blue/squawk
blue
/
squawk
2
3
Fork 6
Code Issues 21 Pull Requests 2 Actions Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Need to test real time roster changes #1

New Issue
Closed
opened 2019-04-06 10:08:33 +00:00 by blue · 2 comments
blue commented 2019-04-06 10:08:33 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link

Roster changes are implemented but are not tested and I'm too lazy to test it right now.
Need to

  • add someone in the roster;
  • assign him to some group;
  • remove him from that group;
  • assign him to a new group;
  • make someone to be the last person in a group and then remove the account from that group - group is supposed to be removed too
  • assign someone to a multiple amount of groups after he have been ungroupped - ungroupped contact should be removed.

Debug messages are fine, cuz the code related to this is taking care of inexplicit details (like removing the group with no members) on the core and on the UI side to avoid desyncronization

Roster changes are implemented but are not tested and I'm too lazy to test it right now. Need to - add someone in the roster; - assign him to some group; - remove him from that group; - assign him to a new group; - make someone to be the last person in a group and then remove the account from that group - group is supposed to be removed too - assign someone to a multiple amount of groups after he have been ungroupped - ungroupped contact should be removed. Debug messages are fine, cuz the code related to this is taking care of inexplicit details (like removing the group with no members) on the core and on the UI side to avoid desyncronization
blue added this to the 0.1.0 milestone 2019-04-06 10:08:33 +00:00
blue added the
Test
 label 2019-04-06 10:08:33 +00:00
blue commented 2019-10-01 08:52:16 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

I have tested everything there, making roster pushes from the app - the changes are relevant. Never tested that with other clients looking at mine but it's supoosed to be the same

I have tested everything there, making roster pushes from the app - the changes are relevant. Never tested that with other clients looking at mine but it's supoosed to be the same
blue commented 2019-11-16 18:05:28 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

No one cares, let's but it as done

No one cares, let's but it as done
blue closed this issue 2019-11-16 18:05:28 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
master
encryption
fontMeasure
settings
0.2.3
0.2.2
0.2.1
0.2.0
newMessageFeedPreview1
0.1.5
0.1.4
0.1.3
0.1.2
0.1.1
0.0.5
Labels
Clear labels   
Bug

Something is not working

  
Documentation

Documentation related issues

  
Easy

   
Feature

New feature

  
Localization

Localization related issues

  
Packaging

Issues related to packaging and building

  
Refactoring

Need to reimplement something in a better way

  
Test

Need to test something

No Label
Bug
Documentation
Easy
Feature
Localization
Packaging
Refactoring
Test
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
0.1.0
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blue/squawk#1
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?