded ordination for himself and secured</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">it to his dearest friend Basil (who should not be confounded with</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">Basil the Great, the brother of Gregory of Nyssa) by a course of</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;"><strong>deception</strong>, which he afterwards labored to justify by the claim that</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">there were <strong>lies</strong> of <strong>necessity</strong>, and that <strong>God</strong> <strong>approved</strong> of <strong>deception</strong> as a</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">means of good to others.[1] In the course of his exculpatory argument,</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">he said to his much aggrieved friend Basil: "<strong>Great</strong> is the <strong>value</strong> of</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;"><strong>deceit</strong>, provided it be not introduced with a mischievous intention. In</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">fact, action of this sort ought <strong>not</strong> to be called <strong>deceit</strong>, but rather a</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">kind of <strong>good</strong> management, <strong>cleverness</strong>, and <strong>skill</strong>, capable of finding</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">out ways where resources fail, and making up for the defects of the</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">mind.... That man would fairly deserve to be called a deceiver who</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">made an unrighteous use of the practice, <strong>not</strong> one who did so with a</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;"><strong>salutary</strong> purpose. And often it is <strong>necessary</strong> to <strong>deceive</strong>, and to do the</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">greatest benefits by means of this device, whereas he who has gone by</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">a <strong>straight</strong> course has done <strong>great</strong> <strong>mischief</strong> to the person whom he has</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;"><strong>not</strong> <strong>deceived</strong>."[2] </span></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">[Footnote 1: See Smith and Wace's _Dictionary of Christian Biography_,</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">I., 519 f.; art. "Chrysostom, John."]</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">[Footnote 2: See Chrysostom's "Treatise on the Priesthood," in _The</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers_, first series (Am. ed.), IX., 34-38.]</span></span></span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">In fact, Chrysostom seems, in this argument, to recognize no absolute</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">and unvarying standard of truthfulness as binding on all at all times;</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">but to judge lies and deceptions as wrong only when they are wrongly</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">used, or when they result in evil to others. He appears to act on the</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><strong><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">anti-Christian theory[1] that "the end justifies the means." </span></strong><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">Indeed</span><strong><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">,</span></strong><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">Dr. Schaff, in reprobating this "<strong>pious fraud</strong>" of Chrysostom, as</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">"conduct which every sound Christian conscience <strong>must</strong> <strong>condemn</strong>," says</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">of the whole matter: "The Jesuitical maxim, 'the end justifies the</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">means,' is much older than Jesuitism, and runs through the whole</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">apocryphal, pseudo-prophetic, pseudo-apostolic, pseudo-Clementine, and</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">pseudo-Isidorian literature of the early centuries. Several of the</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">best Fathers show a surprising want of a strict sense of veracity.</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">They introduce a sort of cheat even into their strange theory of</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">redemption, by supposing that the Devil caused the crucifixion under</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">the delusion [intentionally produced by God] that Christ was a mere</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">man, and thus lost his claim upon the fallen race." [2]</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">[Footnote 1: Rom. 3: 7, 8.]</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">[Footnote 2: See Dr. Schaff's "Prologemena to The Life and Works of</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">St. Chrysostom," in _The Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers_, first Series</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">(Am. ed.), IX., 8.] </span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">Chrysostom, like Gregory of Nyssa, having done that which was wrong in</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">itself, with a laudable end in view, naturally attempts its defense by</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">the use of arguments based on a confusion in his own mind of things</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">which are unjustifiable, with things which are allowable. He does <strong>not</strong></span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">seem to <strong>distinguish</strong> between <strong>deliberate</strong> deception as a mode of lying,</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">and <strong>concealment</strong> of that which one has a <strong>right</strong> to <strong>conceal</strong>. Like many</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">another defender of the right to lie in behalf of a worthy cause, in</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">all the centuries, Chrysostom essays no definition of the "lie," and</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">indicates no distinction between culpable concealment, and concealment</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">that is right and proper. Yet Chrysostom was a man of loving heart and</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">of unwavering purpose of life. In an age of evil-doing, he stood firm</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">for the right. And in spite of any lack of logical perceptions on his</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">part in a matter like this, it can be said of him with truth that</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">"perhaps few have ever exercised a more powerful influence over the</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">hearts and affections of the most exalted natures."[1]</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">[Footnote 1: Smith and Wace's _Dictionary of Christian Biography_, I.,</span><br style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;" /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;">532.]</span></p>
|
||
|
|
<p> </p>
</td>
|
||
|
|
</tr>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
</table>
|
||
|
|
<span class="article_separator"> </span>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
</td>
|
||
|
|
</tr>
|
||
|
|
</table>
|
||
|
|
<div class="bottom_top"></div>
|
||
|
|
<div id="bottom">
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
<div id="footer"><strong>Content View Hits</strong> : 19268065<br />
|
||
|
|
<script type="text/javascript">
|
||
|
|
var pv = new Array(1,0,0,0,1);
|
||
|
|
var trdlname = "/downloads";
|
||
|
|
//<![CDATA[
|
||
|
|
var regex = /\.(?:doc|eps|jpg|png|svg|xls|ppt|pdf|xls|zip|txt|vsd|vxd|js|css|rar|exe|wma|mov|avi|wmv|mp3)($|\&|\?)/;
|
||
|
|
//]]>
|
||
|
|
var trlkname = "/external/";
|
||
|
|
var trmlname = "/mailto/";
|
||
|
|
</script>
|
||
|
|
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://jesuswordsonly.com/modules/mod_analytics/gatr.js"></script>
|
||
|
|
<script type="text/javascript">
|
||
|
|
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
|
||
|
|
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
|
||
|
|
</script>
|
||
|
|
<script type="text/javascript">
|
||
|
|
try {
|
||
|
|
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-3747914");
|
||
|
|
pageTracker._initData();
|
||
|
|
pageTracker._trackPageview();
|
||
|
|
} catch(err) {}
|
||
|
|
</script>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
<div class="copyright"></div>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
</body>
|
||
|
|
</html>
|