embed
/
christianity2.0
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Wiki Activity

updates

embed 2023-10-27 23:31:08 +00:00
parent 7d16bd7fac
commit c14029d356
201 changed files with 8049 additions and 4556 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

0
GospelOfPhilip.md → .todo/GospelOfPhilip.md

0
GospelOfPhilipCoptic.md → .todo/GospelOfPhilipCoptic.md

0
GospelOfThomas.md → .todo/GospelOfThomas.md

0
GospelOfThomas1.md → .todo/GospelOfThomas1.md

0
GospelOfThomasST.md → .todo/GospelOfThomasST.md

0
ThomasParallelsAngelfire.md → .todo/ThomasParallelsAngelfire.md

0
ThomasParallelsSchenk.md → .todo/ThomasParallelsSchenk.md

8
ApocalypseOfPeter.md

@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
<!-- -*-mode: text; fill-column: 75; tab-width: 8; coding: utf-8-unix -*- -->
Parent:: [[ToDo]]
## Apocalypse Of Peter
@ -8,7 +11,8 @@ Detering in [[PaulineEpistlesDetering]] points out:
the image-mixture of Simon and Paul already well-known from the
Pseudo-Clementines.
* https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/nhlapocalypsepeter.html
* https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/apocalypsepeter.html
- [www.earlychristianwritings.com/nhlapocalypsepeter.html](https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/nhlapocalypsepeter.html)
- [www.earlychristianwritings.com/apocalypsepeter.html](https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/apocalypsepeter.html)
---
[[Home]] [[TitleIndex]]

6
ApostlePaulSimonMagusAndMarcion.md

@ -1,7 +1,11 @@
<!-- -*-mode: text; fill-column: 75; tab-width: 8; coding: utf-8-unix -*- -->
Parent:: [[ApostlePaulSimonMagusAndMarcion]]
### The Apostle Paul, Simon Magus, And Marcion
https://timsteppingout.wordpress.com/2016/01/07/the-apostle-paul-simon-magus-and-marcion/index.html
[timsteppingout.wordpress.com/2016/01/07/the-apostle-paul-simon-magus-and-marcion/index.html](https://timsteppingout.wordpress.com/2016/01/07/the-apostle-paul-simon-magus-and-marcion/index.html)
I think the connection between Simon Magus and the Apostle Paul is
fairly compelling. In Acts of the Apostles 8, Simon Magus, a baptized

68
AramaicClarificationStatementsInNT.md

@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
Parent: [[ChurchOfTheEastPeshitta]]
<!-- -*-mode: text; fill-column: 75; tab-width: 8; coding: utf-8-unix -*- -->
Parent:: [[ChurchOfTheEastPeshitta]]
## Aramaic Clarification Statements In NT
http://www.peshitta.org/for/archive/index.php?thread-2572.html
[http://www.peshitta.org/for/archive/index.php?thread-2572.html](http://www.peshitta.org/for/archive/index.php?thread-2572.html)
The Greek text of the New Testament along with the AENT have a
number of places where Aramaic words are embedded within the
@ -20,20 +22,23 @@ of the Greek text, like all other language versions are: To compare
the texts, I have added the Syriac Sinaitic Palimpsest and the Western
Peshitto readings as well.
Matthew:
| Matthew: | | | |
| | | | |
| 27:33 | PeshittA: Yes | OldScratch: No | Western: Yes |
| 27:46 | PeshittA: No | OldScratch: No | Western: No |
Mark:
| 3:17 | PeshittA: Yes | OldScratch: No | Western: Yes |
| 5:41 | PeshittA: No | OldScratch: N/A | Western: No |
| Mark: | | | |
| | | | |
| 3:17 | PeshittA: Yes | OldScratch: No | Western: Yes |
| 5:41 | PeshittA: No | OldScratch: N/A | Western: No |
| 7:34 | PeshittA: No | OldScratch: No | Western: No |
| 7:11 | PeshittA: No | OldScratch: No | Western: No |
| 14:36 | PeshittA: No | OldScratch: N/A | Western: No |
| 15:22 | PeshittA: Yes | OldScratch: No | Western: Yes |
| 15:34 | PeshittA: Yes | OldScratch: No | Western: Yes |
John:
| John: | | | |
| | | | |
| 1:38 | PeshittA: No | OldScratch: No | Western: No |
| 1:41 | PeshittA: No | OldScratch: No | Western: No |
| 9:7 | PeshittA: No | OldScratch: No | Western: No |
@ -41,19 +46,24 @@ John:
| 19:13 | PeshittA: Yes | OldScratch: N/A | Western: Yes |
| 20:16 | PeshittA: Yes | OldScratch: No | Western: Yes |
Acts:
| 1:19 | PeshittA: Yes | Western: Yes |
| 4:36 | PeshittA: Yes | Western: Yes |
| 9:36 | PeshittA: No | Western: No |
| 13:8 | PeshittA: Yes | Western: Yes |
-Note: Here, an Arabic name is translated into an Aramaic name for the sorcerer.
| Acts: | | |
| | | |
| 1:19 | PeshittA: Yes | Western: Yes |
| 4:36 | PeshittA: Yes | Western: Yes |
| 9:36 | PeshittA: No | Western: No |
| 13:8 | PeshittA: Yes | Western: Yes |
Note: Here, an Arabic name is translated into an Aramaic name for the sorcerer.
| Hebrews: | | |
| | | |
| 7:2 | PeshittA: Yes | Western: Yes |
Hebrew:
| 7:2 | PeshittA: Yes | Western: Yes |
Note: Here, a Hebrew name is translated into an Aramaic name for the Priest.
Galatians:
| 4:6 | PeshittA: No | Western: No |
| Galatians: | | |
| | | |
| 4:6 | PeshittA: No | Western: No |
**No = 10 times Yes = 11 times**
@ -77,36 +87,36 @@ occurrences I have found, like all the Latin and all the Coptic
versions do for instance.... and all the other Language translations
of the Greek text version.
### distazo 08-20-2011, 07:36 AM
#### distazo 08-20-2011, 07:36 AM
I also have made such a list where I got the result that 6 times, no
clarification is given.
In addition, I would like to add to this list:
John 11:16 (Didymus / Tuma)
John 9:7 Hebrew-Syriac
John 19:13
- John 11:16 (Didymus / Tuma)
- John 9:7 Hebrew-Syriac
- John 19:13
Mark 7:11 Korban/Qurbany
(Here the Greek shows a hebrew word, not an Aramaic one)
- Mark 7:11 Korban/Qurbany
(Here the Greek shows a Hebrew word, not an Aramaic one)
Acts 13:8 (Here there is an Arabic translation. G.d. Bauscher says
- Acts 13:8
(Here there is an Arabic translation. G.d. Bauscher says
that Alumas is Arabic for sorcerer)
Hebrew 7:2 (Hebrew- Aramaic)
- Hebrew 7:2 (Hebrew- Aramaic)
Galatians 4:6 Aba ho pater - Abba Abun
### Thirdwoe 08-20-2011, 10:45 AM
#### Thirdwoe 08-20-2011, 10:45 AM
This brings the totals to 20 clarifications/interpretations in the
Greek and its translations. And adds 3 more as I judge, to the 6
verses in the Aramaic Scriptures where no clarifications/interpretations
are given...for a total of 9 verses/places where they do not appear.
**New Clarification Total in Eastern Aramaic PeshittA (Khabouris Codex):**
11 Yes
9 No
**New Clarification Total in Eastern Aramaic PeshittA (Khabouris Codex):
11 Yes 9 No **
As far as I know...this does not occur in any translation of the Greek NT.

11
AramaicPrimacy.md Normal file

@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
<!-- -*-mode: text; fill-column: 75; tab-width: 8; coding: utf-8-unix -*- -->
Parent:: [ToDo]]
# Peshitta Primacy
There are a number of reasons to believe in the Aramaic Primacy
in the New Testament, that we find convincing:
- [[WastheNewTestamentReallyWritteninGreek]]
- [[AramaicClarificationStatementsInNT]]

322
BnaiAmenEbionaens.md Normal file

@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
<!-- -*-mode: text; fill-column: 75; tab-width: 8; coding: utf-8-unix -*- -->
Parent:: [[EbioniteChristianity]]
[www.essene.com/B%27nai-Amen/B%27nai-AmenAndEbionites.htm](https://www.essene.com/B%27nai-Amen/B%27nai-AmenAndEbionites.htm)
## B'nai-Amen & Ebionites
The Ebionites were a branch of "Jewish Christianity" mentioned by
several "Christian" writers. They made use of the original Aramaic
Hebrew Gospel written by Saint Matthew. This text was sometimes
referred to as the Gospel of the Hebrews, or According to the Hebrews.
(This original edition was different than the later altered and
translated version adopted by Rome, now known as Matthew.) The
B'nai-Amen accept this Ebionite gospel as the True Gospel before being
corrupted and rewritten as the New Testament Matthew by Rome.
Epiphanius, pretending or believing that he had the original version,
accused the Ebionites, and other Hebrew speaking disciples, of changing
this Gospel of Matthew to reflect their own vegetarian and Essene
views. The truth is that Epiphanius' own "Christian" church had been
the one to change the text to reflect its own meat eating and non
Essene approach to religion. The quotes preserved in his Panarion,
despite all his railing to the contrary, are the original words spoken
of by Yeshua and faithfully recorded in Aramaic by Matthew and others.
### Excerpts from The Gospel of the Ebionites
In the Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis (Epiphanius, Panarion 30.13.2-3),
we read:
In the Gospel that is in general use among them (Ebionites) which is
called "according to Matthew", which however is not whole and
complete but forged and mutilated - they call it the Hebrew's Gospel
- it is reported:
There appeared a certain man named Jesus of about thirty years of
age, who chose us. And when he came to Capernaum, he entered into
the house of Simon whose surname is Peter, and opened his mouth and
said: "As I passed the Lake of Tiberias, I chose John and James the
sons of Zebedee, and Simon and Andrew and Thaddeus and Simon the
Zealot and Judas the Iscariot, and you, Matthew, I called as you sat
at the receipt of custom, and you followed me. You, therefore, I
will to be twelve apostles for a testimony unto Palestine."
*
And:
It came to pass that John was baptizing; and there went out to him
Pharisees and were baptized, and all of Jerusalem. And John had a
garment of camel's hair and a leather girdle about his loins, and
his food, as it is said, was wild honey, the taste if which was that
of manna, as a cake dipped in oil. Thus they were resolved to
pervert the truth into a lie and put a cake in the place of locusts.
(Epiphanius, Panarion 30.13.4-5)
And the beginning of their Gospel runs:
It came to pass in the days of Herod the king of Judaea, when
Caiaphas was high priest, that there came one, John by name, and
baptized with the baptism of repentance in the river Jordan. It was
said of him that he was of the lineage of Aaron the priest, a son of
Zacharias and Elisabeth : and all went out to him. (Epiphanius,
Panarion 30.13.6)
And after much has been recorded it proceeds:
When the people were baptized, Jesus also came and was baptized by
John. And as he came up from the water, the heavens was opened and
he saw the Holy Spirit in the form of a dove that descended and
entered into him. And a voice sounded from Heaven that said: "You
are my beloved Son, in you I am well pleased. " And again: " I have
this day begotten you". And immediately a great light shone round
about the place. When John saw this, it is said, he said unto him :
"Who are you, Lord?" And again a voice from Heaven rang out to him:
"This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased." And then, it is
said, John fell down before him and said: "I beseech you, Lord,
baptize me." But he prevented him and said: "Suffer it; for thus it
is fitting that everything should be fulfilled." (Epiphanius,
Panarion 30.13.7-8)
Moreover, they deny that he was a man, evidently on the ground of
the word which the Savior spoke when it was reported to him:
"Behold, your mother and your brethren stand without." namely: "Who
is my mother and who are my brethren?" And he stretched his hand
towards his disciples and said: "These are my brethren and mother
and sisters, who do the will of my Father."
(Epiphanius, Panarion 30.14.5)
They say that Christ was not begotten of God the Father, but created
as one of the archangels ... that he rules over the angels and all
the creatures of the Almighty, and that he came and declared, as
their Gospel, which is called Gospel according to Matthew, or Gospel
According to the Hebrews?,
reports:
"I am come to do away with sacrifices, and if you cease not
sacrificing, the wrath of God will not cease from you."
(Epiphanius, Panarion 30.16,4-5)
But they abandon the proper sequence of the words and pervert the
saying,
as is plain to all from the readings attached, and have let the
disciples say:
"Where will you have us prepare the passover?" And him to answer to
that: "Do I desire with desire at this Passover to eat flesh with
you?"
(Epiphanius, Panarion 30.22.4)
### Clementine Homilees
Most scholars concur that the Clementine Homilees (and the Recognition's of
Clement) contain large Ebionite interpolated additions. Within this writing
we learn of a different Peter than the one presented in the gentile "Book
of Acts". In the Clementine Homilees Peter expounds many profound
principles and doctrines of immense worth to modern Essenes and B'nai-Amen.
They also contain information of the daily lifestyle and diet of early
Nasarene leaders such as Peter. We learn that Peter bathes in flowing water
every morning before dawn and that he eats only wheat, olives, fruits and
vegetables. We also learn of the strict Nasarene rules governing
association and eating with meat eaters. All doctrines and principles espoused
by these Clementine works are received by the Essene Church of the B'nai-Amen.
### Ancient Writers on the Ebionites
"Those who are called Ebionites agree that the world was made by
God; but their opinions with respect to the Lord are similar to
those of Cerinthus and Carpocrates. They use the Gospel according to
Matthew only, and repudiate the Apostle Paul, maintaining that he
was an apostate from the law. As to the prophetical writings, they
endeavor to expound them in a somewhat singular manner: they
practice circumcision, persevere in the observance of those customs
which are enjoined by the law, and are so Judaic in their style of
life, that they even adore Jerusalem as if it were the house of
God." (Irenaeus, Adversus haereses (Against Heresies), 180 A.D.)
God, then, was made man, and the Lord did Himself save us, giving us
the token of the Virgin. But not as some allege, among those now
presuming to expound the Scripture, [thus:] "Behold, a young woman
shall conceive, and bring forth a son," as Theodotion the Ephesian
has interpreted, and Aquila of Pontus, both Jewish proselytes. The
Ebionites, following these, assert that He was begotten by Joseph;
thus destroying, as far as in them lies, such a marvelous
dispensation of God, and setting aside the testimony of the prophets
which proceeded from God. (Irenaeus, Adversus haereses (Against
Heresies), 180 A.D.)
He will judge also the Ebionites; [for] how can they be saved unless
it was God who wrought out their salvation upon earth? Or how shall
man pass into God, unless God has [first] passed into man? And how
shall he (man) escape from the generation subject to death, if not
by means of a new generation, given in a wonderful and unexpected
manner (but as a sign of salvation) by God [I mean] that
regeneration which flows from the virgin through faith? Or how shall
they receive adoption from God if they remain in this [kind of]
generation, which is naturally possessed by man in this world? And
how could He (Christ) have been greater than Solomon, or greater
than Jonah, or have been the Lord of David, who was of the same
substance as they were? How, too, could He have subdued him who was
stronger than men, who had not only overcome man, but also retained
him under his power, and conquered him who had conquered, while he
set free mankind who had been conquered, unless He had been greater
than man who had thus been vanquished? But who else is superior to,
and more eminent than, that man who was formed after the likeness of
God, except the Son of God, after whose image man was created? And
for this reason He did in these last days exhibit the similitude;
[for] the Son of God was made man, assuming the ancient production
[of His hands] into His own nature, as I have shown in the
immediately preceding book. (Irenaeus, Adversus haereses (Against
Heresies), 180 A.D.)
He shall also judge those who describe Christ as [having become man]
only in [human] opinion. For how can they imagine that they do
themselves carry on a real discussion, when their Master was a mere
imaginary being? Or how can they receive anything steadfast from
Him, if He was a merely imagined being, and not a verity? And how
can these men really be partaken of salvation, if He in whom they
profess to believe, manifested Himself as a merely imaginary being?
Everything, therefore, connected with these men is unreal, and
nothing [possessed of the character of] truth; and, in these
circumstances, it may be made a question whether (since, perchance,
they themselves in like manner are not men, but mere dumb animals)
they do not present, in most cases, simply a shadow of humanity.
(Irenaeus, Adversus haereses (Against Heresies), 180 A.D.)
"The Ebionaeans, however, acknowledge that the world was made by Him
Who is in reality God, but they propound legends concerning the
Christ similarly with Cerinthus and Carpocrates. They live
conformably to the customs of the Jews, alleging that they are
justified. according to the law, and saying that Jesus was justified
by fulfilling the law. And therefore it was, (according to the
Ebionaeans,) that (the Savior) was named (the) Christ of God and
Jesus, since not one of the rest (of mankind) had observed
completely the law. For if even any other had fulfilled the
commandments (contained) in the law, he would have been that Christ.
And the (Ebionaeans allege) that they themselves also, when in like
manner they fulfill (the law), are able to become Christ's; for they
assert that our Lord Himself was a man in a like sense with all (the
rest of the human family)." (Hippolytus, d. c. 235, Against All
Heresies)
"But the Ebionaeans assert that the world is made by the true God,
and they speak of Christ in a similar manner with Cerinthus. They
live, however, in all respects according to the law of Moses,
alleging that they are thus justified." (Hippolytus, d. c. 235,
Against All Heresies)
[The Heresy of the Ebionites.] "The evil demon, however, being
unable to tear certain others from their allegiance to the Christ of
God, yet found them susceptible in a different direction, and so
brought them over to his own purposes. The ancients quite properly
called these men Ebionites, because they held poor and mean opinions
concerning Christ. For they considered him a plain and common man,
who was justified only because of his superior virtue, and who was
the fruit of the intercourse of a man with Mary. In their opinion
the observance of the ceremonial law was altogether necessary, on
the ground that they could not be saved by faith in Christ alone and
by a corresponding life. There were others, however, besides them,
that were of the same name, but avoided the strange and absurd
beliefs of the former, and did not deny that the Lord was born of a
virgin and of the Holy Spirit. But nevertheless, inasmuch as they
also refused to acknowledge that he pre-existed, being God, Word,
and Wisdom, they turned aside into the impiety of the former,
especially when they, like them, endeavored to observe strictly the
bodily worship of the law. These men, moreover, thought that it was
necessary to reject all the epistles of the apostle, whom they
called an apostate from the law; and they used only the so-called
Gospel according to the Hebrews and made small account of the rest.
The Sabbath and the rest of the discipline of the Jews they observed
just like them, but at the same time, like us, they celebrated the
Lord's days as a memorial of the resurrection of the Savior.
Wherefore, in consequence of such a course they received the name of
Ebionites, which signified the poverty of their understanding. For
this is the name by which a poor man is called among the
Hebrews."(Eusebius, 4th century, Ecclesiastical History)
[The Translator Symmachus] "As to these translators it should be
stated that Symmachus was an Ebionite. But the heresy of the
Ebionites, as it is called, asserts that Christ was the son of
Joseph and Mary, considering him a mere man, and insists strongly on
keeping the law in a Jewish manner, as we have seen already in this
history. Commentaries of Symmachus are still extant in which he
appears to support this heresy by attacking the Gospel of Matthew.
Origen states that he obtained these and other commentaries of
Symmachus on the Scriptures from a certain Juliana, who, he says,
received the books by inheritance from Symmachus himself."(Eusebius,
4th century, Ecclesiastical History)
"The matter in debate, therefore, or I should rather say your
opinion regarding it, is summed up in this: that since the preaching
of the gospel of Christ, the believing Jews do well in observing the
precepts of the law, i.e. in offering sacrifices as Paul did, in
circumcising their children, as Paul did in the case of Timothy, and
keeping the Jewish Sabbath, as all the Jews have been accustomed to
do. If this be true, we fall into the heresy of Cerinthus and Ebion,
who, though believing in Christ, were anathematized by the fathers
for this one error, that they mixed up the ceremonies of the law
with the gospel of Christ, and professed their faith in that which
was new, without letting go what was old. Why do I speak of the
Ebionites, who make pretensions to the name of Christian? In our own
day there exists a sect among the Jews throughout all the synagogues
of the East, which is called the sect of the Minei, and is even now
condemned by the Pharisees. The adherents to this sect are known
commonly as Nasarenes; they believe in Christ the Son of God, born
of, the Virgin Mary; and they say that He who suffered under Pontius
Pilate and rose again, is the same as the one in whom we believe.
But while they desire to be both Jews and Christians, they are
neither the one nor the other. I therefore beseech you, who think
that you are called upon to heal my slight wound, which is no more,
so to speak, than a prick or scratch from a needle, to devote your
skill in the healing art to this grievous wound, which has been
opened by a spear driven home with the impetus of a javelin. For
there is surely no proportion between the culpability of him who
exhibits the various opinions held by the fathers in a commentary on
Scripture, and the guilt of him who reintroduces within the Church a
most pestilential heresy. If, however, there is for us no
alternative but to receive the Jews into the Church, along with the
usages prescribed by their law; if, in short, it shall be declared
lawful for them to continue in the Churches of Christ what they have
been accustomed to practice in the synagogues of Satan, I will tell
you my opinion of the matter: they will not become Christians, but
they will make us Jews." (Jerome, CE 404, Letter 75 - Jerome to Augustin)
### Conclusion
The surviving literature of the ancient Ebionites contain many
accurate and true preservations of original B'nai-Amen Essenism. The
various quotes preserved therein are more accurate portrayals of
original scripture than the mutilated and edited New Testament books
used by modern Christianity. The few preserved quotes of Yeshu (Jesus)
that survive in them radically reorientate the true believer toward
the true role and teachings of Yeshua.
*Copyright C 1999-2016. The Nazarenes of Mount Carmel.*
### References
1. [www.essene.com/recognitions/index.htm](https://www.essene.com/recognitions/index.htm)
2. [www.essene.com/recognitions/book1.htm](https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book1.htm)
3. [www.essene.com/recognitions/book2.htm](https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book2.htm)
4. [www.essene.com/recognitions/book3.htm](https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book3.htm)
5. [www.essene.com/recognitions/book4.htm](https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book4.htm)
6. [www.essene.com/recognitions/book5.htm](https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book5.htm)
7. [www.essene.com/recognitions/book6.htm](https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book6.htm)
8. [www.essene.com/recognitions/book7.htm](https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book7.htm)
9. [www.essene.com/recognitions/book8.htm](https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book8.htm)
10. [www.essene.com/recognitions/book9.htm](https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book9.htm)
11. [www.essene.com/Recognitions/Book10.htm](https://www.essene.com/Recognitions/Book10.htm)
---
**Links**
- [www.hope-of-israel.org/originalMatthew.html](https://www.hope-of-israel.org/originalMatthew.html)
- [www.biblewise.com/bible_study/apocrypha/gospel-ebionites.php](https://www.biblewise.com/bible_study/apocrypha/gospel-ebionites.php)
- [http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/gospelebionites.html](http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/gospelebionites.html)
- [gnosis.study/library/%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0/ENG/Epiphanius%20of%20Salamis%20-%20The%20Panarion,%20Book%20I%20(Sects%201-46).pdf](https://gnosis.study/library/%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0/ENG/Epiphanius%20of%20Salamis%20-%20The%20Panarion,%20Book%20I%20(Sects%201-46).pdf)
---
[[Home]] [[TitleIndex]]

72
BnaiAmenEbionites.md

@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
<!-- -*-mode: text; fill-column: 75; tab-width: 8; coding: utf-8-unix -*- -->
Parent: [[EbioniteChristianity]]
Parent:: [[EbioniteChristianity]]
https://www.essene.com/B%27nai-Amen/B%27nai-AmenAndEbionites.htm
[www.essene.com/B%27nai-Amen/B%27nai-AmenAndEbionites.htm](https://www.essene.com/B%27nai-Amen/B%27nai-AmenAndEbionites.htm)
## B'nai-Amen & Ebionites
## B'nai-Amen & Ebionæans
The Ebionites were a branch of "Jewish Christianity" mentioned by
The Ebionæans were a branch of "Jewish Christianity" mentioned by
several "Christian" writers. They made use of the original Aramaic
Hebrew Gospel written by Saint Matthew. This text was sometimes
referred to as the Gospel of the Hebrews, or According to the Hebrews.
@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ B'nai-Amen accept this Ebionite gospel as the True Gospel before being
corrupted and rewritten as the New Testament Matthew by Rome.
Epiphanius, pretending or believing that he had the original version,
accused the Ebionites, and other Hebrew speaking disciples, of changing
accused the Ebionæans, and other Hebrew speaking disciples, of changing
this Gospel of Matthew to reflect their own vegetarian and Essene
views. The truth is that Epiphanius' own "Christian" church had been
the one to change the text to reflect its own meat eating and non
@ -24,12 +24,12 @@ Essene approach to religion. The quotes preserved in his Panarion,
despite all his railing to the contrary, are the original words spoken
of by Yeshua and faithfully recorded in Aramaic by Matthew and others.
### Excerpts from The Gospel of the Ebionites
### Excerpts from The Gospel of the Ebionæans
xIn the Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis (Epiphanius, Panarion 30.13.2-3),
In the Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis (Epiphanius, Panarion 30.13.2-3),
we read:
In the Gospel that is in general use among them (Ebionites) which is
In the Gospel that is in general use among them (Ebionæans) which is
called "according to Matthew", which however is not whole and
complete but forged and mutilated - they call it the Hebrew's Gospel
- it is reported:
@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ we read:
sons of Zebedee, and Simon and Andrew and Thaddeus and Simon the
Zealot and Judas the Iscariot, and you, Matthew, I called as you sat
at the receipt of custom, and you followed me. You, therefore, I
will to be twelve apostles for a testimony unto Israel."
will to be twelve apostles for a testimony unto Palestine."
*
And:
@ -123,9 +123,9 @@ vegetables. We also learn of the strict Nasarene rules governing
association and eating with meat eaters. All doctrines and principles espoused
by these Clementine works are received by the Essene Church of the B'nai-Amen.
### Ancient Writers on the Ebionites
### Ancient Writers on the Ebionæans
"Those who are called Ebionites agree that the world was made by
"Those who are called Ebionæans agree that the world was made by
God; but their opinions with respect to the Lord are similar to
those of Cerinthus and Carpocrates. They use the Gospel according to
Matthew only, and repudiate the Apostle Paul, maintaining that he
@ -141,13 +141,13 @@ by these Clementine works are received by the Essene Church of the B'nai-Amen.
presuming to expound the Scripture, [thus:] "Behold, a young woman
shall conceive, and bring forth a son," as Theodotion the Ephesian
has interpreted, and Aquila of Pontus, both Jewish proselytes. The
Ebionites, following these, assert that He was begotten by Joseph;
Ebionæans, following these, assert that He was begotten by Joseph;
thus destroying, as far as in them lies, such a marvelous
dispensation of God, and setting aside the testimony of the prophets
which proceeded from God. (Irenaeus, Adversus haereses (Against
Heresies), 180 A.D.)
He will judge also the Ebionites; [for] how can they be saved unless
He will judge also the Ebionæans; [for] how can they be saved unless
it was God who wrought out their salvation upon earth? Or how shall
man pass into God, unless God has [first] passed into man? And how
shall he (man) escape from the generation subject to death, if not
@ -207,11 +207,11 @@ by these Clementine works are received by the Essene Church of the B'nai-Amen.
alleging that they are thus justified." (Hippolytus, d. c. 235,
Against All Heresies)
[The Heresy of the Ebionites.] "The evil demon, however, being
[The Heresy of the Ebionæans.] "The evil demon, however, being
unable to tear certain others from their allegiance to the Christ of
God, yet found them susceptible in a different direction, and so
brought them over to his own purposes. The ancients quite properly
called these men Ebionites, because they held poor and mean opinions
called these men Ebionæans, because they held poor and mean opinions
concerning Christ. For they considered him a plain and common man,
who was justified only because of his superior virtue, and who was
the fruit of the intercourse of a man with Mary. In their opinion
@ -232,13 +232,13 @@ by these Clementine works are received by the Essene Church of the B'nai-Amen.
just like them, but at the same time, like us, they celebrated the
Lord's days as a memorial of the resurrection of the Savior.
Wherefore, in consequence of such a course they received the name of
Ebionites, which signified the poverty of their understanding. For
Ebionæans, which signified the poverty of their understanding. For
this is the name by which a poor man is called among the
Hebrews."(Eusebius, 4th century, Ecclesiastical History)
[The Translator Symmachus] "As to these translators it should be
stated that Symmachus was an Ebionite. But the heresy of the
Ebionites, as it is called, asserts that Christ was the son of
Ebionæans, as it is called, asserts that Christ was the son of
Joseph and Mary, considering him a mere man, and insists strongly on
keeping the law in a Jewish manner, as we have seen already in this
history. Commentaries of Symmachus are still extant in which he
@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ by these Clementine works are received by the Essene Church of the B'nai-Amen.
for this one error, that they mixed up the ceremonies of the law
with the gospel of Christ, and professed their faith in that which
was new, without letting go what was old. Why do I speak of the
Ebionites, who make pretensions to the name of Christian? In our own
Ebionæans, who make pretensions to the name of Christian? In our own
day there exists a sect among the Jews throughout all the synagogues
of the East, which is called the sect of the Minei, and is even now
condemned by the Pharisees. The adherents to this sect are known
@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ by these Clementine works are received by the Essene Church of the B'nai-Amen.
### Conclusion
The surviving literature of the ancient Ebionites contain many
The surviving literature of the ancient Ebionæans contain many
accurate and true preservations of original B'nai-Amen Essenism. The
various quotes preserved therein are more accurate portrayals of
original scripture than the mutilated and edited New Testament books
@ -297,24 +297,26 @@ the true role and teachings of Yeshua.
### References
1. https://www.essene.com/recognitions/index.htm
2. https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book1.htm
3. https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book2.htm
4. https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book3.htm
5. https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book4.htm
6. https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book5.htm
7. https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book6.htm
8. https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book7.htm
9. https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book8.htm
10. https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book9.htm
11. https://www.essene.com/Recognitions/Book10.htm
1. [www.essene.com/recognitions/index.htm](https://www.essene.com/recognitions/index.htm)
2. [www.essene.com/recognitions/book1.htm](https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book1.htm)
3. [www.essene.com/recognitions/book2.htm](https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book2.htm)
4. [www.essene.com/recognitions/book3.htm](https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book3.htm)
5. [www.essene.com/recognitions/book4.htm](https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book4.htm)
6. [www.essene.com/recognitions/book5.htm](https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book5.htm)
7. [www.essene.com/recognitions/book6.htm](https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book6.htm)
8. [www.essene.com/recognitions/book7.htm](https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book7.htm)
9. [www.essene.com/recognitions/book8.htm](https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book8.htm)
10. [www.essene.com/recognitions/book9.htm](https://www.essene.com/recognitions/book9.htm)
11. [www.essene.com/Recognitions/Book10.htm](https://www.essene.com/Recognitions/Book10.htm)
### Links
---
**Links**
* https://www.hope-of-israel.org/originalMatthew.html
* https://www.biblewise.com/bible_study/apocrypha/gospel-ebionites.php
* http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/gospelebionites.html
* https://gnosis.study/library/%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0/ENG/Epiphanius%20of%20Salamis%20-%20The%20Panarion,%20Book%20I%20(Sects%201-46).pdf
- [www.hope-of-israel.org/originalMatthew.html](https://www.hope-of-israel.org/originalMatthew.html)
- [www.biblewise.com/bible_study/apocrypha/gospel-ebionites.php](https://www.biblewise.com/bible_study/apocrypha/gospel-ebionites.php)
- [http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/gospelebionites.html](http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/gospelebionites.html)
- [gnosis.study/library/%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0/ENG/Epiphanius%20of%20Salamis%20-%20The%20Panarion,%20Book%20I%20(Sects%201-46).pdf](https://gnosis.study/library/%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0/ENG/Epiphanius%20of%20Salamis%20-%20The%20Panarion,%20Book%20I%20(Sects%201-46).pdf)
---
[[Home]] [[TitleIndex]]

84
ChristianityOne.md Normal file

@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
<!-- -*-mode: text; fill-column: 75; tab-width: 8; coding: utf-8-unix -*- -->
Parent:: [[ToDo]]
## Christianity 1.0
We stand on the shoulders of giants. There have been many who have gone before
us that have vied for an authentic Christianity, and we briefly summarize
some of their most relevant history here.
### Vigilantius
To our eyes, Vigilantius was Europe's first notable Christian reformer.
[New Advent Encycopaedia](https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3010.htm)
...he was born about 370, at Calagurris, near Convenæ (Comminges),
which was a station on the Roman road from Aquitaine to Spain.
His father was probably the keeper of the inn, and Vigilantius appears
to have been brought up to his father's business. He was of a studious
character, and Sulpicius Severus, the ecclesiastical historian, who had
estates in those parts, took him into his service, and, possibly, made
him manager of his estates. Having been ordained he was introduced to
Jerome (then living at Bethlehem, in 395) through Paulinus of Nola, who
was the friend of Sulpicius Severus. After staying with Jerome for a
considerable time he begged to be dismissed, and left in great haste
without giving any reason...
The points against which he argued as being superstitious are:
(1) the reverence paid to the relics of holy men by carrying them round the
church in costly vessels or silken wrappings to be kissed, and
the prayers offered to the dead;
(2) the late watchings at the basilicas of the martyrs, with their attendant
[homosexual] scandals, the burning of numerous tapers. alleged miracles, etc.;
(3) the sending of alms to Jerusalem, which, Vigilantius urged, had better
be spent among the poor in each separate diocese, and the monkish vow of poverty;
(4) the exaggerated estimate of virginity.
- [Vigilantius and his times : Gilly, William Stephen, 1789-1855](https://archive.org/details/vigilantiushistius00gill)
- https://archive.org/details/vigilantiusandh00gillgoog
- https://books.google.com/books/about/Vigilantius_and_His_Times.html?id=--P44-tbb20C
### Waldensees
Bishop Ambrose
Valentinius Palo of Nola
#### Anabaptists
#### Christadelphians
### William Tyndale
### Issac Newton
Issac Newton was one of the greatest mathematicians of his age.
(1John 5:7) in the KJV, called the Johannine Comma was added in Erasmus'
3rd edition of the Greek text (effectively the TR of the day for the English,
French and German reformation bibles), without explication, he having said
explicitly before that he would not add it to his 2nd edition -
["it was omitted in his first and second editions"](https://www.newtonproject.ox.ac.uk/view/texts/normalized/THEM00261).
Newton wrote [a lengthy essay on it](https://books.google.com/books/download/An_Historical_Account_of/%20_Two_Notable_Cor.pdf?id=mQ4JOuiEMWoC),
which he called a pious fraud, but didn't dare publish the essay in England,
because the fraud was then being used by the episcopals to support the Trinity.
Pious fraud was the best they could do, but they backed it up by up to life
in prison for those who denied it. Newton saw what happened to his former
protogé Whiston, who was more courageous and more overtly honest than he was.
#### William Whiston
William Whiston was one of the greatest mathematicians of his age, and one of the
greatest truth-telling english Christians of any age.
Whiston completed a complete translation of the [New Testament](https://www.eswordlibrary.com/download/bblx/Whiston-Primitive-NT-1745.bblx)
which is an English translation based on Codex Bezae.
- https://archive.org/search?query=whiston%20william
- [Mr. Whiston's letter to the Right Honourable the Earl of Nottingham, concerning the eternity of the Son of God, and of the Holy Spirit. The fourth edition, improved.](https://archive.org/details/bim_eighteenth-century_mr-whistons-letter-to-_whiston-william_1721)
### United Society of Believers

21
ChurchOfTheEastPeshitta.md

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
<!-- -*-mode: text; fill-column: 75; tab-width: 8; coding: utf-8-unix -*- -->
Parent: [[PeshittAEnglishTranslations]]
Parent:: [[PeshittAEnglishTranslations]]
## Church Of The East Peshitta
@ -31,11 +31,11 @@ and has different content. A lot of the minor differences makes on ask:
[[WastheNewTestamentReallyWritteninGreek]], especially the wordplays and
some things like Philemon 7 KJV. There are at least 4 or 5 Codicies of it
that have near perfect agreement regardless of the century they date from:
* The [Yonan](https://www.dukhrana.com/yonan/) Codex,
* The [Khabouris](https://www.dukhrana.com/khabouris/) Codex,
* The 1199 Houghton Codex, and
* The [Mingana](https://archive.org/details/front-cover-converted)
[148](https://archive.org/details/alphonse-mingana-an-ancient-syriac-translation-of-the-kuran-john-rylands-library) Codex
- The [Yonan](https://www.dukhrana.com/yonan/) Codex,
- The [Khabouris](https://www.dukhrana.com/khabouris/) Codex,
- The 1199 Houghton Codex, and
- The [Mingana](https://archive.org/details/alphonse-mingana-an-ancient-syriac-translation-of-the-kuran-john-rylands-library) Codex
The differences to the TR are relatively small, and the Eastern PeshittAs
should also be free from Constantinunist or Roman or [[KjvTampering]],
@ -43,10 +43,11 @@ unlike the Westerns which were brought info alignment with the Greek.
I think the OT is considered to be from the Hebrew before 3 c.,
so neither Masoretic nor LXX.
* [[PeshittasEasternOrWestern]]
* [[AramaicClarificationStatementsInNT]]
* https://peshitta.org
* https://www.dukhrana.com/
- [[PeshittasEasternOrWestern]]
- [[AramaicClarificationStatementsInNT]]
- [peshitta.org](https://peshitta.org)
- [www.dukhrana.com/](https://www.dukhrana.com/)
---
[[Home]] [[TitleIndex]]

31
ClementineHomilees.md

@ -1,26 +1,25 @@
Parent: [[EbioniteCanon]]
<!-- -*-mode: text; fill-column: 75; tab-width: 8; coding: utf-8-unix -*- -->
Parent [[EbioniteCanon]]
## Clementine Homilees and Recognitions
* [[SyriacClementineRecognitionsAndHomilies]]
* [[BnaiAmenEbionites]]
- [[SyriacClementineRecognitionsAndHomilies]]
### JWO Videos
---
**JWO Videos**
* [20220912@Gray Omits Any Mention of Clementine Homilies - Earliest Major Anti-Pauline Work of Ebion Ep 12@4WWTlY5OeHQ](https://youtube.com/watch?v=4WWTlY5OeHQ)
- [20220912@Gray Omits Any Mention of Clementine Homilies - Earliest Major Anti-Pauline Work of Ebion Ep 12@4WWTlY5OeHQ](https://youtube.com/watch?v=4WWTlY5OeHQ)
### JWO Wiki
---
**Jesus' Words Only**
* [[JesusWordsOnly]]
* * [[JWO/JWO_12_06_EvidenceofPeter_sTestimonyAgainstPaulinaTrial_0068]]
* * [[JWO/JWO_12_07_HowActsMirrorstheClementineHomilies_0069]]
* * [[JWO/JWO_12_08_TheValidityoftheChargesofPeterinHomily17_0070]]
* * [[JWO/JWO_12_09_DidPaulAdmitHeRejectedtheTeachingsofPeter__0071]]
* * [[JWO/JWO_21_03_BibliographicalReferences_0115]]
* [[PaulApostleOfTheHeretics]]
* [[PaulineEpistlesDetering]]
* [[RecentCanonAdditions]]
* [[SyriacClementineRecognitionsAndHomilies]]
- [[JesusWordsOnly]]
- [[JWO_12_06_EvidenceofPeter_sTestimonyAgainstPaulinaTrial_0068]]
- [[JWO_12_07_HowActsMirrorstheClementineHomilies_0069]]
- [[JWO_12_08_TheValidityoftheChargesofPeterinHomily17_0070]]
- [[JWO_12_09_DidPaulAdmitHeRejectedtheTeachingsofPeter__0071]]
- [[JWO_21_03_BibliographicalReferences_0115]]
---
[[Home]] [[TitleIndex]]

88
CodexHierosolymitanusGreek.md

@ -1,50 +1,59 @@
<!-- -*-mode: text; fill-column: 75; tab-width: 8; coding: utf-8-unix -*- -->
Parent: [[CodexSinaticusSyriac]]
Parent:: [[RecentCanonAdditions]]
## Is Codex Hierosolymitanus (H.) a fraud? ##
## Is Codex Hierosolymitanus (H.) also a fraud?
* Has it ever been dated?
* Has it ever been textually critiqued?
[en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Hierosolymitanus](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Hierosolymitanus)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Hierosolymitanus
It was discovered in 1873 by Philotheos Bryennios, the metropolitan of
Nicomedia, in the collection of the Jerusalem Monastery of the Most
Holy Sepulchre in Constantinople. He published the texts of the two
familiar Epistles of Clement in 1875, overlooking the Didache, which he
found when he returned to the manuscript.
It contains:
* the Didache
* Epistle of Barnabas
* First Epistle of Clement
* the Second Epistle of Clement
* long version of the letters of Ignatius of Antioch
* and a list of books of the Bible following the order of John Chrysostom.
Codex Hierosolymitanus (H.) contains:
The choice of books in the contents are significant.
- the Didache
- Epistle of Barnabas
- First Epistle of Clement
- the Second Epistle of Clement
- long version of the letters of Ignatius of Antioch
- and a list of books of the Bible following the order of John Chrysostom.
The choice of books in the context may be significant.
This question naturally arises because:
1. [[CodexSinaticusGreekFraud]] (A.) is being pushed on the world as an ancient
work when in fact it's author Simondies claims otherwise, and proved
that the Epistle of Barnabus in A. is in fact his.
that the Epistle of Barnabus in A. is in fact his. He listed a set of acrostics
he had put on the manuscripts, and when outsiders finally gained access,
all of those places on the manuscript where either missing or disfigured.
2. Greek Codex Vaticanus (B.), known to exist as far back as the time of
Erasmus (he rejected it), yet shows the same scribal hand in Mark 8
as the Sinaiticus fraud.
These two codicies were used as the basis for Wescott/Hort/Shcaff to claim
The two codicies A. and B. were used as the basis for Wescott/Hort/Shcaff to claim
all of the world's bibles needed replacing by a new work based on this
"family" of Codicies. And the fakery of the [[CodexSinaticusGreekFraud]]
seems to be a collaboration between the Sianai monestary and the Vatican;
Tischendorf was received by the Pope in a personal audience just before his
first visit, and again before "obtaining" the Codex. If A. was false and
B. was tampered with, we ask if H. (and [[CodexSinaiticusSyriac]]?) are also
false and/or tampered with?
seems to be a collaboration between the Sianai monestary and the Vatican and
the Jerusalem Patriarch; Tischendorf was received by the Pope in a personal
Tischendorf visited the Constantinople library of the Patriarch of Jerusalem
in 1844 (on the way back from Saint Catherines)
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/the-theft-and-mutilation-of-manuscripts.91/
audience just before his first visit to Ste. Katherines, and again before
"obtaining" the Codex. If A. was false and B. was tampered with, we ask if
H. is also false and/or tampered with? (And [[CodexSinaiticusSyriac]]?)
Tischendorf visited the Constantinople library of the Patriarch of Jerusalem
in 1844 ("on the way back" from Saint Catherines)
[www.purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/the-theft-and-mutilation-of-manuscripts.91/](https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/the-theft-and-mutilation-of-manuscripts.91/)
Tischendorf alludes to a theft of this leaf: Travels in the East,
tr. from "Reise in den Orient" by William Edward Shuckard
https://books.google.sc/books?id=KBYEAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA274
[books.google.sc/books?id=KBYEAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA274](https://books.google.sc/books?id=KBYEAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA274)
He was allowed to inspect the library himself, perhaps alone!
He was allowed to inspect in the Constantinople library himself, perhaps alone!
Given that the Epistle of Barnabas is in Tischendorf/Simondies Codex A.
and is known to have been published by Simondies years earlier, we ask:
@ -52,22 +61,29 @@ and is known to have been published by Simondies years earlier, we ask:
If they are the same, could Tischendorf have deposited a copy of what was
later "found" in the Codex A. into the library, or conspired with
someone to do so? It was "found" in 1873.
someone to do so? It was "found" in 1873. We ask:
In asking "is Codex Hierosolymitanus (H.) is forgery, or tampered with",
- Has H. ever been C-14 AMS dated?
- Has it ever been textually critiqued?
In asking "is Codex Hierosolymitanus (H.) is forgery, or tampered with",
we ask the corollary:
> "what role in the NewWorldBible would it play"?
> "what role in the NewWorldBible could the books from H. play"?
To that end, we point out that the following writings:
* First Epistle of Clement
* the Second Epistle of Clement
* long version of the letters of Ignatius of Antioch
To that end, we point out that it has the following writings:
are exactly the writings whose authenticity has long been called into
- First Epistle of Clement
- the Second Epistle of Clement
- long version of the letters of Ignatius of Antioch
which are exactly the writings whose authenticity has long been called into
question in the debate on:
> "Are there any signs of the letters attributed to Paul before Marcion?"
> "Are there any concrete signs of the Pauline letters before Marcion?"
[[DidMarcionWritePaulsLetters]]
-- --
[[TitleIndex]]
See [[LGFRCJPStoryLine]]
---
[[Home]] [[TitleIndex]]

67
CodexSinaticusGreekFraud.md

@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
Parent: [[Home]]
<!-- -*-mode: text; fill-column: 75; tab-width: 8; coding: utf-8-unix -*- -->
Parent:: [[Home]]
## Codex Sinaticus Greek is a Fraud
@ -6,10 +8,12 @@ The Greek Codex Sinaiticus is clearly a fraud, and was used in a
relentless globalist campaign to rewrite Bibles worldwide, with the aim
of either destroy Christian faith in the Bible, or concocting a "Bible"
that does not conflict with an upcoming "One World Religion". Or both.
A bibles based on the combination of Sinaiticus and Vaticanus are based
on a fraud and are to be avoided.
See [[GreekHierosolymitanus]]
A bibles based on the combination of Sinaiticus and Vaticanus are based
on a fraud and are to be avoided, including NIV, RKJV.
More or less anything that starts with an N or an R.
See also [[]].
Here's a great [19th c. style quote](http://web.archive.org/web/20120512021709/http://preteristarchive.com/Books/1924_mauro_which-version.html)
on the Sinaiticus:
@ -27,51 +31,54 @@ on the Sinaiticus:
unquestioned antiquity turns out to be about the worst and most
"scandalously corrupt" of all the Greek Texts now known to exist.
### Links
---
**Links**
* https://www.sinaiticus.net/
* https://dorightchristians.wordpress.com/tag/codex-sinaiticus/
- [www.sinaiticus.net/](https://www.sinaiticus.net/)
- [dorightchristians.wordpress.com/tag/codex-sinaiticus/](https://dorightchristians.wordpress.com/tag/codex-sinaiticus/)
Steve Avery has excellent coverage at the Pure Bible Forum:
Steve Avery has excellent coverage at his
[https://purebibleforum.com/](Pure Bible Forum):
"And there even could be some elements involving the counter-Reformation
attempt to make a new Bible version against the Received Text,
and this sorely needed a full Bible companion manuscript to Vaticanus"
* https://www.thetextofthegospels.com/2017/03/sinaiticus-is-not-forgery-setting-stage.html (comments by steve avery)
* https://purebibleforum.com/index.php#sinaiticus-authenticity.301
* https://purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/the-forging-of-codex-sinaiticus-by-william-cooper.261/ (not read yet)
* https://purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/why-the-james-keith-elliott-book-tells-you-very-little-about-sinaiticus-authenticity.240/
* https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/james-snapp-attempts-to-defend-authenticity-of-sinaiticus-multiplication-of-nothings.468/
* https://purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/the-must-see-spots-for-understanding-the-simonides-athos-creation-of-codex-simoneidos.1616/
* https://archive.org/download/literaryforgeri01farrgoog/literaryforgeri01farrgoog.pdf
- https://www.thetextofthegospels.com/2017/03/sinaiticus-is-not-forgery-setting-stage.html (comments by steve avery)
- https://purebibleforum.com/index.php#sinaiticus-authenticity.301
- [purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/the-forging-of-codex-sinaiticus-by-william-cooper.261/](https://purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/the-forging-of-codex-sinaiticus-by-william-cooper.261/)
- [purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/why-the-james-keith-elliott-book-tells-you-very-little-about-sinaiticus-authenticity.240/](https://purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/why-the-james-keith-elliott-book-tells-you-very-little-about-sinaiticus-authenticity.240/)
- [www.purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/james-snapp-attempts-to-defend-authenticity-of-sinaiticus-multiplication-of-nothings.468/](https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/james-snapp-attempts-to-defend-authenticity-of-sinaiticus-multiplication-of-nothings.468/)
- [purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/the-must-see-spots-for-understanding-the-simonides-athos-creation-of-codex-simoneidos.1616/](https://purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/the-must-see-spots-for-understanding-the-simonides-athos-creation-of-codex-simoneidos.1616/)
- [archive.org/download/literaryforgeri01farrgoog/literaryforgeri01farrgoog.pdf](https://archive.org/download/literaryforgeri01farrgoog/literaryforgeri01farrgoog.pdf)
An epic film:
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MG9PuqP4QvY
* W. R. Cooper, "The Forging of Codex Sinaiticus", Creation Science Movement, 2016
- [www.youtube.com/watch?v=MG9PuqP4QvY](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MG9PuqP4QvY)
- W. R. Cooper, "The Forging of Codex Sinaiticus", Creation Science Movement, 2016
David Daniels has some good research on Sinaiticus as videos
(we do not necessarily vouch for him on other topics):
* David Daniels, "Is the World's Oldest Bible a Fake?", 2018.
* 20151205 - [01 Is Sinaiticus a Fake](https://youtube.com/watch?v=OVjOhDJ5HKo)
* 20151210 - [02 KJV Sinaiticus and the NWO](https://youtube.com/watch?v=RcgRR1NWFGU)
* 20160926 - [The Sinaiticus Smoking Gun](https://youtube.com/watch?v=OmfGK1CtMSI)
* 20170601 - [Simonides Betrayed Part 1 - Summary](https://youtube.com/watch?v=4O557156hxg)
* 20170614 - [Simonides Betrayed Part 2 - Fake History](https://youtube.com/watch?v=YfPcV2qvNUk)
* 20171010 - [Simonides Betrayed Part 3 - Uncle Benedict s Plan](https://youtube.com/watch?v=fCZ6lOD5gkU)
* 20171104 - [Simonides Betrayed Part 4 - Raising Rebels](https://youtube.com/watch?v=q6sJZxGD3pY)
* 20180629 - [The real reason Sinaiticus was created](https://youtube.com/watch?v=VIdA6lVQpJk)
* 20190407 - [Sinaiticus and Apotheosis](https://youtube.com/watch?v=o6xLMyNGoSs)
- David Daniels, "Is the World's Oldest Bible a Fake?", 2018.
- 20151205 - [01 Is Sinaiticus a Fake](https://youtube.com/watch?v=OVjOhDJ5HKo)
- 20151210 - [02 KJV Sinaiticus and the NWO](https://youtube.com/watch?v=RcgRR1NWFGU)
- 20160926 - [The Sinaiticus Smoking Gun](https://youtube.com/watch?v=OmfGK1CtMSI)
- 20170601 - [Simonides Betrayed Part 1 - Summary](https://youtube.com/watch?v=4O557156hxg)
- 20170614 - [Simonides Betrayed Part 2 - Fake History](https://youtube.com/watch?v=YfPcV2qvNUk)
- 20171010 - [Simonides Betrayed Part 3 - Uncle Benedict s Plan](https://youtube.com/watch?v=fCZ6lOD5gkU)
- 20171104 - [Simonides Betrayed Part 4 - Raising Rebels](https://youtube.com/watch?v=q6sJZxGD3pY)
- 20180629 - [The real reason Sinaiticus was created](https://youtube.com/watch?v=VIdA6lVQpJk)
- 20190407 - [Sinaiticus and Apotheosis](https://youtube.com/watch?v=o6xLMyNGoSs)
* https://christianpublishinghouse.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/A-Review-of-The-Forging-of-Codex-Sinaiticus.pdf
- [christianpublishinghouse.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/A-Review-of-The-Forging-of-Codex-Sinaiticus.pdf](https://christianpublishinghouse.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/A-Review-of-The-Forging-of-Codex-Sinaiticus.pdf)
(Warning about anything from that publisher, and we find his arguments weak.)
---
See also:
* [[CodexSinaticusSyriac]]
* [[Mark16Ending]]
- [[CodexSinaticusSyriac]]
- [[Mark16Ending]]
---
[[Home]] [[TitleIndex]]

38
CodexSinaticusSyriac.md

@ -1,20 +1,22 @@
<!-- -*-mode: text; fill-column: 75; tab-width: 8; coding: utf-8-unix -*- -->
Parent: [[EbioniteChristianity]]
Parent:: [[EbioniteChristianity]]
## Codex Sinaticus Syriac
The near-simultaneous discovery of:
* [[CodexHierosolymitanusGreek]]
* Codex Vaticanus
* [[CodexSinaticusGreekFraud]]
* Codex Sinaticus Syriac
- [[CodexHierosolymitanusGreek]]
- Codex Vaticanus
- [[CodexSinaticusGreekFraud]]
- [[CodexSinaticusSyriac]]
in a short 40 year timeframe is worrysome as:
* [[CodexSinaticusGreekFraud]] clearly a fraud.
* it's fraudster, Tischendorf visited the library where
- [[CodexSinaticusGreekFraud]] clearly a fraud.
- it's fraudster, Tischendorf visited the library where
[[CodexHierosolymitanusGreek]] was "found" shortly before its discovery.
* it is Palimpsest and has never been C-14 dated.
- it is palimpsest and has never been C-14 dated.
Agnes Smith's [Syriac Sinaiticus](https://archive.org/details/translationoffou00lewiiala/)
has a similar provenance to the Greek Sinaiticus (closely related time and place).
@ -27,8 +29,10 @@ The 'authenticity" of Vaticanus and the [[CodexSinaticusGreekFraud]] was staunch
defended for decades by the same group/cabal that became the
[Revision Committee](https://archive.org/details/revisionrevised0000john/).
<!--
The Syriac Sinaiticus is also turning to be not as old as earlier suggested:
it's currently dated at [698 AD](https://esketikon.hypotheses.org/134).
-->
It's important to distinguish between:
@ -36,22 +40,24 @@ It's important to distinguish between:
been brought by the A. Thomas to India via Persia with a
[shipwreck](http://aina.org/articles/socotra.pdf) on
[socotra](http://www.trcmst.org/st-thomas/)
(a.k.a. [Nestorian](http://www.peshitta.org/for/showthread.php?tid=1927)).
(a.k.a. [Nestorian](http://www.peshitta.org/for/showthread.php?tid=1927))
that we will refer to as PeshittA or Eastern or Nestorian.
2. Old Syriac PeshittO, said to have been translated from the Greek after
the Diatesseron, and westernized with added NT books (a.k.a. Philoxenian
[Johnannite](http://www.peshitta.org/for/showthread.php?tid=1928))
2. The later renditions augmented with or translated from the Greek after
the Diatesseron, or westernized PeshittAs with added NT books (a.k.a. Philoxenian
[Johannite](http://www.peshitta.org/for/showthread.php?tid=1928))
that we will refer to as PeshittO or Western or Johannite.
3. Syriac Sinaiticus, which is considered Old Syriac like the Cureton, but
an oddball because of its high number of scribal errors.
3. Old Syriac, like the Cureton. The Syriac Sinaiticus, is considered like
the Old Syriac but an oddball because of its high number of scribal errors.
There are strong reasons to prefer the Church of the East (CoE)
[[ChurchOfTheEastPeshitta]]: see [[PeshittaPrimacy]]
[[ChurchOfTheEastPeshitta]]: see [[PeshittAPrimacy]]
In addition, we must look to see if the additions or deletions in the
Syriac Sinaiticus support the same additions or deletions in Vaticanus
relative to the Textus Receptus, to see if there are indications of a
concerted effort to rewrite the Bible.
concerted effort to rewrite the Bible; see [[Greek_SinaiticusCommentary]].
---
[[Home]] [[TitleIndex]]

24
CommentariesInOsis.md Normal file

@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
<!-- -*-mode: text; fill-column: 75; tab-width: 8; coding: utf-8-unix -*- -->
Parent:: [[Home]]
## Commentaries
Rather than restricting ourselves to one English translation from the
Aramaic or Greek, we use a Commentary that can be read alongside any
Bible with good bible software.
We standardize on the OSIS format so that modules can be generated
that work with a wide variety of bible readers. Our Christianity 2.0
Commentaries of Bible verses are mainly of the New Testament. These
can be combined to create an OSIS commentary, that can be used to
create Sword and ESword modules that can be used alongside any bible
with bible reading software.
- [[TyndaleCommentary]]
- [[Greek_SinaiticusCommentary]]
- [[HealingCommentary]]
- [[WtNTRWiG1eCommentary]]
---
[[Home]] [[TitleIndex]]

66
ConstantinianChurch.md

@ -1,48 +1,56 @@
Parent: [[EbioniteChristianity]]
<!-- -*- mode: text; fill-column: 75; tab-width: 8; coding: utf-8-unix -*- -->
Parent:: [[EbioniteChristianity]]
## Constantinian Church
The Constantinian Church incorporated aspects of Constantine's pagan worship
into the Church at the Council of Nicea.
Later, the Constantinian Church turned anti-montheistic at the Council of
Constantinople where the Church turned against "the absurdity of Jewish monotheism"
as Bishop/Pope Gregory of Nyssa put it in his defense of the Trinity. We
reject the Trinity of the Constantinian Church as an anti-monotheistic addition
that has no support in the Gospels. Under the Emporer Justinian, the recital
of the Shema Israel was forbidden as being anti-Trinitarian, yet it is said
by Jesus to be the "first of all the commandments":
Later, the Constantinian Church turned anti-montheistic at the Council
of Constantinople where the Church turned against "the absurdity of
Jewish monotheism" as Bishop/Pope Gregory of Nyssa put it in his
defense of the Trinity. Under the Emporer Justinian, the recital of
the Shema Israel was forbidden as being anti-Trinitarian, yet it is
said by Jesus to be the "first of all the commandments":
Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord (Mark 12:29).
### Links
We reject the Trinity of the Constantinian Church as an
anti-monotheistic addition that has no support in the Gospels.
* [[RichardReeves]] on Easter
* [Constantine as the anti-Christ](https://messengers-of-messiah.org/newpdf/6manlawlessnessapostatechurch.pdf)
---
**Links**
- [[RichardRives]] on Easter
- [Constantine as the anti-Christ](https://messengers-of-messiah.org/newpdf/6manlawlessnessapostatechurch.pdf)
#### JWO Links
* [[JWO/JWO_12_01_TheEbioniteRecordsontheTrialofPaul_0063]]
* [[JWO/JWO_12_03_TheReliabilityofTheEbionitesDespitetheOne-SidedChargesAgainstThem_0065]]
* [[JWO/JWO_13_01_DidJohnsEpistlesIdentifyPaulAsAFalseProphet__0072]]
* [[JWO/JWO_16_07_ProtestantsAgreeFor1400YearsNoOneHadTheCorrectSalvationFormula_0097]]
* [[JWO/JWO_20_01_HowTheCanonWasFormed_0112]]
- [[JWO_JWO_12_01_TheEbioniteRecordsontheTrialofPaul_0063]]
- [[JWO_JWO_12_03_TheReliabilityofTheEbionitesDespitetheOne-SidedChargesAgainstThem_0065]]
- [[JWO_JWO_13_01_DidJohnsEpistlesIdentifyPaulAsAFalseProphet__0072]]
- [[JWO_16_07_ProtestantsAgreeFor1400YearsNoOneHadTheCorrectSalvationFormula_0097]]
- [[JWO_20_01_HowTheCanonWasFormed_0112]]
### JWO Videos
---
**JWO Videos**
* [20221021@Constantinian_Christians_Control_the_Narrative_to_Protect_Evil_Constantine._Ep_8_Constantine_Paul@RFWMQ-l3JGw](https://youtube.com/watch?v=RFWMQ-l3JGw)
* [20220917@Constantine Elevates Paul from Obscurity. A Marriage Made in Heaven or Hell Pt 1@FFEAMbNv9O8](https://youtube.com/watch?v=FFEAMbNv9O8)
* [20221021@Constantinian Christians Control the Narrative to Protect Evil Constantine. Ep 8 Constantine Paul@RFWMQ-l3JGw](https://youtube.com/watch?v=RFWMQ-l3JGw)
* [20221027@Ep 1 of 4 Fraudulent Hiding 324 AD Constantine Moved HQ of Pagan Idolatry 2Constantinople. Ep 9 A .@zWT4UkVgDIA](https://youtube.com/watch?v=zWT4UkVgDIA)
* [20221028@Ep 2 4 Fraudulent Hiding 324 AD Constantine Moved HQ of Pagan Idolatry to Constantinople. Ep 9 B@qZ3G9pBfnGE](https://youtube.com/watch?v=qZ3G9pBfnGE)
* [20221029@11 Constantine Byzantium Anti-Jesus Legacy of Hate Destruction of Monotheism True Bible.@JtTO5aPK2LY](https://youtube.com/watch?v=JtTO5aPK2LY)
* [20221102@Did Paul Bring These Pagan figures in2 Christianity provable by Acts Later actions of Constantine@YeuWhSwmcFs](https://youtube.com/watch?v=YeuWhSwmcFs)
* [20221107@Chi Rho Fraud by Constantine - False Claim He Intended as New Christian Symbol when Is Pagan Sun God@bLeW wiMc4s](https://youtube.com/watch?v=bLeW_wiMc4s)
* [20221107@Eusebius -- Conniver Protector or Survivor Or Did Eusebius know of Apollo statue of Constantine@CAEDWdwGY-s](https://youtube.com/watch?v=CAEDWdwGY-s)
* [20221201@Tolstoy Greatest Anti Paul Thinker After Constantine Era@c1ioPwwoNlo](https://youtube.com/watch?v=c1ioPwwoNlo)
* [20221227@3 Is Constantine s Sol Invictus god also Baal in Bible Why Was Jesus given Sol s 12-25 birthday@TLYwiDKSG I](https://youtube.com/watch?v=TLYwiDKSG_I)
* [20230105@Constantine Letter to Bishops - Is This Proof Constantine is 4th Beast of Daniel 7 Who Changes Times@cPZ5U7nsVgY](https://youtube.com/watch?v=cPZ5U7nsVgY)
- [20221021@Constantinian_Christians_Control_the_Narrative_to_Protect_Evil_Constantine._Ep_8_Constantine_Paul@RFWMQ-l3JGw](https://youtube.com/watch?v=RFWMQ-l3JGw)
- [20220917@Constantine Elevates Paul from Obscurity. A Marriage Made in Heaven or Hell Pt 1@FFEAMbNv9O8](https://youtube.com/watch?v=FFEAMbNv9O8)
- [20221021@Constantinian Christians Control the Narrative to Protect Evil Constantine. Ep 8 Constantine Paul@RFWMQ-l3JGw](https://youtube.com/watch?v=RFWMQ-l3JGw)
- [20221027@Ep 1 of 4 Fraudulent Hiding 324 AD Constantine Moved HQ of Pagan Idolatry 2Constantinople. Ep 9 A .@zWT4UkVgDIA](https://youtube.com/watch?v=zWT4UkVgDIA)
- [20221028@Ep 2 4 Fraudulent Hiding 324 AD Constantine Moved HQ of Pagan Idolatry to Constantinople. Ep 9 B@qZ3G9pBfnGE](https://youtube.com/watch?v=qZ3G9pBfnGE)
- [20221029@11 Constantine Byzantium Anti-Jesus Legacy of Hate Destruction of Monotheism True Bible.@JtTO5aPK2LY](https://youtube.com/watch?v=JtTO5aPK2LY)
- [20221102@Did Paul Bring These Pagan figures in2 Christianity provable by Acts Later actions of Constantine@YeuWhSwmcFs](https://youtube.com/watch?v=YeuWhSwmcFs)
- [20221107@Chi Rho Fraud by Constantine - False Claim He Intended as New Christian Symbol when Is Pagan Sun God@bLeW wiMc4s](https://youtube.com/watch?v=bLeW_wiMc4s)
- [20221107@Eusebius -- Conniver Protector or Survivor Or Did Eusebius know of Apollo statue of Constantine@CAEDWdwGY-s](https://youtube.com/watch?v=CAEDWdwGY-s)
- [20221201@Tolstoy Greatest Anti Paul Thinker After Constantine Era@c1ioPwwoNlo](https://youtube.com/watch?v=c1ioPwwoNlo)
- [20221227@3 Is Constantine s Sol Invictus god also Baal in Bible Why Was Jesus given Sol s 12-25 birthday@TLYwiDKSG I](https://youtube.com/watch?v=TLYwiDKSG_I)
- [20230105@Constantine Letter to Bishops - Is This Proof Constantine is 4th Beast of Daniel 7 Who Changes Times@cPZ5U7nsVgY](https://youtube.com/watch?v=cPZ5U7nsVgY)
---
[[Home]] [[TitleIndex]]

71
DidMarcionWritePaulsLetters.md

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
<!-- -*-mode: text; fill-column: 75; tab-width: 8; coding: utf-8-unix -*- -->
Parent: [[Home]]
Parent:: [[Home]]
## Did Marcion Write the "Pauline" Letters
@ -64,41 +64,48 @@ which is also purely, and unabashedly, Marcionite.
We understand that the Paulines post-150 AD will have some dating reprecussions,
be that as it may, but we can let the Tubingen school speak to that.
*
---
**Links**
- [/depts.drew.edu/jhc/Rpcanon.html](https:///depts.drew.edu/jhc/Rpcanon.html)
### JWO Web Site
* [Recommended-Reading/marcionism](.../Recommended-Reading/marcionism.html)
* [JWO/marcionite-influence-on-rcc](.../JWO/marcionite-influence-on-rcc.html)
* [books/205-marcionites-tampering-with-the-text](.../books/205-marcionites-tampering-with-the-text.html)
* [books/206-marcionite-influence-on-rcc](.../books/206-marcionite-influence-on-rcc.html)
* [books/453-antithesis-of-marcion](.../books/453-antithesis-of-marcion.html)
* [books/479-tertullian-treatment-of-paul-in-against-marcion](.../books/479-tertullian-treatment-of-paul-in-against-marcion.html)
* [books/56-marcionism](.../books/56-marcionism.html)
* [home/4-recommendedreading/56-marcionism](.../home/4-recommendedreading/56-marcionism.html)
* [recommendedreading/205-marcionites-tampering-with-the-text](.../recommendedreading/205-marcionites-tampering-with-the-text.html)
* [recommendedreading/206-marcionite-influence-on-rcc](.../recommendedreading/206-marcionite-influence-on-rcc.html)
* [recommendedreading/453-antithesis-of-marcion](.../recommendedreading/453-antithesis-of-marcion.html)
* [recommendedreading/479-tertullian-treatment-of-paul-in-against-marcion](.../recommendedreading/479-tertullian-treatment-of-paul-in-against-marcion.html)
* [recommendedreading/56-marcionism](.../recommendedreading/56-marcionism.html)
* [recommendedreading/683-marcionite-tampering-with-paul](.../recommendedreading/683-marcionite-tampering-with-paul.html)
* [reviews/jwo-reviews/56-marcionism](.../reviews/jwo-reviews/56-marcionism.html)
* [topicindex/205-marcionites-tampering-with-the-text](.../topicindex/205-marcionites-tampering-with-the-text.html)
* [topicindex/206-marcionite-influence-on-rcc](.../topicindex/206-marcionite-influence-on-rcc.html)
* [topicindex/453-antithesis-of-marcion](.../topicindex/453-antithesis-of-marcion.html)
* [topicindex/479-tertullian-treatment-of-paul-in-against-marcion](.../topicindex/479-tertullian-treatment-of-paul-in-against-marcion.html)
* [topicindex/56-marcionism](.../topicindex/56-marcionism.html)
* [topicindex/683-marcionite-tampering-with-paul](.../topicindex/683-marcionite-tampering-with-paul.html)
- [Recommended-Reading/marcionism](/static/Recommended-Reading/marcionism.html)
- [marcionite-influence-on-rcc](/static/marcionite-influence-on-rcc.html)
- [books/205-marcionites-tampering-with-the-text](/static/books/205-marcionites-tampering-with-the-text.html)
- [books/206-marcionite-influence-on-rcc](/static/books/206-marcionite-influence-on-rcc.html)
- [books/453-antithesis-of-marcion](/static/books/453-antithesis-of-marcion.html)
- [books/479-tertullian-treatment-of-paul-in-against-marcion](/static/books/479-tertullian-treatment-of-paul-in-against-marcion.html)
- [books/56-marcionism](/static/books/56-marcionism.html)
- [home/4-recommendedreading/56-marcionism](/static/home/4-recommendedreading/56-marcionism.html)
- [recommendedreading/205-marcionites-tampering-with-the-text](/static/recommendedreading/205-marcionites-tampering-with-the-text.html)
- [recommendedreading/206-marcionite-influence-on-rcc](/static/recommendedreading/206-marcionite-influence-on-rcc.html)
- [recommendedreading/453-antithesis-of-marcion](/static/recommendedreading/453-antithesis-of-marcion.html)
- [recommendedreading/479-tertullian-treatment-of-paul-in-against-marcion](/static/recommendedreading/479-tertullian-treatment-of-paul-in-against-marcion.html)
- [recommendedreading/56-marcionism](/static/recommendedreading/56-marcionism.html)
- [recommendedreading/683-marcionite-tampering-with-paul](/static/recommendedreading/683-marcionite-tampering-with-paul.html)
- [reviews/jwo-reviews/56-marcionism](/static/reviews/jwo-reviews/56-marcionism.html)
- [topicindex/205-marcionites-tampering-with-the-text](/static/topicindex/205-marcionites-tampering-with-the-text.html)
- [topicindex/206-marcionite-influence-on-rcc](/static/topicindex/206-marcionite-influence-on-rcc.html)
- [topicindex/453-antithesis-of-marcion](/static/topicindex/453-antithesis-of-marcion.html)
- [topicindex/479-tertullian-treatment-of-paul-in-against-marcion](/static/topicindex/479-tertullian-treatment-of-paul-in-against-marcion.html)
- [topicindex/56-marcionism](/static/topicindex/56-marcionism.html)
- [topicindex/683-marcionite-tampering-with-paul](/static/topicindex/683-marcionite-tampering-with-paul.html)
### JWO Videos
---
**JWO Videos**
* 20220722 [Secret History of Post-Paul Church Pt 2 - 207 AD Tertullian Has to Fight Paul-Only Marcionites@ZlH 3lUQnt4](https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZlH 3lUQnt4)
* 20220925 [Is the Virgin Birth Account the Corruption of Anti-Christian Marcion of our Text@7iOXawDJ6dQ](https://youtube.com/watch?v=7iOXawDJ6dQ)
* 20220928 [Marcion and Theodotion - Obvious Architects of Greek Translation of Hebrew Matthew with Virgin Birth@UKEtOjC24V4](https://youtube.com/watch?v=UKEtOjC24V4)
* 20230204 [1 of Series- Did Marcion Tamper with Paul and fabricate his epistles Ep 1 - Intro to Marcion.@P9KUibcmFw0](https://youtube.com/watch?v=P9KUibcmFw0)
* 20230205 [2 Series - Did Marcion Tamper with Paul s Epistles Paul s Oldest MSS is post-Marcion 144 AD@WQlFxK8KPb4](https://youtube.com/watch?v=WQlFxK8KPb4)
* 20230213 [Pt 3 Did Marcion Tamper with Paul s Epistles@](https://youtube.com/watch?v=OzDo6c9cMaE)
* 20230627 [Ep3 Did Apostolic Churches Defeat Marcion s Docetism by Showing Lack of Proof Paul Was True Apostle@RoyqzQVFYCc](https://youtube.com/watch?v=RoyqzQVFYCc)
* 20230713 [Famous Quotes on Paul 10.2 - Edwin Johnson Review of Tertullian s Anti-Paul Views in Against Marcion@6WbW0og9Avo](https://youtube.com/watch?v=6WbW0og9Avo)
- 20220722 [Secret History of Post-Paul Church Pt 2 - 207 AD Tertullian Has to Fight Paul-Only Marcionites@ZlH 3lUQnt4](https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZlH 3lUQnt4)
- 20220925 [Is the Virgin Birth Account the Corruption of Anti-Christian Marcion of our Text@7iOXawDJ6dQ](https://youtube.com/watch?v=7iOXawDJ6dQ)
- 20220928 [Marcion and Theodotion - Obvious Architects of Greek Translation of Hebrew Matthew with Virgin Birth@UKEtOjC24V4](https://youtube.com/watch?v=UKEtOjC24V4)
- 20230204 [1 of Series- Did Marcion Tamper with Paul and fabricate his epistles Ep 1 - Intro to Marcion.@P9KUibcmFw0](https://youtube.com/watch?v=P9KUibcmFw0)
- 20230205 [2 Series - Did Marcion Tamper with Paul s Epistles Paul s Oldest MSS is post-Marcion 144 AD@WQlFxK8KPb4](https://youtube.com/watch?v=WQlFxK8KPb4)
- 20230213 [Pt 3 Did Marcion Tamper with Paul s Epistles@](https://youtube.com/watch?v=OzDo6c9cMaE)
- 20230627 [Ep3 Did Apostolic Churches Defeat Marcion s Docetism by Showing Lack of Proof Paul Was True Apostle@RoyqzQVFYCc](https://youtube.com/watch?v=RoyqzQVFYCc)
- 20230713 [Famous Quotes on Paul 10.2 - Edwin Johnson Review of Tertullian s Anti-Paul Views in Against Marcion@6WbW0og9Avo](https://youtube.com/watch?v=6WbW0og9Avo)
---
[[Home]] [[TitleIndex]]

115
EarlyEbioniteMatthew.md

@ -1,11 +1,12 @@
<!-- -*- mode: text; fill-column: 75; tab-width: 8; coding: utf-8-unix -*- -->
Parent: [[EbioniteChristianity]]
Parent:: [[EbioniteChristianity]]
## Early Church "Fathers" on the Primacy of a Hebrew Dialect Matthew
https://www.atour.com/forums/peshitta/573.html#3
[www.atour.com/forums/peshitta/573.html#3](https://www.atour.com/forums/peshitta/573.html#3)
From: James Trimm, New Messianic Version, translated from the Hebrew and
Aramaic HRV https://www.nazarene.net/hrv
Aramaic HRV [www.nazarene.net/hrv](https://www.nazarene.net/hrv)
All of the "Church Fathers", both East and West, testified to the
Semitic origin of at least the Book of Matthew, as the following
@ -106,7 +107,7 @@ would disagree with him. (Epiphanius; Pan. 30:3) The truth in this
matter is clear, if Greek had replaced Hebrew as the language of Jews
as early as the first century, then why would fourth century Jews have
any need for Hebrew translations. The very existence of Hebrew
manuscripts of these books in fourth century Israel testifies to their
manuscripts of these books in fourth century Palestine testifies to their
originality, not to mention the fact that the Jewish believers
regarded them as authentic.
@ -228,31 +229,34 @@ the setting forth of the preaching of the Gospel into the New
Testament, in the Hebrew language and letters."
(Epiphanius, Pan. 30:3)
Epiphanius does however, tell us, that the Yehudish believers would disagree
with him, and point out the existence of Hebrew copies of Yo-Khawnawn and Acts
in a "Gaza" or "treasury" [Genizah?] in Tiberius, Yisra-Ail.#14 Epiphanius
believed these versions to be mere "translations,"#15 but admitted that the
Yehudish believers disagreed with him.#16 The truth in this matter is clear:
If Greek had replaced Hebrew as the language of Yehudeem as early as the 1st
Century, then why would fourth century Yehudeem have any need for Hebrew
translations. The very existence of Hebrew manuscripts of these books in 4th
Century, testifies to their originality, not to mention the fact that
the Yehudish believers regarded them as authentic. Also not only does the Church
of the East testify that they received the Gospels directly from the Apostles in
a Semitic, not Greek, language but the Targums [Commentaries] of the Hebrew
Scriptures are all written in Aramaic! So if the Hebrew people had been so
familiar with Greek why would they need Commentaries of the Scriptures in
Aramaic? Would they not known Aramaic? And if Aramaic had also fallen to the
wayside why are there still people to this day still using it handed down
to them from antiquities?
#14 Epipnanius, Pan. 30:3, 6
#15 Epiphanius, Pan. 30:3, 6, 12
#16 Epiphanius, Pan. 30:3
Epiphanius does however, tell us, that the Yehudish believers would
disagree with him, and point out the existence of Hebrew copies of
Yo-Khawnawn and Acts in a "Gaza" or "treasury" [Genizah?] in Tiberius,
Yisra-Ail. ( Epipnanius, Pan. 30:3, 6) Epiphanius believed these
versions to be mere "translations," (Epiphanius, Pan. 30:3, 6, 12) but
admitted that the Yehudish believers disagreed with him. (Epiphanius, Pan. 30:3)
The truth in this matter is clear: If Greek had replaced Hebrew as the
language of Yehudeem as early as the 1st Century, then why would
fourth century Yehudeem have any need for Hebrew translations. The
very existence of Hebrew manuscripts of these books in 4th Century,
testifies to their originality, not to mention the fact that the
Yehudish believers regarded them as authentic. Also not only does the
Church of the East testify that they received the Gospels directly
from the Apostles in a Semitic, not Greek, language but the Targums
[Commentaries] of the Hebrew Scriptures are all written in Aramaic! So
if the Hebrew people had been so familiar with Greek why would they
need Commentaries of the Scriptures in Aramaic? Would they not known
Aramaic? And if Aramaic had also fallen to the wayside why are there
still people to this day still using it handed down to them from
antiquities?
* Eusebius; Eccl. History
https://archive.org/download/eusebiusecclesia0000euse/eusebiusecclesia0000euse.pdf
- Eusebius; Eccl. History
[archive.org/download/eusebiusecclesia0000euse/eusebiusecclesia0000euse.pdf](https://archive.org/download/eusebiusecclesia0000euse/eusebiusecclesia0000euse.pdf)
#### Some References on the Web
@ -263,59 +267,62 @@ by Steven Avery:
Ron Jones and the Titus Institute
http://hebrewgospel.com/Jeromes Scholarly Speculation.php
==========================
----
For this one the scholarship is fine, but very limited
The Hebrew gospel of Matthew.
Ben Smith
http://www.textexcavation.com/hebrewmatthew.html
[http://www.textexcavation.com/hebrewmatthew.html](http://www.textexcavation.com/hebrewmatthew.html)
This next one is uneven, I will try to look it over.
HEBREW MATTHEW - Shem Tob - du Tillet - Munster
Are we to believe and trust these references by Origen and his student Eusebius?
Malachi
http://oneinmessiah.net/HEBREWMATTHEW.htm
[http://oneinmessiah.net/HEBREWMATTHEW.htm](http://oneinmessiah.net/HEBREWMATTHEW.htm)
Introduction to the New Testament
Johann Michaelis
http://books.google.com/books?id=sLAXAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA146
[http://books.google.com/books?id=sLAXAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA146](http://books.google.com/books?id=sLAXAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA146)
p. 145-194 and more, even DuTillet and Muenster on p. 185
Nazarene Jewish Christianity by Ray Pritz has a lot of fine material, but he does not seem to have a clear section just on this topic.
Nazarene Jewish Christianity: From the End of the New Testament Period Until Its Disappearance in the Fourth Century (1988)
Ray Pritz
https://books.google.com/books?id=vh84AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA93
[books.google.com/books?id=vh84AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA93](https://books.google.com/books?id=vh84AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA93)
The page there that is of the most interest we have captured as
[[HebrewMatthewShemTob]] and clearly show the Pharisitical changes to the
middle-aged Hebrew Matthew by Shem Tob - du Tillet - Munster.
### Links
---
**Links**
* [Hebrew Dialect of Aramaic](http://www.peshitta.org/for/showthread.php?tid=820)
* [Jerome and the Hebrew Matthew - (not canonical Matthew)](https://purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/jerome-and-the-hebrew-matthew-not-canonical-matthew.543/)
* [original-gospel-of-matthew-knol.html](.../Hebrew-Matthew/original-gospel-of-matthew-knol.html)
* https://gnosis.study/library/%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0/ENG/Epiphanius%20of%20Salamis%20-%20The%20Panarion,%20Book%20I%20(Sects%201-46).pdf
* https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/gospelebionites.html
### JWO Videos
- [Hebrew Dialect of Aramaic](http://www.peshitta.org/for/showthread.php?tid=820)
- [Jerome and the Hebrew Matthew - (not canonical Matthew)](https://purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/jerome-and-the-hebrew-matthew-not-canonical-matthew.543/)
- [original-gospel-of-matthew-knol.html](.../Hebrew-Matthew/original-gospel-of-matthew-knol.html)
- [gnosis.study/library/%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0/ENG/Epiphanius%20of%20Salamis%20-%20The%20Panarion,%20Book%20I%20(Sects%201-46).pdf](https://gnosis.study/library/%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0/ENG/Epiphanius%20of%20Salamis%20-%20The%20Panarion,%20Book%20I%20(Sects%201-46).pdf)
- [www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/gospelebionites.html](https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/gospelebionites.html)
* [20220718@Habakkuk and Paul Series Ep 1 - Did Paul Know Ebionites Thought Habakkuk 2 4 Applied to Him@kjENiaJhfdw](https://youtube.com/watch?v=kjENiaJhfdw)
* [20220823@The Return of the Ebionites the Dead Sea Scrolls -2 featuring Peter s Testimony at Paul s Trial.@AUxveYgBYSo](https://youtube.com/watch?v=AUxveYgBYSo)
* [20220823@The Return of the Ebionites the Dead Sea Scrolls - Ep. 1 God Vindicates the Ebion Against Smears.@TbuR4ongLW0](https://youtube.com/watch?v=TbuR4ongLW0)
* [20220826@The Return of the Ebionites the Dead Sea Scrolls DSS - Ep 3 The Ebionites Conflict with Paul in DSS@qZ4ksdQmgZk](https://youtube.com/watch?v=qZ4ksdQmgZk)
* [20220912@Gray Omits Any Mention of Clementine Homilies - Earliest Major Anti-Pauline Work of Ebion Ep 12@4WWTlY5OeHQ](https://youtube.com/watch?v=4WWTlY5OeHQ)
* [20220913@Gray Incredibly Omits Greatest Discovery of Anti-Paul Works of Ebion among Dead Sea Scrolls - Ep 14.@erSxdlRvrHw](https://youtube.com/watch?v=erSxdlRvrHw)
* [20220916@Gray Gives Short Shrift to Ebion -- 12 apostles who found Paul apostate vs Jesus Law. Ep 10@nMSnlHXwlSs](https://youtube.com/watch?v=nMSnlHXwlSs)
* [20220923@Baigent s Dead Sea Scrolls Deception 1991 Revisited. Then 1992 Reveal of Spouter of Lies vs Ebion.@TREbPpbIDQA](https://youtube.com/watch?v=TREbPpbIDQA)
* [20220926@Does Paul Eviscerate All of God s Law in All 5 Books of Moses in Gal. 3 What did Ebion Think of It@JwyJe8 HJf0](https://youtube.com/watch?v=JwyJe8_HJf0)
* [20220927@Why Did Ebionites ask Help of Symmachus on Virgin Birth Issue in Greek Translation of Matthew@tLNYgyvhckI](https://youtube.com/watch?v=tLNYgyvhckI)
* [20221110@Did Apostles turn Anti Paul Believe Joseph was Father link to David Who were the Ebionites Ep1@2AypJTAAMUw](https://youtube.com/watch?v=2AypJTAAMUw)
* [20230611@Peter s Letter to James James Reply Ebionite Writings@tFMmp9tYrFw](https://youtube.com/watch?v=tFMmp9tYrFw)
* [20230826@Dead Sea Scrolls prove Paul rejected by 12 James - Christian Ebion Proven from Texts. Ep 2.@97T41UDqm5A](https://youtube.com/watch?v=97T41UDqm5A)
---
**JWO Videos**
* [Early Church View of Law Prove Following Jesus not Paul@](https://youtube.com/watch?v=vXMTKglCiew)
- [20220718@Habakkuk and Paul Series Ep 1 - Did Paul Know Ebionites Thought Habakkuk 2 4 Applied to Him@kjENiaJhfdw](https://youtube.com/watch?v=kjENiaJhfdw)
- [20220823@The Return of the Ebionites the Dead Sea Scrolls -2 featuring Peter s Testimony at Paul s Trial.@AUxveYgBYSo](https://youtube.com/watch?v=AUxveYgBYSo)
- [20220823@The Return of the Ebionites the Dead Sea Scrolls - Ep. 1 God Vindicates the Ebion Against Smears.@TbuR4ongLW0](https://youtube.com/watch?v=TbuR4ongLW0)
- [20220826@The Return of the Ebionites the Dead Sea Scrolls DSS - Ep 3 The Ebionites Conflict with Paul in DSS@qZ4ksdQmgZk](https://youtube.com/watch?v=qZ4ksdQmgZk)
- [20220912@Gray Omits Any Mention of Clementine Homilies - Earliest Major Anti-Pauline Work of Ebion Ep 12@4WWTlY5OeHQ](https://youtube.com/watch?v=4WWTlY5OeHQ)
- [20220913@Gray Incredibly Omits Greatest Discovery of Anti-Paul Works of Ebion among Dead Sea Scrolls - Ep 14.@erSxdlRvrHw](https://youtube.com/watch?v=erSxdlRvrHw)
- [20220916@Gray Gives Short Shrift to Ebion -- 12 apostles who found Paul apostate vs Jesus Law. Ep 10@nMSnlHXwlSs](https://youtube.com/watch?v=nMSnlHXwlSs)
- [20220923@Baigent s Dead Sea Scrolls Deception 1991 Revisited. Then 1992 Reveal of Spouter of Lies vs Ebion.@TREbPpbIDQA](https://youtube.com/watch?v=TREbPpbIDQA)
- [20220926@Does Paul Eviscerate All of God s Law in All 5 Books of Moses in Gal. 3 What did Ebion Think of It@JwyJe8 HJf0](https://youtube.com/watch?v=JwyJe8_HJf0)
- [20220927@Why Did Ebionites ask Help of Symmachus on Virgin Birth Issue in Greek Translation of Matthew@tLNYgyvhckI](https://youtube.com/watch?v=tLNYgyvhckI)
- [20221110@Did Apostles turn Anti Paul Believe Joseph was Father link to David Who were the Ebionites Ep1@2AypJTAAMUw](https://youtube.com/watch?v=2AypJTAAMUw)
- [20230611@Peter s Letter to James James Reply Ebionite Writings@tFMmp9tYrFw](https://youtube.com/watch?v=tFMmp9tYrFw)
- [20230826@Dead Sea Scrolls prove Paul rejected by 12 James - Christian Ebion Proven from Texts. Ep 2.@97T41UDqm5A](https://youtube.com/watch?v=97T41UDqm5A)
- [Early Church View of Law Prove Following Jesus not Paul@](https://youtube.com/watch?v=vXMTKglCiew)
---
[[Home]] [[TitleIndex]]

101
EbioniteCanon.md

@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
<!-- -*-mode: text; fill-column: 75; tab-width: 8; coding: utf-8-unix -*- -->
Parent: [[Home]]
Parent:: [[EbioniteCanon]]
Each church or congregation defines it's own canon: the Copts and the Ethiopians
and the Assyrian Church of the East all have canons that differ from the Roman.
(Even Luther was trying to make his own canon for a while.) And we don't see much
debate having gone into the Roman one - it's basically what Athanasius put out
in a pastoral letter that was adopted at the Synod at Carthage.
So we are free to make our own.
Each church or congregation defines it's own canon: the Copts and the
Ethiopians and the Assyrian Apostolic Church of the East all have canons
that differ from the Roman. (Even Luther was trying to make his own canon
for a while.) And we don't see much debate having gone into the Roman one -
it's basically what Athanasius put out in a pastoral letter that was
adopted at the synod then council at Carthage. So we are free to make our own.
The Ebionites according to
The Ebionæans according to
[Epiphanius in Panarion Book 1 30.13.6](https://gnosis.study/library/%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0/ENG/Epiphanius%20of%20Salamis%20-%20The%20Panarion,%20Book%20I%20(Sects%201-46).pdf)
had a Matthew without our first
2 chapters. Which means no virgin birth (something there is no strong need for)
@ -17,18 +17,11 @@ which means that Jesus' father was Joseph. That result is Jesus
is of the Davidic line, which is a Hebrew prerequisite for being a Messiah.
(Which may be the whole point for adding it to the early christian Matthew.)
If we build on the Ebionites we can start with Matthew, without the
first 2 chapters:
[Epiphanius in Panarion Book 1 30.13.6](https://gnosis.study/library/%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0/ENG/Epiphanius%20of%20Salamis%20-%20The%20Panarion,%20Book%20I%20(Sects%201-46).pdf)
The Ebionites held that Jesus was born a man by Joseph, and acquired His
divine qualities by the Holy Spirit at his baptism.
The Ebionites held that Jesus acquired his divinity at his baptism:
"this day I have begotten thee". The Holy Spirit was that dove that
entered him by God's will, hence they're non/anti-Trinitarian, as was
the early church - Tertullian et al. The Ebionites celebrate
Epiphany as celebration of His baptism by the Holy Spirit, and did not
practice paedobaptism.dx
The Ebionæans held that He acquired his divinity at his baptism: "this day
I have begotten thee". The Holy Spirit was that dove that entered him by
God's will, hence they're non/anti-Trinitarian, as was the early church -
see Tertullian et al. The Ebionæans celebrate Epiphany as celebration of
His baptism by the Holy Spirit, and did not practice paedobaptism.
We read Acts as a historical document, being a brief to the Roman
procecutor of Paul, intended to help get Paul acquitted, and hence avoid
@ -55,10 +48,10 @@ James or Jude, so you could follow the ACoE and drop those 5. (On the other
hand, they may be absent from the CoE canon because they were not yet
circulating at the time the canon was finalized, < 180 AD.)
Similar to the [approach of Carlstadt](.../JWO/carlstadt-research.html)
Similar to the [approach of Carlstadt](.../carlstadt-research.html)
at the beginning of the reformation, we could order the books by
importance, or rate them on a scale of 1-10 (lowest most important),
with Matthew the sole 1, and those 5 books further down the list.
with Matthew the sole 1, and the others books further down the list.
Anything attributed to Paul is probably written later by the Marcionites,
e.g. (1Cor. 15:26) - we ask if [[DidMarcionWritePaulsLetters]]?
@ -68,27 +61,42 @@ So we can add [[TheDidache]] as a community rule, and perhaps things from of
the NagHamadhi library; there have been more early texts discovered in the last
180 years, than in the previous 1800!
The Ebionæans were said to refer to Luke, but there's no mention of them
refering to Mark or John. John is not a synoptic gospel, so including it adds
a lot. The same cannot be said of Mark, which has the feel of a synoptic edited
to lessen the conflict between Christ and Paul's teachings, or
[but rather that the teachings come from Paul himself, not Jesus](http://www.decipheringthegospels.com/examples.html). We can leave it out or score it low.
Is Hebrews Pauline? We think not. Tertullian says it was by Barnabas.
What are the other Ebionite Writings? See [[RecentCanonAdditions]].
### Preliminary Canon
(In some kind of rough order):
[https://earlywritings.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=11226](In some kind of rough order):
1. Gospel of Matthew ( >= ch. 3 )
2. Gospel of Luke ( >= ch. 3 )
3. Book of Acts - as history
4. The Didache - as a community rule, not as scripture
1. Gospel of [[EarlyEbioniteMatthew]] ( >= ch. 3 )
2. Gospel of Luke (Irenaeus reported the Ebionites did use Luke)
3. Gospel of John (more important than Luke according to Tertullian)
4. Gospel of Mark (less important than Luke - edited to lessen the conflict with Paul)
5. Gospel of James (clarifies the Ebionite position on works.)
5. Gospel of Jude (clarifies the Ebionite position on Paul.)?
6. Book of Acts - as history; (Irenaeus reported the Ebionites did not use Acts)
7. The rest of the Church of the East canon including Hebrews
8. [[GospelOfThomas]] - from the NagHammadi Library
9. [[GospelOfPhilip]] - from the NagHammadi Library
10. [[TheDidache]] - as a community rule, not as scripture
11. Syriac [[ClementineHomilees]] - as history
12. Letter from [[PeterToJames]] (preface to the Homilies)
6. Gospel of Jude (clarifies the Ebionite position on Paul.)
7. The rest of the non-Fauline letters including Hebrews
8. Book of Revelations (clarifies the Ebionite position on Paul.)
9. Gospel of John
10. Gospel Of Thomas - from the Nag Hammadi Library
11*. Gospel Of Philip - from the Nag Hammadi Library (tentative)
99. Gospel of Mark (has been edited to lessen the conflict with Paul)
Apochrapha:
101. Clementine Homilees - not Rufinized, as historical fiction?
102. Letter from Peter To James (preface to the Homilies)
A criteria for the inclusion of works into our Canon is that they refer for
doctorine to the Gospel of Matthew, so we can show the interrelatedness
@ -101,15 +109,26 @@ that we can use different translations and base texts. There may be
more than one recommended translation, and we think one has to include
KJV1611 in the set as a cross-reference.
### JWO Web Pages
[The opening of Mark really Marcion's?](https://earlywritings.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=11172)
* [[Luke-is-a-Legitimate-Gospel-History]](.../recommendedreading/465-luke-is-a-legitimate-gospel-history.html)
I'm continuously struck by the degree to which the Gospel of Mark appears to more closely align with the theology of Marcion,
### JWO Videos
We certainly see Mark as edited with respect to Matthew to edit out the
conflicts between itand the Paulines.
* 20221118 [A Protestant Critique of 1546 Council of Trent as Invalid. Proves NT Unsettled as of Nicea Later.@](https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZmOBBiBYgZE)
* 20221118 [Paul was Excluded from First Canon Never Accepted Until Purported Universal Decision in 1543@297DKDiZdAE](https://youtube.com/watch?v=297DKDiZdAE)
* [20230603@What are the surviving manuscripts of New Testament Ep 1 When Did Censorship Begin of NT Bible@9tNVE7ekNEM](https://youtube.com/watch?v=9tNVE7ekNEM)
---
**JWO Web Pages**
- [[Luke-is-a-Legitimate-Gospel-History]](.../recommendedreading/465-luke-is-a-legitimate-gospel-history.html)
---
**JWO Videos**
- 20221118 [A Protestant Critique of 1546 Council of Trent as Invalid. Proves NT Unsettled as of Nicea Later.@](https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZmOBBiBYgZE)
- 20221118 [Paul was Excluded from First Canon Never Accepted Until Purported Universal Decision in 1543@297DKDiZdAE](https://youtube.com/watch?v=297DKDiZdAE)
- [20230603@What are the surviving manuscripts of New Testament Ep 1 When Did Censorship Begin of NT Bible@9tNVE7ekNEM](https://youtube.com/watch?v=9tNVE7ekNEM)
---
[[Home]] [[TitleIndex]]

114
EbioniteChristianity.md

@ -1,29 +1,29 @@
<!-- -*-mode: text; fill-column: 75; tab-width: 8; coding: utf-8-unix -*- -->
Parent: [[Home]]
Parent:: [[Home]]
## Ebonite Christianity
We are led by the Apostles with James and followers of their followers,
who later fled to Pella just before the sack of Jerusalem in 70 AD,
and in time expanded ro Antioch.
* [[EarlyEbioniteMatthew]] Early Church "Fathers" on the Primacy of a Hebrew Dialect Matthew
* [[BnaiAmenEbionites]] The Ebionites were the early branch of "Jewish Christianity" led
- [[EarlyEbioniteMatthew]] Early Church "Fathers" on the Primacy of a Hebrew Dialect Matthew
- [[BnaiAmenEbionaens]] The Ebionæans were the early branch of "Jewish Christianity" led
by James, the brother of Jesus in Jerusalem.
The Early Church of the 12 Apostles, under James the brother of Jesus in
Jerusalem, held to the Mosaic law, including:
* the commandments of Moses
* the weekly Sabbath
* the Hebrew feasts of Passover, Pentecost, and Tabernacles
* the law of circumcision
- the commandments of Moses
- the weekly Sabbath
- the Hebrew feasts of Passover, Pentecost, and Tabernacles
- the law of circumcision
As Christians, we continue the traditions of the Early Church.
* the commandments of Moses are commandments of all time. To this we add:
* Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thine heart, with all thy soul,
- the commandments of Moses are commandments of all time. To this we add:
- Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thine heart, with all thy soul,
and with all thy mind. (Matt. 22:37)
* the Sabbath day is a day of rest to be celebrated with the congregation
- the Sabbath day is a day of rest to be celebrated with the congregation
and familiy. The day of the Sabbath is determined by the day of the week
that is the first day of the week in the country you are in: if the first
day of the work week is Monday, then the Sabbath is Sunday. Some groups
@ -34,56 +34,68 @@ As Christians, we continue the traditions of the Early Church.
livestock, is always allowed.
As Christians:
* we celebrate Passover as the rememberance of the Cruxifiction
in addition to the Seders of the Hebrews (Luke 22:19); we keep
the feast of the unleavened bread.
* we also celebrate Ephiphany, celebrating the baptism of Christ.
* we also celebrate Pentecost, the Hebrew feast of Sukkoth.
* we do not celebrate Xmas, which is a pagan holiday celebrating
the birth of Sol Invictus.
* we do not adopt [[ConstantinianChurch]] Cross as symbol: if we have a symbol
it is likely to be the sword (Matt. 10:34).
- we celebrate Passover as the rememberance of the Cruxifiction
in addition to the Seders of the Hebrews (Luke 22:19); we keep
the feast of the unleavened bread.
- we also celebrate Ephiphany, celebrating the baptism of Christ.
- we also celebrate Pentecost, the Hebrew feast of Sukkoth.
- we do not celebrate Xmas, which is a pagan holiday celebrating
the birth of Sol Invictus.
- we do not adopt [[ConstantinianChurch]] Cross (or pagan ChiRho) as symbol:
if we have a symbol it is likely to be the sword (Matt. 10:34).
Our [[EbioniteCanon]] follows that of the Jamesian church and
* puts the primacy on the Gospel of Matthew, without the first 2 chapters
* rejects the Paulines of [[PaulApostleOfTheHeretics]].
* We set as a criteria for inclusion into our Canon the synergy with the
Gospel of Matthew.
* The law of circumcision applies and is encouraged for infants,
but we do not hold it to be a requirement for fellowship, nor is it
considered a ritual to be done in a special manner by a special person.
* The law of matriarcical heritage was not held by all Hebrew groups,
and was not detailed in the Pentauch as far as we know. It is of a lesser
importance to us a Christians in that we do not hold that one must be
a Christian (or Hebrew) by birth for fellowship.
- puts the primacy on the Gospel of Matthew, without the first 2 chapters
- rejects the Paulines of [[PaulApostleOfTheHeretics]].
- Lacks the first 2 chapters of Matthew and Luke, as ignore the notion
of a [[VirginBirth]], and hold that Jesus acquired his divinity at his baptism.
- We set as a criteria for inclusion into our Canon the synergy with the
Gospel of Matthew.
- The law of circumcision applies and is encouraged for infants,
but we do not hold it to be a requirement for fellowship, nor is it
considered a ritual to be done in a special manner by a special person.
- The law of matriarcical heritage was not held by all Hebrew groups,
and was not detailed in the Pentauch as far as we know. It is of a lesser
importance to us a Christians in that we do not hold that one must be
a Christian (or Hebrew) by birth for fellowship.
We are for life, and against death:
* we oppose all forms of abortion
* we oppose all forms of euthanasia
* we oppose the death penalty
* we are Concientious Objectors - we fight War, but will defend ourselves.
- we oppose all forms of abortion
- we oppose all forms of euthanasia
- we oppose extra-judicial executuions by the military or secret services
- we oppose the death penalty
- we are Concientious Objectors - we fight War, but will defend ourselves.
We place an emphasis on what Jesus was known for - Healing:
* Concientious Objectors to pHarma
* Seek remedies to enhance our God-given Natural Healing abilities
* Follow the Christian practices of healing where possible, with healing circles.
- Concientious Objectors to pHarma
- Seek remedies to enhance our God-given Natural Healing abilities
- Follow the Christian practices of healing where possible, with healing circles.
## JWO Videos
---
**JWO Videos**
* 20221119 [Early Church View of Law Prove Following Jesus not Paul@](https://youtube.com/watch?v=vXMTKglCiew)
* 20220718 [Habakkuk and Paul Series Ep 1 - Did Paul Know Ebionites Thought Habakkuk 2 4 Applied to Him@kjENiaJhfdw](https://youtube.com/watch?v=kjENiaJhfdw)
* 20220823 [The Return of the Ebionites the Dead Sea Scrolls - Ep. 1 God Vindicates the Ebion Against Smears.@TbuR4ongLW0](https://youtube.com/watch?v=TbuR4ongLW0)
* 20220823 [The Return of the Ebionites the Dead Sea Scrolls -2 featuring Peter s Testimony at Paul s Trial.@AUxveYgBYSo](https://youtube.com/watch?v=AUxveYgBYSo)
* 20220826 [The Return of the Ebionites the Dead Sea Scrolls DSS - Ep 3 The Ebionites Conflict with Paul in DSS@qZ4ksdQmgZk](https://youtube.com/watch?v=qZ4ksdQmgZk)
* 20220927 [Why Did Ebionites ask Help of Symmachus on Virgin Birth Issue in Greek Translation of Matthew@tLNYgyvhckI](https://youtube.com/watch?v=tLNYgyvhckI)
* 20221110 [Did Apostles turn Anti Paul Believe Joseph was Father link to David Who were the Ebionites Ep1@2AypJTAAMUw](https://youtube.com/watch?v=2AypJTAAMUw)
* 20230611 [Peter s Letter to James James Reply Ebionite Writings@tFMmp9tYrFw](https://youtube.com/watch?v=tFMmp9tYrFw)
* 20221110 [[Did_Apostles_turn_Anti_Paul_Believe_Joseph_was_Father_link_to_David_Who_were_the_Ebionites_Ep1@2AypJTAAMUw]](https://youtube.com/watch?v=2AypJTAAMUw)
### Links
- 20221119 [Early Church View of Law Prove Following Jesus not Paul@](https://youtube.com/watch?v=vXMTKglCiew)
- 20220718 [Habakkuk and Paul Series Ep 1 - Did Paul Know Ebionæans Thought Habakkuk 2 4 Applied to Him@kjENiaJhfdw](https://youtube.com/watch?v=kjENiaJhfdw)
- 20220823 [The Return of the Ebionæans the Dead Sea Scrolls - Ep. 1 God Vindicates the Ebion Against Smears.@TbuR4ongLW0](https://youtube.com/watch?v=TbuR4ongLW0)
- 20220823 [The Return of the Ebionæans the Dead Sea Scrolls -2 featuring Peter s Testimony at Paul s Trial.@AUxveYgBYSo](https://youtube.com/watch?v=AUxveYgBYSo)
- 20220826 [The Return of the Ebionæans the Dead Sea Scrolls DSS - Ep 3 The Ebionæans Conflict with Paul in DSS@qZ4ksdQmgZk](https://youtube.com/watch?v=qZ4ksdQmgZk)
- 20220927 [Why Did Ebionæans ask Help of Symmachus on Virgin Birth Issue in Greek Translation of Matthew@tLNYgyvhckI](https://youtube.com/watch?v=tLNYgyvhckI)
- 20221110 [Did Apostles turn Anti Paul Believe Joseph was Father link to David Who were the Ebionæans Ep1@2AypJTAAMUw](https://youtube.com/watch?v=2AypJTAAMUw)
- 20230611 [Peter s Letter to James James Reply Ebionite Writings@tFMmp9tYrFw](https://youtube.com/watch?v=tFMmp9tYrFw)
- 20221110 [[Did_Apostles_turn_Anti_Paul_Believe_Joseph_was_Father_link_to_David_Who_were_the_Ebionæans_Ep1@2AypJTAAMUw]](https://youtube.com/watch?v=2AypJTAAMUw)
* http://web.archive.org/web/20110812012016/http%3A/www.preteristarchive.com/Books/pdf/1842_boardman_church-of-james.pdf
---
**Links**
- [http://web.archive.org/web/20110812012016/http%3A/www.preteristarchive.com/Books/pdf/1842_boardman_church-of-james.pdf](http://web.archive.org/web/20110812012016/http%3A/www.preteristarchive.com/Books/pdf/1842_boardman_church-of-james.pdf)
---
PS: [Rosh Hashanah is a hoax](https://talmudical.blogspot.com/2010/09/truth-about-talmud.html);
a man-made tradition masquerading as being of Old Testament origin. Rosh
Hashanah as the start of a “Biblical New Year” is a bogus rabbinic
tradition falsely ascribed to the Word of God.
[[Home]] [[TitleIndex]]

22
EbioniteWebFriends.md

@ -1,23 +1,29 @@
Parent: [[Home]]
<!-- -*- mode: text; fill-column: 75; tab-width: 8; coding: utf-8-unix -*- -->
## Friends Sympathetic to Ebionite Christianity
Parent:: [[Home]]
### Douglas Del Tonto
## Friends on the Web Sympathetic to Ebionite Christianity
We draw tremendous inspiration from Douglas Del Tonto's work starting with a book
### Douglas Del Tondo
We draw tremendous inspiration from Douglas Del Tondo's work starting with a book
titled "Jesus' Words Only" that places the emphasis for Christianity on
"Sola Scriptura". He had [a website](https://jesuswordsonly.com) but that is
now gone. His book was available on the site for free-download in PDF and is on
[archive.org](https://archive.org/download/JesusWordsOnlyOrWasPaulTheApostleJesusCondemnsInRevelation22)
[archive.org](https://archive.org/download/JesusWordsOnlyOrWasPaulTheApostleJesusCondemnsInRevelation22) We have translated it into Wiki syntax: [[JesusWordsOnly]]
### Forrest Marready
* [protarian.org](https://protarian.org)
An author who feels that he has an Incredible Opinion: and indeed he has.
His documentary [Are You Crooked?](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lf8fdiU1Qk)
is [[RequiredWatching]].
- [protarian.org](https://protarian.org)
### Assyrian Holy Apostoloc Church of the East
* https://www.atour.com/
* https://aim.atour.com/
- [www.atour.com/](https://www.atour.com/)
- [aim.atour.com/](https://aim.atour.com/)
### Friends we hope to meet

1
Greek_SinaiticusCommentary.md Symbolic link

@ -0,0 +1 @@
Greek_SinaiticusCommentary.wiki

1
HealingCommentary.md Symbolic link

@ -0,0 +1 @@
HealingCommentary.wiki

35
HebrewMatthewShemTob.md

@ -1,22 +1,23 @@
Parent: [[RichardRives]]
<!-- -*- mode: text; fill-column: 75; tab-width: 8; coding: utf-8-unix -*- -->
## HEBREW MATTHEW - Shem Tob - du Tillet - Munster
Parent:: [[RichardRives]]
From: Http://oneinmessiah.net/HEBREWMATTHEW.htm
## Hebrew Matthew - Shem Tob - du Tillet - Munster
Info on this page taken from my studies, www.seekgod.ca/roodnewsflash.htm,
by Vicky Dillen and a good brother in the Lord, [[Richard Rives]]. His website
is https://www.toolong.com, check it out!
From: [oneinmessiah.net/HEBREWMATTHEW.htm](http://oneinmessiah.net/HEBREWMATTHEW.htm)
Info on this page taken from [my studies(https://www.seekgod.ca/roodnewsflash.htm),
by Vicky Dillen and a good brother in the Lord, [[RichardRives]]. His website
is [www.toolong.com,](https://www.toolong.com,) check it out!
Beware of those who present the Shem Tob version of Matthew as an accurate
representation of a manuscript.
Many believers in Messiah Yeshua are being led by unbelievers to accept an
unscriptual version of pseudo Hebrew Matthew which was found as a part of a
polemic document entitled Eban Bohan. This document was authored by Shem
Tob, an unbelieving Jewish theologian.
Many unbelievers are going around the country promoting this trash.
Many believers in Messiah Yeshua are being led by unbelievers to
accept an unscriptual version of pseudo Hebrew Matthew which was found
as a part of a polemic document entitled Eban Bohan. This document was
authored by Shem Tob, an unbelieving Jewish theologian.Many
unbelievers are going around the country promoting this trash.
Quoting Professor George Howard, translator of Shem Tob:
@ -354,7 +355,7 @@ you: and, lo "I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world" Amen
Shem Tob - and teach them to carry out all the things which I have commanded
you forever.
-----------
---
Quoting Professor George Howard, translator of Shem Tob:
@ -364,10 +365,12 @@ Quoting Professor George Howard, translator of Shem Tob:
traits), --- Shem-Tob’s text envisions the salvation of the Gentiles only in
the Messianic era.
### Links
---
**Links**
* https://purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/the-shem-tob-hebrew-matthew-used-for-sinaiticus.997/
* [[JwoHebrewMatthew]]
- [purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/the-shem-tob-hebrew-matthew-used-for-sinaiticus.997/](https://purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/the-shem-tob-hebrew-matthew-used-for-sinaiticus.997/)
- [[JwoHebrewMatthew]]
---
[[Home]] [[TitleIndex]]

46
Home.md

@ -6,53 +6,53 @@ It's time for Christianity 2.0.
### Inspired by Early Christianity
* We following the [[EbioniteChristianity]] of Jesus' brother James and the Apostles,
- We following the [[EbioniteChristianity]] of Jesus' brother James and the Apostles,
until his murder by the Sadducees and Pharisees in ~63 AD.
* we are followers of James, and followers of their followers the Ebionites,
- we are followers of James, and followers of their followers the Ebionites,
who later fled to Pella just before the sack of Jerusalem in 70 AD.
* we hold to the Mosaic law, and reject the teachings of the Pharisees.
* We have a revised [[EbioniteCanon]], augmented by [[RecentCanonAdditions]].
* We are montheistic and anti-pagan.
* We follow their rejection of Paul as an Apostate as shown in Acts,
- we hold to the Mosaic law, and reject the teachings of the Pharisees.
- We have a revised [[EbioniteCanon]], augmented by [[RecentCanonAdditions]].
- We are montheistic and anti-pagan.
- We follow their rejection of Paul as the [[PaulApostleOfTheHeretics]],
and we reject the "Pauline" Epistles: we ask [[DidMarcionWritePaulsLetters]].
### Inspired by Jesus Christ
* We emphasize Christianity as the Way of God in Spirit and in Truth.
* We hold to an intense, literal understanding of the first commandment:
- We emphasize Christianity as the Way of God in Spirit and in Truth.
- We hold to an intense monotheistic understanding of the first commandment:
"You shall have no other gods before Me". Because of that, we reject everything that
would deify anything other than God the Father as he’s described within scripture.
This means we do not think of Jesus Christ as an angel, God, or any
other deity, but a very special human being uniquely gifted by our Creator.
This means we acknowledge the Holy Spirit as the power of God himself, not a
separate deity.
* We are Conscientious Objectors - we fight War itself
* But we are not pacifists: Christ came not to bring Peace but the Sword.
* We place the Emphasis on what Jesus was known for - Healing:
* We are Conscientious Objectors to pHarma
* We seek remedies to enhance our God-given Natural Healing abilities
* We follow the Christian practices of healing where possible, with healing circles.
* we hope to learn the casting out of demons from the body politic
* We read the Bible but reject KJV Onlyism as a recipe for ignorance and
- We are Conscientious Objectors - we fight War itself
- But we are not pacifists: Christ came not to bring Peace but the Sword.
- We place the Emphasis on what Jesus was known for - Healing:
- We are Conscientious Objectors to pHarma
- We seek remedies to enhance our God-given Natural Healing abilities
- We follow the Christian practices of healing where possible, with healing circles.
- we hope to learn the casting out of demons from the body politic
- We read the Bible but reject KJV Onlyism as a recipe for ignorance and
a path to destruction.
* We each make our own covenant with God, without the intermediary of anyone ordained.
- We each make our own covenant with God, without the intermediary of anyone ordained.
See our [[StatementOfFaith]]
## Jesus' Words Only or Was Paul the Apostle Jesus Condemns in Revelation 2:2
We draw tremendous inspiration from Douglas Del Tonto's work:
* starting with a book entitled "[[JesusWordsOnly]]" that places the emphasis for
We draw tremendous inspiration from Douglas Del Tondo's work:
- starting with a book entitled "[[JesusWordsOnly]]" that places the emphasis for
Christianity on "Sola Scriptura".
* He had [a website](https://jesuswordsonly.com) but that is now gone.
* His book was available on the site for free-download in PDF and is on
- He had [a website](https://jesuswordsonly.com) but that is now gone.
- His book was available on the site for free-download in PDF and is on
[archive.org](https://archive.org/download/JesusWordsOnlyOrWasPaulTheApostleJesusCondemnsInRevelation22)
See our [[EbioniteWebFriends]].
### OSIS Bible Commentary
We are working on a commentary in OSIS bible format that can create Sword
We are working on [[CommentariesInOsis]] bible format that can create Sword
and ESword modules that can be used alongside any bible reading software.
We favour that as an approach rather than trying to emit a definitive bible
translation , as the base bibles vary greatly, and we still need to refer to
@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ the KJV for versification.
---
* [[WikiSoftware]]
- [[WikiSoftware]]
---

34
IntroToLukeVirginBirth.md

@ -1,10 +1,14 @@
<!-- -*-mode: text; fill-column: 75; tab-width: 8; coding: utf-8-unix -*- -->
Parent: [[VirginBirth]]
Parent:: [[VirginBirth]]
## How Do We know Virgin Birth Account was not Originally Present?
Bear in mind, the first two chapters are not in the [[EarlyEbioniteMatthew]],
and if Luke is subsequently derived from Matthew, they would not be in an
[[EbioniteCanon]] either.
From https://jesuswordsonly.com/topicindex/225-virgin-birth-issues.html
## How Do We know Virgin Birth Account was not Originally Present?
From [jesuswordsonly.com/topicindex/225-virgin-birth-issues.html](.../topicindex/225-virgin-birth-issues.html)
The one most important fact staring us in the face is the line of the
geneaology itself. Both Matthew and Luke are spending verse after
@ -14,7 +18,6 @@ Friedrich Delitzsch in 1908, a theologian, rhetorically asks 'why did
Matthew or Luke bother to trace as they did if it originally ended
with Mary as the sole human procreator of Jesus?' He wrote:
Common sense teaches us that these genealogies, whose sole aim is
to prove that Jesus is the son and descendent of David through
Joseph, the son and descendent of David, would be absolutely
@ -51,7 +54,7 @@ true family in Mark 3:34-35 which in their hearing was:  
And he looked round about on them which sat about him, and said,
Behold my mother and my brethren! For whosoever shall do the will of
God, the same is my brother, and my sister, and mother. Cf. Luke 8:21.
If Mary had really experienced a divine birth of Jesus, why would Mary
be apart from Jesus' ministry? Be thinking He was a bit touched? Why
would Jesus spurn his own mother, and call members of a crowd more a
@ -75,7 +78,7 @@ by reasoning that the Gospel portrays a very realistic situation that
can happen in any family where no one respects you. Tertullian
explained:
"The Lord's brethren had not yet believed in Him." [Quoting Luke.]
So is it contained in the Gospel which was published before
Marcion's time; whilst there is at the same time a want of
@ -87,7 +90,7 @@ explained:
strangers were intent on Him, His very nearest relatives were
absent. (Tertullian, The Flesh of Christ, ch. 5.)
Hence, we can take Tertullian's analysis and use it to question the
presence of the virgin birth story in Luke's original Gospel. How can
@ -115,15 +118,15 @@ advise of its importance, as recorded supposedly earlier? Obviously
not. Hence, the virgin birth account in Luke mismatches other portions
of Luke, indicating a successful early -- pre-325 AD -- corruption.
And if we regard the Ebionites as the custodians of the earliest
And if we regard the Ebionæans as the custodians of the earliest
Matthew in Hebrew, prior to the Greek translation, then the recording
in 180, 236 and when the Syriac Sinaiticus of Agnes Lewis (200s) of
having the view Joseph begat Jesus is just one more proof of how the
Gospel of Matthew originally read.
<!-- For the Ebionites' View on the Birth of Jesus, see our article "Ebionites." -->
<!-- For the Ebionæans' View on the Birth of Jesus, see our article "Ebionites." -->
=== Scholar Affirms That Later Editor Deliberately Corrupted Text to Add Virgin Birth
=== Scholar Affirms That Later Editor Deliberately Corrupted Text to Add Virgin Birth
This is agreed upon by J.R. Wilkinson - a renown Christian scholar of
@ -163,13 +166,11 @@ the old text," i.e., mixing mention of the "virgin Mary" in 1:16 with
"Joseph begat Jesus." So now it reads in Syr Sinaiticus 1:16 partly in
favor of a virgin birth and partly negating it.
The scholar Wilkinson earlier had agreed on why we are compelled to
believe both Matthew and Luke had to have something like "Joseph begat
Jesus." Otherwise, the point of the geneologies is lost:
believe both Matthew and Luke had to have something like "Joseph begat Jesus."
Otherwise, the point of the geneologies is lost:
[355] The text of Syrus Sinaiticus [of Agnes Lewis] alone seems to
The text of Syrus Sinaiticus [of Agnes Lewis] alone seems to
postulate such a clause [i.e., Joseph begat Jesus -- it is not
merely postulated but in the text]; and is it possible to believe
anyone would have taken the trouble to construct the long line of
@ -186,12 +187,9 @@ Jesus." Otherwise, the point of the geneologies is lost:
very clumsy correction), so as to render these genealogies
consistent with a virgin birth.
---
[[Home]] [[TitleIndex]]

74
JWO/JWO_23_01_Pdfs.md

@ -1,74 +0,0 @@
Parent: [[JesusWordsOnly]]
## Pdfs in Jesus Words Only
* https://aramaicnt.com/files/Jesus in Acts _5 versions_.pdf
* https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/60773/rchenaul_1.pdf
* https://ia600301.us.archive.org/26/items/Paulpaulus/Wrede-Paul.pdf
* https://images.csntm.org/Manuscripts/GA_1175/GA_1175.pdf
* https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/0741443570JWOS.pdf
* https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/Hebrew Matthew.pdf
* https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/The Problem of Paul.pdf
* https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/balaamprophecy.pdf
* https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/es app on enoch.pdf
* https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/es12 a.pdf
* https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/images/stories/JWOBook/Paul pamphlet-final2011.pdf
* https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/images/stories/JWOBook/Por_Qué_Jesús_No_Viene.pdf
* https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/images/stories/JWO_Online/ch15.pdf
* https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/images/stories/Lessons/Appendix on Founding Fathers.pdf
* https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/images/stories/Lessons/Easter.pdf
* https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/images/stories/Lessons/Easter.pdf
* https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/images/stories/Lessons/LutherCarlstadtAnabtistsJWOreformation splits.pdf
* https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/images/stories/Lessons/balaam prophecy for friends.pdf
* https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/images/stories/Lessons/es app on paul as evangelist.pdf
* https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/images/stories/Lessons/es app on tithing.pdf
* https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/images/stories/Lessons/es app on tithing.pdf
* https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/images/stories/Lessons/es15 aauthentbookrevelation.pdf
* https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/images/stories/Lessons/short_biography_of-jesus_without_miraculous_own_miracle.pdf
* https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/images/stories/Salvation/Conclusion.pdf
* https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/images/stories/Salvation/ConclusionChronolgyTableforonline.pdf
* https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/images/stories/Salvation/preface specially formatted.pdf
* https://larryhurtado.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/nt-in-second-century-essay2.pdf
* https://lothealing.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/HABAKKUK-PESHER-COMPLETED-WITH-NOTES.pdf
* https://planobiblechapel.org/tcon/notes/pdf
* https://planobiblechapel.org/tcon/notes/pdf/daniel.pdf
* https://rsc.byu.edu/sites/default/files/pub_content/pdf
* https://rsc.byu.edu/sites/default/files/pub_content/pdf/10 Roman Law Relating to the New Testament.pdf
* https://tmcdaniel.palmerseminary.edu/Volume4_ShemTob+.pdf
* https://trobisch.com/david/wb/media/material/PaulsLetterCollection chapter 1.pdf
* https://web.archive.org/web/20110812012016/http%3A/www.preteristarchive.com/Books/pdf
* https://web.archive.org/web/20110812012016/http%3A/www.preteristarchive.com/Books/pdf/1677_crowne_destruction-of-jerusalem_1873.pdf
* https://web.archive.org/web/20110812012016/http%3A/www.preteristarchive.com/Books/pdf/1842_boardman_church-of-james.pdf
* https://web.archive.org/web/20110812012016/http%3A/www.preteristarchive.com/Books/pdf/1873_renan_antichrist.pdf
* https://web.archive.org/web/20110812012016/http%3A/www.preteristarchive.com/Books/pdf/1891_steffler_sege-of-jerusalem.pdf
* https://web.archive.org/web/20110812012016/http%3A/www.preteristarchive.com/Books/pdf/1913_edmundson_church-rome_first-century.pdf
* https://web.archive.org/web/20210303174615/http_/www.biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf
* https://web.archive.org/web/20210303174615/http_/www.biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/heresy_skarsaune.pdf
* https://web.archive.org/web/20221013182926/http%3A/www.riksavisen.no/uploads/MohrGordon_Lost_tribes_of_Israel.pdf
* https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf03.pdf
* https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.pdf
* https://www.christian-history.org/support-files/ibwl-appendices-for-web.pdf
* https://www.ctsfw.net/media/pdfs/mackenziechallengeofhistory.pdf
* https://www.difa3iat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Eharman.pdf
* https://www.etsjets.org/files/JETS-PDFs/17/17-4/17-4-pp235-238_JETS.pdf
* https://www.etsjets.org/files/JETS-PDFs/47/47-1/47-1-pp071-088_JETS.pdf
* https://www.etsjets.org/files/JETS-PDFs/50/50-3/JETS_50-3_467-487_Graves.pdf
* https://www.health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015-scientific-report/PDFs/Scientific-Report-of-the-2015-Dietary-Guidelines-Advisory-Committee.pdf
* https://www.hisnameisyahweh.org/His Name is Yahweh.pdf
* https://www.ibiblio.org/freebiblecommentary/pdf
* https://www.ibiblio.org/freebiblecommentary/pdf/EN/VOL05.pdf
* https://www.ijfm.org/PDFs_IJFM/14_2_PDFs/03_Fuller_Bibl_Theo.pdf
* https://www.lutheranpress.com/docs/ACHP-fulltext.pdf
* https://www.lutheranpress.com/docs/HTLACL2-fulltext.pdf
* https://www.marcionite-scripture.info/Romans_Interlinear.pdf
* https://www.nonresistance.org/docs_pdf
* https://www.nonresistance.org/docs_pdf/Tolstoy/Church_and_State.pdf
* https://www.richardwaynegarganta.com/redating-testament.pdf
* https://www.roberteisenman.com/articles/Redating_the_Radio_Carbon_Dating_of_the_DSS.pdf
* https://www.thinkoutsidethebeast.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/TO-WEAR-A-_CHRISTIAN_-CROSS-OR-NOT.pdf
* https://www.truthmagazine.com/content/webpdf
* https://www.upper-register.com/papers/influence-of-LXX-on-GNT.pdf
* https://www.westcotthort.com/books/Westcott_Hort_Interlinear.pdf
* https://www.wholebible.com/PdfLibrary/covenantthinking.pdf
* https://www.willker.de/wie/TCG/TC-Luke.pdf
* https://www.yorku.ca/inpar/butler.pdf

23
JWO/JWO_01_01_Introduction_0002.md → JWO_01_01_Introduction_0002.md

@ -30,28 +30,37 @@ even true prophecy. They are not going to be notorious workers of
lawlessness. Such sinners could not deceive "if possible, the elect."
Rather, Jesus' real meaning could only be the second Greek dictionary
definition of anomia which is "negator of the Law (of Moses)." 1 The
false prophet who will do many miracles and signs and wonders in Jesus
' name will be one who is a "negator of the Law (of Moses)." Jesus is
false prophet who will do many miracles and signs and wonders in Jesus'
name will be one who is a "negator of the Law (of Moses)." Jesus is
warning us that this false prophet to come is one who says he is a
Christian, has sign and wonders, and preaches Christ, but he will be a
"negator of the Law of Moses."
Thus, for example, even if Paul came with true signs and wonders, this
does not make him a true prophet if his words diminish the Law of
Moses, or otherwise contradict earlier validated prophets, such as
Moses.
Moses, or otherwise contradict earlier validated prophets, such as Moses.
These are not radical propositions. What is radical is looking in the direction of Paul to see whether he can be validated Biblically. Mainstream Christian commentators say, for example, that the prophetic words of Moses and Jesus must be used to validate any 'holy book' or person. For example, Muncaster states:
These are not radical propositions. What is radical is looking in the
direction of Paul to see whether he can be validated
Biblically. Mainstream Christian commentators say, for example, that
the prophetic words of Moses and Jesus must be used to validate any
'holy book' or person. For example, Muncaster states:
Importance of prophecy is stressed in the Bible with commands to:
1. Test everything ...including 'holy books' and people.
2. Use prophecy ...to determine if something is from God. 2
2. Use prophecy ...to determine if something is from God. [^2]
1. See "Why Anomia Means Negator of Mosaic Law" on page 60.
2. Ralph O. Muncaster, The Bible Prophecy Miracles: Investigation of the Evidence preceded Paul. To survive God's tests, Paul must not only have true prophecy in God's name of unlikely events, he must never seduce us not to follow a single command God gave previously. God commands us to be able to defend Paul's inclusion in the Bible as much as any other writer.
[^2]:
Ralph O. Muncaster, The Bible Prophecy Miracles: Investigation
of the Evidence preceded Paul. To survive God's tests, Paul must
not only have true prophecy in God's name of unlikely events, he
must never seduce us not to follow a single command God gave
previously. God commands us to be able to defend Paul's inclusion
in the Bible as much as any other writer.
### Canon History: Additions to Scripture Have Not Been Scrutinized

0
JWO/JWO_02_01_DoesPaul_sLongAcceptanceinNTProveGod_s_0003.md → JWO_02_01_DoesPaul_sLongAcceptanceinNTProveGod_s_0003.md

0
JWO/JWO_02_02_Will__0004.md → JWO_02_02_Will__0004.md

4
JWO/JWO_03_01_MustWeApplyTheBiblesTestsForaTrueProphettoPaul__0005.md → JWO_03_01_MustWeApplyTheBiblesTestsForaTrueProphettoPaul__0005.md

@ -195,9 +195,9 @@ Verdict says the criteria for New Testament canon are: "Is it
authoritative.... prophetic.... authentic.... dynamic? Was it
received, collected, read and used...?" in the name of the Lord ;
* Came true; and
- Came true; and
* The would-be prophet's teachings at all subsequent times are 100% consistent with prior tested and tried Scripture, and do not negate any commands in such Scripture.
- The would-be prophet's teachings at all subsequent times are 100% consistent with prior tested and tried Scripture, and do not negate any commands in such Scripture.
### The Origin of McDowell s Test

0
JWO/JWO_03_02_PaulCouldStillBeABalaamWhoInitiallyHasTrueProphecy_0006.md → JWO_03_02_PaulCouldStillBeABalaamWhoInitiallyHasTrueProphecy_0006.md

0
JWO/JWO_03_03_Balaam_sStarProphecyofMessiah(1290B.C.)_0007.md → JWO_03_03_Balaam_sStarProphecyofMessiah(1290B.C.)_0007.md

0
JWO/JWO_03_04_Conclusion_0008.md → JWO_03_04_Conclusion_0008.md

30
JWO/JWO_04_01_DidJesusWarnofFalseProphetsWhoWouldNegatetheLaw__0009.md → JWO_04_01_DidJesusWarnofFalseProphetsWhoWouldNegatetheLaw__0009.md

@ -6,8 +6,9 @@ Parent: [[JesusWordsOnly]]
Jesus was concerned about the "signs and wonders" prophets misleading
Christians. (Matt. 7:15-23), viz., v. 22; 24:11, 24.) Jesus warns of
the false prophets in (Mark 13:22). They "shall show signs and wonders
to seduce , if possible, even the elect."
the false prophets in (Mark 13:22). They
"shall show signs and wonders to seduce , if possible, even the elect."
In Deuteronomy, these signs-and-wonders prophets are false not because
their prophecies are untrue. Rather, their signs and wonders are
@ -37,19 +38,32 @@ them even though on Judgment Day they are able to say they did
they lacked true prophecy or marvelous wonders. Rather, the sole
reason to reject them is they are workers of "anomia" (Matt. 7:23).
This Greek word anomia here means "negators of the Law (of Moses)." This is one of its two lexicon definitions. In choosing this definition over lawless, we do so primarily because Jesus' warning was obviously paralleling (Deut. 13:1-5). See discussion in the next section.
This Greek word anomia here means "negators of the Law (of Moses)."
This is one of its two lexicon definitions. In choosing this
definition over lawless, we do so primarily because Jesus' warning was
obviously paralleling (Deut. 13:1-5). See discussion in the next section.
If you agree on choosing this dictionary definition, then we can easily anticipate that Paul is not going to fare well. Paul's doctrine that the Law of Moses was abolished by Jesus' coming is well known. See chapter five.
If you agree on choosing this dictionary definition, then we can
easily anticipate that Paul is not going to fare well. Paul's doctrine
that the Law of Moses was abolished by Jesus' coming is well
known. See chapter five.
### Why Anomia Means Negator of Mosaic Law
Jesus tells us we can identify the false prophets because they are workers of "anomia" (Matt. 7:23). What does this Greek word anomia mean?
Jesus tells us we can identify the false prophets because they are
workers of "anomia" (Matt. 7:23). What does this Greek word anomia mean?
In Greek, anomia is a feminine noun, related to the adjective a-nomos. Nomos is the Greek word to identify the Law or Torah, i.e., the Five Books of Moses. (Strong's #3551.) The prefix a is a negative particle in Greek. Putting the parts together, it should mean anomia precisely mean in (Matt. 7:23)? The best lexicon of ancient Greek (which is free online) is Henry George Liddell's and Robert
In Greek, anomia is a feminine noun, related to the adjective
a-nomos. Nomos is the Greek word to identify the Law or Torah, i.e.,
the Five Books of Moses. (Strong's #3551.) The prefix a is a negative
particle in Greek. Putting the parts together, it should mean anomia
precisely mean in (Matt. 7:23)? The best lexicon of ancient Greek
(which is free online) is Henry George Liddell's and Robert
Scott's A Greek-English Lexicon. It defines anomia as one of two meanings:
* "the negation of the law"
* "lawlessness, lawless conduct."
- "the negation of the law"
- "lawlessness, lawless conduct."
The common rendering of (Matt. 7:23) opts for the second meaning. (See
ALT, KJV, and ASV translations). These texts ignore entirely the first

0
JWO/JWO_05_01_DidPaulNegatetheLaws_0010.md → JWO_05_01_DidPaulNegatetheLaws_0010.md

0
JWO/JWO_05_02_FurtherApplicability__0011.md → JWO_05_02_FurtherApplicability__0011.md

0
JWO/JWO_05_03_TheAbolishedLawWasAMinistryOfDeath_0012.md → JWO_05_03_TheAbolishedLawWasAMinistryOfDeath_0012.md

0
JWO/JWO_05_04_RomansChapterSevenSaystheJewsAreReleasedFromtheLaw_0013.md → JWO_05_04_RomansChapterSevenSaystheJewsAreReleasedFromtheLaw_0013.md

0
JWO/JWO_05_05_TheNewMoralityInItsPlace_0014.md → JWO_05_05_TheNewMoralityInItsPlace_0014.md

0
JWO/JWO_05_06_DenigrationoftheLawasGivenbytheAngels_0015.md → JWO_05_06_DenigrationoftheLawasGivenbytheAngels_0015.md

0
JWO/JWO_05_07_DoesPaulImplyTheAngelsLackedGodsAuthorityinIssuingtheLaw__0016.md → JWO_05_07_DoesPaulImplyTheAngelsLackedGodsAuthorityinIssuingtheLaw__0016.md

0
JWO/JWO_05_08_JudeFindsPaulsIdeasHeretical_0017.md → JWO_05_08_JudeFindsPaulsIdeasHeretical_0017.md

0
JWO/JWO_05_09_JesusHimselfCondemnsPaulsUnderminingofMoses_Inspiration_0018.md → JWO_05_09_JesusHimselfCondemnsPaulsUnderminingofMoses_Inspiration_0018.md

0
JWO/JWO_05_10_PaulContradictsJesusToo_0019.md → JWO_05_10_PaulContradictsJesusToo_0019.md

0
JWO/JWO_05_11_MartinLutherDefendsPaulsAttributionoftheLawtoAngelsandItsAbolishedNature_0020.md → JWO_05_11_MartinLutherDefendsPaulsAttributionoftheLawtoAngelsandItsAbolishedNature_0020.md

0
JWO/JWO_05_12_WhatAboutPro-LawCommentsbyPaul__0021.md → JWO_05_12_WhatAboutPro-LawCommentsbyPaul__0021.md

0
JWO/JWO_05_13_HowActs24_14UnravelsPaulsAuthority_0022.md → JWO_05_13_HowActs24_14UnravelsPaulsAuthority_0022.md

0
JWO/JWO_05_14_DidGodEverRespondToPaulsTeachingsontheLawsAbrogation__0023.md → JWO_05_14_DidGodEverRespondToPaulsTeachingsontheLawsAbrogation__0023.md

0
JWO/JWO_05_15_Conclusion_0024.md → JWO_05_15_Conclusion_0024.md

0
JWO/JWO_06_01_PaulContradictsJesusAboutIdolMeat_0025.md → JWO_06_01_PaulContradictsJesusAboutIdolMeat_0025.md

0
JWO/JWO_06_02_PaulsAntinomianismonIdolMeatIssueversusJesus_0026.md → JWO_06_02_PaulsAntinomianismonIdolMeatIssueversusJesus_0026.md

0
JWO/JWO_06_03_Conclusion_0027.md → JWO_06_03_Conclusion_0027.md

18
JWO/JWO_07_01_WhyDoesJesusMentionBalaaminRevelation2_14__0028.md → JWO_07_01_WhyDoesJesusMentionBalaaminRevelation2_14__0028.md

@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ idols and commit fornication. (Rev. 2:14). Thus, with these additional
facts, let's make a synopsis of the story of Balaam. Then we can see
whether anyone appears similar in the New Testament era.
* Balaam was a Prophet in the Hebrew Scriptures who was changed from
- Balaam was a Prophet in the Hebrew Scriptures who was changed from
an enemy to a friend by an angelic vision on a Road.
1. (Rev. 2:14:) "But I have a few things against thee, because thou
@ -30,10 +30,10 @@ hast there some that hold the teaching of Balaam, who taught Balak to
cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel, to eat things
sacrificed to idols, and to commit fornication." (ASV)
* Balaam, after properly serving the Lord for a time, changed back
- Balaam, after properly serving the Lord for a time, changed back
into being an enemy.
* This inspired prophet is deemed to be an enemy of God because he
- This inspired prophet is deemed to be an enemy of God because he
taught it was permissible to eat meat sacrificed to idols and to
commit fornication. This part of the story was omitted in Moses'
account. Jesus alone reveals this.
@ -235,17 +235,17 @@ comparison to events two millennia earlier. What an amazing God we
have! Jesus specifically made sure the encounter with Paul would have
all the earmarks of the Balaam encounter:
* It would be on a road.
- It would be on a road.
* There would be a divine vision.
- There would be a divine vision.
* Jesus would ask why is Paul persecuting Him.
- Jesus would ask why is Paul persecuting Him.
* Jesus would let Paul know it is hard to go up against the goads of God.
- Jesus would let Paul know it is hard to go up against the goads of God.
* The experience would turn Paul around to be a true spokesperson of God for a time.
- The experience would turn Paul around to be a true spokesperson of God for a time.
* Finally, Paul would fall like Balaam did by teaching it was
- Finally, Paul would fall like Balaam did by teaching it was
permissible to eat meat sacrificed to idols.
Of course, to understand this, you have to have ears to hear. (Rev. 2:29.)

8
JWO/JWO_07_02_strongestverseintheBibleforoncesaved,alwayssavedandIwouldnotdisagree.(R.T._0029.md → JWO_07_02_strongestverseintheBibleforoncesaved,alwayssavedandIwouldnotdisagree.(R.T._0029.md

@ -49,16 +49,16 @@ Accordingly, mainstream Christianity offers several proofs that Paul
teaches it is permissible for a Christian to commit fornication
although it may not be expedient:
* The Law is abrogated.
- The Law is abrogated.
* If one said fornication were strictly impermissible, that is not
- If one said fornication were strictly impermissible, that is not
only Legalism, but also it implies a works-salvation.
* Paul only warns loss of rewards in (Gal. 5:19) if a Christian
- Paul only warns loss of rewards in (Gal. 5:19) if a Christian
practices fornication. (Dillow.) Thus, no rewards nor salvation are
lost for occasional fornication; and
* Paul's language in (1Cor. 5:5) implies consistent acts of
- Paul's language in (1Cor. 5:5) implies consistent acts of
unrepentant incest do not even threaten loss of salvation, so
practicing unrepentant fornication cannot possibly pose such a threat.

0
JWO/JWO_07_03_WhyPaulMustBeTheFigureWhoPermittedFornication_0030.md → JWO_07_03_WhyPaulMustBeTheFigureWhoPermittedFornication_0030.md

0
JWO/JWO_07_04_RecapitulationofTheMeaningofRevelation2_14_0031.md → JWO_07_04_RecapitulationofTheMeaningofRevelation2_14_0031.md

0
JWO/JWO_07_05_Conclusion_0032.md → JWO_07_05_Conclusion_0032.md

12
JWO/JWO_08_01_DoesJesusShareSalvationDoctrinewithPaul__0033.md → JWO_08_01_DoesJesusShareSalvationDoctrinewithPaul__0033.md

@ -76,21 +76,21 @@ that [[Jesus]] described is based on good works and attitudes." 6
In fact, in the Synoptics, the point is that mere faith without works is useless. There is no countervailing Pauline concept that if you once believed this somehow excuses or satisfies the requirement of repentance from sin, good works, and obedience to the Ten Commandments to enter "eternal life." For example:
* See (Matt. 25:31-46) (the sheep who do charity go to heaven; those goats who refuse go to hell).
- See (Matt. 25:31-46) (the sheep who do charity go to heaven; those goats who refuse go to hell).
* See (Matt. 19:17) and Luke 10:25-27 (Jesus' answer how to have eternal life starts with keeping the Law, quoting (Deut. 6:5) and (Lev. 19:18)).
- See (Matt. 19:17) and Luke 10:25-27 (Jesus' answer how to have eternal life starts with keeping the Law, quoting (Deut. 6:5) and (Lev. 19:18)).
* See (Matt. 5:20) (your righteousness must exceed the Pharisees to enter the kingdom of heaven which Jesus then defines as not cursing, lusting, etc.).
- See (Matt. 5:20) (your righteousness must exceed the Pharisees to enter the kingdom of heaven which Jesus then defines as not cursing, lusting, etc.).
* See (Matt. 16:2) (Son of Man will come and "reward each according to his works").
- See (Matt. 16:2) (Son of Man will come and "reward each according to his works").
* See (Mark 9:42-48) (better to cut off a body part causing you to sin and enter heaven maimed than to not repent of sin and go to hell whole).
- See (Mark 9:42-48) (better to cut off a body part causing you to sin and enter heaven maimed than to not repent of sin and go to hell whole).
6. SALVATION: According to the synoptic gospels cf. Matt.
13:42 the ensnared are thrown into the "fiery furnace" where there is weeping and gnashing).
* See (Matt. 13:3-23) and Luke 8:5-15 (those who "believe for a while" but in time of temptation fall away or who are choked and bring no fruit to completion are lost, but the one who in a good and noble heart brings forth fruit to completion in patient endurance is saved).
- See (Matt. 13:3-23) and Luke 8:5-15 (those who "believe for a while" but in time of temptation fall away or who are choked and bring no fruit to completion are lost, but the one who in a good and noble heart brings forth fruit to completion in patient endurance is saved).
What About John's Gospel?

0
JWO/JWO_08_02_LutherCouldNotComeUpWithAGlossToSolvetheParableoftheSower_0034.md → JWO_08_02_LutherCouldNotComeUpWithAGlossToSolvetheParableoftheSower_0034.md

20
JWO/JWO_08_03_Conclusion_0035.md → JWO_08_03_Conclusion_0035.md

@ -23,24 +23,24 @@ doctrine. If you read Paul, it is all over once the seed is
successfully sown , no matter what happens next. Paul's main salvation
verses at odds with this Parable of the Sower are well-known:
* (Rom. 3:28) ("man is justified by faith apart from observing the law").
- (Rom. 3:28) ("man is justified by faith apart from observing the law").
* (Rom. 4:5) ("To the man who does not work, but trusts God who
- (Rom. 4:5) ("To the man who does not work, but trusts God who
justifies the wicked, his faith is credited as righteousness").
* (Gal. 5:4) ("You who are trying to be justified by law have been
- (Gal. 5:4) ("You who are trying to be justified by law have been
alienated from Christ; you have fallen away from grace").
* (Rom. 7:6) ("Now, by dying to what once bound us, we have been
- (Rom. 7:6) ("Now, by dying to what once bound us, we have been
released from the law, so that we serve in a new way of the Spirit,
and not in the old way of the written code").
* (Gal. 2:16) ("A man is not justified by observing the law, but by
- (Gal. 2:16) ("A man is not justified by observing the law, but by
faith in Jesus Christ, because by observing the law no one will be
justified").
* (Eph. 2:8-9) ("For it is by grace that you have been saved, through faith, this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God, not by works, so that no one can boast.")
- (Eph. 2:8-9) ("For it is by grace that you have been saved, through faith, this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God, not by works, so that no one can boast.")
Paul has a different voice than our Lord Jesus. Paul's themes are alien to Jesus's message of salvation. They undercut, if not destroy, the message of Jesus. The true sheep of Jesus recognize His voice, and will not follow another. (John 10:27-29). Who are you following?
@ -48,13 +48,13 @@ Thus, how many times must Jesus make the same points about repentance from sin a
The fact we cannot find Paul's gospel in Jesus' words brings us back to the fundamental questions presented in this book:
* When will we finally make a commitment to keeping Jesus' words only?
- When will we finally make a commitment to keeping Jesus' words only?
* What is our Biblical justification for adding Paul to Scripture?
- What is our Biblical justification for adding Paul to Scripture?
* What fulfilled prophecy did Paul give?
- What fulfilled prophecy did Paul give?
* Even if Paul gave a valid prophecy, does Paul seek to seduce us from
- Even if Paul gave a valid prophecy, does Paul seek to seduce us from
following the Law and thus is disqualified from being added to
Scripture by virtue of the Law's strict disqualification rule in
(Deut. 4:2) and 13:1-5 and (Isa. 8:20)?

16
JWO/JWO_09_01_IsJesus_SalvationDoctrineinRevelationARebuttaltoPaul__0036.md → JWO_09_01_IsJesus_SalvationDoctrineinRevelationARebuttaltoPaul__0036.md

@ -6,17 +6,17 @@ Parent: [[JesusWordsOnly]]
Key features of the Book of Revelation are that:
* It is written long after Paul's writings.
- It is written long after Paul's writings.
* It was written by one of the twelve apostles.
- It was written by one of the twelve apostles.
* It was written in a region where Paul's writings were available to Apostle John.
- It was written in a region where Paul's writings were available to Apostle John.
* The churches addressed are in Gentile lands, thus potentially under the influence of Paul.
- The churches addressed are in Gentile lands, thus potentially under the influence of Paul.
* Only one church of the seven churches mentioned was one that Paul visited (according to the Bible): the church at Ephesus.
- Only one church of the seven churches mentioned was one that Paul visited (according to the Bible): the church at Ephesus.
* Jesus is the actual speaker grace is mentioned only twice in
- Jesus is the actual speaker grace is mentioned only twice in
Revelation. The word is used as part of greetings and
farewells. (Rev. 1:4; 22:21). Grace is never mentioned as part of
salvation statements. Nor are faith and believing ever mentioned as
@ -313,10 +313,10 @@ dead. Wake up! Strengthen what remains and is about to die,
These three verses exactly parallel the Parable of the Ten Virgins:
* The lamps of five virgins are about to flicker out and die due to
- The lamps of five virgins are about to flicker out and die due to
lack of oil. The Sardisians likewise have something in them "about to die."
* The foolish virgins failed to watch and be ready. The lesson Jesus
- The foolish virgins failed to watch and be ready. The lesson Jesus
draws is that "Watch, for you will not know the day nor hour"
(Matt. 25:13). This is likewise the precise lesson to the
Sardisians. "I will come like a thief, and you will not know at what

0
JWO/JWO_09_02_ComparisonoftheParableoftheSheep_0037.md → JWO_09_02_ComparisonoftheParableoftheSheep_0037.md

0
JWO/JWO_09_03_GoatstoJamesChapter2_0038.md → JWO_09_03_GoatstoJamesChapter2_0038.md

0
JWO/JWO_09_04_WhyIsCharitySoCentralinGodsWord__0039.md → JWO_09_04_WhyIsCharitySoCentralinGodsWord__0039.md

0
JWO/JWO_09_05_PaulinistInterpretationoftheParableoftheSheepandGoats_0040.md → JWO_09_05_PaulinistInterpretationoftheParableoftheSheepandGoats_0040.md

0
JWO/JWO_09_06_TheMeaningoftheParableoftheSheep_0041.md → JWO_09_06_TheMeaningoftheParableoftheSheep_0041.md

0
JWO/JWO_09_07_TheGoats_0042.md → JWO_09_07_TheGoats_0042.md

0
JWO/JWO_09_08_TheSalvationMessageofRevelationIsStraightFromtheParableoftheSower_0043.md → JWO_09_08_TheSalvationMessageofRevelationIsStraightFromtheParableoftheSower_0043.md

0
JWO/JWO_09_09_Conclusion_0044.md → JWO_09_09_Conclusion_0044.md

0
JWO/JWO_0_01_Jesus_WordsOnlyorWasPaultheApostleJesusCondemnsinRevelation2_2_0001.md → JWO_0_01_Jesus_WordsOnlyorWasPaultheApostleJesusCondemnsinRevelation2_2_0001.md

6
JWO/JWO_10_01_DidJesusApplaudtheEphesiansforExposingPaulasaFalseApostle__0045.md → JWO_10_01_DidJesusApplaudtheEphesiansforExposingPaulasaFalseApostle__0045.md

@ -72,11 +72,11 @@ Thus, the identity of the person who said he was an apostle to the Ephesians in
6. Luke does describe Paul and Barnabas as messengers from the church at Antioch. In Acts 14:4 and 14, the Greek word for messenger is used for them, apostoli. However, as the Christian historian Ben Witherington explains: "The use of the term apostoli in [[Acts]] 14:4 and 14 seems to indicate that Paul and Barnabas are being viewed as agents/apostles of the Antioch church (cf. 2Cor. 8:23), not apostles with a capital A." (Witherington, New Testament History (Baker Academic: 2001) at 229.) In fact, the context clearly shows Paul was merely a messenger (i apostoios ) of the church of Antioch. Paul was not one of the apostoli of Jesus. Even if Luke had called Paul an apostle of Jesus, Luke does not attribute such title as coming from the twelve apostles, or from Jesus in any vision that Paul relates. Thus, it would have been Luke's remark alone. Luke never claims he himself is a prophet. Nor even if he was a prophet, we still lack the second witness. Nevertheless, Luke's meaning was apostoli with a small a. one person told the Ephesians he was an apostle who was in fact not one of the twelve apostles (i.e., Paul).
* A complete record of the twelve apostles in Acts excludes Paul.
- A complete record of the twelve apostles in Acts excludes Paul.
* In Acts, Paul was never recognized as an apostle by the twelve; and
- In Acts, Paul was never recognized as an apostle by the twelve; and
* In Acts, Paul never claims to be an apostle of Jesus Christ and thus no record exists of an authoritative acceptance by the twelve of Paul as such an apostle.
- In Acts, Paul never claims to be an apostle of Jesus Christ and thus no record exists of an authoritative acceptance by the twelve of Paul as such an apostle.
7. Jesus was corroborated by God's Holy Spirit in the appearance of a Dove as well as the Father's voice from heaven. (Matt. 3:16-17). Paul lacks any corroboration on his claim. The theme of corroboration by two witnesses runs throughout the Bible. The Law said that no crime could be established by a single witness. (Deut. 19:15, "any crime or any wrong"). Jesus taught in event of a dispute over a wrong, obtain witnesses so by "the mouth of two witnesses or three every word may be established." (Mat 18:16). Why must this principle apply to wouldbe apostles? Because without two witnesses with competent knowledge, one's claim is entirely self-serving. If two witnesses were needed to prove a crime, how much more so to prove something far more important eternally such as one being an apostle. In this case, the Ephesians must have realized proof that someone was an apostle required more than the person's say-so that he was an apostle. Just as Jesus' witnesses were the voice of Yahweh and the Holy Spirit in the form of a dove, Paul needed two witnesses. In this case, the only valid two witnesses would be Jesus on one side and/or the joint decision of the twelve apostles of Jesus Christ on the other. The binding authority of the apostles required a joint decision, and not the solitary decision of a single apostle. This is precisely how Matthias was added as the twelfth. (See "Apostolic Decisions Were Binding In Heaven Only When Reached Jointly" on page 494.) However, such proof from either Jesus or the twelve is entirely lacking in the New Testament. Paul's supposed apostleship is never stated by Jesus 9

18
JWO/JWO_10_02_TertulliansPointsAboutPaul_0046.md → JWO_10_02_TertulliansPointsAboutPaul_0046.md

@ -7,21 +7,21 @@ what one would expect would be a judicial decision at Ephesus involving Paul.
Tertullian makes the following sobering points about Paul:
* Jesus never made Paul an apostle from the records that we can read.
- Jesus never made Paul an apostle from the records that we can read.
* Paul's claim to apostleship solely relies upon Paul's veracity.
- Paul's claim to apostleship solely relies upon Paul's veracity.
* If Paul were a true apostle, he is still an inferior apostle because
- If Paul were a true apostle, he is still an inferior apostle because
Paul in Acts 15 submitted his doctrine to the twelve.
* If Paul later varied from the twelve, we must regard the twelve as
- If Paul later varied from the twelve, we must regard the twelve as
more authoritative than Paul because he came later.
* Paul's claim of being selected as an apostle later by Jesus seems
- Paul's claim of being selected as an apostle later by Jesus seems
implausible* That story asks us to believe Jesus had not planned
things adequately with the twelve.
* Lastly, Jesus warned us of false prophets who would come doing
- Lastly, Jesus warned us of false prophets who would come doing
miracles in His name and signs and wonders, and Paul perfectly
matches that prophesied type of prophet.
@ -50,14 +50,14 @@ Christianity, Paul must have been deemed inferior by the church at
large, particularly on issues of salvation, or else the following
facts make no sense:
* The early church leaders from 125-325 A.D. universally reject almost
- The early church leaders from 125-325 A.D. universally reject almost
all of Paul's unique doctrines, e.g., salvation by faith alone,
total depravity, predestination, man lacks free-will, docetism, etc.
13.See footnote 12 on page 225. On Paul's docetism, and its rejection,
see "Did Paul Teach Jesus Did Not Truly Have Human Flesh?" on page 336 et seq.
* The Orthodox Church (now totalling 250 million members) can trace
- The Orthodox Church (now totalling 250 million members) can trace
back its origins to that same early church. It existed in
territories outside the Roman Empire and was free therefore to
reject most of the errors later arising in Roman Catholicism (e.g.,
@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ see "Did Paul Teach Jesus Did Not Truly Have Human Flesh?" on page 336 et seq.
Orthodox claim it was never abrogated. (They have always also
worshipped on Sunday.) 15
* Roman Catholicism, in the form we know it today, arose after 325
- Roman Catholicism, in the form we know it today, arose after 325
A.D. 16 Despite all its flaws, it still retained some of the core
teaching of James and Jesus on salvation, claiming sin causes loss
of salvation. Thus, Catholicism has always rejected Paul's faith

0
JWO/JWO_10_03_LukeEvenTellsUsWhatWereTheChargesofHeresyAgainstPaul_0047.md → JWO_10_03_LukeEvenTellsUsWhatWereTheChargesofHeresyAgainstPaul_0047.md

0
JWO/JWO_10_04_Conclusion_0048.md → JWO_10_04_Conclusion_0048.md

18
JWO/JWO_11_01_WasJamesWritingHisEpistleForATrialofPaul__0049.md → JWO_11_01_WasJamesWritingHisEpistleForATrialofPaul__0049.md

@ -102,7 +102,23 @@ What Eusebius says, we see occurring in Acts ch. 15.
Church in conjunction with the apostles. Memoirs of Hegesippus
Book V (quoted by Eusebius).
3. Roman Catholicism insists Mary remained a perpetual virgin. Yet, in (Matt. 13:55-56) when the people of Nazareth are amazed at Jesus, they ask: "Is not his brothers James and Joseph and Simon and Judas [i.e., Jude]?" Catholic authorities claim brother here should be understood as cousin. However, there is a word in Greek for cousin, cmepsios. When ancient writers spoke of James, they called him the brother of Jesus. In the same context, they identified Jesus' cousins, using the word cmepsios. (Eusebius, Hist. Eccl. 4.22.4; see 2.23.4 and 3.20.1 (quoting Hegesippus).) Also, Matthew 1:24-25 states Mary and Joseph had sex after Jesus was bom. Once he knew of the pregnancy, Joseph "had no marital relations with her until she had bom a son." This is the same as saying he had sexual relations with Mary only after she had a son. Furthermore, if Mary never had sexual relations with Joseph, she would have defrauded him. (1Cor. 7:5). Marriage in Judaism meant having sex with God's purposes in mind: to sustain a family line. (Ben Witherington, Woman in the Ministry' of Jesus head of the Church at Jerusalem.'
3. Roman Catholicism insists Mary remained a perpetual virgin. Yet, in
(Matt. 13:55-56) when the people of Nazareth are amazed at Jesus, they
ask: "Is not his brothers James and Joseph and Simon and Judas [i.e.,
Jude]?" Catholic authorities claim brother here should be understood
as cousin. However, there is a word in Greek for cousin,
cmepsios. When ancient writers spoke of James, they called him the
brother of Jesus. In the same context, they identified Jesus' cousins,
using the word cmepsios. (Eusebius, Hist. Eccl. 4.22.4; see 2.23.4 and
3.20.1 (quoting Hegesippus).) Also, Matthew 1:24-25 states Mary and
Joseph had sex after Jesus was bom. Once he knew of the pregnancy,
Joseph "had no marital relations with her until she had bom a son."
This is the same as saying he had sexual relations with Mary only
after she had a son. Furthermore, if Mary never had sexual relations
with Joseph, she would have defrauded him. (1Cor. 7:5). Marriage in
Judaism meant having sex with God's purposes in mind: to sustain a
family line. (Ben Witherington, Woman in the Ministry' of Jesus head
of the Church at Jerusalem.'
Jerome, the famous translator of the entire Bible into the Latin
Vulgate (405 A.D.), devotes chapter two of his On Famous Men to a

0
JWO/JWO_11_02_JustificationinAbrahamsLife_JamesandPaulatOdds_0050.md → JWO_11_02_JustificationinAbrahamsLife_JamesandPaulatOdds_0050.md

0
JWO/JWO_11_03_JamesLikewiseSeesPaulsErroronAbrahamsJustification_0051.md → JWO_11_03_JamesLikewiseSeesPaulsErroronAbrahamsJustification_0051.md

0
JWO/JWO_11_04_WhatAboutJustificationByWorksintheHebrewScriptures__0052.md → JWO_11_04_WhatAboutJustificationByWorksintheHebrewScriptures__0052.md

0
JWO/JWO_11_05_WhatAboutJustificationByFaithintheHebrewScriptures__0053.md → JWO_11_05_WhatAboutJustificationByFaithintheHebrewScriptures__0053.md

0
JWO/JWO_11_06_JamesUsed‘Faith_intheSenseGenesisUsedtheWord_0054.md → JWO_11_06_JamesUsed‘Faith_intheSenseGenesisUsedtheWord_0054.md

0
JWO/JWO_11_07_James_ReproofthatFaithWithoutEnduranceSaves(James1_12)_0055.md → JWO_11_07_James_ReproofthatFaithWithoutEnduranceSaves(James1_12)_0055.md

0
JWO/JWO_11_08_JamesRidiculesAFaithBasedonMereMentalAssent_0056.md → JWO_11_08_JamesRidiculesAFaithBasedonMereMentalAssent_0056.md

0
JWO/JWO_11_09_JamesCritiqueofPaulsIdeaThatTheLawArousesSin_0057.md → JWO_11_09_JamesCritiqueofPaulsIdeaThatTheLawArousesSin_0057.md

0
JWO/JWO_11_10_James3_17_IsItaResponsetoBeingtheVictimofPaulsHypocrisy__0058.md → JWO_11_10_James3_17_IsItaResponsetoBeingtheVictimofPaulsHypocrisy__0058.md

0
JWO/JWO_11_11_James3_17onVariances(Inconsistencies)_0059.md → JWO_11_11_James3_17onVariances(Inconsistencies)_0059.md

0
JWO/JWO_11_12_JamesFaultsOverbearingRebukes_0060.md → JWO_11_12_JamesFaultsOverbearingRebukes_0060.md

0
JWO/JWO_11_13_AreJamessRemarksonBoastingAimedforPaul__0061.md → JWO_11_13_AreJamessRemarksonBoastingAimedforPaul__0061.md

2
JWO/JWO_11_14_Conclusion_0062.md → JWO_11_14_Conclusion_0062.md

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Parent: [[JesusWordsOnly]]
= Conclusion
## Conclusion
James is the head of the church in Paul's day. His epistle is intended
to set up rules for attendance at a judicial assembly in a

14
JWO/JWO_12_01_TheEbioniteRecordsontheTrialofPaul_0063.md → JWO_12_01_TheEbioniteRecordsontheTrialofPaul_0063.md

@ -281,18 +281,16 @@ an Essene settlement. See, AP 8/18/04; S.F. Chronicle (9/6/04); Ha
'aretz (Israel), July 30, 2004. Finally, this story is now being
carried in mainstream publications. See Carmichael, "Archaeology:
Question in Qumram," Newsweek (Sept. 6, 2005), available at
http://
msnbc.msn.com/id/5842298/site/newsweek. Newsweek mentions that "Magen
and Peleg set off what can only be called an academic revolution"
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5842298/site/newsweek. Newsweek mentions that
Magen and Peleg set off what can only be called an academic revolution"
which now corroborates "Norman Golb" who first argued what Magen and
Peleg now confirm. See also, "The Dead Sea Scrolls,"
http://
virtualreligion.net/iho/dss.html ("After 10 years of excavation Magen
http://virtualreligion.net/iho/dss.html ("After 10 years of excavation Magen
and Peleg conclude that the settlement at Qumran could not have been a
monastery, but rather was a pottery factory which was vacated by its
few inhabitants during the Jewish-Roman war.")
==== JWO Videos
---
**JWO Videos**
* [20230603@What are the surviving manuscripts of New Testament Ep 1 When Did Censorship Begin of NT Bible@9tNVE7ekNEM](
https://youtube.com/watch?v=9tNVE7ekNEM)
- [20230603@What are the surviving manuscripts of New Testament Ep 1 When Did Censorship Begin of NT Bible@9tNVE7ekNEM](https://youtube.com/watch?v=9tNVE7ekNEM)

0
JWO/JWO_12_02_DoTheDeadSeaScrollsDepictATrialofPaid__0064.md → JWO_12_02_DoTheDeadSeaScrollsDepictATrialofPaid__0064.md

0
JWO/JWO_12_03_TheReliabilityofTheEbionitesDespitetheOne-SidedChargesAgainstThem_0065.md → JWO_12_03_TheReliabilityofTheEbionitesDespitetheOne-SidedChargesAgainstThem_0065.md

0
JWO/JWO_12_04_TheEbioniteChargeAgainstPaul_0066.md → JWO_12_04_TheEbioniteChargeAgainstPaul_0066.md

20
JWO/JWO_12_05_HowPlausibleIsTheEbioniteChargeAgainstPaul__0067.md → JWO_12_05_HowPlausibleIsTheEbioniteChargeAgainstPaul__0067.md

@ -6,16 +6,16 @@ There is independent evidence to corroborate the Ebionite charge that
Paul was not a Jew in the strict Jewish sense. It appears he was an
Herodian Jew which to true Jews is not a true Jew at all :
* Herod and his family tried to tell Jews he was Jewish, but true Jews did not accept Herod's claims. The Herodian lineage had foreign elements in it.
- Herod and his family tried to tell Jews he was Jewish, but true Jews did not accept Herod's claims. The Herodian lineage had foreign elements in it.
* Herod the Great was a Roman collaborator ruling Judea as King prior to Jesus. He was put into power by the Romans lending him troops to subjugate Judea.
- Herod the Great was a Roman collaborator ruling Judea as King prior to Jesus. He was put into power by the Romans lending him troops to subjugate Judea.
* One of his sons, Herod Antipas, succeeds him in the time of Christ to rule part of his kingdom.
- One of his sons, Herod Antipas, succeeds him in the time of Christ to rule part of his kingdom.
* Saul/Paul in (Rom. 16:11) greets "Herodion, my kinsman" [i.e., 'my
- Saul/Paul in (Rom. 16:11) greets "Herodion, my kinsman" [i.e., 'my
relative'] which is a name that a member of the Herodian family would use. 16
* Josephus, who as far as we know was not a Christian, mentions a
- Josephus, who as far as we know was not a Christian, mentions a
Saulus in his work The Antiquities of the Jews.
In book XX, chapter 9, Josephus says Saulus is a member of the family
@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ records this Saulus' activity was after Jesus' movement had
already begun but before we know independently that Paul joined it. (. Antiquities , XX 9.4.). This therefore puts the Saulus of Josephus in precisely the chronological position of Saul (Paul) prior to his road to Damascus experience. Further, the Saulus of Josephus and the Saul of Acts both are collaborators of the High Priest (an appointee of Herod). So when Josephus says Saulus was of the family of Herod, this is direct evidence that Saul-Paul was of the family of Herod.
* The most important fact is that Paul says he has Roman citizenship
- The most important fact is that Paul says he has Roman citizenship
from birth. (Acts 22:28 "I have been born a Roman citizen.") You
would carry around proof on a small Libellus.
@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Paul's claim was accepted in Acts.
It has several implications.
* First, Roman citizenship was an honor from Rome which in the Judean
- First, Roman citizenship was an honor from Rome which in the Judean
region primarily only could be enjoyed by members of Herod's family
or his closest allies. The list of Roman citizens was kept in
Caesar's office in Rome. It was not a very long list. Most
@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ It has several implications.
allies and their families to give them special protection from Roman
occupation forces. You could not torture or beat a Roman citizen.
* Second, Roman citizenship from birth means Saul had to be given a
- Second, Roman citizenship from birth means Saul had to be given a
Roman name from birth. It turns out that Paul is a 1 8 Roman name.
"I am giving [those] of the synagogue of Satan, the ones who say
@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ It has several implications.
16.See discussion in Prof. Robert Eisenman, "Paul as Herodion,"
JHC (Spring 1996) at 110 etseq.,![Picture #65](images/img_0065.png)
* How did Paul happen to have a Roman birth name if he was truly
- How did Paul happen to have a Roman birth name if he was truly
Jewish? It cannot happen. A true Jewish family would not give their
child a Roman name or even accept Roman citizenship from birth. This
would represent defilement. Thus, Paul had to be from birth a
@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ JHC (Spring 1996) at 110 etseq.,![Picture #65](images/img_0065.png)
the Herodians. They would be non-Jews and Roman citizens, but they
would also aspire to be Jewish.
* Thus, in the Judea of that era, only Herodians would have a child
- Thus, in the Judea of that era, only Herodians would have a child
with both a Roman and Hebrew name (Paul Saul ) who would have Roman
citizenship from birth (Acts 22:28) and who would greet a "kinsman"
(i.e., a relative) named Herodion. ((Rom. 16:11).) It thus is not a

0
JWO/JWO_12_06_EvidenceofPeter_sTestimonyAgainstPaulinaTrial_0068.md → JWO_12_06_EvidenceofPeter_sTestimonyAgainstPaulinaTrial_0068.md

Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More