blue/squawk
blue/squawk
2
3
Fork 8
Code Issues 23 Pull Requests 3 Actions Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Get rid of the order #63

New Issue
Closed
opened 2022-03-31 20:14:20 +00:00 by blue · 1 comment
blue commented 2022-03-31 20:14:20 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link

I have a class W::Order in shared folder. It is used in badges of attached files while composing a message. Since I depend on boost an have that glorious container there (used in messageFeed) it will make sence to get rid of this order, cuz boost seems to be way more efficient

I have a class W::Order in shared folder. It is used in badges of attached files while composing a message. Since I depend on boost an have that glorious container there (used in messageFeed) it will make sence to get rid of this order, cuz boost seems to be way more efficient
blue added this to the 0.4.0 milestone 2022-03-31 20:14:20 +00:00
blue added the
Refactoring
 label 2022-03-31 20:14:20 +00:00
blue commented 2023-11-22 23:49:30 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

Got rid of the order in encryption branch

Got rid of the order in encryption branch
blue closed this issue 2023-11-22 23:49:30 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Bug
Something is not working
Documentation
Documentation related issues
Easy
Feature
New feature
Localization
Localization related issues
Packaging
Issues related to packaging and building
Refactoring
Need to reimplement something in a better way
Test
Need to test something
No Label
Refactoring
Milestone
No items
No Milestone 0.4.0
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blue/squawk#63
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?