mirror of
https://gitlab.com/spritely/ocappub.git
synced 2024-11-26 15:13:02 +00:00
Add the "Composition" section
This commit is contained in:
parent
ba6a0eaa72
commit
1d826f33ed
76
README.org
76
README.org
@ -1395,6 +1395,82 @@ tonight.
|
|||||||
# add backup of file example; alice's composed capability should
|
# add backup of file example; alice's composed capability should
|
||||||
# live on her own server
|
# live on her own server
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
One thing we might notice about the previous example is that we said
|
||||||
|
that Alyssa set up the endpoint pointed by the capability to "log"
|
||||||
|
information about who was associated with it.
|
||||||
|
But... where did the logger come from?
|
||||||
|
The file did not contain this functionality, and capabilities
|
||||||
|
themselves do not intrinsically have logging functionality.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The answer is: Alyssa had a capability to a logging facility, and used
|
||||||
|
that to do the logging!
|
||||||
|
But what's interesting about that?
|
||||||
|
Think about it for a moment: the capability is now doing something more
|
||||||
|
interesting than mere "proxying".
|
||||||
|
It isn't merely forwarding or not a message to a single capability...
|
||||||
|
Alyssa has *composed together* the file capability with the logging
|
||||||
|
capability.
|
||||||
|
Pretty cool!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
And yet we are about to see an even cooler example of composition.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Now that Alyssa has put enough work into this file, she would like to
|
||||||
|
automatically back up the file's contents twice a day.
|
||||||
|
Luckily, she has a capability to a job-scheduling service:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
: # lets Alyssa schedule work at periodic intervals
|
||||||
|
: # aka <JOB-SCHEDULER>
|
||||||
|
: https://webchronjobs.example/api/3Gw5Ivk_qaNPLWro0MTr_KP1JhuC6GWDvhgDARFG61g
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Alyssa also has a capability to a backup service:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
: # more or less another place to put files
|
||||||
|
: # aka <BACKUP-SERVICE>
|
||||||
|
: https://backups.example/api/BUWRNHd2kIkhl0MvtPUd8tqhW_c99c5KdBZYC7bC0NA
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
And recall, of course, Alyssa's original capability to <PARTY-FILE>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
: # aka <PARTY-FILE>
|
||||||
|
: https://filestore.example/obj/30SVLFRf1cTPNnjgaJfN8r85joIMVDSgWSKXKoYiFuY
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Alyssa would like to have =<JOB-SCHEDULER>= periodically copy
|
||||||
|
=<PARTY-FILE>= over to =<BACKUP-SERVICE>=.
|
||||||
|
However, she wouldn't like =<JOB-SCHEDULER>= to be able to read
|
||||||
|
the contents of =<PARTY-FILE>= or write anything else other than
|
||||||
|
the backup of =<PARTY-FILE>= to =<BACKUP-SERVICE>=.
|
||||||
|
This might seem like an impossible task... but Alyssa knows how
|
||||||
|
to do it.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Alyssa creates a new object/endpoint on her own server with the
|
||||||
|
following capability URL:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
: # aka <BACKUP-PARTY-FILE>
|
||||||
|
: https://alyssas-home.example/obj/9SzcK9U40-EPYll1ixTU2-jgqvPWJy1xvQWfSp3aT-c
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Now here's the cool thing: internally, =<BACKUP-PARTY-FILE>= knows
|
||||||
|
about and actually uses both =<PARTY-FILE>= and =<BACKUP-SERVICE>=...
|
||||||
|
it's just some simple code that reads the current state of
|
||||||
|
=<PARTY-FILE>= and copies it over to =<BACKUP-SERVICE>=; that's it.
|
||||||
|
But =<BACKUP-PARTY-FILE>= never /discloses/ the locations of either
|
||||||
|
=<PARTY-FILE>= or =<BACKUP-SERVICE>=.
|
||||||
|
Why should it?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
And so, Alyssa can schedule =<JOB-SCHEDULER>= to run
|
||||||
|
=<BACKUP-PARTY-FILE>= twice a day.
|
||||||
|
But =<JOB-SCHEDULER>= never gets to read the actual contents of
|
||||||
|
=<PARTY-FILE>= or write anything else to =<BACKUP-SERVICE>=
|
||||||
|
(it doesn't even know where either live).
|
||||||
|
This is the Principle of Least Authority in action!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
You may also notice that all four of the capabilities in this section
|
||||||
|
were on different servers.
|
||||||
|
And yet there was no trouble coordinating authority between them.
|
||||||
|
The servers really did not need to "think" about which servers, or
|
||||||
|
which users, had access to what.
|
||||||
|
This all just fell out of the design of the system, the same way
|
||||||
|
that data naturally flows through the code pathways of our programs
|
||||||
|
through argument passing.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**** Mapping this to ActivityPub
|
**** Mapping this to ActivityPub
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user