From dcbb838429740793314905dc4711f7aa85951623 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christopher Lemmer Webber Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 13:31:43 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Be clear why breaking the actor model breaks our solution --- README.org | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/README.org b/README.org index 832301c..412469a 100644 --- a/README.org +++ b/README.org @@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ so the receiving server can decide whom to send the message to. Unfortunately this decision breaks the actor model and also our suggested solution to authorization; see [[https://github.com/WebOfTrustInfo/rwot9-prague/blob/master/topics-and-advance-readings/ap-unwanted-messages.md#org7937fed][MultiBox]] for a suggestion on how we can solve this. +This is more serious than it seems; we cannot proceed to make the system +much safer to use without throwing out =sharedInbox= since we will +lose our ability to make intentional, directed messages. # - What to do about the holes in the spec? Many community members have # asked that we codify current behavior. However, as this document lays