From 717b0814464805e404c9675b75e8d2143b2bfd31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christopher Lemmer Webber Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:50:36 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] clearer words on paying-to-be-spammed a bit --- README.org | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.org b/README.org index ee476bc..68e9989 100644 --- a/README.org +++ b/README.org @@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ her in the future, for free. But say Bob is a spammer and is sending a viagra ad; Alice can keep the stamps. Now Bob has to "pay" Alice to be spammed (and depending on how we -decide to implement it, Alice might be paid to be spammed). +decide to implement it, Alice might be able to keep this payment). There is always a cost to unwanted messages, but in our current systems the costs lie on the side of the receiver, not the sender. We can shift that dynamic for unestablished relationships.